ImageImageImageImageImage

This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention)

Moderators: og15, TrueLAfan

wco81
RealGM
Posts: 26,355
And1: 11,257
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#61 » by wco81 » Wed Sep 10, 2025 8:06 pm

donemilio21 wrote:
TrueLAfan wrote:Part of the problem is that there's this incredibly mistaken idea that Super Wealthy People Are Super Smart About Money. And to be super nice about it, that’s not true a lot of the time. FTX is a perfect example. You don’t hear stories about Curry or Brady or other FTX investors getting blamed. They got ripped off. Their business people made bad decisions—which, rich or poor, people do.

I don’t know what Kawhi did. His Uncle was clearly looking for money and I think he or, by proxy, Kawhi may have taken a shady deal from a company that was ripping people off—even Steve Ballmer. It doesn’t excuse Kawhi and his team, but it makes their actions a whole lot less questionable. They didn’t know about this company

They weren't the only ones. Aspiration got over a quarter of a billion dollars in funding beyond Ballmer’s stake, and then more after that. Renren Chinese Media Conglomerate put in a huge amount. Leonardo DiCaprio is/was on the Board of Directors. David Bonderman, a founder and partner of TPG Capital, made a big investment. So did Frank Yeary, who ran Citigroup’s global mergers and acquisitions group. There are top businessmen. All of them lost big by having stock options in a company that got targeted by the Feds last year and filed Chapter 11 six months ago.

The Kawhi stuff, even if 100% true and bad, is small stuff. First, I think the Ballmer is angle is—nothing. What I’m supposed to get out of this is Ballmer lost a huge chunk of money because it was a way of avoiding cap penalties. Doesn’t make sense. If “This company is shady because of a $28 million deal with Kawhi Leonard!” is how you’re framing this, you’re missing out. Aspiration had a valuation of close to $2 billion in 2021, before the house of cards started to collapse. Kawhi’s deal was .014 of that.

And, yes, Ballmer was a backer, like all those other guys and groups. Did Aspitation offer a deal to Kawhi to get Ballmer’s (much larger) investment? Probably. Did Ballmer have anything beyond his investment to do or say about Kawhi’s deal? Unlikely. (Leonardo DiCaprio may have.) Did Kawhi get a deal for which he did little to nothing beyond being a name on a website? Probably. Is that illegal or uncommon? No. Was the company legit? No. Would Kawhi or Ballmer have known that? No. My .02.



Because Ballmer is very rich people tend to think he must be a genius. He became rich because he happened to know the right people and those people created a product that controlled 90% worlds business software use. Beyond that his tenure at Microsoft was average, company was stagnating and losing market share rapidly and had lots of failed endeavors. He became really rich after he was no longer in charge of Microsoft and the company's revenue, profits and subsequently it stock price skyrocketed. Remember, Ballmer thought Zune would be in everyone's pocket.


Yeah the thing is he was forced out of MS. If he stayed CEO, the stock wouldn't be worth nearly as much. Nadella made all the right bets, like cloud and now AI, which made MSFT stock go way up, which is why Ballmer is the richest owner in the NBA and probably all sports except for the Middle Easter sovereign wealth funds which own several big soccer clubs in England and Europe.

Ballmer basically allowed iPhone and then Android to take over the smart phone market, in which MS had first-mover advantage. He tried to play it off like nobody was going to go for touch screens instead of phones with keyboards. By the time MS tried to catch up with Windows Mobile 7 and 8, it was way too late.
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,124
And1: 4,847
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#62 » by esqtvd » Wed Sep 10, 2025 8:11 pm

wco81 wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
wco81 wrote:Zach Lowe thinks light slap on the wrist.


I see no provable crime at all. Looks like these guys ripped Ballmer off for $50M.



Remember, the NBA rules do not require the kind of standards required in a court of law. Supposedly circumstantial evidence would meet the bar.

Lowe just thinks the NBA wouldn't want to come down too hard on Ballmer for whatever reason.

Otherwise, you would have to believe that this company decided on its own to throw a huge amount of money at KL to do nothing, that the "investment" Ballmer made had NOTHING to do with them giving KL almost the same amount of money.

