LUKE23 wrote:The Knicks do not have a package that would make it worth it to trade GA. It's that simple.
You dont think a KAT OG and ? is worth it
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
LUKE23 wrote:The Knicks do not have a package that would make it worth it to trade GA. It's that simple.
jakecronus8 wrote:BigO wrote:humanrefutation wrote:
Explain to me how anything he's said or done indicates that his priority isn't competing for titles. Whether here or elsewhere.
The rumors about Giannis and New York have been around a long time.
What's different now is that Horst and the Knicks had a discussion and apparently that is the only team they did that with.
Assuming the above is true, the only reason would be that Giannis expressed interest in the Knicks (likely thru his agent).
If all Giannis was interested in was a championship, he wouldn't limit himself to the Knicks.
Yep. Knicks are not a good trade partner for Milwaukee if Giannis wants to win titles. They'd be gutted. San Antonio still remains the team that makes the most sense if he wants out and wants to be playing for titles.
For the Bucks, if NY is the only place Giannis wants to be then the Nets make more sense as a trade partner as they have literally 30 tradable picks at the moment.
The more I hear and put pieces together the more I believe:
1. Giannis does indeed want out.
2. Giannis doesn't want to be held accountable or blamed for asking out.
3. Something changed in the relationship between Giannis and the org and perhaps his family dynamic as well.
Less than ideal way to start the season. I feel bad for Turner/Bobby etc. They signed for under market value, assumingly because of Giannis' presence.
Ron Swanson wrote:Dylan Harper
Stephon Castle
Keldon Johnson
Harrison Barnes
2027 ATL unprotected 1st
2029 SAS unprotected 1st
2028 Swap rights between SAS/BOS
2031 Swap rights between SAS/SAC
That's at the very least gonna be what it takes. San Antonio can take it or leave it.
Daver wrote:LUKE23 wrote:The Knicks do not have a package that would make it worth it to trade GA. It's that simple.
You dont think a KAT OG and ? is worth it
Ron Swanson wrote:Dylan Harper
Stephon Castle
Keldon Johnson
Harrison Barnes
2027 ATL unprotected 1st
2029 SAS unprotected 1st
2028 Swap rights between SAS/BOS
2031 Swap rights between SAS/SAC
That's at the very least gonna be what it takes. San Antonio can take it or leave it.
paulpressey25 wrote:I wouldn’t discount the Knicks entirely as we will want win now guys unless we get overwhelmed with picks. I can’t see Edens or Haslam wanting to deal with a full rebuild if we don’t control all our picks.
Can you route either Bridges or OG to Portland to get our pick and both swaps back? It’s a thought.
Ron Swanson wrote:If it comes to that, he doesn't have a no-trade clause so IDGAF where he wants to go. He'll get over it when he'll be competing for titles over in San Antonio while we can build around Harper, Castle, and all their future firsts/swaps. If this organization is seriously **** dumb enough to accept whatever mediocre package of win-now players that the Knicks can send just to "honor his wishes", then basketball in Milwaukee is dead. Just fold up the franchise.
BigO wrote:humanrefutation wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:
Bingo.
And I think once you’ve threatened your spouse with divorce it is hard to put that toothpaste back in the tube.
And for those of you who say “this is no different than other years” oh yes it is. We’ve lost Dame and all those draft picks we gave up to get him. And Giannis has had people in his ear the past six months telling him the Bucks have no assets to get better.
Explain to me how anything he's said or done indicates that his priority isn't competing for titles. Whether here or elsewhere.
The rumors about Giannis and New York have been around a long time.
What's different now is that Horst and the Knicks had a discussion and apparently that is the only team they did that with.
Assuming the above is true, the only reason would be that Giannis expressed interest in the Knicks (likely thru his agent).
If all Giannis was interested in was a championship, he wouldn't limit himself to the Knicks.
Daver wrote:
You dont think a KAT OG and ? is worth it
Sigra wrote:KAT is actually good fit to play with Giannis.
Brunson isnt. It would be better for both teams if Brunson is in package insteed of KAT. Just saying
BucksFanSD wrote:What drives down the trade market is a player demanding to play for only one other team, which currently appears to be the case. The team will ask for a list of teams said star player is willing to play for. When the player only gives one team it drives down his price. In turn the team asks the player to increase the list of teams to get market price. Things sometimes get ugly from there. Right now it seems Giannis is hinting it's just one team (the Knicks) that he would play for if Milwaukee isn't a contender.
BucksFanSD wrote:I mentioned this earlier, Giannis holds the leverage, the more each day passes. If he doesn't want a bidding war, there won't be one. He wants championships which mean his 'new team' needs to 'not lose the trade'. The alternative is holding on to him until his contract expires, and that can be negative in how that plays out.
Packbuckman wrote:BucksFanSD wrote:What drives down the trade market is a player demanding to play for only one other team, which currently appears to be the case. The team will ask for a list of teams said star player is willing to play for. When the player only gives one team it drives down his price. In turn the team asks the player to increase the list of teams to get market price. Things sometimes get ugly from there. Right now it seems Giannis is hinting it's just one team (the Knicks) that he would play for if Milwaukee isn't a contender.
Hinting from who Shams and espn if you believe that **** and his company that wants Giannis in a big market like New York. He was asked a question he answered it that didn’t mean anything but Shams sure will run with it **** douche bag
ShootingtheJ wrote:BucksFanSD wrote:I mentioned this earlier, Giannis holds the leverage, the more each day passes. If he doesn't want a bidding war, there won't be one. He wants championships which mean his 'new team' needs to 'not lose the trade'. The alternative is holding on to him until his contract expires, and that can be negative in how that plays out.
The alternative is to win and just keep him.
LUKE23 wrote:The Knicks do not have a package that would make it worth it to trade GA. It's that simple.