pilkoids wrote:Surprised to find out that both these guys are just 6'9
Probably why Detroit tried to trot out James Wiseman at C for a while next to Jalen before realizing size doesn't equal effectiveness in the NBA
Moderators: bwgood77, Dirk, Domejandro, zimpy27, ken6199, cupcakesnake, infinite11285, KingDavid, bisme37, Clav
pilkoids wrote:Surprised to find out that both these guys are just 6'9

GregOden wrote:pilkoids wrote:Surprised to find out that both these guys are just 6'9
Probably why Detroit tried to trot out James Wiseman at C for a while next to Jalen before realizing size doesn't equal effectiveness in the NBA
HumbleRen wrote:Sane wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:
Cade is a much better two way player than Sengun.
Sengun had a better supporting cast and coach last year, that Detroit roster was a dumpster fire.
Totally disagree but that's irrelevant. The point is Sengun is his team's Cade. He is the offensive hub that carries everything. He's also (for over 2 years now) the starting C and rim protector of a western contender top 10 in defense. Duren is not in that conversation.
Subjective. Pistons are good because of their defensive identity, not because of Cade’s offence. He’s one of the least efficient players in the league with volume and their offence is mid at best. I don’t want to discredit Cade but I think people put way too much credit on Cade. They’re great because they’re a top 5 defence and Duren plays a big role in that, that can’t get lost in this.
Sane wrote:HumbleRen wrote:Sane wrote:
Totally disagree but that's irrelevant. The point is Sengun is his team's Cade. He is the offensive hub that carries everything. He's also (for over 2 years now) the starting C and rim protector of a western contender top 10 in defense. Duren is not in that conversation.
Subjective. Pistons are good because of their defensive identity, not because of Cade’s offence. He’s one of the least efficient players in the league with volume and their offence is mid at best. I don’t want to discredit Cade but I think people put way too much credit on Cade. They’re great because they’re a top 5 defence and Duren plays a big role in that, that can’t get lost in this.
Not subjective at all. Defense is Rockets identity too. Sengun just brings points as well. In basketball there's only offense and defense.
Sengun is a bigger part of Houston's offense. He's not just better than Duren, he's clearly one or two tiers higher. We're talking about a guy who's putting up 23 points from post, midrange, drives, 3pt land and 8 assists to boot. It's another universe bro.
He's just as important to the defense as Duren. In fact they're in identical situations: a top 6 defense, their backup C is a better rim protector than them and there's a Thompson twin helping them out at all times. I'll repeat: Sengun is about to have his 3rd straight season as the starting C of a top 10 defense i.e. a championship calibre defense. Duren definitely has a more promising defensive FUTURE, but at PRESENT he's not anywhere near as accomplished as Sengun.
So if he's a roughly equivalent defender and Sengun is a far better offensive player, it's not even a debate. I think the better argument for you is for the future since Duren is younger (I think) and his defensive potential is still untapped. If he becomes a DPOY type player later, then yes on the overall he will be able to compete with Sengun.
hardenASG13 wrote:Sane wrote:HumbleRen wrote:
Subjective. Pistons are good because of their defensive identity, not because of Cade’s offence. He’s one of the least efficient players in the league with volume and their offence is mid at best. I don’t want to discredit Cade but I think people put way too much credit on Cade. They’re great because they’re a top 5 defence and Duren plays a big role in that, that can’t get lost in this.
Not subjective at all. Defense is Rockets identity too. Sengun just brings points as well. In basketball there's only offense and defense.
Sengun is a bigger part of Houston's offense. He's not just better than Duren, he's clearly one or two tiers higher. We're talking about a guy who's putting up 23 points from post, midrange, drives, 3pt land and 8 assists to boot. It's another universe bro.
He's just as important to the defense as Duren. In fact they're in identical situations: a top 6 defense, their backup C is a better rim protector than them and there's a Thompson twin helping them out at all times. I'll repeat: Sengun is about to have his 3rd straight season as the starting C of a top 10 defense i.e. a championship calibre defense. Duren definitely has a more promising defensive FUTURE, but at PRESENT he's not anywhere near as accomplished as Sengun.
So if he's a roughly equivalent defender and Sengun is a far better offensive player, it's not even a debate. I think the better argument for you is for the future since Duren is younger (I think) and his defensive potential is still untapped. If he becomes a DPOY type player later, then yes on the overall he will be able to compete with Sengun.
Im not sure about it being a different universe on offense. Duren is averaging 20.6 to Senguns 23ppg. But sengun plays 7 minutes more a game due to Duren struggling with foul issues earlier in the season. Duren averages more points per 36. Yes Sengun gets more assists, partially as a result of his team not having a true pg, as opposed to Duren having Cade. Why does that matter so much to say they're in a different universe? Duren averages more rebounds, including offensive rebounds, in the 7 less minutes per game. Duren is also shooting a ridiculous 67% from the field and 77% from the line. His off the dribble game has improved alot, and he attacks alot on drives from the midpost/top of the key, too. This isn't to say Sengun is bad, but its not some sizable gap between the two offensively.
Sane wrote:HumbleRen wrote:Sane wrote:
Totally disagree but that's irrelevant. The point is Sengun is his team's Cade. He is the offensive hub that carries everything. He's also (for over 2 years now) the starting C and rim protector of a western contender top 10 in defense. Duren is not in that conversation.
Subjective. Pistons are good because of their defensive identity, not because of Cade’s offence. He’s one of the least efficient players in the league with volume and their offence is mid at best. I don’t want to discredit Cade but I think people put way too much credit on Cade. They’re great because they’re a top 5 defence and Duren plays a big role in that, that can’t get lost in this.
Not subjective at all. Defense is Rockets identity too. Sengun just brings points as well. In basketball there's only offense and defense.
Sengun is a bigger part of Houston's offense. He's not just better than Duren, he's clearly one or two tiers higher. We're talking about a guy who's putting up 23 points from post, midrange, drives, 3pt land and 8 assists to boot. It's another universe bro.
He's just as important to the defense as Duren. In fact they're in identical situations: a top 6 defense, their backup C is a better rim protector than them and there's a Thompson twin helping them out at all times. I'll repeat: Sengun is about to have his 3rd straight season as the starting C of a top 10 defense i.e. a championship calibre defense. Duren definitely has a more promising defensive FUTURE, but at PRESENT he's not anywhere near as accomplished as Sengun.
So if he's a roughly equivalent defender and Sengun is a far better offensive player, it's not even a debate. I think the better argument for you is for the future since Duren is younger (I think) and his defensive potential is still untapped. If he becomes a DPOY type player later, then yes on the overall he will be able to compete with Sengun.

