Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Are LeBrons Rings Cherry Picked Chips?

Yes
32
65%
No
17
35%
 
Total votes: 49

DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,511
And1: 4,063
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#821 » by DimesandKnicks » Fri Aug 22, 2025 2:30 pm

michaelm wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
michaelm wrote:You launched into the Jordan stuff as is the wont of those of your ilk. I responded. At all times I have said LeBron had no option to win championships at the Cavs due to the quality of the organisation the first time around, and was justified in leaving.

And again, you try to make a negative out of Jordan retiring at the age of 35 in 1998, elderly at that time, after a feat unprecedented since the Bill Russell Celtics in the infancy of the sport of leading a second threepeat as the universally acclaimed best player in the NBA with no caveats and as the consensus GOAT. He didn't need to keep playing to pass Kareem's points record to have some further claim on greatness, no one at the time, rightly or wrongly, thought Kareem was better than him. As I said Bill Russell retired at age 35 himself, was this because a crystal ball told him Lebron would put him in the shade 41 years later by continuing after that age ?. Was Bill a coward for not trying for a 12th title ?. Utter nonsense. Jordan like Bill could retire any time he felt like it after all he had achieved, and if being pissed off at the Bulls owner whom he had made so much wealthier was among Jordan's reasons so what ?, perhaps he was early into the player empowerment thing. Again, list players who have won titles as the lead player after the age of 35, the answer as I said is zero including LeBron. And when I said contend I didn't mean get absolutely smashed whether or not by the eventual title winner before the finals, there was never any chance of those Lakers teams winning the title, many contend partly because old Lebron can't play out a whole regular season then through a whole play-off series. Even if Jordan retired because he didn't think he could continue to be the best player in the world and win titles if he kept going after the second threepeat, again so what ?, there comes a time for everyone. Lebron has generated some nice numbers since 2020 but no one is under any illusion he has been the best player in the NBA over that period.

And you make the same internally contradictory point as your fellow traveller, how is Jerry Krause making better decisions than Jordan would have made proof that Krause wasn't allowed to build the Bulls teams by Jordan ?. What does it matter if he accepted Krause's decisions grudgingly ?. Steph Curry by wide repute didn't want GSW to fire Mark Jackson either, but go on with things with a new coach with some success. Does this mean he and his teams didn't really win the 4 titles, which most GSW fans doubt would have occurred had GSW continued with Mark Jackson.


You’re arguing against a bunch of arguments I’m not making.

So you say when challenged as did another poster currently on vacation who argues similarly to you. As I have said it would appear Jordan fans are limited to being entirely specific while you can make general arguments as you actually posted in this thread that you and fellow travellers were doing.


I don't read every post in every thread that I post in so yes, I'm actually only interested in debating the arguments that I make. I did put in one of my post to you that "to be fair this might not be your argument". Why would I argue other people's points? I'm talking to you and the points that You're making.

Did you not make contentions about why Jordan retired at the age of 35, going so far as to attribute same to cowardice ?.


No. I did not. When I called Jordan a coward I was saying it facetiously implying that those who think Lebron is a coward for joining the heat or the cavs because he didn't believe they could compete for championships should have the same enegry for Jordan who went on record as retiring because he wasn't interested in playing for the Bulls unless they were interested in contending.

And did you not directly disagree that Jordan allowed Krause to construct the Bulls around him ?. Your argument for the latter continues to escape me, but you did list bad choices that were reputedly Jordan’s preference but were not actually made.


Idk what you mean by allowed. The implication is that he had any power to do otherwise..but allowed? No..Jordan didn't allow Krause to build around him as Krause saw fit...at all. He was actively trying to get him fired!!!:

Excerpts from Jordan Rules https://www.oklahoman.com/story/news/1991/12/24/bulls-owner-quieted-jordan-star-player-wanted-to-run-team/62507195007/
(After learning that NBA veteran and former North Carolina Tar Heel Walter Davis had been traded to Portland and not the Bulls, Jordan responded before a game against the Nets. "As soon as we get back, I'm calling (Jerry) Reinsdorf. Krause has messed everything up again. He can't do anything. " (Two days later before practice, Jordan took off after Krause again. "If I were general manager, we'd be a better team. ")


"I figured I'd try to put the pressure on him to do something about Krause," Jordan said about his first volley of remarks after the team returned from New Jersey in late January. His eyes were hard and cold as he spoke. "This thing isn't over. I'm gonna get that guy fired yet. "


"Well," Reinsdorf pointed out to Jordan, "you're not helping any. We're working on several deals, but every time you come out criticizing the general manager, it makes it look like Jerry has to do something and that makes it harder on us. People start thinking we're desperate and want to take advantage of us. "


A few years ago Jordan had come in to talk to him, upset about the team's play and demanding trades. He wanted Horace Grant out, among others.


