threethehardway wrote:Desmond Bane is your Dejounte Murray. Got a player that you don't need to solve a problem you aren't willing to fix for a price that nobody else was willing to pay.
Sheesh, the reality of that is brutal.
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
threethehardway wrote:Desmond Bane is your Dejounte Murray. Got a player that you don't need to solve a problem you aren't willing to fix for a price that nobody else was willing to pay.
JujitsuFlip wrote:threethehardway wrote:Desmond Bane is your Dejounte Murray. Got a player that you don't need to solve a problem you aren't willing to fix for a price that nobody else was willing to pay.
Sheesh, the reality of that is brutal.

kg01 wrote:Ngl, as a Hawks fan, that cut deep deep. All them picks we gave the Spurs for him....![]()
Ah well, whats done is done. But still, I had to go caress that '26 Pelicans first round pick to console myself.
Last night was the first time I watched them this season. And in a sense, Bane does have a green light but he put the ball on the floor and drove it like 80% of the time he touched it.liquidswords wrote:I drafted Bane in my high(er) stakes fantasy league and what a **** mistake. I thought he was going to get a greenlight in ORL but he's been ordinary as ****.
JujitsuFlip wrote:Last night was the first time I watched them this season. And in a sense, Bane does have a green light but he put the ball on the floor and drove it like 80% of the time he touched it.liquidswords wrote:I drafted Bane in my high(er) stakes fantasy league and what a **** mistake. I thought he was going to get a greenlight in ORL but he's been ordinary as ****.
He needs to play more like Korver, Curry, and Merrill. Be that movement shooter to get the offense to open up.
The main issue with that is Banchero will have to sacrifice his ISO touches and frustrated 3 point chucking.
I said it from the start of this trade and I believe it. If this Magic team wanna get to where they think they should be, Banchero will have to sacrifice the most. He needs to set his teammates up, make his free throws, stop jacking 3s, and stop pouting.
Until Banchero does that, it doesn't matter if Bane has a red, yellow, or green light; he and the Magic won't be successful. Trying to turn Bane into a facilitator was never going to work. Trying to start him with another small guard who also can't facilitate is just a terrible combination.

LarsV8 wrote:This class of players is always tricky, both in trade value and contract value.
I view them as likely "4th best players on championship teams", ala high end role players, but probably not all star caliber.
Mikal Bridges
OG Anunoby
Desmond Bane
Aaron Gordon
DJ Murray
There will always be a temptation to overpay these guys from a contract standpoint or by sending to many picks (Bridges / Bane)
Savy teams will avoid overpaying, but it looks like Orlando got caught up in overpaying for this.
Magic#1 wrote:We have won two playoff games in two years. If we decide to keep this team for the next two years, maybe it will feel like we won a series.
John Murdoch wrote:LarsV8 wrote:This class of players is always tricky, both in trade value and contract value.
I view them as likely "4th best players on championship teams", ala high end role players, but probably not all star caliber.
Mikal Bridges
OG Anunoby
Desmond Bane
Aaron Gordon
DJ Murray
There will always be a temptation to overpay these guys from a contract standpoint or by sending to many picks (Bridges / Bane)
Savy teams will avoid overpaying, but it looks like Orlando got caught up in overpaying for this.
Before his injury tho Dejauntae was looking like a franchise player

JujitsuFlip wrote:Last night was the first time I watched them this season. And in a sense, Bane does have a green light but he put the ball on the floor and drove it like 80% of the time he touched it.liquidswords wrote:I drafted Bane in my high(er) stakes fantasy league and what a **** mistake. I thought he was going to get a greenlight in ORL but he's been ordinary as ****.
He needs to play more like Korver, Curry, and Merrill. Be that movement shooter to get the offense to open up.
The main issue with that is Banchero will have to sacrifice his ISO touches and frustrated 3 point chucking.
I said it from the start of this trade and I believe it. If this Magic team wanna get to where they think they should be, Banchero will have to sacrifice the most. He needs to set his teammates up, make his free throws, stop jacking 3s, and stop pouting.
Until Banchero does that, it doesn't matter if Bane has a red, yellow, or green light; he and the Magic won't be successful. Trying to turn Bane into a facilitator was never going to work. Trying to start him with another small guard who also can't facilitate is just a terrible combination.