Sane wrote:Don't want to go in circles. I've listed out all the things that Sengun does better including 3pt shooting, assists and driving ability. Like how are we having a genuine conversation when you're leaving 8 assists out of the conversation?
Clearly the guy averaging over 20ppg since last season and averaging 23 points and 8 assists is better than Jalen Duren. Way better. The 5+ assist differential is 10-15 points generated. I can't take you seriously if you can't see that, I'm really sorry.
HumbleRen wrote:I’d be way more comfortable having Duren as my 2nd best player on a contender than having Sengun as my best player in the future.
The Master wrote:Sane wrote:Don't want to go in circles. I've listed out all the things that Sengun does better including 3pt shooting, assists and driving ability. Like how are we having a genuine conversation when you're leaving 8 assists out of the conversation?
Clearly the guy averaging over 20ppg since last season and averaging 23 points and 8 assists is better than Jalen Duren. Way better. The 5+ assist differential is 10-15 points generated. I can't take you seriously if you can't see that, I'm really sorry.
First of all, Sengun is a main creator and top2 scorer on the best offense in the league at the beginning of the season, Duren is a fantastic finisher, but he doesn't provide spacing nor playmaking. Sengun was also a better rim protector throughout their respective careers, although so far their splits are similar.
Duren is great, but I don't think it's close at this point.HumbleRen wrote:I’d be way more comfortable having Duren as my 2nd best player on a contender than having Sengun as my best player in the future.
Sengun is already the best player on a strong contender. He's 23.


