ImageImageImageImageImage

Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN**

Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX

User avatar
Mattatron
Veteran
Posts: 2,601
And1: 1,903
Joined: Feb 15, 2019
 

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1421 » by Mattatron » Sat Aug 23, 2025 3:36 pm

Los_29 wrote:
Thaddy wrote:A real rebuild is easier in this type of market. If we had tanked after Barnes and taken picks for our assets we would look really good now. We could have overpaid in FA for players of IQ and Ingram's caliber and had better pick assets to build with.


The past four drafts have not been great. In fact, one of them was dreadful. High probability we would be worse off.

Picks that were offered were not good as well.

And what players could we have overpaid for?


"Picks that were offered were not good as well." Who says that ? In 2021 there were no trade talks surrounding fvv, siakam, og etc. It was known that NN and MU wanted to compete. The contract of each of them was good and tradeable and had lots of years left. And their value was at peak. MU started talks around 2023.
Without any doubt we would've been a more attractive team right now if we started the real full rebuild thru the draft after the day we picked @ #4 in 2021.

Every other team that was in the lottery with us back then looks more promising than we do.
JB7
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,313
And1: 1,986
Joined: Jun 03, 2002

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1422 » by JB7 » Sat Aug 23, 2025 5:17 pm

Mattatron wrote:
Los_29 wrote:
Thaddy wrote:A real rebuild is easier in this type of market. If we had tanked after Barnes and taken picks for our assets we would look really good now. We could have overpaid in FA for players of IQ and Ingram's caliber and had better pick assets to build with.


The past four drafts have not been great. In fact, one of them was dreadful. High probability we would be worse off.

Picks that were offered were not good as well.

And what players could we have overpaid for?


"Picks that were offered were not good as well." Who says that ? In 2021 there were no trade talks surrounding fvv, siakam, og etc. It was known that NN and MU wanted to compete. The contract of each of them was good and tradeable and had lots of years left. And their value was at peak. MU started talks around 2023.
Without any doubt we would've been a more attractive team right now if we started the real full rebuild thru the draft after the day we picked @ #4 in 2021.

Every other team that was in the lottery with us back then looks more promising than we do.


Everyone (teams and media) were expecting a tear down at the Scottie draft. They would have been lowballed with offers. Teams feast on those situations.

Masai held off to get better deals. OG was his greatest trade asset. Once he was moved, teams knew they were in the tear down.

So he waited for the best return on OG
Los_29
RealGM
Posts: 15,177
And1: 13,803
Joined: Apr 10, 2021

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1423 » by Los_29 » Sat Aug 23, 2025 5:29 pm

JB7 wrote:
Mattatron wrote:
Los_29 wrote:
The past four drafts have not been great. In fact, one of them was dreadful. High probability we would be worse off.

Picks that were offered were not good as well.

And what players could we have overpaid for?


"Picks that were offered were not good as well." Who says that ? In 2021 there were no trade talks surrounding fvv, siakam, og etc. It was known that NN and MU wanted to compete. The contract of each of them was good and tradeable and had lots of years left. And their value was at peak. MU started talks around 2023.
Without any doubt we would've been a more attractive team right now if we started the real full rebuild thru the draft after the day we picked @ #4 in 2021.

Every other team that was in the lottery with us back then looks more promising than we do.


Everyone (teams and media) were expecting a tear down at the Scottie draft. They would have been lowballed with offers. Teams feast on those situations.

Masai held off to get better deals. OG was his greatest trade asset. Once he was moved, teams knew they were in the tear down.

