Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
Moderator: JaysRule15
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,972
- And1: 21,996
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,870
- And1: 9,955
- Joined: Jun 22, 2011
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
Randle McMurphy wrote:
The trade was won on this swing alone. What a player. The real MVP.
Varsho 2.0 WAR > Moreno 2.6 WAR
MVP MVP MVP
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,972
- And1: 21,996
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
:
Kirk better +
50+ HR pace from the real MVP. They miss the playoffs without him.
PushDaRock wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:
The trade was won on this swing alone. What a player. The real MVP.
Varsho 2.0 WAR > Moreno 2.6 WAR
MVP MVP MVP
Kirk better +
50+ HR pace from the real MVP. They miss the playoffs without him.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,870
- And1: 9,955
- Joined: Jun 22, 2011
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
Randle McMurphy wrote::PushDaRock wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:
The trade was won on this swing alone. What a player. The real MVP.
Varsho 2.0 WAR > Moreno 2.6 WAR
MVP MVP MVP
Kirk better +
50+ HR pace from the real MVP. They miss the playoffs without him.
52-39 Without the MVP
39-29 with the MVP
They would be doomed without him!!!
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
-
- Junior
- Posts: 379
- And1: 196
- Joined: Dec 22, 2005
-
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
He’s actually the reason they’re likely going to lose the division. The Jays got stretch happened when he was out and they started tailing off as he was coming back because players knew an inferior player would be stealing their job soon.
It’s a direct correlation.
It’s a direct correlation.
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
-
- Junior
- Posts: 379
- And1: 196
- Joined: Dec 22, 2005
-
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
brwnman wrote:Alejandro Kirk
BA .285
OBP .352
OPS .759
OPS+ 109
SB 1
HR/162 - 15.5
bWAR/162 - 2.46
fWAR/162 - 5.44
Gabriel Moreno
BA .291
OBP .354
OPS .804
OPS+ 120
SB 2
HR/162 - 18.9
bWAR/162 - 3.37
fWAR/162 - 5.89
What they gonna say now?
Yep.. Kirk better.

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
- LLJ
- RealGM
- Posts: 53,873
- And1: 18,139
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: Unfixed
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
Stats be damned. Kirk and Varsho really came through with big hits in the past few games
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,972
- And1: 21,996
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
LLJ wrote:Stats be damned. Kirk and Varsho really came through with big hits in the past few games
They came up with the two biggest hits of the season. Their haters have been exposed and vanquished for all time, never to return.
What a trade.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,972
- And1: 21,996
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
brwnman wrote:brwnman wrote:Alejandro Kirk
BA .285
OBP .352
OPS .759
OPS+ 109
SB 1
HR/162 - 15.5
bWAR/162 - 2.46
fWAR/162 - 5.44
Gabriel Moreno
BA .291
OBP .354
OPS .804
OPS+ 120
SB 2
HR/162 - 18.9
bWAR/162 - 3.37
fWAR/162 - 5.89
What they gonna say now?
Yep.. Kirk better.
Kirk better? No, Kirk best.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
-
- Junior
- Posts: 379
- And1: 196
- Joined: Dec 22, 2005
-
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
Oh the argument now is… “IGNORE THE STATS!” - keep moving them goal posts folks. 3 straight years that the Jays have lost this trade.
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,105
- And1: 3,633
- Joined: Mar 19, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
brwnman wrote:Oh the argument now is… “IGNORE THE STATS!” - keep moving them goal posts folks. 3 straight years that the Jays have lost this trade.
people, this here
a real life post from a real life person
on the same day the jays win the division thanks in part to two of the main subjects of this thread
at least marty york can be considered “entertainment”
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.
Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
- Raps in 4
- RealGM
- Posts: 66,632
- And1: 61,548
- Joined: Nov 01, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
Gabriel Bustreno: 2.7 fWAR (in 82 games)
Captain Kirk: 4.3 fWAR (in 129 games)
Daulton "Mike Trout" Varsho: 2.2 fWAR (in 70 games)
In all seriousness though, Moreno and Varsho had pretty much identical seasons, and Kirk wasn't even part of the trade. This trade was still a wash. It filled a position of need, but I still feel Moreno could have landed a player better than Varsho.
But then, we're in the playoffs, so who cares.
Captain Kirk: 4.3 fWAR (in 129 games)
Daulton "Mike Trout" Varsho: 2.2 fWAR (in 70 games)
In all seriousness though, Moreno and Varsho had pretty much identical seasons, and Kirk wasn't even part of the trade. This trade was still a wash. It filled a position of need, but I still feel Moreno could have landed a player better than Varsho.
But then, we're in the playoffs, so who cares.
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,972
- And1: 21,996
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
brwnman wrote:Oh the argument now is… “IGNORE THE STATS!” - keep moving them goal posts folks. 3 straight years that the Jays have lost this trade.
It’s done. You’ve lost and nobody is buying it anymore.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,717
- And1: 3,204
- Joined: Apr 23, 2012
- Location: Toronto, ON
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
Raps in 4 wrote:Gabriel Bustreno: 2.7 fWAR (in 82 games)
Captain Kirk: 4.3 fWAR (in 129 games)
Daulton "Mike Trout" Varsho: 2.2 fWAR (in 70 games)
In all seriousness though, Moreno and Varsho had pretty much identical seasons, and Kirk wasn't even part of the trade. This trade was still a wash. It filled a position of need, but I still feel Moreno could have landed a player better than Varsho.
But then, we're in the playoffs, so who cares.
The trade was Gurriel and Moreno for Varsho. For the millionth F'n time, if people want to discuss the trade- why is Kirk discussed like he was a part of the trade and acquired from Arizona? He was already an all-star here in 2022. Kirk struggled in 2023 and 2024 and I trashed him for being mediocre offensively for two seasons; but he has returned to his 2022 form, and I salute him for being the contributor he was especially in today's game.
Gurriel missed the past 4 weeks to injury, while both Varsho and Moreno missed almost two months to injury also this year. Once again, the trade was Varsho for Gurriel and Moreno. It was a 2 for 1 trade. Kirk should not even be discussed as part of the trade. You can discuss Varsho vs. Moreno and Gurriel, but Kirk was already an all-star here in 2022 and not a part of the deal. Leave him out of the trade discussion once again.
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
-
- Junior
- Posts: 379
- And1: 196
- Joined: Dec 22, 2005
-
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
s e n s i wrote:brwnman wrote:Oh the argument now is… “IGNORE THE STATS!” - keep moving them goal posts folks. 3 straight years that the Jays have lost this trade.
people, this here
a real life post from a real life person
on the same day the jays win the division thanks in part to two of the main subjects of this thread
at least marty york can be considered “entertainment”
When stats and facts don't support your argument; it's "let me enjoy this moment.

