SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890

OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,715
And1: 1,368
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#21 » by OGSactownballer » Sat Aug 23, 2025 8:26 pm

I guess I’m amongst the few people who still believe that Kuzma has the ability and actually does fit in as a stretch PF which both makes Domas truly deadly with his full skill set and allows Keegan to reach his potential as a true SF - which is where he has always belonged.

Personally I look to make this a move DDR instead of Monk and save moving Monk for the deadline.

My feeling is that DDR is THE problem with the Kings roster - the absolute total worst fitting non position guy we have. Perfect as the third scorer for a vet contender team that has defensive role players established and in place to cover that. He also really is ultimately a SG no matter what people like to say.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,817
And1: 6,524
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#22 » by gswhoops » Wed Aug 27, 2025 3:06 pm

OGSactownballer wrote:I guess I’m amongst the few people who still believe that Kuzma has the ability and actually does fit in as a stretch PF which both makes Domas truly deadly with his full skill set and allows Keegan to reach his potential as a true SF - which is where he has always belonged.

I can see the logic on offense. The defense would be brutal, though.
User avatar
mlloyd10
General Manager
Posts: 8,091
And1: 964
Joined: Jan 18, 2012
     

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#23 » by mlloyd10 » Thu Aug 28, 2025 1:48 pm

What's the motivation for either team?

Monk is a chucker who isn't really good - Rather the Bucks just give those mins to Ryan Rollins/AJ Green
User avatar
giannis and 1
Starter
Posts: 2,389
And1: 1,195
Joined: Jan 06, 2019
Location: Vancouver, BC
       

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#24 » by giannis and 1 » Fri Aug 29, 2025 1:05 pm

I guess? Bucks have a million guards. If we have to add, I pass.
still learning the game

Matches Malone wrote:How did NBA fandom get to the point that it's more fun to thirst over players on other teams than to care more about your own team and players...
User avatar
SacTown Kings
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,869
And1: 184
Joined: May 12, 2003

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#25 » by SacTown Kings » Sat Aug 30, 2025 6:16 pm

mlloyd10 wrote:What's the motivation for either team?

Monk is a chucker who isn't really good - Rather the Bucks just give those mins to Ryan Rollins/AJ Green


I disagree Monk is a chucker. He is ideally a 6th man who has the job of coming off the bench and put up points. Easy to classify those types of players as chuckers. He played the pick and roll with Domas better than Fox and he has the ability to finish at the rim. There is more to Monk than just shooting 3 pointers. His last year in Charlotte and the year on the Lakers he shot 40% and 39% from 3. Average almost as many assists as Fox with less minutes played. He is actually a very dynamic offensive player. His negatives are mostly his defensive game.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,297
And1: 36,306
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#26 » by jbk1234 » Sat Aug 30, 2025 6:37 pm

mlloyd10 wrote:What's the motivation for either team?

Monk is a chucker who isn't really good - Rather the Bucks just give those mins to Ryan Rollins/AJ Green


The Kings were 3.8 points better with Monk on the court last season. The Bucks were 3.5 worse with Kuzma on the court last season.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
sackings916
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,235
And1: 853
Joined: Sep 07, 2002

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#27 » by sackings916 » Sat Aug 30, 2025 8:14 pm

mlloyd10 wrote:What's the motivation for either team?

Monk is a chucker who isn't really good - Rather the Bucks just give those mins to Ryan Rollins/AJ Green


Are you familiar with Monk? He was 2nd last season in pick and roll Ppp. Giannis would feast with Monk in the pick and roll. Playing those other guys are fine for a rebuilding team, but a team trying to compete would be superior with Monk instead of Rollins or Green.
User avatar
Thaddy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,867
And1: 3,994
Joined: Dec 12, 2022

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#28 » by Thaddy » Tue Sep 2, 2025 4:34 am

I would offer RJ Barrett straight up for Monk if the Kings would want Kuzma for him. Monk hasn't been on a winning team but he's a good scorer. I think him, IQ, and Ingram is enough scoring power to get to the finals in the East. Poeltl and Barnes can take care of defense.

Poeltl / CMB
Barnes / Mogbo
Ingram / Walter
Monk / Dick / Agbaji
IQ / Shead

I could see them getting fairly deep with that.
OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,715
And1: 1,368
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#29 » by OGSactownballer » Tue Sep 2, 2025 7:49 pm

Thaddy wrote:I would offer RJ Barrett straight up for Monk if the Kings would want Kuzma for him. Monk hasn't been on a winning team but he's a good scorer. I think him, IQ, and Ingram is enough scoring power to get to the finals in the East. Poeltl and Barnes can take care of defense.

