Rebuilding the Spurs

Moderator: G R E Y

User avatar
imagump1313
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,998
And1: 4,006
Joined: Apr 27, 2013
Location: Behind You
       

Re: Rebuilding the Spurs 

Post#161 » by imagump1313 » Tue Nov 18, 2025 12:18 am

Rustyman wrote:
imagump1313 wrote:You dont really need a SF to be a big scorer with this roster. Castle is a scorer, Wemby is a scorer, Barnes is a scorer, Fox is a scorer, Harper is a scorer, Johnson is somewhat of a scorer. You need someone who can move the ball around and involve Wemby who can rebound and play defense. Bryant can do all of that. Johnson can as well. Champaigne is just a chucker who gets lit up every night defensively and turns the ball over like a maniac.


Not true. Wemby and Fox are the only reliable scorers on the roster. Everyone else is game to game.

Champagnie is no better or worse than Vassell at 10% of the cost and he will stay faithful to that role.

Vassell will get "main character syndrome" at least a couple of times a game where he thinks the team is built around him. Julian has no such misconceptions and therefore makes less errors.


We can agree to disagree about that. I'd rather have Vassell than Champaigne any day of the week.
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,236
And1: 2,052
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

Re: Rebuilding the Spurs 

Post#162 » by Ballings7 » Tue Nov 18, 2025 4:07 am

Rustyman wrote:
Ballings7 wrote:And, Champegnie of course is not the answer as a starting/finishing SF, but in the short-term he is a better gap filler until probably Carter Bryant is ready, or someone else perhaps.


And this I think is at the heart of the problem, when your $27m dollar guy can not even perform at the level of a standard MLE 3&D guy, you have a problem. Julian is the best option now and I would play Bryant heavy minutes in the G-League to see if his shot comes around as that is the key failing of the Spurs at the moment. Even more than the lack of a starting calibre PF where Barnes/Sochan and platoon effectively until something better comes along.

And I am starting to agree with GREY. Lets bring something in this trade deadline to see if it can improve the team. If not, we do it in the off-season.


Yeah, I think the Spurs will be looking actively to improve the team, SF being primary issue.
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
Rustyman
Pro Prospect
Posts: 754
And1: 771
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: Rebuilding the Spurs 

Post#163 » by Rustyman » Yesterday 8:30 am

imagump1313 wrote:We can agree to disagree about that. I'd rather have Vassell than Champaigne any day of the week.


Embrace the Champagne!!! You know it is good for you!
Rustyman
Pro Prospect
Posts: 754
And1: 771
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: Rebuilding the Spurs 

Post#164 » by Rustyman » Yesterday 10:05 am

I think what the last couple of Spurs wins without Wemby and Castle has proved is that the Spurs are probably a 35-38 win team without those two.

With Wemby and Castle, I predicted that the Spurs would win 50 games this year.

Assuming that both Wemby and Castle are back within the next 2-4 weeks, what does this board think the next Spurs personnel move should be?

For me it is Vassell for a 3&D player, whether it be for a high-end player like Trey Murphy III where we probably have to attach a couple of firsts or whether it simply be a MLE level player + a young big. I would prefer this move happen earlier than later but what do others think.
User avatar
G R E Y
Senior Mod - Spurs
Senior Mod - Spurs
Posts: 52,888
And1: 40,374
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Location: Silver and Black
 

Re: Rebuilding the Spurs 

Post#165 » by G R E Y » Yesterday 3:32 pm

Rustyman wrote:I think what the last couple of Spurs wins without Wemby and Castle has proved is that the Spurs are probably a 35-38 win team without those two.

With Wemby and Castle, I predicted that the Spurs would win 50 games this year.

Assuming that both Wemby and Castle are back within the next 2-4 weeks, what does this board think the next Spurs personnel move should be?

For me it is Vassell for a 3&D player, whether it be for a high-end player like Trey Murphy III where we LEprobably have to attach a couple of firsts or whether it simply be a MLE level player + a young big. I would prefer this move happen earlier than later but what do others think.

Yeah Vassell came into the league as a defensive stalwart. Then in whichever year it was that a contract was looming he came to camp focused much more on scoring and in 2023/24he averaged 19.5/3.8/4.1. The points and assists stand as career highs and the rebounds have remained within that range.