So he waited for the best return on OG


And OG was just 24 years old. He’s a guy you’d keep in that situation. Pascal didn’t have much value at that point and I believe Fred was an upcoming FA.
mihaic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,607
And1: 3,791
Joined: Jul 05, 2006
   

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1424 » by mihaic » Sat Aug 23, 2025 8:18 pm

Los_29 wrote:
JB7 wrote:
Mattatron wrote:
"Picks that were offered were not good as well." Who says that ? In 2021 there were no trade talks surrounding fvv, siakam, og etc. It was known that NN and MU wanted to compete. The contract of each of them was good and tradeable and had lots of years left. And their value was at peak. MU started talks around 2023.
Without any doubt we would've been a more attractive team right now if we started the real full rebuild thru the draft after the day we picked @ #4 in 2021.

Every other team that was in the lottery with us back then looks more promising than we do.


Everyone (teams and media) were expecting a tear down at the Scottie draft. They would have been lowballed with offers. Teams feast on those situations.

Masai held off to get better deals. OG was his greatest trade asset. Once he was moved, teams knew they were in the tear down.

So he waited for the best return on OG


And OG was just 24 years old. He’s a guy you’d keep in that situation. Pascal didn’t have much value at that point and I believe Fred was an upcoming FA.

OG wanted out, it was rumoured as early as the summer of Scottie's draft if I recall, we fans just didn't want to believe it.
Saul Goodman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,903
And1: 2,614
Joined: Feb 27, 2013
         

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1425 » by Saul Goodman » Sat Aug 23, 2025 10:26 pm

If Sabonis wants a trade would you do this



Quickley
Barrett
2026 1st


For

Sabonis
Malik monk



Sabonis/poetl
Barnes/CMB/mamu
Ingram/Abaji
Dick/Walter
Monk/shead
2016 GMAT Blazers

Howard/Nene/
Griffin/M.Leonard/T.Jones
Porter/Marc.Morris/J.Johnson
McCollum/Stauskas/Thompson/Seldon
Lillard/Bayless/DeColo
TNRaps4life
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,905
And1: 1,216
Joined: Aug 30, 2005
 

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1426 » by TNRaps4life » Sun Aug 24, 2025 12:48 am

Saul Goodman wrote:If Sabonis wants a trade would you do this



Quickley
Barrett
2026 1st


For

Sabonis
Malik monk



Sabonis/poetl
Barnes/CMB/mamu
Ingram/Abaji
Dick/Walter
Monk/shead




Do that and get fired
Los_29
RealGM
Posts: 15,177
And1: 13,803
Joined: Apr 10, 2021

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1427 » by Los_29 » Sun Aug 24, 2025 2:20 am

mihaic wrote:
Los_29 wrote:
JB7 wrote:
Everyone (teams and media) were expecting a tear down at the Scottie draft. They would have been lowballed with offers. Teams feast on those situations.

Masai held off to get better deals. OG was his greatest trade asset. Once he was moved, teams knew they were in the tear down.

So he waited for the best return on OG


And OG was just 24 years old. He’s a guy you’d keep in that situation. Pascal didn’t have much value at that point and I believe Fred was an upcoming FA.

OG wanted out, it was rumoured as early as the summer of Scottie's draft if I recall, we fans just didn't want to believe it.


If he wanted out he would’ve been traded a lot sooner. Scottie’s draft to when he was traded was nearly three years.
ConSarnit
Head Coach
Posts: 6,049
And1: 5,782
Joined: May 05, 2015
 

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1428 » by ConSarnit » Sun Aug 24, 2025 3:37 am

Mattatron wrote:
Los_29 wrote:
Thaddy wrote:A real rebuild is easier in this type of market. If we had tanked after Barnes and taken picks for our assets we would look really good now. We could have overpaid in FA for players of IQ and Ingram's caliber and had better pick assets to build with.


The past four drafts have not been great. In fact, one of them was dreadful. High probability we would be worse off.

Picks that were offered were not good as well.

And what players could we have overpaid for?


"Picks that were offered were not good as well." Who says that ? In 2021 there were no trade talks surrounding fvv, siakam, og etc. It was known that NN and MU wanted to compete. The contract of each of them was good and tradeable and had lots of years left. And their value was at peak. MU started talks around 2023.
Without any doubt we would've been a more attractive team right now if we started the real full rebuild thru the draft after the day we picked @ #4 in 2021.

