Fat wrote:Sixers our biggest threat in the East!
That backcourt.
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Fat wrote:Sixers our biggest threat in the East!

gavran wrote:NiceLikeChrist wrote:gavran wrote:And no Bridges. I'd rather have Bridges.
But kudos to Grimes, he had confidence issues, and that is the hardest thing to overcome. He seems like a different person today then he was 2 years ago. He's also not staying with Philly long term, so that's a plus too.
Then that means we have all those picks and we can scoop Giannis before the season starts most likely
Brunson
Grimes
OG
Giannis
Towns
Easy dynasty. Thank you thibs
And if your grandma had wheels...

JayTWill wrote:gavran wrote:NiceLikeChrist wrote:
Then that means we have all those picks and we can scoop Giannis before the season starts most likely
Brunson
Grimes
OG
Giannis
Towns
Easy dynasty. Thank you thibs
And if your grandma had wheels...
Why couldn't they have both Bridges and Grimes?
3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Damn shame your coach hated him
Mike brown hates grimes? Wow!

gavran wrote:JayTWill wrote:gavran wrote:
And if your grandma had wheels...
Why couldn't they have both Bridges and Grimes?
Because Grimes was traded for the contract that made the Bridges trade possible?
JayTWill wrote:gavran wrote:JayTWill wrote:
Why couldn't they have both Bridges and Grimes?
Because Grimes was traded for the contract that made the Bridges trade possible?
They could have kept Fournier for a few more months and made the same deal
or traded Fournier to a team looking to dump a 2 year deal like the Lakers were trying to do with Russell's contract at the time and likely received some compensation for it.
Any expiring around $20M could have been used as salary filler in the Bridges deal and it didn't require Grimes and two 2nds to acquire it.
gavran wrote:JayTWill wrote:gavran wrote:
Because Grimes was traded for the contract that made the Bridges trade possible?
They could have kept Fournier for a few more months and made the same deal
Would have been quite hard considering Fournier, as an NBA player was not a thing anyore, at the time of the trade, and his contract was in past tense.or traded Fournier to a team looking to dump a 2 year deal like the Lakers were trying to do with Russell's contract at the time and likely received some compensation for it.
They did just that, and it cost them Grimes.Any expiring around $20M could have been used as salary filler in the Bridges deal and it didn't require Grimes and two 2nds to acquire it.
And your grandma could have been the bus, if only she had wheels instead of feet.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Damn shame your coach hated him
Mike brown hates grimes? Wow!
No, your coach named Thomas, the one you said was paying you.



2010 wrote:Fat wrote:Sixers our biggest threat in the East!
That backcourt.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Guano wrote:2010 wrote:Fat wrote:Sixers our biggest threat in the East!
That backcourt.
Really sucks that backcourt plays for the 6ers because their game is dope and they both are cool as hell.

3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Mike brown hates grimes? Wow!
No, your coach named Thomas, the one you said was paying you.
Sir my coach is Michael Burton Brown.
It sounds like you’re having a really hard time moving on from our old coach. Let me help you brother!

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
No, your coach named Thomas, the one you said was paying you.
Sir my coach is Michael Burton Brown.
It sounds like you’re having a really hard time moving on from our old coach. Let me help you brother!
MeL0 really adding Psychology to his bag?


2010 wrote:Guano wrote:2010 wrote:
That backcourt.
Really sucks that backcourt plays for the 6ers because their game is dope and they both are cool as hell.
I’m really pulling for Edgecombe (when he isn’t playing NY). His personal story is easy to root for.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Guano wrote:2010 wrote:Guano wrote:
Really sucks that backcourt plays for the 6ers because their game is dope and they both are cool as hell.
I’m really pulling for Edgecombe (when he isn’t playing NY). His personal story is easy to root for.
Impressively grounded

JayTWill wrote:gavran wrote:JayTWill wrote:
Why couldn't they have both Bridges and Grimes?
Because Grimes was traded for the contract that made the Bridges trade possible?
They could have kept Fournier for a few more months and made the same deal or traded Fournier to a team looking to dump a 2 year deal like the Lakers were trying to do with Russell's contract at the time and likely received some compensation for it. Any expiring around $20M could have been used as salary filler in the Bridges deal and it didn't require Grimes and two 2nds to acquire it.
2010 wrote:Guano wrote:2010 wrote:
That backcourt.
Really sucks that backcourt plays for the 6ers because their game is dope and they both are cool as hell.
I’m really pulling for Edgecombe (when he isn’t playing NY). His personal story is easy to root for.
