Image ImageImage Image

Bears thread 13

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,302
And1: 6,689
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1141 » by Dresden » Wed Oct 22, 2025 3:52 pm

It's also a good sign that two of Poles' IOL pick ups are among are three highest rated Offensive players. I'm surprised Dalman is rated so highly- he seems to have given up a lot of sacks.
Jimako10
Analyst
Posts: 3,551
And1: 1,693
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
   

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1142 » by Jimako10 » Wed Oct 22, 2025 7:06 pm

biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


I'm generally against trading picks for players midseason, especially when they're looking for a new contract but Will Mcdonald for a 3rd and breece for a 5th would be pretty enticing. It would be even more enticing if they can pull off a baltimore win this weekend.
biggestbullsfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,744
And1: 2,280
Joined: Apr 28, 2004
     

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1143 » by biggestbullsfan » Wed Oct 22, 2025 8:46 pm

Read on Twitter


I get the irony in my statement, but I feel that this could be a mistake lol. Braxton is bad but we don’t have a better swing tackle back up. Unless they offer something significant like a 4th or 5th but i doubt it lol
Betta Bulleavit
General Manager
Posts: 7,771
And1: 2,883
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
       

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1144 » by Betta Bulleavit » Wed Oct 22, 2025 9:06 pm

dougthonus wrote:
sco wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/where-bears-rank-statistically-heading-192524373.html

1st in sacks allowed
1st in take-aways

Basically sums it up.


FWIW, there are 7 teams that have allowed fewer sacks, so not sure where this data comes from. 4 of those teams have allowed fewer sacks despite playing an additional game.

That said, the Bears are doing well here relative to the past, and the offensive line has been solid.


I'd be interested in knowing if "sacks allowed" are tabulated based on the number of sacks that offensive lineman have allowed rather than total sack numbers. At least a few of the sacks that Caleb has taksn weren't really on the offensive line at all. He just ran out of bounds behind the line of scrimmage, which count as sacks but are more on ths QB and/or receivers.
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,043
And1: 37,349
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1145 » by fleet » Wed Oct 22, 2025 9:37 pm

Jimako10 wrote:
biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


I'm generally against trading picks for players midseason, especially when they're looking for a new contract but Will Mcdonald for a 3rd and breece for a 5th would be pretty enticing. It would be even more enticing if they can pull off a baltimore win this weekend.

Grady Jarrett’s injury has me wondering if the Bears pull the trigger on the D-Line
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,849
And1: 18,927
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1146 » by dougthonus » Wed Oct 22, 2025 10:00 pm

Betta Bulleavit wrote:
dougthonus wrote:
sco wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/where-bears-rank-statistically-heading-192524373.html

1st in sacks allowed
1st in take-aways

Basically sums it up.


FWIW, there are 7 teams that have allowed fewer sacks, so not sure where this data comes from. 4 of those teams have allowed fewer sacks despite playing an additional game.

That said, the Bears are doing well here relative to the past, and the offensive line has been solid.


I'd be interested in knowing if "sacks allowed" are tabulated based on the number of sacks that offensive lineman have allowed rather than total sack numbers. At least a few of the sacks that Caleb has taksn weren't really on the offensive line at all. He just ran out of bounds behind the line of scrimmage, which count as sacks but are more on ths QB and/or receivers.


It's how many times Caleb has been sacked. It isn't distinguishing who the blame for the sack is on (similar to an INT still counts against the QB even if he hits the receiver in the chest and the ball bounces off his hands). There might be some more advanced stats that cover what you are discussing.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,302
And1: 6,689
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1147 » by Dresden » Wed Oct 22, 2025 11:50 pm

Apparently Lamar is still limited in practice, questionable if he plays on Sunday or not.

Tyrod Taylor was named Jets starter for this week, if he's healthy, but he's day to day with a bad knee, so Fields may get another chance.

A fair number of QB's dinged up- Lamar, Tyrod, Bryce Young, Purdy, Daniels will miss another game.
dice
RealGM
Posts: 44,086
And1: 13,021
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1148 » by dice » Yesterday 2:53 am

% of pass attempts ending in sack:

2.59% Daniel Jones
2.86% Bo Nix
2.91% Dak Prescott
3.79% Patrick Mahomes
4.21% Michael Penix
4.30% Matthew Stafford
4.39% Sam Darnold
4.45% Bryce Young
4.51% Joe Flacco
4.84% Aaron Rodgers
5.05% Jordan Love
5.07% Baker Mayfield
5.26% Caleb Williams
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,043
And1: 37,349
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1149 » by fleet » Yesterday 12:44 pm

Read on Twitter


His accuracy is bad. His EPA is leading the bottom third of the league. I don’t know if holding the ball is key, but it might be key for him. How much he can get better is anybody’s guess. I don’t think he reads the defense well enough to say getting the ball out faster would help, because he looks even less accurate when he tries to be quick. The Bears offense is surviving more or less without him being the reason why they score, and on turnovers. They have to be a team that can win with him. Perhaps not because of him.
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,390
And1: 11,404
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1150 » by TheSuzerain » Yesterday 3:51 pm

Jimako10 wrote:
biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


I'm generally against trading picks for players midseason, especially when they're looking for a new contract but Will Mcdonald for a 3rd and breece for a 5th would be pretty enticing. It would be even more enticing if they can pull off a baltimore win this weekend.

Will McDonald would get a 2nd. A 3rd is nuts.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,302
And1: 6,689
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1151 » by Dresden » Yesterday 6:38 pm

fleet wrote:
Read on Twitter


His accuracy is bad. His EPA is leading the bottom third of the league. I don’t know if holding the ball is key, but it might be key for him. How much he can get better is anybody’s guess. I don’t think he reads the defense well enough to say getting the ball out faster would help, because he looks even less accurate when he tries to be quick. The Bears offense is surviving more or less without him being the reason why they score, and on turnovers. They have to be a team that can win with him. Perhaps not because of him.


Let's not get carried away. Until this last game, he'd been getting better each week. As BC has said, there's going to be some ups and downs.
NZB2323
RealGM
Posts: 14,485
And1: 11,026
Joined: Aug 02, 2008

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1152 » by NZB2323 » Yesterday 7:41 pm

Dresden wrote:
fleet wrote:
Read on Twitter


His accuracy is bad. His EPA is leading the bottom third of the league. I don’t know if holding the ball is key, but it might be key for him. How much he can get better is anybody’s guess. I don’t think he reads the defense well enough to say getting the ball out faster would help, because he looks even less accurate when he tries to be quick. The Bears offense is surviving more or less without him being the reason why they score, and on turnovers. They have to be a team that can win with him. Perhaps not because of him.


Let's not get carried away. Until this last game, he'd been getting better each week. As BC has said, there's going to be some ups and downs.


I don’t know if that’s true. He was worse week 4 than week 3.

I think we can be critical and have patience. Baker Mayfield and Josh Allen weren’t great their 2nd year. CJ Stroud and Jayden Daniels looked great their rookie year, but how are they looking now?

I went into the year expecting Caleb to look better the 2nd half of the year as he’s learning the Ben Johnson offense. The running game should help, cleaning up penalties should help, and Rome holding onto the ball should help. However, it can be frustrating that he’s not better considering how he has guys open, we can be competitive this year, and Drake Maye is looking like Tom Brady 2.0.
dice
RealGM
Posts: 44,086
And1: 13,021
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1153 » by dice » Today 2:43 am

NFC 25-13 vs. AFC heading into tonight's game
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care

Return to Chicago Bulls