Every other team that was in the lottery with us back then looks more promising than we do.


The 5 worst teams from 4 seasons ago:

OKC
HOU
DET
ORL
IND

Good thing we didn’t pivot to a tank and end up like the teams above.
User avatar
Thaddy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,492
And1: 3,745
Joined: Dec 12, 2022

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1429 » by Thaddy » Sun Aug 24, 2025 3:41 am

ConSarnit wrote:
Mattatron wrote:
Los_29 wrote:
The past four drafts have not been great. In fact, one of them was dreadful. High probability we would be worse off.

Picks that were offered were not good as well.

And what players could we have overpaid for?


"Picks that were offered were not good as well." Who says that ? In 2021 there were no trade talks surrounding fvv, siakam, og etc. It was known that NN and MU wanted to compete. The contract of each of them was good and tradeable and had lots of years left. And their value was at peak. MU started talks around 2023.
Without any doubt we would've been a more attractive team right now if we started the real full rebuild thru the draft after the day we picked @ #4 in 2021.

Every other team that was in the lottery with us back then looks more promising than we do.


The 5 worst teams from 4 seasons ago:

OKC
HOU
DET
ORL
IND

Good thing we didn’t pivot to a tank and end up like the teams above.

We went for a soft rebuild thinking we could skip the tanking process. We landed pretty well I'd say... Dick, Walter, CMB, and the others could still be top 5 players from their classes.
Los_29
RealGM
Posts: 15,177
And1: 13,803
Joined: Apr 10, 2021

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1430 » by Los_29 » Sun Aug 24, 2025 4:04 am

ConSarnit wrote:
Mattatron wrote:
Los_29 wrote:
The past four drafts have not been great. In fact, one of them was dreadful. High probability we would be worse off.

Picks that were offered were not good as well.

And what players could we have overpaid for?


"Picks that were offered were not good as well." Who says that ? In 2021 there were no trade talks surrounding fvv, siakam, og etc. It was known that NN and MU wanted to compete. The contract of each of them was good and tradeable and had lots of years left. And their value was at peak. MU started talks around 2023.
Without any doubt we would've been a more attractive team right now if we started the real full rebuild thru the draft after the day we picked @ #4 in 2021.

Every other team that was in the lottery with us back then looks more promising than we do.


The 5 worst teams from 4 seasons ago:

OKC
HOU
DET
ORL
IND

Good thing we didn’t pivot to a tank and end up like the teams above.


Detroit isn’t a good team. Indiana didn’t get better through the lottery but rather through trades. In fact they were seen as a treadmill team just last year. Orlando is in a weird spot because they tanked but didn’t end up with any high-end talent and traded all their picks for Bane. Houston has good young talent but didn’t draft any superstars. They turned their team around by signing guys like Fred and trading for KD. And OKC had SGA. Them being at the bottom of the league isn’t the reason for their turnaround.
mihaic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,607
And1: 3,791
Joined: Jul 05, 2006
   

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1431 » by mihaic » Sun Aug 24, 2025 1:24 pm

Los_29 wrote:
mihaic wrote:
Los_29 wrote:
And OG was just 24 years old. He’s a guy you’d keep in that situation. Pascal didn’t have much value at that point and I believe Fred was an upcoming FA.

OG wanted out, it was rumoured as early as the summer of Scottie's draft if I recall, we fans just didn't want to believe it.


If he wanted out he would’ve been traded a lot sooner. Scottie’s draft to when he was traded was nearly three years.

2 and a half seasons.
You might be right, I think the rumour came out a year later and they countered by trying to run the attack through him (which failed miserably and they gave up after a few games). Perhaps they knew earlier but that would be speculation.