I don't know the background of the people who ran this company, what kind of track record they had. Maybe they will cooperate with the NBA investigators and explain why they decided to give KL almost $50 million, without him having to do anything other than continuing to be on the Clippers.


Ballmer says Aspiration approached HIM for an introduction to Kawhi. If it was the other way around, he's LYING.



Sep 10, 2025 11:58 AM
Kawhi Leonard's Camp Asked Raptors For No-Show Endorsement Deal, Equity

During Kawhi Leonard's 2019 free agency, his uncle Dennis Robertson made demands to the Toronto Raptors that line up almost perfectly with the terms of the star player's endorsement deal with Aspiration, sources tell Bruce Arthur of The Toronto Star. Robertson reportedly requested that the Raptors trade for Paul George plus give them an ownership stake in the Toronto Maple Leafs.

Robertson also asked the Raptors for ownership stakes in outside companies associated with MLSE. The Raptors were also told they needed to match at least $10 million per year in additional sonship income. NBA teams are allowed to introduce players to team sponsors, but collective bargaining agreement rules prohibit them to negotiate those deals.

It was also communicated that Leonard didn't "want to do anything" as part of the endorsement deal.

MLSE realized that Leonard's camp wasn't asking for traditional sponsorship introductions, but no-show jobs instead. MLSE rejected those proposals.

Leonard's $7 million per year deal with Aspiration began in April 2022, which was a few months after he signed a contract extension with the Clippers. Both Steve Ballmer and the Clippers have denied any involvement in the deal beyond the initial introduction.

Bruce Arthur/Toronto Star
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,124
And1: 4,847
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#63 » by esqtvd » Wed Sep 10, 2025 9:17 pm

og15 wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
wco81 wrote:Zach Lowe thinks light slap on the wrist.


I see no provable crime at all. Looks like these guys ripped Ballmer off for $50M.

NBA doesn't have the requirement of having to prove a crime. Now, they might "slap on the wrist" because they don't get enough information, but they can still scrutinize a lot of aspects, not doing due diligence, deal not being announced, team not pushing to know the details of the deal, Kawhi and co not sharing the details of the deal.

All the denials about intent can be done, but there's still a reality of a lot of negligence, and the NBA isn't in a situation where it has to prove you committed a crime for there to be a punishment.


Well, you do have to figure out at least what the crime IS.

Read on Twitter
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 26,355
And1: 11,257
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#64 » by wco81 » Wed Sep 10, 2025 9:36 pm

He doesn't want to take FRPs from the Clippers after they're finally within sight of regaining control of their draft assets.
User avatar
MartinToVaught
RealGM
Posts: 15,724
And1: 17,795
Joined: Oct 19, 2014
     

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#65 » by MartinToVaught » Thu Sep 11, 2025 1:38 pm

Read on Twitter


Sounds like Wong is being set up as the fall guy for this.
Image
User avatar
donemilio21
Analyst
Posts: 3,123
And1: 848
Joined: Aug 20, 2009
Location: Santa Barbara
   

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#66 » by donemilio21 » Thu Sep 11, 2025 4:30 pm

MartinToVaught wrote:
Read on Twitter


Sounds like Wong is being set up as the fall guy for this.



there is a lot of smoke here. we can't deny it as Clippers fans. if anyone is to be the fall guy, it would have to be Kawhi. I can't stomach us losing bunch of FRPs while Kawhi goes unscathed if allegations turn out to be true. He would need to be punished in the tens of millions and also get a minimum 3 year ban.
Roscoe Sheed
RealGM
Posts: 11,344
And1: 5,262
Joined: May 01, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#67 » by Roscoe Sheed » Thu Sep 11, 2025 5:59 pm

donemilio21 wrote:
MartinToVaught wrote:
Read on Twitter


Sounds like Wong is being set up as the fall guy for this.



there is a lot of smoke here. we can't deny it as Clippers fans. if anyone is to be the fall guy, it would have to be Kawhi. I can't stomach us losing bunch of FRPs while Kawhi goes unscathed if allegations turn out to be true. He would need to be punished in the tens of millions and also get a minimum 3 year ban.

not condoning anyone's behavior- definitely seems sketchy, but we as Clipper fans cannot be pulling for any ban considering how important Kawhi is to the roster for the next 2 seasons
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,124
And1: 4,847
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#68 » by esqtvd » Thu Sep 11, 2025 7:03 pm

heh

Read on Twitter


But seriously, folks: It does seem to be a full-on Ponzi scheme, and Sports investigator Pablo Torre has a mole on the inside.