Poeltl / CMB
Barnes / Mogbo
Ingram / Walter
Monk / Dick / Agbaji
IQ / Shead

I could see them getting fairly deep with that.


I’d be comfortable with this if a pick were included to offset the larger contract owed to RJ.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,349
And1: 25,534
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#30 » by Baddy Chuck » Tue Sep 2, 2025 11:39 pm

sackings916 wrote:
mlloyd10 wrote:What's the motivation for either team?

Monk is a chucker who isn't really good - Rather the Bucks just give those mins to Ryan Rollins/AJ Green


Are you familiar with Monk? He was 2nd last season in pick and roll Ppp. Giannis would feast with Monk in the pick and roll. Playing those other guys are fine for a rebuilding team, but a team trying to compete would be superior with Monk instead of Rollins or Green.

Image
Image
Image

What am I missing.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
sackings916
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,235
And1: 853
Joined: Sep 07, 2002

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#31 » by sackings916 » Tue Sep 2, 2025 11:58 pm

Baddy Chuck wrote:
sackings916 wrote:
mlloyd10 wrote:What's the motivation for either team?

Monk is a chucker who isn't really good - Rather the Bucks just give those mins to Ryan Rollins/AJ Green


Are you familiar with Monk? He was 2nd last season in pick and roll Ppp. Giannis would feast with Monk in the pick and roll. Playing those other guys are fine for a rebuilding team, but a team trying to compete would be superior with Monk instead of Rollins or Green.

Image
Image
Image

What am I missing.


The stat I was referring to was PPP in the pick and roll as the ball handler. Kyrie was 1st at 1.16, Monk and SGA were tied for 2nd at 1.14.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,349
And1: 25,534
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#32 » by Baddy Chuck » Wed Sep 3, 2025 12:05 am

sackings916 wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:
sackings916 wrote:
Are you familiar with Monk? He was 2nd last season in pick and roll Ppp. Giannis would feast with Monk in the pick and roll. Playing those other guys are fine for a rebuilding team, but a team trying to compete would be superior with Monk instead of Rollins or Green.

Spoiler:
Image
Image
Image


What am I missing.


The stat I was referring to was PPP in the pick and roll as the ball handler. Kyrie was 1st at 1.16, Monk and SGA were tied for 2nd at 1.14.

Are we not looking at exactly that right there where he was no higher than .91 PPP as a PNR ball handler the last three years.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
sackings916
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,235
And1: 853
Joined: Sep 07, 2002

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#33 » by sackings916 » Wed Sep 3, 2025 12:43 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
sackings916 wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:
Spoiler:
Image
Image
Image


What am I missing.


The stat I was referring to was PPP in the pick and roll as the ball handler. Kyrie was 1st at 1.16, Monk and SGA were tied for 2nd at 1.14.

Are we not looking at exactly that right there where he was no higher than .91 PPP as a PNR ball handler the last three years.


StatDefender posted the stat on X. They are a legit account I believe, so I’m not sure where the discrepancy is.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,349
And1: 25,534
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#34 » by Baddy Chuck » Wed Sep 3, 2025 1:08 am

sackings916 wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:
sackings916 wrote:
The stat I was referring to was PPP in the pick and roll as the ball handler. Kyrie was 1st at 1.16, Monk and SGA were tied for 2nd at 1.14.

Are we not looking at exactly that right there where he was no higher than .91 PPP as a PNR ball handler the last three years.


StatDefender posted the stat on X. They are a legit account I believe, so I’m not sure where the discrepancy is.

[x]
Read on Twitter
[/x]

?
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
sackings916
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,235
And1: 853
Joined: Sep 07, 2002

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#35 » by sackings916 » Wed Sep 3, 2025 1:10 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
sackings916 wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:
Spoiler:
Image
Image
Image


What am I missing.


The stat I was referring to was PPP in the pick and roll as the ball handler. Kyrie was 1st at 1.16, Monk and SGA were tied for 2nd at 1.14.

Are we not looking at exactly that right there where he was no higher than .91 PPP as a PNR ball handler the last three years.


[x]
Read on Twitter
[/x]
sackings916
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,235
And1: 853
Joined: Sep 07, 2002

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#36 » by sackings916 » Wed Sep 3, 2025 1:17 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
sackings916 wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:Are we not looking at exactly that right there where he was no higher than .91 PPP as a PNR ball handler the last three years.


StatDefender posted the stat on X. They are a legit account I believe, so I’m not sure where the discrepancy is.

[x]
Read on Twitter
[/x]

?


