Billl wrote:I was going to say NO, but I went Jazz. If you are going to be horrible, at least pick Bourbon st over South Temple Street.
The question isn’t which city you would like to get a beer in or try to get laid. The question is the past and present success and failures of a franchise.
The Pels aren’t even remotely close to the Jazz from a historical perspective. Not even up for debate.
The Jazz have a million draft picks incoming and the Pels have a broken Zion and traded away their FRP this year.
And don’t hit me with stars don’t want to go to Utah. They don’t want to be in NO either. When was the last big name free agent that the Pels signed? And AD and CP3 both got out of NO and weren’t trying to go back.
There really is only a few big cities guys want to go to. It’s LA, Miami, NY, and Chicago and Boston. And NY and Chi have done such a poor job from a management perspective over the past 20+ years they have fumbled their advantage. So really we got three teams in LA, Miami, and Boston who have a location advantage and maximized it or made the most of it. Maybe you could argue Texas teams because of the tax incentives as well. But no one is pushing for NO, Char, Sac, UT, ATL, etc, etc.
I don’t see a single point that someone could argue NO has a better situation than UT (or just about any other team) other than “NO is cool and SLC sucks”. Which is a lazy take and has nothing to do with building a team. No one wants to be in OKC and yet they built a champion level team who are going to compete for the next decade.
The CBA dictates good managed teams are going to become the better teams. It takes time but that’s how it’s going to work. Dumars clearly isn’t up to the task of building a good team. Trading away the FRP for the 13th pick when you don’t have a good solid team and the pick could end up going number 1 in a loaded draft is up there with trading Luka away. And I have to think Dumars got clearance from ownership for the trade so clearly the owners of NO aren’t up to the task either.