Read on Twitter
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
Clemenza
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,962
And1: 5,108
Joined: Jan 21, 2013
Location: California
   

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#69 » by Clemenza » Thu Sep 11, 2025 11:20 pm

Roscoe Sheed wrote:
donemilio21 wrote:
MartinToVaught wrote:
Read on Twitter


Sounds like Wong is being set up as the fall guy for this.



there is a lot of smoke here. we can't deny it as Clippers fans. if anyone is to be the fall guy, it would have to be Kawhi. I can't stomach us losing bunch of FRPs while Kawhi goes unscathed if allegations turn out to be true. He would need to be punished in the tens of millions and also get a minimum 3 year ban.

not condoning anyone's behavior- definitely seems sketchy, but we as Clipper fans cannot be pulling for any ban considering how important Kawhi is to the roster for the next 2 seasons

The problem is, what's the next scandal that will come to light from Kawhi and Uncle Dennis in these next two years if he goes unpunished? The next injury, the next time he sits out the 2nd half of a ballgame to the surprise of Lue and the entire team? How much longer are we going to be hostages under Kawhi/Uncle Dennis rule with no results to speak of on the court? I'd rather a punishment of his contract being voided and a huge fine that Ballmer has to pay than losing future picks.
User avatar
madmaxmedia
RealGM
Posts: 12,551
And1: 7,490
Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Location: SoCal
     

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#70 » by madmaxmedia » Thu Sep 11, 2025 11:22 pm

The new stuff regarding Clipper 1% owner and alternate franchise governor Dennis Wong smells pretty bad. Why would he invest $2M in a company that seems to already have been going down the tubes at the time? Again, we'll see...

Clippers co-owner Dennis Wong wired the now-bankrupt company just under $2 million on Dec. 6, 2022 - nine days before it sent an overdue payment of $1.75 million to Kawhi Leonard as part of Aspiration's contract with the forward, Pablo Torre reported Thursday on the "Pablo Torre Finds Out" podcast, citing bank statements.

The $1.75-million payment to Leonard on Dec. 15 was reportedly months late as Aspiration began running out of funds. That same day, the company laid off approximately 20% of its staff, a former finance department employee told Torre.

He owns 1% of the Clippers in contrast to Ballmer's 99%. Wong is also the vice-chairman and alternate governor of the franchise. He and Ballmer were roommates at Harvard during the 1970s and occasionally sit together courtside at Clippers games.


https://www.thescore.com/nba/news/3342940
User avatar
madmaxmedia
RealGM
Posts: 12,551
And1: 7,490
Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Location: SoCal
     

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#71 » by madmaxmedia » Thu Sep 11, 2025 11:26 pm

Clemenza wrote:
Roscoe Sheed wrote:
donemilio21 wrote:

there is a lot of smoke here. we can't deny it as Clippers fans. if anyone is to be the fall guy, it would have to be Kawhi. I can't stomach us losing bunch of FRPs while Kawhi goes unscathed if allegations turn out to be true. He would need to be punished in the tens of millions and also get a minimum 3 year ban.

not condoning anyone's behavior- definitely seems sketchy, but we as Clipper fans cannot be pulling for any ban considering how important Kawhi is to the roster for the next 2 seasons

The problem is, what's the next scandal that will come to light from Kawhi and Uncle Dennis in these next two years if he goes unpunished? The next injury, the next time he sits out the 2nd half of a ballgame to the surprise of Lue and the entire team? How much longer are we going to be hostages under Kawhi/Uncle Dennis rule with no results to speak of on the court? I'd rather a punishment of his contract being voided and a huge fine that Ballmer has to pay than losing future picks.