In yesterday's game, and several others before it this season, we created some Vassell shots and got clanks early. Some games he stubbornly keeps taking 3s regardless of efficiency, others he drives very well and finishes through tough contests. Lately he's been making turning point level defensive impact, like clutch plays late in games and these have been huge for us. This is his identity and wheelhouse which he'd gotten away from to try and become more of a scorer. You want a guy to grow his game and can't blame him for focusing more on O in a contract year. But it feels like an imbalance occurred in our lean years when he was the default go to guy. Keldon has made the adjustments and accepted an important niche role, as has Sochan. Both their games are so important for us.

Devin though still gets prime option syndrome as some residual carry over from the lean years and though these were growing pains as guys tried to figure out scoring at the NBA level, it just feels like we're still stuck in growing pains rather than accepting, like Keldon and Sochan have, a specific role.

Even his own teammates looked off him late last night on O. In the last 3 minutes during our 11-0 run, he did not put up a shot. Defended well as he did all game, grabbed a board, dished an assist, perfect complementary role contributing to winning .

Trouble is consistency and confidence. He doesn't like contact on drives and so we do not get them consistently. The most he has averaged is 3FTAs a game, in that 2023/24 season.

His shot profile this season is about 43%/57% 2s and 3s, and of those 2s, he takes the most from 10-16', a habit he's shown his entire career except for 2023/24 when most of his 2s were from 0-3'. And that's fine I guess as a different type of threat and look defenses have to cover. It's just he's making the 10-16' shots at 48.3% (actually second highest of his career), but making 3s at just 34.7%, tied with his rookie year for lowest. Of course the highest efficiency is at the rim.

All of which is to say that in increased minutes, he's taking 1.7FGAs fewer than last season (3 fewer than in 2023/24), at worse efficiency in the shots he takes the most. I'd look up clutch efficiency but that would be an unnecessary cruelty.

I don't know if he is trying so hard to stand out on O given the pressure of his contact, but he's just not the second or even third option type (though sometimes he can be). Making smart clutch defensive plays helps his stock and takes pressure off needing to make O plays.

I'd love to pry Murphy III from the Pels but even they know what they have in him. 6"8', 25, 19.7, 6.8, 3.1 on 37.7 % from 3, gets to the FT line well, makes over 93% there, great defender, on a smaller contract than Vassell's. They've made some questionable trades but unless they value unprotected picks, and not ours but those we have from other teams, Murphy III is exactly the kind of player you keep.

Carter will hopefully become what we need at 3, but in the meantime the wheelhouse is TMIII or Avdija types. I like Santi's game, too.

Packaging Devin with whichever reasonable assets for a steady 3&D at 3 upgrade is the move now. We can't have an inefficient 13ppg at $27M 3rd/4th option who forces a 2nd / 3rd option role (he's 3rd this season with 12.2FGAs behind Wemby and Fox). Getting Fox was an acknowledgement that Vassell isn't the 2nd option to Wemby we thought he'd be. And that's ok. But paying more for less isn't. Even with better D this season, it's hard to have the O we're getting from an out of position at 3 player. (Then again, he way over dribbles and takes too long making decisions as a 2, so... ). More downhill drives, more elbow makes, no end of Q heaves, stellar clutch D. That's a better profile for him. He's still the likeliest trade candidate, but in the meantime we really need him to break some bad habits, for us and for him.
ImageImageImage
The Spurs Way Ever Onward

#XX
Rustyman
Pro Prospect
Posts: 754
And1: 771
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: Rebuilding the Spurs 

Post#166 » by Rustyman » Today 12:12 am

G R E Y wrote:Combining Devin with whichever reasonable assets for a steady 3&D at 3 upgrade is the move now. We can't have an inefficient 13ppg at $27M 3rd/4th option who forces a 2nd / 3rd option role (he's 3rd this season with 12.2FGAs behind Wemby and Fox). Getting Fox was an acknowledgement that Vassell isn't the 2nd option to Wemby we thought he'd be. And that's ok. But paying more for less isn't. Even with better D this season, it's hard to have the O we're getting from an out of position at 3 player. (Then again, he way over dribbles and takes too long making decisions as a 2, so... ). More downhill drives, more elbow makes, no end of Q heaves, stellar clutch D. That's a better profile for him. He's still the likeliest trade candidate, but in the meantime we really need him to break some bad habits, for us and for him.


And this is at the heart of my argument. It is nothing against Devin, it is simply that he does not offer what the Spurs need at this stage and he is way overpaid for his production.
User avatar
imagump1313
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,998
And1: 4,006
Joined: Apr 27, 2013
Location: Behind You
       

Re: Rebuilding the Spurs 

Post#167 » by imagump1313 » Today 1:11 am

Rustyman wrote:I think what the last couple of Spurs wins without Wemby and Castle has proved is that the Spurs are probably a 35-38 win team without those two.