The point is they should have traded him at that point, when he asked out, not keep him for another 1.5 seasons.
Los_29
RealGM
Posts: 15,177
And1: 13,803
Joined: Apr 10, 2021

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1432 » by Los_29 » Sun Aug 24, 2025 1:59 pm

mihaic wrote:
Los_29 wrote:
mihaic wrote:OG wanted out, it was rumoured as early as the summer of Scottie's draft if I recall, we fans just didn't want to believe it.


If he wanted out he would’ve been traded a lot sooner. Scottie’s draft to when he was traded was nearly three years.

2 and a half seasons.
You might be right, I think the rumour came out a year later and they countered by trying to run the attack through him (which failed miserably and they gave up after a few games). Perhaps they knew earlier but that would be speculation.

The point is they should have traded him at that point, when he asked out, not keep him for another 1.5 seasons.


I'm glad they didn't trade him a year earlier because the offers weren't as good. Even the Knicks offer was worse. Memphis was offering a bunch of horrible FRPs and that was seen as the best offer on the table.
MessiahUjiri
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 4,504
Joined: Dec 16, 2014
Contact:

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1433 » by MessiahUjiri » Tue Aug 26, 2025 12:13 am

Saul Goodman wrote:If Sabonis wants a trade would you do this



Quickley
Barrett
2026 1st


For

Sabonis
Malik monk



Sabonis/poetl
Barnes/CMB/mamu
Ingram/Abaji
Dick/Walter
Monk/shead



They will want Poeltl+ if they are sending out Sabonis.

Poeltl, Ingram, ‘26 1st, 2 2nds
for
Sabonis, Monk


Something like that is a Kings style deal.
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 29,766
And1: 32,547
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1434 » by YogurtProducer » Tue Aug 26, 2025 4:44 am

Los_29 wrote:
ConSarnit wrote:
Mattatron wrote:
"Picks that were offered were not good as well." Who says that ? In 2021 there were no trade talks surrounding fvv, siakam, og etc. It was known that NN and MU wanted to compete. The contract of each of them was good and tradeable and had lots of years left. And their value was at peak. MU started talks around 2023.
Without any doubt we would've been a more attractive team right now if we started the real full rebuild thru the draft after the day we picked @ #4 in 2021.

Every other team that was in the lottery with us back then looks more promising than we do.


The 5 worst teams from 4 seasons ago:

OKC
HOU
DET
ORL
IND

Good thing we didn’t pivot to a tank and end up like the teams above.


Detroit isn’t a good team. Indiana didn’t get better through the lottery but rather through trades. In fact they were seen as a treadmill team just last year. Orlando is in a weird spot because they tanked but didn’t end up with any high-end talent and traded all their picks for Bane. Houston has good young talent but didn’t draft any superstars. They turned their team around by signing guys like Fred and trading for KD. And OKC had SGA. Them being at the bottom of the league isn’t the reason for their turnaround.

Yeah almost like you need a TON of context to those 5 teams.

Not to mention, I am not even fully convinced DET/ORL/IND necessarily is a lock to have better next 5 years than we are.
What an absolute failure and disaster this franchise is, ran by one of the most incompetent front offices in the league.
- Raptors RealGM Forum re: Masai Ujiri - June 2023
youngRAPZ
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,279
And1: 1,027
Joined: Mar 17, 2011

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1435 » by youngRAPZ » Wed Aug 27, 2025 12:11 am

MessiahUjiri wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:If Sabonis wants a trade would you do this



Quickley
Barrett
2026 1st


For

Sabonis
Malik monk



Sabonis/poetl
Barnes/CMB/mamu
Ingram/Abaji
Dick/Walter
Monk/shead



They will want Poeltl+ if they are sending out Sabonis.

Poeltl, Ingram, ‘26 1st, 2 2nds
for
Sabonis, Monk


Something like that is a Kings style deal.

What? lol Jak and BI for Sabonis???