At the end of the day I am just rooting for as much of the facts to come out as possible, and a suitable punishment (or not) is levied based on that. It is starting to look pretty bad with the Wong stuff.
User avatar
MartinToVaught
RealGM
Posts: 15,724
And1: 17,795
Joined: Oct 19, 2014
     

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#72 » by MartinToVaught » Fri Sep 12, 2025 1:30 am

Roscoe Sheed wrote:not condoning anyone's behavior- definitely seems sketchy, but we as Clipper fans cannot be pulling for any ban considering how important Kawhi is to the roster for the next 2 seasons

No, enough of this, we need to be done with the Kawhi experience. At this stage of his career, come playoff time, we all know he'll either be in street clothes like he is most years or a glorified role player like he was against Denver. I don't care how nice his regular-season stats are in the five games he'll actually play.
Image
Roscoe Sheed
RealGM
Posts: 11,344
And1: 5,262
Joined: May 01, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#73 » by Roscoe Sheed » Fri Sep 12, 2025 2:04 am

MartinToVaught wrote:
Roscoe Sheed wrote:not condoning anyone's behavior- definitely seems sketchy, but we as Clipper fans cannot be pulling for any ban considering how important Kawhi is to the roster for the next 2 seasons

No, enough of this, we need to be done with the Kawhi experience. At this stage of his career, come playoff time, we all know he'll either be in street clothes like he is most years or a glorified role player like he was against Denver. I don't care how nice his regular-season stats are in the five games he'll actually play.

I actually like Kawhi as a player- he is a great 2 way player and carries himself well- never gloats and rarely whines. I really don't care about the supposed off court drama. Also, his knee seems to have stabilized- rarely missed games in the 2nd half of the season.

I am middle aged now and don't want seasons wasted- this team as currently constructed could be very good. Yes, are quite old, but very talented and deep. If his contract is voided and still counts against the cap, the team will be average at best and not worth watching.
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,124
And1: 4,847
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#74 » by esqtvd » Fri Sep 12, 2025 4:00 am

Roscoe Sheed wrote:
I am middle aged now and don't want seasons wasted- this team as currently constructed could be very good. Yes, are quite old, but very talented and deep. If his contract is voided and still counts against the cap, the team will be average at best and not worth watching.


Very interesting. Did you hear this anywhere? That's probably a proper punishment, IF THERE IS GENUINE HANKY-PANKY HERE*. Plus Ballmer banned from any contact with the team for a year. He's middle-aged too, and losing a year with his favorite plaything, not to mention missing out on 213's Last Gasp [Kawhi, Beard, CP3, Lopez] would be a pretty devastating punishment, without destroying the franchise's future for all us long-suffering fans by gutting our FRP for another decade.

As for Kawhi, I'm not sure that banning him for a year or more would stand up to a Players Union grievance, and frankly, losing $50 MILLION DOLLARS is way too harsh a punishment for anyone. But voiding the contract and making him an UFA would still put the hurt on him bigtime: Somebody will sign him, but certainly NOT for the 2yr/$100M that Ballmer owes him.

_______________________________________________

*In the ESPN interview, Ballmer said Aspiration asked for an introduction to Kawhi in order to throw millions of dollars at him for doing nothing. OK, fine, but If the Clippers initiated contact with Aspiration, and proposed or maintained any financial arrangement [the $2M re-investment from Dr. Wong], Nosferatu has enough to move on this and probably has to. That means Ballmer LIED on national TV and to the world.

That would be really bad.
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
User avatar
Sofia
GOTB: Mean Girls
Posts: 30,385
And1: 34,177
Joined: Aug 03, 2008

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#75 » by Sofia » Fri Sep 12, 2025 2:05 pm

I don’t care if Kawhi gets banned. I don’t care about Wong, ban him too.

Smash Balmers pockets. unfortunately, we should lose picks and cap flexibility too.

Cheating should not be tolerated.
lottery is rigged militia
President of the Pharmcat Fanclub
President of the GreatWhiteStiff Fanclub
Free OKCFanSinceSGA
Reddyplayerone = my RealGM bae
User avatar
madmaxmedia
RealGM
Posts: 12,551
And1: 7,490
Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Location: SoCal
     

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#76 » by madmaxmedia » Fri Sep 12, 2025 5:54 pm

esqtvd wrote:
Roscoe Sheed wrote:
I am middle aged now and don't want seasons wasted- this team as currently constructed could be very good. Yes, are quite old, but very talented and deep. If his contract is voided and still counts against the cap, the team will be average at best and not worth watching.


