JM00n69 wrote:DimesandKnicks wrote:MavsDirk41 wrote:
Acquring Rodman turned out to be a great move by Krause but Rodman was 34 and only played 49 games the year prior in San Antonio because of multiple suspensions, a personal leave of absence, and a motorcycle accident while openly criticizing Pop and others in the organization while heading out the door.
When James recruited Love to Cleveland he was 25 and coming off a 26/13/4 season and was an all star and all nba team 2.
When James recruited Davis to LA he was 25 and coming off a 26/12/4 season and only played 56 games because he publicly requested a trade and New Orleans benched him. He was an all star and all nba player.
When James was gifted Luka he was 25 and averaged 28/8/8 coming off a season in which he led his team to the finals, was an all star, all nba team 1, mvp candidate.
One isnt like the others. And getting back to your response to me from Tuesday, i had no clue that Jordan wanted the Bulls to trade for Walter Davis. With BJ and Craig Hodges they didnt need him and he was way past his prime and old at that point in his career. I knew Jordan was the reason Stackhouse was traded to Washington for Rip Hamilton. Terrible trade that didnt work out. But James has recruited Love, Davis, Westbrook, Leonard, Lilllard, DeRozan, Durant, and of course was part of getting the superteam Heat together. An article i read said he has a “war room” at his house where he has met with players to strategize ways to get them on his team. So he is way better than Jordan at recruiting talent to play with.
Again the league Jordan dominated wasn’t like the league LeBron played in. A free agent was essentially a restricted free agent so you could recruit all you wanted but all that players team would have to do is match an offer sheet to retain a player.
And it doesn’t matter if Rodman was 34. He was the second best player on the best team in the league that year and was all nba and all nba defense. He was as much of a headache as Jordan was, but some organizations tolerate the BS to win (I.e Draymond Green). Jordan pinched two teammates and was constantly berating teammates and Krause. I even heard a story of him playing a game drunk, dropping 30 in a half than sitting for the rest of the game.
Pippen delayed surgery to protest his contract and refused to go in a game because a play wasn’t drawn up for him.
Him being a headache off the court doesn’t negate the fact that he helped the bulls, who just lost to the Magic, “stack the deck”.
So the question remains, was acquiring Dennis Rodman the Bulls and MJ “stacking the deck”?
Well MJ/Pippen/Rodman didn't play for different teams and conspire to sign together and take massive deals below market value, which is now not allowed in the CBA, btw. All that so they could play together.
Pippen was a draft day trade and signed a 7 year contract to secure a future for his family going against the advice from people close to him, which he tried to negotiate after he realised the mistake he'd made- unsuccessfully.. Rodman was aquired via trade.
So no is the pretty clear answer to your question.
Ahh so once more. If the organization is able to secure your rights under market value that’s okay with the basketball gods (Pippen 122nd ranked salary and Jordan 25th) but of the players willingly and without protest accept low salaries to build teams they’re organizations could not than bad?
Or is this just a you can’t leave your team thing?
Was it stacking the deck for no other reason than LeBron left the Heat in free agency? Because Kyrie was there than they acquired Love via trade?
Was Clyde Drexler and Hakeem “stacking the deck” when Clyde requested a trade from Portland with Hakeem lobbying for the move to be made?
Was Shaq stacking the deck when he joined a young 50 win Laker team?
Did the Sixers stack the deck when they sign and traded for Moses Malone the year after he won MVP (or is it different because it was an organizational move)
Did the Celtics “stacking the deck” when instead of just drafting Mchale with the first pick they traded it for Parish and the third pick which became Mchale or when they acquired Dennis Johnson?
I’m just curious as to what constitutes as “stacking the deck”?
Is it something you frown upon? (Or others, you’re more than welcome to lmk) and why?
Is it simply when a player plays the role of GM? Switches teams for better situation? Puts pressure on their organizations to make acquisitions?
Is what LeBron and KD did different in principle from what Clyde, Shaq, Barkley, Moses Malone, Wilt or Kobe did (either leaving or putting pressure on organizations)
Just curious as to what the threshold is in terms of what has to be done to be out of the basketball gods favor in yall opinion. Not be an ass, just genuinely curious