Handlez wrote:Lakers gotta get in on this.
I’ll take Keon Ellis. No thanks to everyone else.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Handlez wrote:Lakers gotta get in on this.
Effigy wrote:Optms wrote:Lalouie wrote::lol:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
it's the zach effect
people are so tethered to his dunking it takes them time to realize he adds zero to the W's and they walk through a season in a malaise inducing brain fog
he's a negative sum player
DeRozan and Sabonis don't add value either. Pacers and Raptors had the most success post Sabonis and DD. Slim pickings.
That's a little unfair in Derozan's case, since they moved him for Kawai Leonard. They haven't had more success other than that one year he was there.
Thaddy wrote:I can tell you right now the Bulls will collapse by mid season and will be fighting in or for the play in.
Remember it.
KnicksGadfly wrote:Damn I'm impressed by the Kings if they have the balls to just call it now.
But one thing - they need to get rid of Scott Perry fast. He does not know shyt. Get someone who actually knows how to rebuild.
Chuck Everett wrote:One (1) playoff berth since 2006. 19 seasons. Futility they name is Sacramento.
The guy with the best value is probably Schröder because his contract is low and we know he can go in the playoffs.

wayoftheroad wrote:We’re getting bodied by Moochie Norris lmao

Lalouie wrote::lol:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
it's the zach effect
people are so tethered to his dunking it takes them time to realize he adds zero to the W's and they walk through a season in a malaise inducing brain fog
he's a negative sum player

Would Lavine control the ball too much for Giannis' liking?TheNewEra wrote:Lalouie wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
it's the zach effect
people are so tethered to his dunking it takes them time to realize he adds zero to the W's and they walk through a season in a malaise inducing brain fog
he's a negative sum player
I hold similar feelings about players like Lavine and Beal but dammit if you put Lavine on the Bucks I think it would be a perfect fit. Even empty calorie points would be a boost and relief for Giannis
TheNewEra wrote:Lalouie wrote::lol:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
it's the zach effect
people are so tethered to his dunking it takes them time to realize he adds zero to the W's and they walk through a season in a malaise inducing brain fog
he's a negative sum player
I hold similar feelings about players like Lavine and Beal but dammit if you put Lavine on the Bucks I think it would be a perfect fit. Even empty calorie points would be a boost and relief for Giannis

TheNewEra wrote:Lalouie wrote::lol:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
it's the zach effect
people are so tethered to his dunking it takes them time to realize he adds zero to the W's and they walk through a season in a malaise inducing brain fog
he's a negative sum player
I hold similar feelings about players like Lavine and Beal but dammit if you put Lavine on the Bucks I think it would be a perfect fit. Even empty calorie points would be a boost and relief for Giannis
wayoftheroad wrote:We’re getting bodied by Moochie Norris lmao

zimpy27 wrote:Sabonis is interesting. I think a team could build a Nuggets style offense around him.
HMFFL wrote:Would Lavine control the ball too much for Guannis' liking?TheNewEra wrote:Lalouie wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
it's the zach effect
people are so tethered to his dunking it takes them time to realize he adds zero to the W's and they walk through a season in a malaise inducing brain fog
he's a negative sum player
I hold similar feelings about players like Lavine and Beal but dammit if you put Lavine on the Bucks I think it would be a perfect fit. Even empty calorie points would be a boost and relief for Giannis
Lavine to me is a negative and the Bucks already have a couple on their roster. Lavine has had one season where is team played above .500 in his NBA career.
Clav wrote:I see Monk being the most versatile fit for other teams to target but Sabonis is probably the best overall player, and certainly could make a difference if teams sack [ha, pun not intended] some MLE level or 20M contracts for a solid post presence. Charlotte ?? Phoenix ?? Orlando (walk with me on Domas high-post unlocking the Magic offense. I rate both of them as 1 FRP or better.
Schroder and Westbrook could potentially help teams needing guards, of which there are a few, but they aren't necessarily game changers for the receivign team. However they might be worth a deeper bench player needing a new home.
Also, will be interesting if DeRozan finds a place a la Sabonis, same situation. He can help in certain situations, but is not the best target for improving the maximum ceiling. He is a proven scorer. There should be some level in intrigue here.
Get creative GMs let's see what you got.
Kings untouchables for me are Murray and Clifford. Saric is low enough salary that he should only be included if necessary.