threethehardway wrote:Desmond Bane is your Dejounte Murray. Got a player that you don't need to solve a problem you aren't willing to fix for a price that nobody else was willing to pay.
Doctor MJ wrote:threethehardway wrote:Desmond Bane is your Dejounte Murray. Got a player that you don't need to solve a problem you aren't willing to fix for a price that nobody else was willing to pay.
Wow, so first, this post hits like a freight train. Poetically stated!
But I'd quibble to some degree:
The fundamental problem with Murray, imho, is that he got drastically overrated by the Spurs letting him play helio so that they could inflate his trade value, and then the team that traded for him had a situation where Murray absolutely could not play helio. It was just awful GMing logic at every point along the way.
For Bane, the thing is, I think the theory of him actually made a lot of sense not just for the Magic but most teams in the league. Getting someone known for off-ball shooting while playing next to an on-ball star is just generally a great idea, and so I wouldn't say that this is "awful GMing long at every point along the way".
So what's the problem? Well, it may prove to be mostly about Bane just not being 100% comfortable yet, so time will tell on that, but there is another component that off-ball shooters are only as valuable as the on-ball facilitation is competent. You can't fix bad decision making on-ball by just giving them more options to make decisions on, and so what I would have suggested would have been to re-format the offense with a good floor general at the helm before going all-in on any kind of off-ball shooter.
To put another way: Trading for Bane doesn't really bother me, but trading so much for Bane without first building offensive infrastructure is just painting your franchise in a corner.
kobe_vs_jordan wrote:Seem like they felt like they couldn’t find their idea fit so they rushed to make a move for best player available
threethehardway wrote:thelead wrote:threethehardway wrote:Come on Magic fans, when is it too late to say when?
When we get a coach that has a good track record at running an offense. Unless you think Bane just forgot how to play basketball over the summer and it's just coincidence that he joins one of the worst offenses and the offense doesn't look any better even though he is a career 41% 3pt shooter (with a 59.5 career TS% too)
I don't think Bane is that good of a player to begin with.
I think people that think Bane was anywhere near even Lavine level are wrong.
What is happening to Bane is what happened to Dejounte Murray. You put them on a team that has expectations of performance to solve a problem and they can not do it because they were never that good
In fact, I only think about 30 NBA players are legitimately good to great NBA players that you can an stuxk anywhere to solve a roster problem and Babe isn't one of them.
If anyone seriously thought Desmond Bane, who suffered with inconsistent shooting and self creation was going to the Magic and was going to be good for them you didn't watch enough Grizzlies games.
It's like people who thought Dejounte Murray was a good point guard because they box scored watched him get triple doubles late at night and come to find out he won't defend, take contact and stop shooting miserable pull ups.
Desmond Bane is your Dejounte Murray. Got a player that you don't need to solve a problem you aren't willing to fix for a price that nobody else was willing to pay.
The Master wrote:kobe_vs_jordan wrote:Seem like they felt like they couldn’t find their idea fit so they rushed to make a move for best player available
Sometimes I think that the weakness (?) of Eastern Conference definitely gives an illusion that you don't need that much to move the needle in your favor, that's why we've seen so many sub-optimal moves lately by the Magic, Knicks, or Hawks earlier, with overpaying for top50 players at best like Bane, Bridges, or Dejounte, or the whole Raptors situation. Not saying this is the only explanation, there are Western Conference teams that would be willing to do the same, but again, this is the best explanation of what Magic did, like you correctly stated - they rushed for no reason, and now they have no flexibility going forward.