Jordan was going to go public with his complaints.


"Imagine how this makes your teammates feel," Reinsdorf continued. "What are they supposed to think when their captain says we're not good enough? How are we supposed to get the most out of them? And then how are we supposed to make a deal when you're knocking the players? Are other teams going to want them when you say they're not good enough? "


They weren't going to make a deal, Jordan thought. Krause was too scared and Reinsdorf was too satisfied. Jordan called his agent, David Falk. Had he checked any further on whether he could get out of his contract for next year?


Is this what "allowing" Jerry Krause to build around Jordan looks like? If so we'll simply agree to disagree. He was actively trying to get Krause fired and trying to figure out how he could get out of his contract...and at the time, the Bulls were in first place this would be the year that they'd ultimately begin their first three-peat.

All of this tells me that if Jordan would have went to the Cav as Lebron did for his second stint, he absolutely lobbies for that 1st pick to be traded and probably along with a 22 year old Kyrie Irving.
JM00n69
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,294
And1: 1,016
Joined: Nov 26, 2023
Location: London, England
 

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#822 » by JM00n69 » Fri Aug 22, 2025 4:09 pm

Joao Saraiva wrote:Before joining LA they had the worst record in the NBA since 2013. How is that cherry picking? Cause they got Davis? Well you can't play one on five and win a chip, no matter how good you are.

In Cleveland he just beat a 73 win team in the finals, so the grass was greener elsewhere when he left the Heat.

Yeah with the Heat he did form a big 3, so I'll take it as cherry picked rings, but still difficult ones.


You're showing you age here man. LeBron went to LAL to retire but the AD signing was something they forced. AD got signed to Cluch before it.

Also the Heatles, DWade won in '06 the chip with old ass Shaq/Haslem/JWill/Walker. Bosh was balling out in TOR and en route to a career as a 1A on a contender.

As soon as DWade decline LBJ 'went home' and upgraded Wade to Irwing and CB to KLove.

Also OP is ragebaiting with the quote, what Stockton said was "You're not climbing the mountain, you're taking a helicopter to the top".
User avatar
OdomFan
General Manager
Posts: 8,567
And1: 6,960
Joined: Jan 07, 2017
Location: Maryland
   

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#823 » by OdomFan » Fri Aug 22, 2025 4:41 pm

Iwasawitness wrote:
OdomFan wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:



Again, I don't know why you're comparing 30 year old Lebron to 24 year old Jordan. My contention is that Jordan's organization gave him players that developed by his third by his fourth year in the league. By year four the Cav's gave Lebron Hughes and Drew Gooden and was playing in the NBA finals. And by Jordan's fourth year in the league he was coming at Krauses neck (he was in his ass) for not fielding a competitive roster and went on record with alot of his comments.

The whole, Jordan LET the Bulls rebuild around hims is just revisionist history. He's given us every indication that he likely would have skipped town or demanded a trade if the Bulls didn't get him help in seven years. He clearly demanded help. Year two the Bulls tried to shut him down to get a higher draft pick but Jordan wanted to compete for a playoff spot. I think the Bulls only lost one more game than the Cavs who ended up with the first pick. Jordan was outraged at the idea of not winning now.

Jordan was also said to be in favor of trading Grant for Buck Williams who was a more established star and was really disrespectful to Grant (which probably influenced Grant turning snitch to help inform the Jordan Rules book.)

The Last Dance showed how Jordan was irritated with Krause obsession with Kukoc, partly because he was focusing too much energy in the future instead of the right now.

In 91 he flamed Krause for not signing a 35 year old Walter Davis and was quoted as saying if he were GM they'd be a better team (hindsight :lol:) and tried to pressure the Bulls owner to fire him.



We have evidence that when you pair Lebron with a top 75 player that team wins a championship. There's no doubt in my mind that Lebron would have won a championship in Cleveland with Pippen and Grant but that's just my opinion. But I'd be willing to bet that Lebron wins his first year against the Warriors if he has Pippen and Grant, as he took the Warriors to six games with five games without Irving and Love and TT and Mosgov being his most competent comrades.



