meekrab wrote:20/6 with 3 stocks is basically the high end of what you could possibly expect from a second year Matas.
Unless......
Moderators: HomoSapien, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, DASMACKDOWN, fleet, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper
meekrab wrote:20/6 with 3 stocks is basically the high end of what you could possibly expect from a second year Matas.
kodo wrote:Okoro gave us a very Lonzo-like game. Good defense, made some good assists, couldn't shoot worth a damn. And overall he was +17 on the night much higher than any other player in the building. It's a vintage Lonzo game, but he's available every night and pretty young. Lonzo was 1-7 himself tonight.
Jalen Smith was actually terrible, on either end.
Giddey & Tre with 19 assists was nice to watch, it's not easy to generate offense as a bad team with your best scorer out but they kept the offense for 3 quarters. Vuc obviously did most of the damage, but he was set up on every single make.

ShouldaPaidBG wrote:Having actual point guards Giddey and Tre on the floor at all times is such a breath of fresh air after watching Zach and Demar do whatever the f that was for years.

                   
                   
                                                                      dougthonus wrote:DuckIII wrote:Good:
1. Matas is a franchise player. He put up 21/6/3 and wasn’t even being aggressive. He has it all mentally and physically.
2. Giddey picked up where he left off and looked terrific. Hopefully as the season goes on he’ll get more respect from the refs. Detroit was straight mugging him on drives all night long.
3. Vuc. Freaking awesome game by him.
4. Tre was instrumental to this win. Steadying force, effectively ran the offense, solid D. If he’s not the best non-rookie bargain deal in the league, who is?
Pretty Good:
Pat, Ayo, and Huerter.
Consistent with the only preseason game I was able to see, this is the most energized Pat has ever looked in the opening games of a season. He normally looks abysmal and lifeless for the first few games. Fingers crossed.
Bad:
Okoro: the idea was that the pace and full court style we play would help Okoro score a bit more. We’ll see. I thought he looked pretty poor all night, including being badly outplayed by Pat on D.
Smith: I have said BD’s failure to give him more run last year was confusing. If that was what BD has been seeing in practice, I get it now.
Terry/BD: Why did Terry play? And why the hell did those minutes come late in a tight game? He’s TERRIBLE. In an otherwise highly enjoyable night, his presence was like someone baking small turd nugget into the middle of a delicious chocolate cake. Just stop it.
How did you think Okoro was bad on D? He was the primary guy on Cade and absolutely shut him down almost all night long. I thought he was great on defense all night.

                   
                   
                                                                      Chi town wrote:Giddey was being defended by Ausar. Then Holland.
Enough said.
                                     
                   
                                                    Indomitable wrote:Will Perdue believes Jalen has a leg issue
Jcool0 wrote:aguifs wrote:Do we have a friggin plan?
If the Bulls do, you would be complaining to much to ever hear it.
                   
                   
                   
                                     
               Chi town wrote:Crazy pace and physicality across the whole league…
- Lots of injuries incoming
- Many teams won’t continue this high effort play
- Teams without depth are going to suck

                   
                   
                                                                      drosestruts wrote:DuckIII wrote:WindyCityBorn wrote:We have something going with Giddey and Matas. Been a long since we’ve had two young players produce like this. They can be cornerstones for the next decade.
And they actually compliment each other to form the core of a logically constructed roster, rather than shoving puzzle pieces together by force.
Wait until we add Essengue. The three of them have the potential to be scary together.
How quickly we forget about Coby White who would also fit with the above three players

                   
                   
                                                                      
                                     
                   
                                                    DuckIII wrote:Something about Vuc's game, that I hope to see more of, is that his shots all seemed to just come in the flow of what the offense was doing. He shot it when open, passed it otherwise. As long as he plays that simple game, he will be much more palatable to watch than someone who views himself as the veteran man on a young team.
                   
                   
                   
                                                    
                   
                   
                                                                      mack2354 wrote:Devil's Advocate take here. Yes, Giddey had a good game. That last play with Giddey getting the ball knocked out of bounds and then the refs changing it to a foul is what bothers me about him.
A good/great ballhandler doesn't get put in that situation to begin with. Giddey just isn't quick enough or have a good enough handle when defenders are going 100%. NBA players are typically only going 80%. 4th quarters, chippy games, playoff/play-in games and contract years are usually the only times guys are really going all out.
That play was just another example in a long track record of Giddey's history where when good defenders are going 100% at him that he simply can't overcome it. Giddey has talent, is a great passer and has a great knack for getting rebounds. Im not saying Giddey is a "bad" player at all.
The Bulls really should have 1 or possibly 2 ball handling guards on the court with Giddey down the stretch of games and especially in the playoffs.
Sent from my SM-A146U using RealGM Forums mobile app
DuckIII wrote:dougthonus wrote:
How did you think Okoro was bad on D? He was the primary guy on Cade and absolutely shut him down almost all night long. I thought he was great on defense all night.
I didn't say he was bad on D. I should explain. He "looked poor all night" - in context of him being an elite defensive specialist who pretty much provides only that. I agree with JCool somewhat on this one. He did a decent job on Cade but some of it was just missed shots. He even shot 60% from the line. Okoro is still who he is, an excellent defender. I just don't think he was all that good at it last night for a dude who is supposed to be elite at it. Which is why I mentioned Pat, who had a very impactful game defensively.
Its not an insult to get outplayed defensively by a fully engaged Pat Williams. One of the nice things about Okoro is we anticipate being able to rely on his consistency, which we cannot do with Pat. But when you also can't score, it calls into question how much you are adding if Pat is engaged.
But it was one game and I was making a single game observation. I still think Okoro will be fine. I'm one of the folks who liked the trade.
mack2354 wrote:Devil's Advocate take here. Yes, Giddey had a good game. That last play with Giddey getting the ball knocked out of bounds and then the refs changing it to a foul is what bothers me about him.
A good/great ballhandler doesn't get put in that situation to begin with. Giddey just isn't quick enough or have a good enough handle when defenders are going 100%. NBA players are typically only going 80%. 4th quarters, chippy games, playoff/play-in games and contract years are usually the only times guys are really going all out.
That play was just another example in a long track record of Giddey's history where when good defenders are going 100% at him that he simply can't overcome it. Giddey has talent, is a great passer and has a great knack for getting rebounds. Im not saying Giddey is a "bad" player at all.
The Bulls really should have 1 or possibly 2 ball handling guards on the court with Giddey down the stretch of games and especially in the playoffs.
Sent from my SM-A146U using RealGM Forums mobile app
                   
                   
                   
                                                    
                   
                   
                   
                                                    
                                                                                                          DuckIII wrote:drosestruts wrote:DuckIII wrote:
And they actually compliment each other to form the core of a logically constructed roster, rather than shoving puzzle pieces together by force.
Wait until we add Essengue. The three of them have the potential to be scary together.
How quickly we forget about Coby White who would also fit with the above three players
I'm sloppy today. To clarify, when I say add Essengue I'm referring to really, consistently adding him as a high minute core player. So I'm referring to 1-2 years from now and depending on if Noa is as good as I think he is. Certainly, by a significant margin, Coby will help more this season.
In my opinion, if this team has a meaningful future it will be because Giddey, Matas and Noa evolve into a huge, fast, athletic three headed monster who can run like crazy with Noa and Matas creating defensive havoc behind Giddey. To me, that is the "special" vision that represents a path to consistent higher level postseason success.
Coby, in my mind, is not special. He's a very good shooting guard, but a guy I believe is far easier to replace in a variety of ways. As of today, I'm not even convinced he's the best option on our own roster when projecting future salaries.