ImageImageImageImageImage

Trades and Transactions 2025 V

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

B8RcDeMktfxC
General Manager
Posts: 9,573
And1: 6,411
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
Location: C'MON, COME GET THE FUKKIN BALL

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1021 » by B8RcDeMktfxC » Tue Sep 30, 2025 6:37 am

This fantasy 10% number comes from the first year of the new (2023) CBA, when teams over the first apron but below the second apron, were allowed to take back up to 110% of outgoing salary. Nothing to do with incoming salary. That number decreased to 100% in the second (2024-2025) year and is still the same this (next) year.
KnixinSix
Head Coach
Posts: 7,123
And1: 3,789
Joined: Jul 27, 2013
Location: In the Spirit
       

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1022 » by KnixinSix » Tue Sep 30, 2025 2:17 pm

B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:
KnixinSix wrote:
B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:My understanding is a little different. The Knicks can't take back more salary than they send out. Utah can.

So shipping Deuce , Dadiet and Kolek for Kessler is fine. You need to fill the two roster spots you lose, but that deal gives you the space to pay vet min contracts rather than Dadiet and Kolek.


Knicks also need to take back salary within 10% of what they give out.

They really do not. The rule for teams between the first and second aprons is that they cannot take back more salary than they send out. There's nothing about having to take back salary in the CBA that I can find. If you have some source, please post it.

Eg, try this summary of the CBA apron rules. https://www.hoopsrumors.com/2025/01/hoops-rumors-glossary-tax-aprons-2.html


I stand corrected. Since Utah is under 1st Apron we can send out more salary to them in the trade and not need to be within 10% of salary coming back.
New reality of Son ship!
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1
KnixinSix
Head Coach
Posts: 7,123
And1: 3,789
Joined: Jul 27, 2013
Location: In the Spirit
       

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1023 » by KnixinSix » Tue Sep 30, 2025 2:25 pm

B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:This fantasy 10% number comes from the first year of the new (2023) CBA, when teams over the first apron but below the second apron, were allowed to take back up to 110% of outgoing salary. Nothing to do with incoming salary. That number decreased to 100% in the second (2024-2025) year and is still the same this (next) year.



If Ainge is willing to play ball the Kessler deal makes a lot of sense.

McBride is a good defensive player on a great contract and would bring needed defense to their backcourt. Dadiet is a very intriguing prospect whom Ainge had in for a workout. Kolek has some potential as a passing PG as well. Add in one of our few remaining 1st round picks and a couple 2nds and I think it makes sense. Kessler being CAA as we've seen also helps.
New reality of Son ship!
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1
KnixinSix
Head Coach
Posts: 7,123
And1: 3,789
Joined: Jul 27, 2013
Location: In the Spirit
       

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1024 » by KnixinSix » Wed Oct 1, 2025 2:44 pm

KAT trade happened on Oct 2. It certainly doesn't feel like another move will happen (like Kessler, Bron or Giannis) but I guess we will see.

IMO this team is still a bit light on defense especially with Mitch so injury prone and probably needing to be load managed.

Kessler is probably the perfect complement to KAT in the frontcourt.

Kessler
KAT
OG
Bridges
Brunson

If you play Brunson and KAT like 32 minutes in regular season on average.....If you stagger them well they only need to be playing together 16 minutes on the court.


-OR-

KAT
OG
Bridges
McBride
Brunson

And the time we have them out there it together should be 3 strong defenders with them no matter what.
New reality of Son ship!
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1
Dave_R
Junior
Posts: 288
And1: 206
Joined: Jul 20, 2019
       

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1025 » by Dave_R » Wed Oct 1, 2025 4:12 pm

If KAT lets players 4" to 6" shorter them him guard him in the playoffs, getting Kessler won't matter. KAT needs to assert himself.
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,426
And1: 42,831
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1026 » by TheGreenArrow » Wed Oct 1, 2025 4:17 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
User avatar
BKlutch
RealGM
Posts: 18,148
And1: 16,227
Joined: Jan 11, 2015
Location: A magical land of rainbows and cotton candy trees where the Knicks D gonna F you up
   

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1027 » by BKlutch » Wed Oct 1, 2025 5:52 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Hoping Schwinny the Pooh is right about this. As is always the case recently, unless Leon suddenly becomes a blabbermouth, we really won't know anything for certain until it happens.
.

____________________
____________________


:basketball: * We have a Brunson Burner™ * :basketball:
* Make the Knicks Champs Again *
:basketball: ** GO NY GO NY GO NY GO! ** :basketball:
____________________
____________________

.
.
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,426
And1: 42,831
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1028 » by TheGreenArrow » Wed Oct 1, 2025 6:15 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,463
And1: 95,153
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1029 » by thebuzzardman » Wed Oct 1, 2025 6:23 pm

I'd rather it be Kolek than Dadiet, as Dadiet at least represents prototypical wing size, while with Kolek, the Knicks don't really need to develop a young PG for another few years. If it has to be one or the other.