There is no insinuation. But NBA fans have a hard on for looking down on Lebron for empowering himself instead of waiting for an organiztaion to do its job. The cleary message is Lebron's championship are less valuable because he needed help and got it. Again, if his orgz did it is that fine? Every other top ten player and all time great started off their NBA careers with other great players to compete with:

Kareem got Oscar in year two
Magic got Kareem in year one and Worthy and Riley in year two I believe
Bird started off with I believ Nate Archibold and got Mchale and Parish before his fourth year if I'm not mistaken
Duncan got Robinson in year one and Manu, Parker and Pop for the rest of his career
Wilt had Paul Arizin and skipped town to LA and won with Jerry West
West had Elgin Baylor until he got Wilt
Russel had Red and Cousy
Hakeem started is career with Sampson
Kobe got Shaq
Shaq got Penny in year two

Lebron had nothing and when he did he bolted to joint two career losers who'd never made it to the playoffs, but yall are calling him leaving MIA for Cleveland "stacking the deck" as if it was viewed as such at the time. People were shocked.

Every single player that entered the league and was expected to be great got help early in their career but Lebron, and when he did get enough help to win a championship, he left to start over to play player and Co-Gm, but adversity. Coward :lol: only in yall heads.



Lebron left to play for the Cav's having played just about, or if not exactly the amount of seasons that Jordan did. If he can play 7 years with trash and win two championships than Jordan can stick around a few more years to entertain a rebuild, but coward. As if he didn't decide to play in Washington a few years later. When the Bul's decided we're going to unstack the deck for you Michael, Micchael said peace to the thought of adverisity...even just the idea of firing his coach.

You can see with clear eyes why a veteran player wouldn't want to retool to win a championship in Jordan's sake but not in Lebron's sake. Even though that's exactly what Lebron did in LA after winning three championships. And Lebron won his last championship two freaking years ago...at 38. When Jordan was 38 he was shooting sub 45 percent from the field and making no All NBA teams despite mising four seasons of wear and tear.

Lebron was sixth in MVP voting and his been ALl NBA for 18 years straight

wow. so much here that I disagree with.

You went on about the not so good parts about what Jordan had to say about Grant back then, that may all be so, but when it came down to it. like you said. They got pass all of that enough to be able to remain civil as a part of the core and it took nothing away from the success the team on to accomplished with Mike at the helm leading. Mike didn't need to be those guys buddy. His job was to make sure they were bringing it, and he did that. He had some doubts. If you ask me its understandable considering who he was playing with from 1984-87. He was dealing with a lot of drunks/drug users, etc so yeah. it took a long time for him to shake all that off and be able to trust some teammates in the NBA. Coach Doug Collins help for the 2 years that he coaches their walked MJs progress in the right direction so that Phil Jacksons approach later on could run it even further ahead to reach those championships. Once all that came into I'm sure there was never any doubt again from Mike about Horaces contributions.

Now on to the second part. You said Lebron had nothing in Cleveland. I disagree. Larry Hughes was a rising star caliber player that showed potential next to Allen Iverson in Philly, and did well with Arenas and Jamison as a core in both Golden State and later on when the 3 of them reunited together on the Washington Wizards. Im from DC so I witnessed it and thought they were a fun team. The Cavs didn't put a super team around Lebron back then, but he had pieces. Mo Williams was already a good point guard with the Bucks, Delonte West was a good 2 way guard, Big Z was good the moment he came in in 1996. I can go on and on. They had guys even after Boozer left for Utah. The real problem with Lebron is the way the team was being ran having everything go thorugh what Lebron wants to do with the ball. They had no strong willed coach ever with a actual system the way the Spurs had Pops, Bulls had the Triangle coached by Phil and Tex, etc. People say this and that team is so stacked but reality is the reason those teams were so great wasn't because they had this and that top level player, but because the system that they played in brought the best out of them. Thats how Parker and Ginobli went from 2nd round or late first round picks in their draft to developing into star players along side Tim Duncan.

Nobody could develop next to Lebron so he jumped around and basically rented stars time to try to win rings off of next to them, then when it didnt pan off after a while anymore, he jumped else where. You said Kyrie and Love wasn't a big 3? I disagree. Kyrie was a rising star with a ton of potential. Already in commercials. Kevin Love may not have been able to lead the Wolves far but individually he was still one of the top players in the NBA. With one of the best outside shots by a big. So it was a very big deal for Cleveland to get him over there with Kyrie and Lebron.


If you don't feel like reading this, just know that Odomfan listed Larry Hughes as legitimate help that LeBron had in his first stint with Cleveland.