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,972
- And1: 21,996
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,105
- And1: 3,633
- Joined: Mar 19, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
brwnman wrote:s e n s i wrote:brwnman wrote:Oh the argument now is… “IGNORE THE STATS!” - keep moving them goal posts folks. 3 straight years that the Jays have lost this trade.
people, this here
a real life post from a real life person
on the same day the jays win the division thanks in part to two of the main subjects of this thread
at least marty york can be considered “entertainment”
When stats and facts don't support your argument; it's "let me enjoy this moment."
my argument has been for 2 years, that it was and always will be hilarious that people called this trade "the worst in baseball history" after "gabriel moreno" had a two-week hot streak in october after which people penciled him in for cooperstown. he ultimately ended that postseason with a 101 wRC+. there are plenty of stats and facts that support that 1) the trade was nowhere close to being bad (let alone a historically bad one) and 2) that gabriel moreno is not going to the hall of fame.
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.
Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
- JaysRule15
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 24,265
- And1: 120,663
- Joined: Dec 26, 2011
- Location: Malvern Crew
-
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
brwnman wrote:s e n s i wrote:brwnman wrote:Oh the argument now is… “IGNORE THE STATS!” - keep moving them goal posts folks. 3 straight years that the Jays have lost this trade.
people, this here
a real life post from a real life person
on the same day the jays win the division thanks in part to two of the main subjects of this thread
at least marty york can be considered “entertainment”
When stats and facts don't support your argument; it's "let me enjoy this moment."
If you're going to make a proper argument arguing why you feel the trade was bad, by all means go for it. But please refrain from personal attacks or baiting. Your recent posts have gotten a couple reports already. We have this thread to keep the Varsho trade debate isolated in a single spot, but if it stops being a debate and becomes a name-calling contest, this thread will be locked.

Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 70,139
- And1: 33,990
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
-
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
Moreno with 1 more stolen base than Kirk lol.
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
- JaysRule15
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 24,265
- And1: 120,663
- Joined: Dec 26, 2011
- Location: Malvern Crew
-
Re: Varsho/Moreno/Kirk Discussion Thread
Mehar wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:Gabriel Bustreno: 2.7 fWAR (in 82 games)
Captain Kirk: 4.3 fWAR (in 129 games)
Daulton "Mike Trout" Varsho: 2.2 fWAR (in 70 games)
In all seriousness though, Moreno and Varsho had pretty much identical seasons, and Kirk wasn't even part of the trade. This trade was still a wash. It filled a position of need, but I still feel Moreno could have landed a player better than Varsho.
But then, we're in the playoffs, so who cares.
The trade was Gurriel and Moreno for Varsho. For the millionth F'n time, if people want to discuss the trade- why is Kirk discussed like he was a part of the trade and acquired from Arizona? He was already an all-star here in 2022. Kirk struggled in 2023 and 2024 and I trashed him for being mediocre offensively for two seasons; but he has returned to his 2022 form, and I salute him for being the contributor he was especially in today's game.
Gurriel missed the past 4 weeks to injury, while both Varsho and Moreno missed almost two months to injury also this year. Once again, the trade was Varsho for Gurriel and Moreno. It was a 2 for 1 trade. Kirk should not even be discussed as part of the trade. You can discuss Varsho vs. Moreno and Gurriel, but Kirk was already an all-star here in 2022 and not a part of the deal. Leave him out of the trade discussion once again.
While I agree with the sentiment that Kirk's production shouldn't be completely counted as a return from the Varsho trade, you do have to look at Kirk's production as part of the full context. At the time of the trade, Moreno's value was high and Kirk's value was declining and his production had dipped. The front office made the bet that Kirk would improve and went with him over Moreno. If Kirk was the one traded over Moreno, we would lose whatever Kirk has done for us this season. And who's to say what Moreno would've done for us in a tougher division during a pennant chase.
That's why it's so hard to look at these type of trades in a vacuum.