Not sure Shamet is worth the move, but I could see a team that's trying to be all in doing something like this.

Then again, Leon sacrificed Grimes for Burks and Burks\Bogs and they kind of sucked.
Image
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,426
And1: 42,831
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1030 » by TheGreenArrow » Wed Oct 1, 2025 6:51 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:I'd rather it be Kolek than Dadiet, as Dadiet at least represents prototypical wing size, while with Kolek, the Knicks don't really need to develop a young PG for another few years. If it has to be one or the other.

Not sure Shamet is worth the move, but I could see a team that's trying to be all in doing something like this.

Then again, Leon sacrificed Grimes for Burks and Burks\Bogs and they kind of sucked.


Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Spree2Houston
Head Coach
Posts: 7,400
And1: 8,819
Joined: Feb 21, 2015
     

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1031 » by Spree2Houston » Wed Oct 1, 2025 7:07 pm

McBride >> 30 games of Brogdon
knicks1999
Junior
Posts: 423
And1: 284
Joined: Jul 11, 2010

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1032 » by knicks1999 » Wed Oct 1, 2025 7:20 pm

We won’t hear anything until the Knicks are back in NY….no way the trade them guys while they are overseas…plus,they need to make sure Shamet and Brogdon are healthy
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 90,060
And1: 109,792
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1033 » by Capn'O » Wed Oct 1, 2025 7:29 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:I'd rather it be Kolek than Dadiet, as Dadiet at least represents prototypical wing size, while with Kolek, the Knicks don't really need to develop a young PG for another few years. If it has to be one or the other.

Not sure Shamet is worth the move, but I could see a team that's trying to be all in doing something like this.

Then again, Leon sacrificed Grimes for Burks and Burks\Bogs and they kind of sucked.


The problem is I doubt Kolek is highly sought after.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

:beer:
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,463
And1: 95,153
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1034 » by thebuzzardman » Wed Oct 1, 2025 7:40 pm

Capn'O wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:I'd rather it be Kolek than Dadiet, as Dadiet at least represents prototypical wing size, while with Kolek, the Knicks don't really need to develop a young PG for another few years. If it has to be one or the other.

Not sure Shamet is worth the move, but I could see a team that's trying to be all in doing something like this.

Then again, Leon sacrificed Grimes for Burks and Burks\Bogs and they kind of sucked.


The problem is I doubt Kolek is highly sought after.


Not sure if they can attach a pick (some 2nd rounder) and trade him into a cap space team. I guess that's not allowed. If it was, I'd do that.

As far as Dadiet goes, Knicks just drafted another big wing. And picked up Dink Pate. MAYBE they feel that's enough for the developmental pipeline and they'd be willing to sacrifice Dadiet for that vet.

For as limited a role that Shamet is going to play, I wouldn't trade Dadiet, but not sure what the thought process is.

And trading Deuce is just dumb and I'd only assume any rumors are based on the Knicks dangling him, but only it some scenario they see as a clear win, like Keon Ellis (not sure I see it as a win) or in some weird Kessler deal.

Meaning, they'll listen to offers on Deuce but aren't actively looking to move him.
Moving Deuce would also be dumb, and I'm aware of what he does well as well as his limitations.
Image
KnixinSix
Head Coach
Posts: 7,123
And1: 3,789
Joined: Jul 27, 2013
Location: In the Spirit
       

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1035 » by KnixinSix » Wed Oct 1, 2025 7:53 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:I'd rather it be Kolek than Dadiet, as Dadiet at least represents prototypical wing size, while with Kolek, the Knicks don't really need to develop a young PG for another few years. If it has to be one or the other.

Not sure Shamet is worth the move, but I could see a team that's trying to be all in doing something like this.

Then again, Leon sacrificed Grimes for Burks and Burks\Bogs and they kind of sucked.


The problem is I doubt Kolek is highly sought after.


Not sure if they can attach a pick (some 2nd rounder) and trade him into a cap space team. I guess that's not allowed. If it was, I'd do that.

As far as Dadiet goes, Knicks just drafted another big wing. And picked up Dink Pate. MAYBE they feel that's enough for the developmental pipeline and they'd be willing to sacrifice Dadiet for that vet.

For as limited a role that Shamet is going to play, I wouldn't trade Dadiet, but not sure what the thought process is.

And trading Deuce is just dumb and I'd only assume any rumors are based on the Knicks dangling him, but only it some scenario they see as a clear win, like Keon Ellis (not sure I see it as a win) or in some weird Kessler deal.

Meaning, they'll listen to offers on Deuce but aren't actively looking to move him.
Moving Deuce would also be dumb, and I'm aware of what he does well as well as his limitations.


With our current roster, I don't like trading elite/near elite level defenders unless I am getting one back. I dont want Duece traded unless its for a stud defender back.
New reality of Son ship!
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,556
And1: 5,709
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1036 » by spree2kawhi » Wed Oct 1, 2025 7:57 pm

KnixinSix wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
The problem is I doubt Kolek is highly sought after.