Larry Hughes.

Let that sink in.

I'm also a guy from Washington DC who was in fact a witness in seeing Hughes being a part of that core Wizards 3 with Arenas and Jamison. He was a very solid player.
Image
User avatar
OdomFan
General Manager
Posts: 8,567
And1: 6,960
Joined: Jan 07, 2017
Location: Maryland
   

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#824 » by OdomFan » Fri Aug 22, 2025 4:52 pm

Iwasawitness wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
OdomFan wrote:wow. so much here that I disagree with.

You went on about the not so good parts about what Jordan had to say about Grant back then, that may all be so, but when it came down to it. like you said. They got pass all of that enough to be able to remain civil as a part of the core and it took nothing away from the success the team on to accomplished with Mike at the helm leading. Mike didn't need to be those guys buddy. His job was to make sure they were bringing it, and he did that. He had some doubts. If you ask me its understandable considering who he was playing with from 1984-87. He was dealing with a lot of drunks/drug users, etc so yeah. it took a long time for him to shake all that off and be able to trust some teammates in the NBA. Coach Doug Collins help for the 2 years that he coaches their walked MJs progress in the right direction so that Phil Jacksons approach later on could run it even further ahead to reach those championships. Once all that came into I'm sure there was never any doubt again from Mike about Horaces contributions.

Now on to the second part. You said Lebron had nothing in Cleveland. I disagree. Larry Hughes was a rising star caliber player that showed potential next to Allen Iverson in Philly, and did well with Arenas and Jamison as a core in both Golden State and later on when the 3 of them reunited together on the Washington Wizards. Im from DC so I witnessed it and thought they were a fun team. The Cavs didn't put a super team around Lebron back then, but he had pieces. Mo Williams was already a good point guard with the Bucks, Delonte West was a good 2 way guard, Big Z was good the moment he came in in 1996. I can go on and on. They had guys even after Boozer left for Utah. The real problem with Lebron is the way the team was being ran having everything go thorugh what Lebron wants to do with the ball. They had no strong willed coach ever with a actual system the way the Spurs had Pops, Bulls had the Triangle coached by Phil and Tex, etc. People say this and that team is so stacked but reality is the reason those teams were so great wasn't because they had this and that top level player, but because the system that they played in brought the best out of them. Thats how Parker and Ginobli went from 2nd round or late first round picks in their draft to developing into star players along side Tim Duncan.

Nobody could develop next to Lebron so he jumped around and basically rented stars time to try to win rings off of next to them, then when it didnt pan off after a while anymore, he jumped else where. You said Kyrie and Love wasn't a big 3? I disagree. Kyrie was a rising star with a ton of potential. Already in commercials. Kevin Love may not have been able to lead the Wolves far but individually he was still one of the top players in the NBA. With one of the best outside shots by a big. So it was a very big deal for Cleveland to get him over there with Kyrie and Lebron.


I never said Love, Lebron and Irving wasn’t a big three. Just highlighting that leaving two players who were capable of dragging teams to the playoffs as the best player to join to players who could not isn’t stacking the deck.

Nor is leaving a “better run” organization for a worse run organization to join those players “stacking the deck”


None of what LeBron has done is stacking the deck. It absolutely amazes me how many people out there continue to use this term to describe what LeBron has done when if you go by the exact definition of what it actually is, base it on what actually happened, and use a little bit of common sense, there's no possible way LeBron in anyway shape or form stacked the deck. It's an incredibly stupid argument to make and yet for some reason, it's a popular one. I don't get it.


Uh he went to Miami specfically to team up with prime Wade and Bosh. I'd call that 100% stacking the deck. Especially considering that he predicted that they'd win not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, etc championships. That was in fact stacking the deck. As was teaming up with Love and Irving in Cleveland, and looking to form another big 3 in Los Angeles. Getting AD. Tried to get Kawhi, and had since been paired up with another top level star in Luka. All this guy has done since 2010-2011 is look to stack the deck for rings.
Image
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,511
And1: 4,063
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#825 » by DimesandKnicks » Fri Aug 22, 2025 5:05 pm

OdomFan wrote:
Iwasawitness wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
I never said Love, Lebron and Irving wasn’t a big three. Just highlighting that leaving two players who were capable of dragging teams to the playoffs as the best player to join to players who could not isn’t stacking the deck.

