mpharris36 wrote:Capn'O wrote:Busta Bucket wrote:Okay, yeah, I just took a closer look at the numbers and I'd love to know more about how they come up w/the composite ratings because they barely relate to the individual skill ratings, so I'm gonna go ahead and just ignore those...

It's probably something like an extrapolation of PER that doesn't really relate.
maybe some composite of all the categories...so the guys that check off a lot of the categories (the masters non but do a little of everything usually have decent ratings.
I think scoring is also heavily influenced or at least thats how I perceive it.
If it is, I haven't seen how but it's also worthless enough that I haven't bothered.
I think a perfect example is Caruso he's 58 ranking...he gets killed because of his low scoring but his defensive impact alone will be higher than most 60 or 70 rated players (maybe even some 80 ranked players).
Right. It's why Thybulle impacted my starting lineup much more positively than Kuminga last season even though Kuminga had a much higher rating.
I don't wanna talk about Thybulle's ratings.