ImageImageImageImageImage

Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread

Moderator: JaysRule15

Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 39,972
And1: 21,996
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2101 » by Randle McMurphy » Fri Sep 26, 2025 2:10 am

Read on Twitter


The trade was won on this swing alone. What a player. The real MVP.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 12,870
And1: 9,955
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2102 » by PushDaRock » Fri Sep 26, 2025 2:13 am

Randle McMurphy wrote:
Read on Twitter


The trade was won on this swing alone. What a player. The real MVP.


Varsho 2.0 WAR > Moreno 2.6 WAR

MVP MVP MVP
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 39,972
And1: 21,996
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2103 » by Randle McMurphy » Fri Sep 26, 2025 2:17 am

:
PushDaRock wrote:
Randle McMurphy wrote:
Read on Twitter


The trade was won on this swing alone. What a player. The real MVP.


Varsho 2.0 WAR > Moreno 2.6 WAR

MVP MVP MVP

Kirk better +

Read on Twitter



50+ HR pace from the real MVP. They miss the playoffs without him.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 12,870
And1: 9,955
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2104 » by PushDaRock » Fri Sep 26, 2025 2:30 am

Randle McMurphy wrote::
PushDaRock wrote:
Randle McMurphy wrote:
Read on Twitter


The trade was won on this swing alone. What a player. The real MVP.


Varsho 2.0 WAR > Moreno 2.6 WAR

MVP MVP MVP

Kirk better +

Read on Twitter



50+ HR pace from the real MVP. They miss the playoffs without him.


52-39 Without the MVP
39-29 with the MVP

They would be doomed without him!!!
brwnman
Junior
Posts: 379
And1: 196
Joined: Dec 22, 2005
     

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2105 » by brwnman » Fri Sep 26, 2025 11:58 am

He’s actually the reason they’re likely going to lose the division. The Jays got stretch happened when he was out and they started tailing off as he was coming back because players knew an inferior player would be stealing their job soon.

It’s a direct correlation.
brwnman
Junior
Posts: 379
And1: 196
Joined: Dec 22, 2005
     

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2106 » by brwnman » Fri Sep 26, 2025 11:59 am

brwnman wrote:Alejandro Kirk
BA .285
OBP .352
OPS .759
OPS+ 109
SB 1
HR/162 - 15.5
bWAR/162 - 2.46
fWAR/162 - 5.44


Gabriel Moreno
BA .291
OBP .354
OPS .804
OPS+ 120
SB 2
HR/162 - 18.9
bWAR/162 - 3.37
fWAR/162 - 5.89


What they gonna say now?


Yep.. Kirk better. :lol:
User avatar
LLJ
RealGM
Posts: 53,873
And1: 18,139
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Unfixed

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2107 » by LLJ » Sun Sep 28, 2025 11:51 pm

Stats be damned. Kirk and Varsho really came through with big hits in the past few games
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 39,972
And1: 21,996
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2108 » by Randle McMurphy » Mon Sep 29, 2025 12:03 am

LLJ wrote:Stats be damned. Kirk and Varsho really came through with big hits in the past few games

Read on Twitter


They came up with the two biggest hits of the season. Their haters have been exposed and vanquished for all time, never to return.

What a trade.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 39,972
And1: 21,996
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2109 » by Randle McMurphy » Mon Sep 29, 2025 12:06 am

brwnman wrote:
brwnman wrote:Alejandro Kirk
BA .285
OBP .352
OPS .759
OPS+ 109
SB 1
HR/162 - 15.5
bWAR/162 - 2.46
fWAR/162 - 5.44


Gabriel Moreno
BA .291
OBP .354
OPS .804
OPS+ 120
SB 2
HR/162 - 18.9
bWAR/162 - 3.37
fWAR/162 - 5.89


What they gonna say now?


Yep.. Kirk better. :lol:

Kirk better? No, Kirk best.

