Texas Chuck wrote:Set aside the gambling.  Almost all of us thought Miami was making a terrible basketball trade at the time.  Not with hindsight as to how bad he played or with regards to this.  Just it was a terrible move that never made sense.
Also don't think they are entitled to any compensation and thats kind of a wild take.  League is under no obligation and probably prevented by the CBA from torpedoing a player's career by saying hey we completely cleared this guy but we are going to send out a league wide memo saying well he was accused of this....
Once we set aside feeling like our team was victimized I think we can see why Miami is entitled to nothing.  My guess is players get investigated with regards to gambling all the time with none of it being made public because they can't prove wrong-doing.  Just the coincidence of a bad game or an injury timed with higher than normal betting activity.   And if the league is notifying every team every time....
Like Whalers says, teams should be monitoring this on their own already.   And I'd be surprised if an organization as competent as Miami wasn't.
I completely disagree. This is like buying a car that's been in an accident. The previous owner knows, the mechanic knows, and NO ONE TELLS YOU! Sorry, but I don't think it's unreasonable to suggest Miami deserves recourse.
Edit: having looked into it, it appears that Charlotte could be the party in the wrong here.
Heat got no warning before Rozier trade, now mulls next move | Miami Herald 
https://share.google/HVRDA7CrwZA5mgzpWI think Miami has legitimate reasons to be angry and expect a compensatory pick.