KGtabake wrote:dhsilv2 wrote:KGtabake wrote:
It's like trying to discuss Pele and Maradona in soccer.
Pele was in the '60s, Maradona in the '80s.
Much more videos and games of Maradona can be found on the internet.
Plus if you're close to 45(I'm 44) , you certainly have watched games as a kid and you do remember.
No way you'll find many that were watching Pele on television though.
I don't know who those guys are. But yeah, I'm in the ball park of your age and I remember say jordan playing live. I don't base anything I think about him on that viewing. Or at least I try not to. We have posters who saw Wilt live on here. Which is cool and really is nice to get their opinions. But I'm not going to take the knowledge they had of the game at that time and expect their live reactions are the same as it would be if you saw it live with a better understanding, that modern analysis has given us all.
That isn't to say Wilt wasn't a physical monster. But so was Russell and the rules/mindset didn't really let Wilt abuse his supposed freaky strength. So I struggle with as a player how Wilt would be see as more a freak outlier than some others. Now if Wilt was as strong as claimed, and he was allowed to maul people like Shaq. Now we'd have something. But even in limited footage and eye witness accounts...including by Wilt. He wasn't able to abuse his strength and mass. And I don't think it's wrong of either of us to take that as reasonably true without having seen him live.
Μy opinion on all things Wilt did and didn't do, has always been the same.
He's always judged by his winning.
There's always a big "if".
There's noone who can convince me that if he played on that era's Celtics instead of Bill, the Celtics wouldn't come up with the same number of championships.
That was a generational team.
I'm not taking anything away from Bill.
He's who he is in the all time lists, his resume speaks for itself.
But if Wilt was playing in his place, i doubt if people would appoint MJ as the GOAT so easily.
Because the rings culture is the strongest in the end of the day.
I guess the only way to measure Wilt's impact on the game is to point out that he lead the way for physical freaks like Shaq or Giannis or Wemby.
All these guys have been compared to Wilt when we're talking about physical dominance.
I just find it a bit unfair to say that Shaq was only the most dominant player of his era.
No. He was the best. Not only the most dominant.
I hear it a lot about Giannis the past few years. "The most dominant".
We'll be hearing about this with Wemby too.
I just think that this definition, is been made by people who don't want to admit that these guys are the best players period.
So they go with the "most dominant" nonsense and leave it there.
Wemby will be the best player in the world soon.
Not only the most "dominant".