Not sure if they can attach a pick (some 2nd rounder) and trade him into a cap space team. I guess that's not allowed. If it was, I'd do that.

As far as Dadiet goes, Knicks just drafted another big wing. And picked up Dink Pate. MAYBE they feel that's enough for the developmental pipeline and they'd be willing to sacrifice Dadiet for that vet.

For as limited a role that Shamet is going to play, I wouldn't trade Dadiet, but not sure what the thought process is.

And trading Deuce is just dumb and I'd only assume any rumors are based on the Knicks dangling him, but only it some scenario they see as a clear win, like Keon Ellis (not sure I see it as a win) or in some weird Kessler deal.

Meaning, they'll listen to offers on Deuce but aren't actively looking to move him.
Moving Deuce would also be dumb, and I'm aware of what he does well as well as his limitations.


With our current roster, I don't like trading elite/near elite level defenders unless I am getting one back. I dont want Duece traded unless its for a stud defender back.

I don’t see another trade coming honestly. If it was for Kessler, I’d welcome it, but other than that, McBride will be a a great player for us.
KnixinSix
Head Coach
Posts: 7,123
And1: 3,789
Joined: Jul 27, 2013
Location: In the Spirit
       

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1037 » by KnixinSix » Wed Oct 1, 2025 8:10 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:
KnixinSix wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
Not sure if they can attach a pick (some 2nd rounder) and trade him into a cap space team. I guess that's not allowed. If it was, I'd do that.

As far as Dadiet goes, Knicks just drafted another big wing. And picked up Dink Pate. MAYBE they feel that's enough for the developmental pipeline and they'd be willing to sacrifice Dadiet for that vet.

For as limited a role that Shamet is going to play, I wouldn't trade Dadiet, but not sure what the thought process is.

And trading Deuce is just dumb and I'd only assume any rumors are based on the Knicks dangling him, but only it some scenario they see as a clear win, like Keon Ellis (not sure I see it as a win) or in some weird Kessler deal.

Meaning, they'll listen to offers on Deuce but aren't actively looking to move him.
Moving Deuce would also be dumb, and I'm aware of what he does well as well as his limitations.


With our current roster, I don't like trading elite/near elite level defenders unless I am getting one back. I dont want Duece traded unless its for a stud defender back.

I don’t see another trade coming honestly. If it was for Kessler, I’d welcome it, but other than that, McBride will be a a great player for us.



Kessler is the guy you'd like to see. KAT really needs a defensive counterbalance at the 5 to protect him.
New reality of Son ship!
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1
ctorres
RealGM
Posts: 17,489
And1: 5,724
Joined: Jun 04, 2005

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1038 » by ctorres » Wed Oct 1, 2025 8:41 pm

KnixinSix wrote:
Knicksfan1992 wrote:
KnixinSix wrote:
100%

Grimes can shoot the 3 and he can play defense at a higher level than Hart. Hart is a reluctant shooter ...that hurts at the 2/3 spot in today's NBA.


I swear some of you guys will only appreciate J Hart when he's gone... We don't deserve nice things lol


The question posed is would you take current Grimes over Hart. Just because the answer is yes in Mike Browns offense doesn't mean I/we don't think Hart has value. Grimes is a very good fit for this current squad under Mike Brown.


This just in

Read on Twitter


I don't know if Grimes would want to go back to NY.

A package of McBride, Dadiet, and Kolek or Hukporti would work for Grimes.
User avatar
Wildcat
RealGM
Posts: 14,780
And1: 4,597
Joined: Aug 07, 2002
Location: Astoria, NY
 

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1039 » by Wildcat » Wed Oct 1, 2025 9:37 pm

ctorres wrote:
KnixinSix wrote:
Knicksfan1992 wrote:
I swear some of you guys will only appreciate J Hart when he's gone... We don't deserve nice things lol


The question posed is would you take current Grimes over Hart. Just because the answer is yes in Mike Browns offense doesn't mean I/we don't think Hart has value. Grimes is a very good fit for this current squad under Mike Brown.


This just in

Read on Twitter


I don't know if Grimes would want to go back to NY.

A package of McBride, Dadiet, and Kolek or Hukporti would work for Grimes.


Wow, he caved, huh?
ctorres
RealGM
Posts: 17,489
And1: 5,724
Joined: Jun 04, 2005

Re: Trades and Transactions 2025 V 

Post#1040 » by ctorres » Wed Oct 1, 2025 9:46 pm

Wildcat wrote:
ctorres wrote:
KnixinSix wrote:
The question posed is would you take current Grimes over Hart. Just because the answer is yes in Mike Browns offense doesn't mean I/we don't think Hart has value. Grimes is a very good fit for this current squad under Mike Brown.


This just in

Read on Twitter


I don't know if Grimes would want to go back to NY.

A package of McBride, Dadiet, and Kolek or Hukporti would work for Grimes.


Wow, he caved, huh?


Taking the QO just like Cam Thomas

I wonder how likely it is for either of them to get traded.

Return to New York Knicks