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
OAKLEY_2
RealGM
Posts: 20,199
And1: 9,186
Joined: Dec 19, 2008

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1436 » by OAKLEY_2 » Wed Aug 27, 2025 12:22 pm

Nothing is going to happen until players with newer deals like Jrue Holiday become available during the season. Raps will likely keep Barrett and move off IQ's longer duration contract. Agbaji was return on Siakam so throwing him away makes zero sense. Nothing wrong with IQ but Raps need to fix their openly ridiculed overpays.
User avatar
OAKLEY_2
RealGM
Posts: 20,199
And1: 9,186
Joined: Dec 19, 2008

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1437 » by OAKLEY_2 » Wed Aug 27, 2025 12:27 pm

Then again Holiday saves the Raps a mere 32 mil. Holiday-Lillard is an expensive duo.
DreamTeam09
RealGM
Posts: 17,405
And1: 10,741
Joined: Jan 06, 2009
Location: Scarborough
 

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1438 » by DreamTeam09 » Wed Aug 27, 2025 12:54 pm

OAKLEY_2 wrote:Nothing is going to happen until players with newer deals like Jrue Holiday become available during the season. Raps will likely keep Barrett and move off IQ's longer duration contract. Agbaji was return on Siakam so throwing him away makes zero sense. Nothing wrong with IQ but Raps need to fix their openly ridiculed overpays.


To appease whom? Media blogs, pundits, and online banter who aren't going to be on the Raptors side for the most part regardless?
If there's nothing wrong with him why would we get rid of him?
Image

In Raptor Ball I Trust
User avatar
OAKLEY_2
RealGM
Posts: 20,199
And1: 9,186
Joined: Dec 19, 2008

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1439 » by OAKLEY_2 » Wed Aug 27, 2025 3:04 pm

DreamTeam09 wrote:
OAKLEY_2 wrote:Nothing is going to happen until players with newer deals like Jrue Holiday become available during the season. Raps will likely keep Barrett and move off IQ's longer duration contract. Agbaji was return on Siakam so throwing him away makes zero sense. Nothing wrong with IQ but Raps need to fix their openly ridiculed overpays.


To appease whom? Media blogs, pundits, and online banter who aren't going to be on the Raptors side for the most part regardless?
If there's nothing wrong with him why would we get rid of him?


Ain't broke don't fix it. I get it. Is your major concern Rogers wants win now moves ("appease" Rogers impatience) and that will make things worse? Cannot see Bobby doing that. I remember some ex gm, not Bobby Marks but someone saying to Sam Vecenie the IQ deal was a travesty. That surprised me. The basic message was that at this stage of a rebuild it was an ill advised financial move. That was the only knock against the Raps. Vecenie is always commenting about who compliments Scottie Barnes and non shooters don't cut it but... IQ is a shooter. Those guys can often overhype draftee potential.
djsunyc
RealGM
Posts: 99,567
And1: 73,340
Joined: Dec 28, 2003

Re: Free Agency & Trades Thread 2 **NOW OPEN** 

Post#1440 » by djsunyc » Wed Aug 27, 2025 10:34 pm

ConSarnit wrote:
Mattatron wrote:
Los_29 wrote:
The past four drafts have not been great. In fact, one of them was dreadful. High probability we would be worse off.

Picks that were offered were not good as well.

And what players could we have overpaid for?


"Picks that were offered were not good as well." Who says that ? In 2021 there were no trade talks surrounding fvv, siakam, og etc. It was known that NN and MU wanted to compete. The contract of each of them was good and tradeable and had lots of years left. And their value was at peak. MU started talks around 2023.
Without any doubt we would've been a more attractive team right now if we started the real full rebuild thru the draft after the day we picked @ #4 in 2021.

Every other team that was in the lottery with us back then looks more promising than we do.


The 5 worst teams from 4 seasons ago:

OKC
HOU
DET
ORL
IND

Good thing we didn’t pivot to a tank and end up like the teams above.


Image

Return to Toronto Raptors