Very interesting. Did you hear this anywhere? That's probably a proper punishment, IF THERE IS GENUINE HANKY-PANKY HERE*. Plus Ballmer banned from any contact with the team for a year. He's middle-aged too, and losing a year with his favorite plaything, not to mention missing out on 213's Last Gasp [Kawhi, Beard, CP3, Lopez] would be a pretty devastating punishment, without destroying the franchise's future for all us long-suffering fans by gutting our FRP for another decade.

As for Kawhi, I'm not sure that banning him for a year or more would stand up to a Players Union grievance, and frankly, losing $50 MILLION DOLLARS is way too harsh a punishment for anyone. But voiding the contract and making him an UFA would still put the hurt on him bigtime: Somebody will sign him, but certainly NOT for the 2yr/$100M that Ballmer owes him.

_______________________________________________

*In the ESPN interview, Ballmer said Aspiration asked for an introduction to Kawhi in order to throw millions of dollars at him for doing nothing. OK, fine, but If the Clippers initiated contact with Aspiration, and proposed or maintained any financial arrangement [The $2M re-investment from Dr. Wong], Nosferatu has enough to move on this and probably has to. That means Ballmer LIED on national TV and to the world.

That would be really bad.


Sofia wrote:I don’t care if Kawhi gets banned. I don’t care about Wong, ban him too.

Smash Balmers pockets. unfortunately, we should lose picks and cap flexibility too.

Cheating should not be tolerated.


Hypothetically, if everything reported has been accurate (particularly the Dennis Wong stuff), I think the TWolves punishment would be a pretty good baseline for what the NBA might do-
1. Void Kawhi's contract
2. Dock a bunch of 1st round picks
3. Suspend Ballmer for a year

I don't think Kawhi's voided contract would count against the cap, but the Aspiration contract might be retroactively applied, along with whatever luxury tax and cap implications that would have.

It's less the cheating part (though that's pretty bad given the inherent advantages Ballmer already has) than the sheer stupidity that would really bother me most of all. Not just why you would decide to surreptitiously pay Kawhi an extra $28M when you're already signing him with torn ACL to a max deal, but the way you're going about doing it, and on top of that later providing a paper trail with the Dennis Wong investment to fund a late payment to Kawhi while the company is going down in flames.

I'm not surprised Pablo found ex-employees willing to talk, they're worrying about their next paycheck while Uncle Dennis is calling every other day about his $1.75M 'sponsorship' payment. I understand that this money was actually unrelated to the company and only funneled through it, but the optics are so bad. I think Paul George is going to fire up his podcast again, just to do a salty episode about this LOL.

Absolutely asinine on all counts, enough for me to be done with this franchise. Again, if everything reported so far ends up being verified.
Roscoe Sheed
RealGM
Posts: 11,344
And1: 5,262
Joined: May 01, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#77 » by Roscoe Sheed » Sat Sep 13, 2025 1:12 am

I find this Pablo guy to be quite obnoxious- so smug. He seems to derive special glee from revealing the sordid details. Hope he isn’t just focusing on the clippers- the Knicks seem suspicious too (I know he claims he will investigate them too- but nothing yet) and the Lakers- something about the Luka trade is really fishy
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,124
And1: 4,847
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#78 » by esqtvd » Sat Sep 13, 2025 5:15 am

Roscoe Sheed wrote:I find this Pablo guy to be quite obnoxious- so smug. He seems to derive special glee from revealing the sordid details. Hope he isn’t just focusing on the clippers- the Knicks seem suspicious too (I know he claims he will investigate them too- but nothing yet) and the Lakers- something about the Luka trade is really fishy


I haven't seen this Pablo guy talk but he's been humping for years under the radar as an investigative reporter scratching out a living. And now has maybe hit his career-making Woodward and Bernstein scoop {Nixon/Watergate, for those born after 1973]. He should be smug. The facts are the facts.

