ImageImageImageImageImage

This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention)

Moderators: og15, TrueLAfan

wco81
RealGM
Posts: 26,216
And1: 11,178
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#61 » by wco81 » Yesterday 8:06 pm

donemilio21 wrote:
TrueLAfan wrote:Part of the problem is that there's this incredibly mistaken idea that Super Wealthy People Are Super Smart About Money. And to be super nice about it, that’s not true a lot of the time. FTX is a perfect example. You don’t hear stories about Curry or Brady or other FTX investors getting blamed. They got ripped off. Their business people made bad decisions—which, rich or poor, people do.

I don’t know what Kawhi did. His Uncle was clearly looking for money and I think he or, by proxy, Kawhi may have taken a shady deal from a company that was ripping people off—even Steve Ballmer. It doesn’t excuse Kawhi and his team, but it makes their actions a whole lot less questionable. They didn’t know about this company

They weren't the only ones. Aspiration got over a quarter of a billion dollars in funding beyond Ballmer’s stake, and then more after that. Renren Chinese Media Conglomerate put in a huge amount. Leonardo DiCaprio is/was on the Board of Directors. David Bonderman, a founder and partner of TPG Capital, made a big investment. So did Frank Yeary, who ran Citigroup’s global mergers and acquisitions group. There are top businessmen. All of them lost big by having stock options in a company that got targeted by the Feds last year and filed Chapter 11 six months ago.

The Kawhi stuff, even if 100% true and bad, is small stuff. First, I think the Ballmer is angle is—nothing. What I’m supposed to get out of this is Ballmer lost a huge chunk of money because it was a way of avoiding cap penalties. Doesn’t make sense. If “This company is shady because of a $28 million deal with Kawhi Leonard!” is how you’re framing this, you’re missing out. Aspiration had a valuation of close to $2 billion in 2021, before the house of cards started to collapse. Kawhi’s deal was .014 of that.

And, yes, Ballmer was a backer, like all those other guys and groups. Did Aspitation offer a deal to Kawhi to get Ballmer’s (much larger) investment? Probably. Did Ballmer have anything beyond his investment to do or say about Kawhi’s deal? Unlikely. (Leonardo DiCaprio may have.) Did Kawhi get a deal for which he did little to nothing beyond being a name on a website? Probably. Is that illegal or uncommon? No. Was the company legit? No. Would Kawhi or Ballmer have known that? No. My .02.



Because Ballmer is very rich people tend to think he must be a genius. He became rich because he happened to know the right people and those people created a product that controlled 90% worlds business software use. Beyond that his tenure at Microsoft was average, company was stagnating and losing market share rapidly and had lots of failed endeavors. He became really rich after he was no longer in charge of Microsoft and the company's revenue, profits and subsequently it stock price skyrocketed. Remember, Ballmer thought Zune would be in everyone's pocket.


Yeah the thing is he was forced out of MS. If he stayed CEO, the stock wouldn't be worth nearly as much. Nadella made all the right bets, like cloud and now AI, which made MSFT stock go way up, which is why Ballmer is the richest owner in the NBA and probably all sports except for the Middle Easter sovereign wealth funds which own several big soccer clubs in England and Europe.

Ballmer basically allowed iPhone and then Android to take over the smart phone market, in which MS had first-mover advantage. He tried to play it off like nobody was going to go for touch screens instead of phones with keyboards. By the time MS tried to catch up with Windows Mobile 7 and 8, it was way too late.
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,116
And1: 4,843
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#62 » by esqtvd » Yesterday 8:11 pm

wco81 wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
wco81 wrote:Zach Lowe thinks light slap on the wrist.


I see no provable crime at all. Looks like these guys ripped Ballmer off for $50M.



Remember, the NBA rules do not require the kind of standards required in a court of law. Supposedly circumstantial evidence would meet the bar.

Lowe just thinks the NBA wouldn't want to come down too hard on Ballmer for whatever reason.

Otherwise, you would have to believe that this company decided on its own to throw a huge amount of money at KL to do nothing, that the "investment" Ballmer made had NOTHING to do with them giving KL almost the same amount of money.

I don't know the background of the people who ran this company, what kind of track record they had. Maybe they will cooperate with the NBA investigators and explain why they decided to give KL almost $50 million, without him having to do anything other than continuing to be on the Clippers.


Ballmer says Aspiration approached HIM for an introduction to Kawhi. If it was the other way around, he's LYING.



Sep 10, 2025 11:58 AM
Kawhi Leonard's Camp Asked Raptors For No-Show Endorsement Deal, Equity

During Kawhi Leonard's 2019 free agency, his uncle Dennis Robertson made demands to the Toronto Raptors that line up almost perfectly with the terms of the star player's endorsement deal with Aspiration, sources tell Bruce Arthur of The Toronto Star. Robertson reportedly requested that the Raptors trade for Paul George plus give them an ownership stake in the Toronto Maple Leafs.

Robertson also asked the Raptors for ownership stakes in outside companies associated with MLSE. The Raptors were also told they needed to match at least $10 million per year in additional sonship income. NBA teams are allowed to introduce players to team sponsors, but collective bargaining agreement rules prohibit them to negotiate those deals.

It was also communicated that Leonard didn't "want to do anything" as part of the endorsement deal.

MLSE realized that Leonard's camp wasn't asking for traditional sponsorship introductions, but no-show jobs instead. MLSE rejected those proposals.

Leonard's $7 million per year deal with Aspiration began in April 2022, which was a few months after he signed a contract extension with the Clippers. Both Steve Ballmer and the Clippers have denied any involvement in the deal beyond the initial introduction.

Bruce Arthur/Toronto Star
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,116
And1: 4,843
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#63 » by esqtvd » Yesterday 9:17 pm

og15 wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
wco81 wrote:Zach Lowe thinks light slap on the wrist.


I see no provable crime at all. Looks like these guys ripped Ballmer off for $50M.

NBA doesn't have the requirement of having to prove a crime. Now, they might "slap on the wrist" because they don't get enough information, but they can still scrutinize a lot of aspects, not doing due diligence, deal not being announced, team not pushing to know the details of the deal, Kawhi and co not sharing the details of the deal.

All the denials about intent can be done, but there's still a reality of a lot of negligence, and the NBA isn't in a situation where it has to prove you committed a crime for there to be a punishment.


Well, you do have to figure out at least what the crime IS.

Read on Twitter
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 26,216
And1: 11,178
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#64 » by wco81 » Yesterday 9:36 pm

He doesn't want to take FRPs from the Clippers after they're finally within sight of regaining control of their draft assets.
User avatar
MartinToVaught
RealGM
Posts: 15,720
And1: 17,792
Joined: Oct 19, 2014
     

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#65 » by MartinToVaught » 8 minutes ago

Read on Twitter


Sounds like Wong is being set up as the fall guy for this.
Image

Return to Los Angeles Clippers