The one I posted specifically said as the ball handler, this one omits it? I’m not sure if there’s even a difference but that may be the discrepancy.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,349
And1: 25,534
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#37 » by Baddy Chuck » Wed Sep 3, 2025 1:33 am

sackings916 wrote:The one I posted specifically said as the ball handler, this one omits it? I’m not sure if there’s even a difference but that may be the discrepancy.

It's literally straight from NBA.com except your stat is from a 30ish game sample to start the season rather than the whole season since he posted that on Jan 6th. He regressed back to his (seemingly) very consistent norm of not being that exceptional in the pick and roll ball handler.

https://www.nba.com/stats/players/ball-handler?CF=POSS*GE*5&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&dir=D&sort=PPP

Here's literally his parameters of PPP of pick and roll ball handlers with more than 5 possessions a game. Malik Monk is right below Andrew Wiggins.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
sackings916
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,235
And1: 853
Joined: Sep 07, 2002

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#38 » by sackings916 » Wed Sep 3, 2025 1:45 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
sackings916 wrote:The one I posted specifically said as the ball handler, this one omits it? I’m not sure if there’s even a difference but that may be the discrepancy.

It's literally straight from NBA.com except your stat is from a 30ish game sample to start the season rather than the whole season since he posted that on Jan 6th. He regressed back to his (seemingly) very consistent norm of not being that exceptional in the pick and roll ball handler.

https://www.nba.com/stats/players/ball-handler?CF=POSS*GE*5&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&dir=D&sort=PPP

Here's literally his parameters of PPP of pick and roll ball handlers with more than 5 possessions a game. Malik Monk is right below Andrew Wiggins.


The same Andrew Wiggins from a 17 game sample size? The 2nd half of the Kings season was chaos - coaching change, star traded, Monk went from 6th man, to starting SG, back
To 6th man, then to starying PG all while trying to integrate a new lineup. Every stat can have added context. My point stands that Monk with the ball in his hands is extremely deadly in the pick and roll, both as a scorer and passer.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,349
And1: 25,534
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#39 » by Baddy Chuck » Wed Sep 3, 2025 2:08 am

sackings916 wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:
sackings916 wrote:The one I posted specifically said as the ball handler, this one omits it? I’m not sure if there’s even a difference but that may be the discrepancy.

It's literally straight from NBA.com except your stat is from a 30ish game sample to start the season rather than the whole season since he posted that on Jan 6th. He regressed back to his (seemingly) very consistent norm of not being that exceptional in the pick and roll ball handler.

https://www.nba.com/stats/players/ball-handler?CF=POSS*GE*5&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&dir=D&sort=PPP

Here's literally his parameters of PPP of pick and roll ball handlers with more than 5 possessions a game. Malik Monk is right below Andrew Wiggins.


The same Andrew Wiggins from a 17 game sample size? The 2nd half of the Kings season was chaos - coaching change, star traded, Monk went from 6th man, to starting SG, back
To 6th man, then to starying PG all while trying to integrate a new lineup. Every stat can have added context. My point stands that Monk with the ball in his hands is extremely deadly in the pick and roll, both as a scorer and passer.

The point stands, this Malik Monk that you called out someone for not knowing who he is and pointing to a limited stat has been pretty much the exact same PNR ball handler his last 3 seasons in Sacramento, and it hasn't been that great.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
sackings916
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,235
And1: 853
Joined: Sep 07, 2002

Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma) 

Post#40 » by sackings916 » Wed Sep 3, 2025 2:19 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
sackings916 wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:It's literally straight from NBA.com except your stat is from a 30ish game sample to start the season rather than the whole season since he posted that on Jan 6th. He regressed back to his (seemingly) very consistent norm of not being that exceptional in the pick and roll ball handler.

https://www.nba.com/stats/players/ball-handler?CF=POSS*GE*5&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&dir=D&sort=PPP

Here's literally his parameters of PPP of pick and roll ball handlers with more than 5 possessions a game. Malik Monk is right below Andrew Wiggins.


The same Andrew Wiggins from a 17 game sample size? The 2nd half of the Kings season was chaos - coaching change, star traded, Monk went from 6th man, to starting SG, back
To 6th man, then to starying PG all while trying to integrate a new lineup. Every stat can have added context. My point stands that Monk with the ball in his hands is extremely deadly in the pick and roll, both as a scorer and passer.

The point stands, this Malik Monk that you called out someone for not knowing who he is and pointing to a limited stat has been pretty much the exact same PNR ball handler his last 3 seasons in Sacramento, and it hasn't been that great.


My stat was “limited” because of a 30 game sample size, and the list you posted had even smaller sample sizes. My point to that poster was that those players he compared to Monk aren’t close to his caliber which is a fact.

Return to Trades and Transactions