MrMiyagi wrote:sunskerr wrote:Any interest in just doing 15 man rosters with no IL this year? Helps tanking teams quite a bit in evaluating prospects year long.
Possibly bump the keepers up to 8 to further help tanking teams keep more prospects.
If the 15 man makes it easier so you don't have to manage who is active or not, sure. I don't care either way about the keepers.
It just removes the silliness from all this IL discussion and gives (a tiny amount of) value to deep prospects who should be rostered by teams but arent because it lets teams stash players better since theyd be able to keep 3 extra players for at least a year.
I know people will complain about "the waiver being barren" but here's the catch - it's already barren as it is. Hardly anyone is picking up replacement level guys - most breakouts happen at the beginning of the year.
Also as for keepers I think the pick 7/8 is hurting rebuilding teams because they can't keep entire rosters of prospects year to year. With keep 7/8 the top teams also forced to just enter this kind of consolidation game where they want to keep upgrading in 2 for 1 trades to stay at 7-8 guys.
Ill probably force 15 since in the new h2h format this will force competitive teams to choose to spend those extra spots on prospects or vets to get maximum weekly games in. Ideally this leads to competitive teams rostering vets/streaming and the prospects/stashes get left to rebuilding teams.
Probably can't do anything about keepers right now without a vote lol I know people hate change but I don't think what we're doing right now is the best thing for the league.