Read on Twitter
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
brwnman
Junior
Posts: 379
And1: 196
Joined: Dec 22, 2005
     

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2110 » by brwnman » Mon Sep 29, 2025 1:57 am

Oh the argument now is… “IGNORE THE STATS!” - keep moving them goal posts folks. 3 straight years that the Jays have lost this trade.
s e n s i
RealGM
Posts: 17,105
And1: 3,633
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2111 » by s e n s i » Mon Sep 29, 2025 2:14 am

brwnman wrote:Oh the argument now is… “IGNORE THE STATS!” - keep moving them goal posts folks. 3 straight years that the Jays have lost this trade.


people, this here

a real life post from a real life person

on the same day the jays win the division thanks in part to two of the main subjects of this thread

at least marty york can be considered “entertainment”
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.

Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
User avatar
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 66,632
And1: 61,548
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2112 » by Raps in 4 » Mon Sep 29, 2025 2:17 am

Gabriel Bustreno: 2.7 fWAR (in 82 games)

Captain Kirk: 4.3 fWAR (in 129 games)

Daulton "Mike Trout" Varsho: 2.2 fWAR (in 70 games)

In all seriousness though, Moreno and Varsho had pretty much identical seasons, and Kirk wasn't even part of the trade. This trade was still a wash. It filled a position of need, but I still feel Moreno could have landed a player better than Varsho.

But then, we're in the playoffs, so who cares.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 39,972
And1: 21,996
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2113 » by Randle McMurphy » Mon Sep 29, 2025 2:26 am

brwnman wrote:Oh the argument now is… “IGNORE THE STATS!” - keep moving them goal posts folks. 3 straight years that the Jays have lost this trade.

It’s done. You’ve lost and nobody is buying it anymore.

One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Mehar
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,716
And1: 3,204
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2114 » by Mehar » Mon Sep 29, 2025 4:26 am

Raps in 4 wrote:Gabriel Bustreno: 2.7 fWAR (in 82 games)

Captain Kirk: 4.3 fWAR (in 129 games)

Daulton "Mike Trout" Varsho: 2.2 fWAR (in 70 games)

In all seriousness though, Moreno and Varsho had pretty much identical seasons, and Kirk wasn't even part of the trade. This trade was still a wash. It filled a position of need, but I still feel Moreno could have landed a player better than Varsho.

But then, we're in the playoffs, so who cares.

The trade was Gurriel and Moreno for Varsho. For the millionth F'n time, if people want to discuss the trade- why is Kirk discussed like he was a part of the trade and acquired from Arizona? He was already an all-star here in 2022. Kirk struggled in 2023 and 2024 and I trashed him for being mediocre offensively for two seasons; but he has returned to his 2022 form, and I salute him for being the contributor he was especially in today's game.

Gurriel missed the past 4 weeks to injury, while both Varsho and Moreno missed almost two months to injury also this year. Once again, the trade was Varsho for Gurriel and Moreno. It was a 2 for 1 trade. Kirk should not even be discussed as part of the trade. You can discuss Varsho vs. Moreno and Gurriel, but Kirk was already an all-star here in 2022 and not a part of the deal. Leave him out of the trade discussion once again.
brwnman
Junior
Posts: 379
And1: 196
Joined: Dec 22, 2005
     

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2115 » by brwnman » Mon Sep 29, 2025 3:06 pm

s e n s i wrote:
brwnman wrote:Oh the argument now is… “IGNORE THE STATS!” - keep moving them goal posts folks. 3 straight years that the Jays have lost this trade.


people, this here

a real life post from a real life person

on the same day the jays win the division thanks in part to two of the main subjects of this thread

at least marty york can be considered “entertainment”


When stats and facts don't support your argument; it's "let me enjoy this moment. :cry:"
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 39,972
And1: 21,996
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2116 » by Randle McMurphy » Mon Sep 29, 2025 4:35 pm

Read on Twitter


The best catcher in Jays history. They chose well.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
s e n s i
RealGM
Posts: 17,105
And1: 3,633
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2117 » by s e n s i » Mon Sep 29, 2025 5:19 pm

brwnman wrote:
s e n s i wrote:
brwnman wrote:Oh the argument now is… “IGNORE THE STATS!” - keep moving them goal posts folks. 3 straight years that the Jays have lost this trade.