Nor is leaving a “better run” organization for a worse run organization to join those players “stacking the deck”


None of what LeBron has done is stacking the deck. It absolutely amazes me how many people out there continue to use this term to describe what LeBron has done when if you go by the exact definition of what it actually is, base it on what actually happened, and use a little bit of common sense, there's no possible way LeBron in anyway shape or form stacked the deck. It's an incredibly stupid argument to make and yet for some reason, it's a popular one. I don't get it.


Uh he went to Miami specfically to team up with prime Wade and Bosh. I'd call that 100% stacking the deck. Especially considering that he predicted that they'd win not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, etc championships. That was in fact stacking the deck. As was teaming up with Love and Irving in Cleveland, and looking to form another big 3 in Los Angeles. Getting AD. Tried to get Kawhi, and had since been paired up with another top level star in Luka. All this guy has done since 2010-2011 is look to stack the deck for rings.


If Bosh and Wade joined LeBron in Cleveland is that still “stacking the deck”
Cavsfansince84
RealGM
Posts: 15,070
And1: 11,546
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#826 » by Cavsfansince84 » Fri Aug 22, 2025 5:12 pm

DimesandKnicks wrote:
If Bosh and Wade joined LeBron in Cleveland is that still “stacking the deck”


No one never answers that question and I've seen it posed many times on here. Had Bosh and Wade simply agreed to work with the Cavs front office or just Wade and someone else people act like it would be so different by the logic they use but they won't actually admit it.
KGtabake
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,681
And1: 7,605
Joined: Jan 28, 2019
 

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#827 » by KGtabake » Fri Aug 22, 2025 5:23 pm

Stockton had his chance when MJ wasn't around.
He didn't even make the Finals.
JM00n69
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,294
And1: 1,016
Joined: Nov 26, 2023
Location: London, England
 

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#828 » by JM00n69 » Fri Aug 22, 2025 5:32 pm

DimesandKnicks wrote:
OdomFan wrote:
Iwasawitness wrote:
None of what LeBron has done is stacking the deck. It absolutely amazes me how many people out there continue to use this term to describe what LeBron has done when if you go by the exact definition of what it actually is, base it on what actually happened, and use a little bit of common sense, there's no possible way LeBron in anyway shape or form stacked the deck. It's an incredibly stupid argument to make and yet for some reason, it's a popular one. I don't get it.


Uh he went to Miami specfically to team up with prime Wade and Bosh. I'd call that 100% stacking the deck. Especially considering that he predicted that they'd win not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, etc championships. That was in fact stacking the deck. As was teaming up with Love and Irving in Cleveland, and looking to form another big 3 in Los Angeles. Getting AD. Tried to get Kawhi, and had since been paired up with another top level star in Luka. All this guy has done since 2010-2011 is look to stack the deck for rings.


If Bosh and Wade joined LeBron in Cleveland is that still “stacking the deck”


100% obv. Why does KD get so much flack for choosing the 'hardest road' in FA but LBJ gets a pass for oranising his own teams again and again and again? And lets not forget his failed attempt at LAL with Russ and Melo just because it didn't end in a ring. And who got the blame for it? You fanboys really twist the history for him than anyone ever has for any other player.
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,511
And1: 4,063
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#829 » by DimesandKnicks » Fri Aug 22, 2025 5:34 pm

KGtabake wrote:Stockton had his chance when MJ wasn't around.
He didn't even make the Finals.


Not to mention the best player on his team attempted to “stacking the deck” by joining the Lakers
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,511
And1: 4,063
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#830 » by DimesandKnicks » Fri Aug 22, 2025 5:35 pm

JM00n69 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
OdomFan wrote:
Uh he went to Miami specfically to team up with prime Wade and Bosh. I'd call that 100% stacking the deck. Especially considering that he predicted that they'd win not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, etc championships. That was in fact stacking the deck. As was teaming up with Love and Irving in Cleveland, and looking to form another big 3 in Los Angeles. Getting AD. Tried to get Kawhi, and had since been paired up with another top level star in Luka. All this guy has done since 2010-2011 is look to stack the deck for rings.


If Bosh and Wade joined LeBron in Cleveland is that still “stacking the deck”


100% obv. Why does KD get so much flack for choosing the 'hardest road' in FA but LBJ gets a pass for oranising his own teams again and again and again? And lets not forget his failed attempt at LAL with Russ and Melo just because it didn't end in a ring. And who got the blame for it? You fanboys really twist the history for him than anyone ever has for any other player.