kobe_vs_jordan wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:threethehardway wrote:Desmond Bane is your Dejounte Murray. Got a player that you don't need to solve a problem you aren't willing to fix for a price that nobody else was willing to pay.
Wow, so first, this post hits like a freight train. Poetically stated!
But I'd quibble to some degree:
The fundamental problem with Murray, imho, is that he got drastically overrated by the Spurs letting him play helio so that they could inflate his trade value, and then the team that traded for him had a situation where Murray absolutely could not play helio. It was just awful GMing logic at every point along the way.
For Bane, the thing is, I think the theory of him actually made a lot of sense not just for the Magic but most teams in the league. Getting someone known for off-ball shooting while playing next to an on-ball star is just generally a great idea, and so I wouldn't say that this is "awful GMing long at every point along the way".
So what's the problem? Well, it may prove to be mostly about Bane just not being 100% comfortable yet, so time will tell on that, but there is another component that off-ball shooters are only as valuable as the on-ball facilitation is competent. You can't fix bad decision making on-ball by just giving them more options to make decisions on, and so what I would have suggested would have been to re-format the offense with a good floor general at the helm before going all-in on any kind of off-ball shooter.
To put another way: Trading for Bane doesn't really bother me, but trading so much for Bane without first building offensive infrastructure is just painting your franchise in a corner.
Think you put it well. They got ahead of themselves on the rebuild and likely heading towards another rebuild because of it.
Seem like they felt like they couldn’t find their idea fit so they rushed to make a move for best player available
I think it's worse than that, after watching them last night.Doctor MJ wrote:threethehardway wrote:Desmond Bane is your Dejounte Murray. Got a player that you don't need to solve a problem you aren't willing to fix for a price that nobody else was willing to pay.
Wow, so first, this post hits like a freight train. Poetically stated!
But I'd quibble to some degree:
The fundamental problem with Murray, imho, is that he got drastically overrated by the Spurs letting him play helio so that they could inflate his trade value, and then the team that traded for him had a situation where Murray absolutely could not play helio. It was just awful GMing logic at every point along the way.
For Bane, the thing is, I think the theory of him actually made a lot of sense not just for the Magic but most teams in the league. Getting someone known for off-ball shooting while playing next to an on-ball star is just generally a great idea, and so I wouldn't say that this is "awful GMing long at every point along the way".
So what's the problem? Well, it may prove to be mostly about Bane just not being 100% comfortable yet, so time will tell on that, but there is another component that off-ball shooters are only as valuable as the on-ball facilitation is competent. You can't fix bad decision making on-ball by just giving them more options to make decisions on, and so what I would have suggested would have been to re-format the offense with a good floor general at the helm before going all-in on any kind of off-ball shooter.
To put another way: Trading for Bane doesn't really bother me, but trading so much for Bane without first building offensive infrastructure is just painting your franchise in a corner.

JujitsuFlip wrote:I think it's worse than that, after watching them last night.Doctor MJ wrote:threethehardway wrote:Desmond Bane is your Dejounte Murray. Got a player that you don't need to solve a problem you aren't willing to fix for a price that nobody else was willing to pay.
Wow, so first, this post hits like a freight train. Poetically stated!
But I'd quibble to some degree:
The fundamental problem with Murray, imho, is that he got drastically overrated by the Spurs letting him play helio so that they could inflate his trade value, and then the team that traded for him had a situation where Murray absolutely could not play helio. It was just awful GMing logic at every point along the way.
For Bane, the thing is, I think the theory of him actually made a lot of sense not just for the Magic but most teams in the league. Getting someone known for off-ball shooting while playing next to an on-ball star is just generally a great idea, and so I wouldn't say that this is "awful GMing long at every point along the way".
So what's the problem? Well, it may prove to be mostly about Bane just not being 100% comfortable yet, so time will tell on that, but there is another component that off-ball shooters are only as valuable as the on-ball facilitation is competent. You can't fix bad decision making on-ball by just giving them more options to make decisions on, and so what I would have suggested would have been to re-format the offense with a good floor general at the helm before going all-in on any kind of off-ball shooter.
To put another way: Trading for Bane doesn't really bother me, but trading so much for Bane without first building offensive infrastructure is just painting your franchise in a corner.
The Magic took an off ball shooter in Bane and now made him their primary ball handler. They're trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.
Mosley miscast Bane as this floor general or facilitator. They're trying to make this off ball shooter they traded for into an on ball threat, it truly makes no sense.
The guy last night was rarely catching and shooting. He was putting it on the floor, driving into traffic trying to score or facilitate for his teammates. Most of the time it ended in turnovers or bad shots.
I don't understand the logic behind it at all.
FarBeyondDriven wrote:that's literally what Memphis did and he shined. The more likely issue is that the offense running through two 6'9" point forwards, neither of which is a great three point shooter (Wagner has been better this year so far), isn't doing anyone any favors. Could be they just need to figure things out and patience is required. Could mean they need to move someone so roles are more properly defined