Sane wrote:hardenASG13 wrote:Sane wrote:
Not subjective at all. Defense is Rockets identity too. Sengun just brings points as well. In basketball there's only offense and defense.
Sengun is a bigger part of Houston's offense. He's not just better than Duren, he's clearly one or two tiers higher. We're talking about a guy who's putting up 23 points from post, midrange, drives, 3pt land and 8 assists to boot. It's another universe bro.
He's just as important to the defense as Duren. In fact they're in identical situations: a top 6 defense, their backup C is a better rim protector than them and there's a Thompson twin helping them out at all times. I'll repeat: Sengun is about to have his 3rd straight season as the starting C of a top 10 defense i.e. a championship calibre defense. Duren definitely has a more promising defensive FUTURE, but at PRESENT he's not anywhere near as accomplished as Sengun.
So if he's a roughly equivalent defender and Sengun is a far better offensive player, it's not even a debate. I think the better argument for you is for the future since Duren is younger (I think) and his defensive potential is still untapped. If he becomes a DPOY type player later, then yes on the overall he will be able to compete with Sengun.
Im not sure about it being a different universe on offense. Duren is averaging 20.6 to Senguns 23ppg. But sengun plays 7 minutes more a game due to Duren struggling with foul issues earlier in the season. Duren averages more points per 36. Yes Sengun gets more assists, partially as a result of his team not having a true pg, as opposed to Duren having Cade. Why does that matter so much to say they're in a different universe? Duren averages more rebounds, including offensive rebounds, in the 7 less minutes per game. Duren is also shooting a ridiculous 67% from the field and 77% from the line. His off the dribble game has improved alot, and he attacks alot on drives from the midpost/top of the key, too. This isn't to say Sengun is bad, but its not some sizable gap between the two offensively.
Don't want to go in circles. I've listed out all the things that Sengun does better including 3pt shooting, assists and driving ability. Like how are we having a genuine conversation when you're leaving 8 assists out of the conversation?
Clearly the guy averaging over 20ppg since last season and averaging 23 points and 8 assists is better than Jalen Duren. Way better. The 5+ assist differential is 10-15 points generated. I can't take you seriously if you can't see that, I'm really sorry.
DelAbbot wrote:HumbleRen wrote:HumbleRen wrote:Duren.
I just don't trust a team with Sengun at the 5. His talent is fascinating but I think there's a hard cap on any team that he's on, similar to Sabonis.
I would like to issue an apology to Sengun. He’s much better than Sabonis. He’s still too inefficient for a center for my taste though but he’s been a stud. I never pictured him playing with KD when I made that post.
Still comfortable with my choice though, Duren is a superhuman haha.
I still don't see a team with Sengun at the 5 wins a championship. Has a prototype (not-Jokic) such as Sengun ever manned the 5 for a championship team?

HumbleRen wrote:Best player is subjective, Sengun hasn’t shown me anything to prove that. Put up one of the least efficient showings from a center in the playoffs last year. Am I supposed to vault him over KD just because a 37 year old KD isn’t going balls to the wall in the regular season? Fat chance.
The Master wrote:HumbleRen wrote:Best player is subjective, Sengun hasn’t shown me anything to prove that. Put up one of the least efficient showings from a center in the playoffs last year. Am I supposed to vault him over KD just because a 37 year old KD isn’t going balls to the wall in the regular season? Fat chance.
Sengun is both the best player on the Rockets in terms of boxscore production (6.3 BPM vs 2.1 BPM of KD) and on/off numbers (+11.2 ON/OFF vs 1.9 ON/OFF of KD). It's still a small sample size, but so is Duren's rise, so it's not an argument in this specific discussion. We have to wait if his shooting splits are sustainable, but so far Rockets are super elite and Sengun is an anchor of their offense (1st in the league).
Also, Sengun, if he had developed his outside shot like his early numbers suggest, would've been a Pau-esque second option with his skillset. One of the reasons why Rockets are legit very early on is that he can be both a complementary piece on offense and a 1A option as a playmaker.
So I'd be definitely less 'decisive' in this 'not a 1st option for a contender' or 'the better 2nd option'.

HumbleRen wrote:People keep saying saying Baby Jokic while completely forgetting one of the largest reasons that Jokic is this good is because he’s one of most hyper efficient scoring bigs that we’ve ever seen in nba history.
Sengun can’t even get to league average TS despite shooting 40% from the 3 right now. Don’t tell me he’s baby Jokic. He’s not. The worst version of Jokic would never be inefficient beside a player of KD’s scoring gravity. Not even Sabonis would.
Let’s stop acting like Sengun is some scoring savant.