Copy so stacking the deck is aggregating good to great players to give a team the best chance to win a championship. So was Jordan and the Bulls stacking the deck when Rodman joined them?
VanWest82
RealGM
Posts: 19,576
And1: 18,097
Joined: Dec 05, 2008

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#831 » by VanWest82 » Fri Aug 22, 2025 5:46 pm

DimesandKnicks wrote:
OdomFan wrote:
Iwasawitness wrote:
None of what LeBron has done is stacking the deck. It absolutely amazes me how many people out there continue to use this term to describe what LeBron has done when if you go by the exact definition of what it actually is, base it on what actually happened, and use a little bit of common sense, there's no possible way LeBron in anyway shape or form stacked the deck. It's an incredibly stupid argument to make and yet for some reason, it's a popular one. I don't get it.


Uh he went to Miami specfically to team up with prime Wade and Bosh. I'd call that 100% stacking the deck. Especially considering that he predicted that they'd win not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, etc championships. That was in fact stacking the deck. As was teaming up with Love and Irving in Cleveland, and looking to form another big 3 in Los Angeles. Getting AD. Tried to get Kawhi, and had since been paired up with another top level star in Luka. All this guy has done since 2010-2011 is look to stack the deck for rings.


If Bosh and Wade joined LeBron in Cleveland is that still “stacking the deck”

Yes. Also, Lebron using his agency to manipulate his teams and the league is a big part of the story. Him, Wade, and Bosh (and Melo though he chickened out and took the $$) tried to game the system to create an unbeatable superteam. But Lebron couldn't control Riley and Wade fell off so he left for a situation with a lot of assets that he could control in Cavs. He used Klutch to sign/re-sign teammates to ensure the guys he wanted to play with would be there (see TT and Shump deals). When he couldn't squeeze anymore out of Cavs asset base, he goes to LA, another team with lots of assets he can use to trade. Klutch signs AD and convinces him to force a trade to only Lebron's team. Klutch has one third of the Lakers roster at one point. Lebron is out recruiting Kawhi. He tried to recruit Derozan, and successfully recruited Westbrook which Lakers had to acquiese and wound up giving up a bunch of their good young players in the process. Pelinka had to pull a rabbit out of his hat to unwind that deal two years later. These are just the ones that have been publically confirmed (Paul George, anyone?).

The "stacking the deck" narrative is part of Lebron's legacy at this point. Miami was a players led initiative. Cavs and Lakers were a Lebron + Klutch initiative.
G35
RealGM
Posts: 22,522
And1: 8,070
Joined: Dec 10, 2005
     

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#832 » by G35 » Fri Aug 22, 2025 6:25 pm

KGtabake wrote:Stockton had his chance when MJ wasn't around.
He didn't even make the Finals.



Sorry that the Jazz didn't play in a weak conference that stacked all the talent on one team. The West has always had a higher competitive environment...iron sharpens iron.....
I'm so tired of the typical......
User avatar
Nate505
RealGM
Posts: 13,757
And1: 13,572
Joined: Oct 29, 2001
Location: Denver, CO
       

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#833 » by Nate505 » Fri Aug 22, 2025 6:35 pm

DimesandKnicks wrote:
OdomFan wrote:
Iwasawitness wrote:
None of what LeBron has done is stacking the deck. It absolutely amazes me how many people out there continue to use this term to describe what LeBron has done when if you go by the exact definition of what it actually is, base it on what actually happened, and use a little bit of common sense, there's no possible way LeBron in anyway shape or form stacked the deck. It's an incredibly stupid argument to make and yet for some reason, it's a popular one. I don't get it.


Uh he went to Miami specfically to team up with prime Wade and Bosh. I'd call that 100% stacking the deck. Especially considering that he predicted that they'd win not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, etc championships. That was in fact stacking the deck. As was teaming up with Love and Irving in Cleveland, and looking to form another big 3 in Los Angeles. Getting AD. Tried to get Kawhi, and had since been paired up with another top level star in Luka. All this guy has done since 2010-2011 is look to stack the deck for rings.


If Bosh and Wade joined LeBron in Cleveland is that still “stacking the deck”

Yes. The location of the deck really doesn't matter.
KGtabake
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,681
And1: 7,605
Joined: Jan 28, 2019
 

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#834 » by KGtabake » Fri Aug 22, 2025 6:58 pm

G35 wrote:
KGtabake wrote:Stockton had his chance when MJ wasn't around.
He didn't even make the Finals.



Sorry that the Jazz didn't play in a weak conference that stacked all the talent on one team. The West has always had a higher competitive environment...iron sharpens iron.....


