El Turco wrote:Unwritten rule? As far as I know spitting is considered assault irl.
Yeah, and if you hit it's battery.
Moderator: bwgood77
El Turco wrote:Unwritten rule? As far as I know spitting is considered assault irl.
Jaydubb wrote:QB_Eagles wrote:Mr B wrote:He should have got at least 1 game for conduct detrimental to the league. The ejection was justified but actually being suspended for 1 game would have been justified.
Oh well. I’m sure the thug will do something else before the end of the year to get suspended. I bet he beats his girlfriend (or boyfriend).
Dak spat first, so they would have had to suspend him as well, because lack of accuracy does not protect from punishment.
Also it's Cowboys players not Eagles players who are regularly in the news for domestic abuse. Maybe you got confused there.
Lack of accuracy lmaaaaaoooo
QB_Eagles wrote:Mr B wrote:Jaydubb wrote:?s=46&t=X4mGciWoUMZElbjz_UjkcA
As expected, Jalen Carter will not be suspended further games. Like I said before, missing the entire game 1 is basically a suspension anyway and the league agrees.
He should have got at least 1 game for conduct detrimental to the league. The ejection was justified but actually being suspended for 1 game would have been justified.
Oh well. I’m sure the thug will do something else before the end of the year to get suspended. I bet he beats his girlfriend (or boyfriend).
Dak spat first, so they would have had to suspend him as well, because lack of accuracy does not protect from punishment.
Also it's Cowboys players not Eagles players who are regularly in the news for domestic abuse. Maybe you got confused there.
El Turco wrote:azcatz11 wrote:QB_Eagles wrote:Dak spat first, so they would have had to suspend him as well, because lack of accuracy does not protect from punishment.
Also it's Cowboys players not Eagles players who are regularly in the news for domestic abuse. Maybe you got confused there.
More than 1 game would have been ridiculous. Tyreek Hill is suiting up this weekend and he has like 11 allegations against him lol. Yes, spitting is bad but it's more of an unwritten rule thing that doesn't deserve insane punishments.
Unwritten rule? As far as I know spitting is considered assault irl.
Jaydubb wrote:QB_Eagles wrote:Mr B wrote:He should have got at least 1 game for conduct detrimental to the league. The ejection was justified but actually being suspended for 1 game would have been justified.
Oh well. I’m sure the thug will do something else before the end of the year to get suspended. I bet he beats his girlfriend (or boyfriend).
Dak spat first, so they would have had to suspend him as well, because lack of accuracy does not protect from punishment.
Also it's Cowboys players not Eagles players who are regularly in the news for domestic abuse. Maybe you got confused there.
Lack of accuracy lmaaaaaoooo
QB_Eagles wrote:Jaydubb wrote:QB_Eagles wrote:Dak spat first, so they would have had to suspend him as well, because lack of accuracy does not protect from punishment.
Also it's Cowboys players not Eagles players who are regularly in the news for domestic abuse. Maybe you got confused there.
Lack of accuracy lmaaaaaoooo
If Iran fired an ICBM at Mr B's house it would be an international incident whether they hit his domicile or not.
Mr B wrote:El Turco wrote:azcatz11 wrote:
More than 1 game would have been ridiculous. Tyreek Hill is suiting up this weekend and he has like 11 allegations against him lol. Yes, spitting is bad but it's more of an unwritten rule thing that doesn't deserve insane punishments.
Unwritten rule? As far as I know spitting is considered assault irl.
Mr B wrote:QB_Eagles wrote:Jaydubb wrote:Lack of accuracy lmaaaaaoooo
If Iran fired an ICBM at Mr B's house it would be an international incident whether they hit his domicile or not.
You wouldn’t consider Iran firing a missle at the U.S. and international incident?
QB_Eagles wrote:Mr B wrote:El Turco wrote:
Unwritten rule? As far as I know spitting is considered assault irl.
"Spitting in a public place, without making contact with a person"... that's what Dak did.
QB_Eagles wrote:Mr B wrote:El Turco wrote:
Unwritten rule? As far as I know spitting is considered assault irl.
"Spitting in a public place, without making contact with a person"... that's what Dak did.
QB_Eagles wrote:Mr B wrote:QB_Eagles wrote:If Iran fired an ICBM at Mr B's house it would be an international incident whether they hit his domicile or not.
You wouldn’t consider Iran firing a missle at the U.S. and international incident?
I would. But you seem to think Iran firing a ballistic missile into Newark Bay wouldn't be a provocation.
Mr B wrote:QB_Eagles wrote:Mr B wrote:
"Spitting in a public place, without making contact with a person"... that's what Dak did.
Spitting in a public place, without making contact with a person “MAY be considered disorderly conduct. “
Where as spitting ON a person is considered assault.
Mr B wrote:QB_Eagles wrote:Mr B wrote:You wouldn’t consider Iran firing a missle at the U.S. and international incident?
I would. But you seem to think Iran firing a ballistic missile into Newark Bay wouldn't be a provocation.
So you’re comparing spit to a ballistic missile. Got it! Lol
QB_Eagles wrote:Mr B wrote:QB_Eagles wrote:"Spitting in a public place, without making contact with a person"... that's what Dak did.
Spitting in a public place, without making contact with a person “MAY be considered disorderly conduct. “
Where as spitting ON a person is considered assault.
Turns out the Cowboys-supporting police is lying:
https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/pe/htm/pe.22.htm
It only mentions saliva in regards to sexual assault and harassment of a public official.
Spitting as an "offensive gesture" can fall under disorderly conduct, but it is immaterial whether the saliva hits a person.
azcatz11 wrote:Mr B wrote:QB_Eagles wrote:I would. But you seem to think Iran firing a ballistic missile into Newark Bay wouldn't be a provocation.
So you’re comparing spit to a ballistic missile. Got it! Lol
How many games were you looking for? Just an additional so 2 total?
Mr B wrote:azcatz11 wrote:Mr B wrote:So you’re comparing spit to a ballistic missile. Got it! Lol
How many games were you looking for? Just an additional so 2 total?
What are you talking about?
Are you asking how many games I think the Cowboys will win?
Mr B wrote:QB_Eagles wrote:Mr B wrote:Spitting in a public place, without making contact with a person “MAY be considered disorderly conduct. “
Where as spitting ON a person is considered assault.
Turns out the Cowboys-supporting police is lying:
https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/pe/htm/pe.22.htm
It only mentions saliva in regards to sexual assault and harassment of a public official.
Spitting as an "offensive gesture" can fall under disorderly conduct, but it is immaterial whether the saliva hits a person.
You spit on someone in Texas and you’re likely to get shot or stomped out, or both.
Mr B wrote:QB_Eagles wrote:Mr B wrote:Spitting in a public place, without making contact with a person “MAY be considered disorderly conduct. “
Where as spitting ON a person is considered assault.
Turns out the Cowboys-supporting police is lying:
https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/pe/htm/pe.22.htm
It only mentions saliva in regards to sexual assault and harassment of a public official.
Spitting as an "offensive gesture" can fall under disorderly conduct, but it is immaterial whether the saliva hits a person.
You spit on someone in Texas and you’re likely to get shot or stomped out, or both.
Mamba Mentality wrote:Lost Purdy, Kittle, and Jennings in one week. CMC was also held out of practice today, probably just precautionary, but it wouldn't suprise anyone if he ended up missing time. This season is ****.
Return to The General NFL Board