With Wemby and Castle, I predicted that the Spurs would win 50 games this year.

Assuming that both Wemby and Castle are back within the next 2-4 weeks, what does this board think the next Spurs personnel move should be?

For me it is Vassell for a 3&D player, whether it be for a high-end player like Trey Murphy III where we probably have to attach a couple of firsts or whether it simply be a MLE level player + a young big. I would prefer this move happen earlier than later but what do others think.



WOAH! Hold on cowboy! We beat two of the worst teams in the league and should have lost one of those. :lol:

Good question about what to do next though. There isn't much available to get in a trade without unbelievably overpaying at this time. Anyone worthwhile that could make us better is going to come with the other team asking for high draft picks.

Maybe if Boston keeps tanking we could trick them into thinking Vassell is a younger version of Derrick White and get him back? Throw in Champaigne and a future pick. This would make me smile. Can you imagine how much better we would be with White playing instead of Vassell? OMG.

I think the bigger flaw is not the roster, but the coaching. Vassell is really valuable to us if he is used properly. I dont hate him. I was one of his biggest fans 2-3 years ago. The problem is he thinks he is the man and no one on the staff reigns that in. As we have talked about here a couple times, He would better serve us coming off the bench. We also have a few guys here who aren't accountable and have never been held accountable(looks at Champaigne) for making horrible decisions, playing terrible defense and turning the ball over like crazy. We could fix that overnight if someone on the staff would actually coach instead of high five everyone who does something stupid. I'm not saying fire Johnson already(even though I said at the time that was a gigantic mistake) but we need a different approach than what we are doing now IMO.
User avatar
G R E Y
Senior Mod - Spurs
Senior Mod - Spurs
Posts: 52,888
And1: 40,374
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Location: Silver and Black
 

Re: Rebuilding the Spurs 

Post#168 » by G R E Y » Today 2:47 am

Hmm, I don't know, gump. Like we've tried Vassell as the bench 6th man, we've tried him as starting 2, as lead guard, as primary scorer, as secondary scorer, now at the 3.

He's just the same guy. His stats have largely plateaued or gotten worse.

He shows that the D IQ is there and when the effort is there he is impactful.

But like this goes beyond coaching and into contract reality and that whole thing of perception. We projected him to be improving from that 19.5ppg season. He was improving until then. But he has dropped off since, never reaching it again.

Seems end of last game when he didn't shoot it once in the last 3 minutes - and Keldon looked off him and chose to pass to Barnes - teammates sorted it out.

We already got Fox as an admission that Vassell is not that guy. Now we should have a $27M guy coming off the bench which sends a he's not even a starter guy?

That's problematic for a variety of reasons. Like having Fox in addition to Wemby was supposed to make things easier for Vassell. Instead he's... Well the same guy with the same shot profile, just more inefficient somehow.

Champie is definitely not a starter but good in his more limited role. He is good value for his contract. Dumb mistakes and all. Champie by the way averages 1.3TOs per game and DV is pretty clean at 1.1. These aren't game breakers (unless of course the one TO is at the worst most crucial anti clutch time of the game. Well then it goes back to who has IT under pressure and who **** the bed).

However unwarranted, perception and expectation are tied in part to contract and draft position to a lesser extent.

Area 51 combines for 7.6 TOs a game this season. Now *that's* bad. Is anyone going to chew them out? Like someone should, but then again Wemby is in the midst of altering his game significantly, or at least adding to it and has to learn how to best post up cleanly.

Not sure wtf Castle and his team high 4TOs/game is about besides **** hard hands.

Anyway, I'm resigned to accepting that Vassell is who he is as a player at this point. Nothing in his stats shows any different whether Pop was chewing him out, whether Mitch does or doesn't do it, whether he's the main go to guy or not or whether he has guys around him who should make his game easier.

They're both 'they are who they are' at this point but headed in opposite directions.

Vassell happens to have a contract that can get more costly value back. It is what it is. I like him as a person, drama free guy, just, we need to level up, and if we know what we are getting already and it's not what we need it to be, there's no sense in lowering expectations or in staying put. We need upgrades and we have a glut of guards.
ImageImageImage
The Spurs Way Ever Onward

#XX
User avatar
imagump1313
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,998
And1: 4,006
Joined: Apr 27, 2013
Location: Behind You
       

Re: Rebuilding the Spurs 

Post#169 » by imagump1313 » Today 1:18 pm

G R E Y wrote:Hmm, I don't know, gump. Like we've tried Vassell as the bench 6th man, we've tried him as starting 2, as lead guard, as primary scorer, as secondary scorer, now at the 3.