LeBron won one in the West. Stockton didn't.
I respect him much as a player and i think his records in assists and steals will never be broken.

Respect isn't forever though. If he opens his mouth and spills poison every now and then, respect will be withdrawn.
He is an all time great.
LeBron is on another tier (and I'm not a LeBron fanboy). Trying to downgrade him this way is idiotic to me.
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,511
And1: 4,063
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#835 » by DimesandKnicks » Fri Aug 22, 2025 7:13 pm

Nate505 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
OdomFan wrote:
Uh he went to Miami specfically to team up with prime Wade and Bosh. I'd call that 100% stacking the deck. Especially considering that he predicted that they'd win not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, etc championships. That was in fact stacking the deck. As was teaming up with Love and Irving in Cleveland, and looking to form another big 3 in Los Angeles. Getting AD. Tried to get Kawhi, and had since been paired up with another top level star in Luka. All this guy has done since 2010-2011 is look to stack the deck for rings.


If Bosh and Wade joined LeBron in Cleveland is that still “stacking the deck”

Yes. The location of the deck really doesn't matter.


So basically, it's only not stacking the deck if you build throuhg the draft? Or don't sign all-nba level/all-start teamates in free agency?
G35
RealGM
Posts: 22,522
And1: 8,070
Joined: Dec 10, 2005
     

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#836 » by G35 » Fri Aug 22, 2025 7:20 pm

KGtabake wrote:
G35 wrote:
KGtabake wrote:Stockton had his chance when MJ wasn't around.
He didn't even make the Finals.



Sorry that the Jazz didn't play in a weak conference that stacked all the talent on one team. The West has always had a higher competitive environment...iron sharpens iron.....


LeBron won one in the West. Stockton didn't.
I respect him much as a player and i think his records in assists and steals will never be broken.

Respect isn't forever though. If he opens his mouth and spills poison every now and then, respect will be withdrawn.
He is an all time great.
LeBron is on another tier (and I'm not a LeBron fanboy). Trying to downgrade him this way is idiotic to me.


Isiah won two championships when the East was a much tougher conference.

Is he as good as Lebron? Is he allowed to give his opinion?

What about Hakeem, who did win two titles, without Jordan in the league, does his opinion count?

Or this list of players who have 5+ championships, do their opinions mean more than Lebron's fans?
https://www.basketball-reference.com/leaders/most_championships.html

Or is this more about people who do not want to hear any criticism...they would rather block people's opinions that differ from their own.
I'm so tired of the typical......
Iwasawitness
Head Coach
Posts: 6,355
And1: 7,630
Joined: Sep 05, 2023
     

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#837 » by Iwasawitness » Fri Aug 22, 2025 7:44 pm

OdomFan wrote:
Iwasawitness wrote:
OdomFan wrote:wow. so much here that I disagree with.

You went on about the not so good parts about what Jordan had to say about Grant back then, that may all be so, but when it came down to it. like you said. They got pass all of that enough to be able to remain civil as a part of the core and it took nothing away from the success the team on to accomplished with Mike at the helm leading. Mike didn't need to be those guys buddy. His job was to make sure they were bringing it, and he did that. He had some doubts. If you ask me its understandable considering who he was playing with from 1984-87. He was dealing with a lot of drunks/drug users, etc so yeah. it took a long time for him to shake all that off and be able to trust some teammates in the NBA. Coach Doug Collins help for the 2 years that he coaches their walked MJs progress in the right direction so that Phil Jacksons approach later on could run it even further ahead to reach those championships. Once all that came into I'm sure there was never any doubt again from Mike about Horaces contributions.

Now on to the second part. You said Lebron had nothing in Cleveland. I disagree. Larry Hughes was a rising star caliber player that showed potential next to Allen Iverson in Philly, and did well with Arenas and Jamison as a core in both Golden State and later on when the 3 of them reunited together on the Washington Wizards. Im from DC so I witnessed it and thought they were a fun team. The Cavs didn't put a super team around Lebron back then, but he had pieces. Mo Williams was already a good point guard with the Bucks, Delonte West was a good 2 way guard, Big Z was good the moment he came in in 1996. I can go on and on. They had guys even after Boozer left for Utah. The real problem with Lebron is the way the team was being ran having everything go thorugh what Lebron wants to do with the ball. They had no strong willed coach ever with a actual system the way the Spurs had Pops, Bulls had the Triangle coached by Phil and Tex, etc. People say this and that team is so stacked but reality is the reason those teams were so great wasn't because they had this and that top level player, but because the system that they played in brought the best out of them. Thats how Parker and Ginobli went from 2nd round or late first round picks in their draft to developing into star players along side Tim Duncan.

