bay2hk wrote:Twinkie defense wrote:If Kuminga's value is that low the Warriors are better off resigning him (to a reasonable dollar and years deal) and using him in trade as an expiring contract.
No, the practical move to make is force JK sign the QO and force him to earn his next contract. We still own his birds rights next offseason even if he signs the QO and can facilitate a S&T if it’s worth it.
I bet warriors are secretly hoping JK rejects their current offer and sign the QO. Warriors FO and most fans don’t want him on $25m per year over 3 years. It’s going to be a negative contract if warriors give him that much.
I agree that $25 mil per over three years is a negative contract and would hamstring the Warriors, just when they need to maximize their assets.
But three years at $18 mil or two years in the low 20s are tradeable contracts that don't carry so much risk for the Warriors, while also giving Kuminga a hefty raise.
The problem with the QO for the Warriors is, because of the rules limiting how trades work for teams over the cap and up against the aprons, they really need a ~$20 mil, positive-value contract on the books to facilitate a trade to improve the team for Curry's twilight seasons.
The other attractive trade pieces they have - future first round picks, they'd need to attach salary to them to get a player in return. Young, positive-value players like Podz and Post, Warriors need them and their salary slots are too small to bring back an impact player.
Currently the Warriors roster is filled with guys with fat salaries who they can't do without. Or guys they can potentially do without but who don't make enough to bring back a great player even if they are sent out with a bunch of prime picks.