Bringing down a guy as big as Ballmer would be a journalistic Holy Grail. President Nixon was brought down over chickenspit, but he WAS guilty af. This $28 million to Kawhi is chickenspit, but it's enough to bring a billionaire down in a league that threw Sterling out for some loose talk to his betraying girlfriend.


I''m on record that I don't like the way Ballmer does business, especially betraying Blake after promising him to be a Clipper for Life. [I din't even like Blake and was glad he was traded, but that's not the point here.] Ballmer is a fraud. As wco81 wrote:

    Yeah the thing is he was forced out of [Microsoft]. If he stayed CEO, the stock wouldn't be worth nearly as much. Nadella made all the right bets, like cloud and now AI, which made MSFT stock go way up, which is why Ballmer is the richest owner in the NBA and probably all sports except for the Middle Easter sovereign wealth funds which own several big soccer clubs in England and Europe.

    Ballmer basically allowed iPhone and then Android to take over the smart phone market, in which MS had first-mover advantage. He tried to play it off like nobody was going to go for touch screens instead of phones with keyboards. By the time MS tried to catch up with Windows Mobile 7 and 8, it was way too late.

Let's see how this goes down. I don't think any NBA owner is gonna stand up for Ballmer, unless they're guilty of the same s**t and don't want it coming down on them. They have no sympathy for the RICHEST OWNER IN SPORTS. They know how he made his billions: Ballmer is a fraud who was in the right place at the right time with Microsoft. Every one of them thinks they could have done better. They have no respect for this clown.


Image
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
User avatar
MartinToVaught
RealGM
Posts: 15,724
And1: 17,795
Joined: Oct 19, 2014
     

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#79 » by MartinToVaught » Sat Sep 13, 2025 3:45 pm

Roscoe Sheed wrote:I find this Pablo guy to be quite obnoxious- so smug. He seems to derive special glee from revealing the sordid details. Hope he isn’t just focusing on the clippers- the Knicks seem suspicious too (I know he claims he will investigate them too- but nothing yet) and the Lakers- something about the Luka trade is really fishy

Yeah, I don't doubt his reporting and the work/research he put into it, but I agree, he does seem to be veering into unprofessionalism a bit with how giddy he seems to be over this story. It makes you wonder whether he's really invested in the integrity of the game or just sees this as his big break and is milking it as much as he can.

But that's what the media is nowadays, sports media in particular and the NBA's media most of all. Even the serious reporters like Pablo sadly have to do a bit of the Skip/Stephen A shtick to draw eyeballs.
Image
User avatar
MartinToVaught
RealGM
Posts: 15,724
And1: 17,795
Joined: Oct 19, 2014
     

Re: This seems really bad (Kawhi cap circumvention) 

Post#80 » by MartinToVaught » Sat Sep 13, 2025 4:01 pm

Sofia wrote:I don’t care if Kawhi gets banned. I don’t care about Wong, ban him too.

Smash Balmers pockets. unfortunately, we should lose picks and cap flexibility too.

Cheating should not be tolerated.

Taking away picks and cap flexibility only punishes the fanbase who had no control over any of this and future rosters/coaching staffs/front office personnel who weren't here to be involved in it. I know the Wolves got a ton of draft picks taken away for the Joe Smith debacle, but that was under Stern, and even he decided the punishment was too harsh and gave them some of their picks back later on. Silver is much softer than Stern ever was, so while I'm not expecting it, I don't think it's entirely out of the question that he avoids touching that side of things altogether.

Kawhi should absolutely be banned. Not only for this, but also for soliciting similar deals from other teams in free agency (as confirmed by the Raptors' owner), which means he can't really pretend to be ignorant of the cap circumvention angle. Banning Uncle Dennis is also a no-brainer. I don't know how any of Kawhi's teams put up with that jackass for as long as they have. Ballmer and Wong might need to be banned too and will definitely need to pay a massive fine. That would be punishing the people who actually did it.

If we had won a championship from this, I'd be favor of pulling the banner down like what happened to Louisville's 2013 title, but what makes this all so painfully Clipperesque is that Ballmer and Kawhi did all this shady dealing and then couldn't even win a playoff series. :banghead:
Image

Return to Los Angeles Clippers