Nobody could develop next to Lebron so he jumped around and basically rented stars time to try to win rings off of next to them, then when it didnt pan off after a while anymore, he jumped else where. You said Kyrie and Love wasn't a big 3? I disagree. Kyrie was a rising star with a ton of potential. Already in commercials. Kevin Love may not have been able to lead the Wolves far but individually he was still one of the top players in the NBA. With one of the best outside shots by a big. So it was a very big deal for Cleveland to get him over there with Kyrie and Lebron.


If you don't feel like reading this, just know that Odomfan listed Larry Hughes as legitimate help that LeBron had in his first stint with Cleveland.

Larry Hughes.

Let that sink in.

I'm also a guy from Washington DC who was in fact a witness in seeing Hughes being a part of that core Wizards 3 with Arenas and Jamison. He was a very solid player.


Cool, great. He wasn't that player in Cleveland, and that's entirely because of injuries.
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20
Iwasawitness
Head Coach
Posts: 6,355
And1: 7,630
Joined: Sep 05, 2023
     

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#838 » by Iwasawitness » Fri Aug 22, 2025 7:47 pm

OdomFan wrote:
Iwasawitness wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
I never said Love, Lebron and Irving wasn’t a big three. Just highlighting that leaving two players who were capable of dragging teams to the playoffs as the best player to join to players who could not isn’t stacking the deck.

Nor is leaving a “better run” organization for a worse run organization to join those players “stacking the deck”


None of what LeBron has done is stacking the deck. It absolutely amazes me how many people out there continue to use this term to describe what LeBron has done when if you go by the exact definition of what it actually is, base it on what actually happened, and use a little bit of common sense, there's no possible way LeBron in anyway shape or form stacked the deck. It's an incredibly stupid argument to make and yet for some reason, it's a popular one. I don't get it.


Uh he went to Miami specfically to team up with prime Wade and Bosh. I'd call that 100% stacking the deck. Especially considering that he predicted that they'd win not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, etc championships. That was in fact stacking the deck. As was teaming up with Love and Irving in Cleveland, and looking to form another big 3 in Los Angeles. Getting AD. Tried to get Kawhi, and had since been paired up with another top level star in Luka. All this guy has done since 2010-2011 is look to stack the deck for rings.


And you'd be wrong, because again, there's more than three players on a basketball team. And again, that's not what stacking the deck means.
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20
Iwasawitness
Head Coach
Posts: 6,355
And1: 7,630
Joined: Sep 05, 2023
     

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#839 » by Iwasawitness » Fri Aug 22, 2025 8:02 pm

JM00n69 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
OdomFan wrote:
Uh he went to Miami specfically to team up with prime Wade and Bosh. I'd call that 100% stacking the deck. Especially considering that he predicted that they'd win not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, etc championships. That was in fact stacking the deck. As was teaming up with Love and Irving in Cleveland, and looking to form another big 3 in Los Angeles. Getting AD. Tried to get Kawhi, and had since been paired up with another top level star in Luka. All this guy has done since 2010-2011 is look to stack the deck for rings.


If Bosh and Wade joined LeBron in Cleveland is that still “stacking the deck”


100% obv. Why does KD get so much flack for choosing the 'hardest road' in FA but LBJ gets a pass for oranising his own teams again and again and again? And lets not forget his failed attempt at LAL with Russ and Melo just because it didn't end in a ring. And who got the blame for it? You fanboys really twist the history for him than anyone ever has for any other player.


You know why KD gets so much flack compared to LeBron. It isn't rocket science.

And organize his own teams? He didn't do that in Miami and he didn't do it in Cleveland. So what are you going on about?
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20
NbaAllDay
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,972
And1: 2,293
Joined: Jun 14, 2017

Re: Stockton says LeBrons titles don’t have value 

Post#840 » by NbaAllDay » Fri Aug 22, 2025 9:26 pm

DimesandKnicks wrote:
Nate505 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
If Bosh and Wade joined LeBron in Cleveland is that still “stacking the deck”

Yes. The location of the deck really doesn't matter.


So basically, it's only not stacking the deck if you build throuhg the draft? Or don't sign all-nba level/all-start teamates in free agency?


The same people will say what Nate said and in the same breathe give Curry all his flowers for the rings with KD.

The hypocrisy is hilarious.

Return to The General Board