
Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- boomershadow
- Forum Mod - Pacers
- Posts: 5,995
- And1: 7,495
- Joined: Jul 14, 2014
- Location: Naptown
-
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,602
- And1: 43,850
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
You don't want to choose a name than can be made fun of.
Araptors.. Braptors..
Nothing wrong with Raptors
Araptors.. Braptors..
Nothing wrong with Raptors
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- RookieStar
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,470
- And1: 7,942
- Joined: Jul 01, 2009
-
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
kwajo wrote:I dunno, the current Instagram logo for the team could go either way I guess:
https://www.instagram.com/raptors/
NGL Id def wear that shirt...
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,878
- And1: 3,473
- Joined: Apr 30, 2005
- Location: 1994 of an Alternate Universe World Seres Parade
-
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
I live the evolotion from Dinosaur to Bird of Prey.
Nothing full time but id like to see a one time concept with Jersey, Court and logo
Nothing full time but id like to see a one time concept with Jersey, Court and logo
http://www.erepublik.com/en/referrer/Emperor+Roobeye
Join Now; Your eNation needs you.
Join Now; Your eNation needs you.
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- Backcountry
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,691
- And1: 2,019
- Joined: Feb 22, 2021
- Location: North of We The North
-
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
bisme37 wrote:
So basically NOT this thing:
No way are they changing that mascot at least until Booker retires...
'Cos it's easier to try
Than to prove it can't be done
Than to prove it can't be done
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,778
- And1: 5,449
- Joined: Nov 25, 2013
-
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
Backcountry wrote:bisme37 wrote:
So basically NOT this thing:
No way are they changing that mascot at least until Booker retires...
he's pushing 60 now.
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- Tacoma
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,400
- And1: 5,466
- Joined: Dec 08, 2004
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
chilluminati wrote:The Raptors? They should rename. They have a worse negative wingspan than Desmond Bane.
As a Pistons fan you shouldn't talk. In a world moving towards electric cars, pistons will be extinct. Dodo birds have an even worse wingspan.

Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- ImmortalD24
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,281
- And1: 718
- Joined: Apr 11, 2007
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
It’s clearly a T-Rex on hormone blockers.
Iwasawitness wrote:Dude, swap prime LeBron with Mitchell and this would be the best team LeBron ever played on.
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,379
- And1: 4,474
- Joined: Aug 30, 2019
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
When Toronto was awarded its NBA expansion franchise in 1993–94, the ownership group ran a nationwide “Name the Team” contest in 1994. Thousands of submissions came in, and the public was given a shortlist to vote on.
The final ten names on the ballot were:
1. Beavers
2. Bobcats
3. Dragons
4. Grizzlies
5. Hogs
6. Scorpions
7. T-Rex
8. Tarantulas
9. Terriers
10. Raptors
“Raptors” ultimately won, heavily influenced by the popularity of Jurassic Park (released in 1993). The runner-up was reportedly “Hogs”.
The final ten names on the ballot were:
1. Beavers
2. Bobcats
3. Dragons
4. Grizzlies
5. Hogs
6. Scorpions
7. T-Rex
8. Tarantulas
9. Terriers
10. Raptors
“Raptors” ultimately won, heavily influenced by the popularity of Jurassic Park (released in 1993). The runner-up was reportedly “Hogs”.
KembaWalker wrote:If you think you need a gun to answer the door, you probably shouldn’t answer the door. Call the police
Re: innocent ex military Roger Fortson gunned down by police at his own house
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- UcanUwill
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,843
- And1: 36,267
- Joined: Aug 07, 2011
-
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
bisme37 wrote:So basically NOT this thing:
I said this many thimes, but Toronto Raptors has to be the team with the most wasted potential when it comes to logos and stuff. Raptors were such fierce, dynamic and even aerodynamic looking creatures, imagine how cool artists could portray them, but their first go at logo and mascot was literally Poochie the dog NBA edition, with basically purple Barney the dinosaur as mascot, And their next logo is something I could legit draw in few minutes, the infamous watermelon looking clawed basketball. Its embarrassing how this team wasted its name.
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- Backcountry
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,691
- And1: 2,019
- Joined: Feb 22, 2021
- Location: North of We The North
-
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
Kingdibs19 wrote:When Toronto was awarded its NBA expansion franchise in 1993–94, the ownership group ran a nationwide “Name the Team” contest in 1994. Thousands of submissions came in, and the public was given a shortlist to vote on.
The final ten names on the ballot were:
1. Beavers
2. Bobcats
3. Dragons
4. Grizzlies
5. Hogs
6. Scorpions
7. T-Rex
8. Tarantulas
9. Terriers
10. Raptors
“Raptors” ultimately won, heavily influenced by the popularity of Jurassic Park (released in 1993). The runner-up was reportedly “Hogs”.
I remember this. Still can't believe "Huskies", the original Toronto NBA team name, wasn't on the list....but then the management was going for the future fans, not the past ones. Gotta give them credit, they tapped a market that wasn't made up of just Leafs fans, and did it successfully.
'Cos it's easier to try
Than to prove it can't be done
Than to prove it can't be done
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,194
- And1: 2,644
- Joined: Apr 22, 2022
-
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- ImmortalD24
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,281
- And1: 718
- Joined: Apr 11, 2007
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
Kingdibs19 wrote:When Toronto was awarded its NBA expansion franchise in 1993–94, the ownership group ran a nationwide “Name the Team” contest in 1994. Thousands of submissions came in, and the public was given a shortlist to vote on.
The final ten names on the ballot were:
1. Beavers
2. Bobcats
3. Dragons
4. Grizzlies
5. Hogs
6. Scorpions
7. T-Rex
8. Tarantulas
9. Terriers
10. Raptors
“Raptors” ultimately won, heavily influenced by the popularity of Jurassic Park (released in 1993). The runner-up was reportedly “Hogs”.
Toronto Titans would’ve went hard.. Tennessee Titans was trademarked in 98 before their debut in 1999. Apart from the Cavaliers, Spurs, and Lakers, no other NBA team’s city or region starts with the same letter as its team name... They might have their reasons.
Iwasawitness wrote:Dude, swap prime LeBron with Mitchell and this would be the best team LeBron ever played on.
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,858
- And1: 32,681
- Joined: Jul 22, 2013
- Location: Saskatchewan
-
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
RoxSteady wrote: Just like the Mighty Ducks changing their names to the Ducks as well as the Devil Rays changing their name to the Rays were positive moves. .
Were they? Both were better as the Mighty Ducks and especially the Devil Rays.
- Raptors RealGM Forum re: Masai Ujiri - June 2023What an absolute failure and disaster this franchise is, ran by one of the most incompetent front offices in the league.