people, this here

a real life post from a real life person

on the same day the jays win the division thanks in part to two of the main subjects of this thread

at least marty york can be considered “entertainment”


When stats and facts don't support your argument; it's "let me enjoy this moment. :cry:"


my argument has been for 2 years, that it was and always will be hilarious that people called this trade "the worst in baseball history" after "gabriel moreno" had a two-week hot streak in october after which people penciled him in for cooperstown. he ultimately ended that postseason with a 101 wRC+. there are plenty of stats and facts that support that 1) the trade was nowhere close to being bad (let alone a historically bad one) and 2) that gabriel moreno is not going to the hall of fame.
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.

Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
User avatar
JaysRule15
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 24,265
And1: 120,663
Joined: Dec 26, 2011
Location: Malvern Crew
       

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2118 » by JaysRule15 » Mon Sep 29, 2025 5:20 pm

brwnman wrote:
s e n s i wrote:
brwnman wrote:Oh the argument now is… “IGNORE THE STATS!” - keep moving them goal posts folks. 3 straight years that the Jays have lost this trade.


people, this here

a real life post from a real life person

on the same day the jays win the division thanks in part to two of the main subjects of this thread

at least marty york can be considered “entertainment”


When stats and facts don't support your argument; it's "let me enjoy this moment. :cry:"


If you're going to make a proper argument arguing why you feel the trade was bad, by all means go for it. But please refrain from personal attacks or baiting. Your recent posts have gotten a couple reports already. We have this thread to keep the Varsho trade debate isolated in a single spot, but if it stops being a debate and becomes a name-calling contest, this thread will be locked.
Image
Fairview4Life
RealGM
Posts: 70,139
And1: 33,990
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
     

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2119 » by Fairview4Life » Mon Sep 29, 2025 5:23 pm

Moreno with 1 more stolen base than Kirk lol.
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
User avatar
JaysRule15
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 24,265
And1: 120,663
Joined: Dec 26, 2011
Location: Malvern Crew
       

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread 

Post#2120 » by JaysRule15 » Mon Sep 29, 2025 5:24 pm

Mehar wrote:
Raps in 4 wrote:Gabriel Bustreno: 2.7 fWAR (in 82 games)

Captain Kirk: 4.3 fWAR (in 129 games)

Daulton "Mike Trout" Varsho: 2.2 fWAR (in 70 games)

In all seriousness though, Moreno and Varsho had pretty much identical seasons, and Kirk wasn't even part of the trade. This trade was still a wash. It filled a position of need, but I still feel Moreno could have landed a player better than Varsho.

But then, we're in the playoffs, so who cares.

The trade was Gurriel and Moreno for Varsho. For the millionth F'n time, if people want to discuss the trade- why is Kirk discussed like he was a part of the trade and acquired from Arizona? He was already an all-star here in 2022. Kirk struggled in 2023 and 2024 and I trashed him for being mediocre offensively for two seasons; but he has returned to his 2022 form, and I salute him for being the contributor he was especially in today's game.

Gurriel missed the past 4 weeks to injury, while both Varsho and Moreno missed almost two months to injury also this year. Once again, the trade was Varsho for Gurriel and Moreno. It was a 2 for 1 trade. Kirk should not even be discussed as part of the trade. You can discuss Varsho vs. Moreno and Gurriel, but Kirk was already an all-star here in 2022 and not a part of the deal. Leave him out of the trade discussion once again.


While I agree with the sentiment that Kirk's production shouldn't be completely counted as a return from the Varsho trade, you do have to look at Kirk's production as part of the full context. At the time of the trade, Moreno's value was high and Kirk's value was declining and his production had dipped. The front office made the bet that Kirk would improve and went with him over Moreno. If Kirk was the one traded over Moreno, we would lose whatever Kirk has done for us this season. And who's to say what Moreno would've done for us in a tougher division during a pennant chase.

That's why it's so hard to look at these type of trades in a vacuum.
Image

Return to Toronto Blue Jays