He's just the same guy. His stats have largely plateaued or gotten worse.

He shows that the D IQ is there and when the effort is there he is impactful.

But like this goes beyond coaching and into contract reality and that whole thing of perception. We projected him to be improving from that 19.5ppg season. He was improving until then. But he has dropped off since, never reaching it again.

Seems end of last game when he didn't shoot it once in the last 3 minutes - and Keldon looked off him and chose to pass to Barnes - teammates sorted it out.

We already got Fox as an admission that Vassell is not that guy. Now we should have a $27M guy coming off the bench which sends a he's not even a starter guy?

That's problematic for a variety of reasons. Like having Fox in addition to Wemby was supposed to make things easier for Vassell. Instead he's... Well the same guy with the same shot profile, just more inefficient somehow.

Champie is definitely not a starter but good in his more limited role. He is good value for his contract. Dumb mistakes and all. Champie by the way averages 1.3TOs per game and DV is pretty clean at 1.1. These aren't game breakers (unless of course the one TO is at the worst most crucial anti clutch time of the game. Well then it goes back to who has IT under pressure and who **** the bed).

However unwarranted, perception and expectation are tied in part to contract and draft position to a lesser extent.

Area 51 combines for 7.6 TOs a game this season. Now *that's* bad. Is anyone going to chew them out? Like someone should, but then again Wemby is in the midst of altering his game significantly, or at least adding to it and has to learn how to best post up cleanly.

Not sure wtf Castle and his team high 4TOs/game is about besides **** hard hands.

Anyway, I'm resigned to accepting that Vassell is who he is as a player at this point. Nothing in his stats shows any different whether Pop was chewing him out, whether Mitch does or doesn't do it, whether he's the main go to guy or not or whether he has guys around him who should make his game easier.

They're both 'they are who they are' at this point but headed in opposite directions.

Vassell happens to have a contract that can get more costly value back. It is what it is. I like him as a person, drama free guy, just, we need to level up, and if we know what we are getting already and it's not what we need it to be, there's no sense in lowering expectations or in staying put. We need upgrades and we have a glut of guards.


Well, we are kind of stuck with him at the moment. I just suggest putting him in a position where he can still chuck up contested shots but hurt us the least. That would be bench minutes when we need scoring without Wemby on the floor. Also keeping him as far away from the floor as possible in crunch time. He still has some value.
User avatar
G R E Y
Senior Mod - Spurs
Senior Mod - Spurs
Posts: 52,888
And1: 40,374
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Location: Silver and Black
 

Re: Rebuilding the Spurs 

Post#170 » by G R E Y » Today 1:52 pm

imagump1313 wrote:
G R E Y wrote:Hmm, I don't know, gump. Like we've tried Vassell as the bench 6th man, we've tried him as starting 2, as lead guard, as primary scorer, as secondary scorer, now at the 3.

He's just the same guy. His stats have largely plateaued or gotten worse.

He shows that the D IQ is there and when the effort is there he is impactful.

But like this goes beyond coaching and into contract reality and that whole thing of perception. We projected him to be improving from that 19.5ppg season. He was improving until then. But he has dropped off since, never reaching it again.

Seems end of last game when he didn't shoot it once in the last 3 minutes - and Keldon looked off him and chose to pass to Barnes - teammates sorted it out.

We already got Fox as an admission that Vassell is not that guy. Now we should have a $27M guy coming off the bench which sends a he's not even a starter guy?

That's problematic for a variety of reasons. Like having Fox in addition to Wemby was supposed to make things easier for Vassell. Instead he's... Well the same guy with the same shot profile, just more inefficient somehow.

Champie is definitely not a starter but good in his more limited role. He is good value for his contract. Dumb mistakes and all. Champie by the way averages 1.3TOs per game and DV is pretty clean at 1.1. These aren't game breakers (unless of course the one TO is at the worst most crucial anti clutch time of the game. Well then it goes back to who has IT under pressure and who **** the bed).

However unwarranted, perception and expectation are tied in part to contract and draft position to a lesser extent.

Area 51 combines for 7.6 TOs a game this season. Now *that's* bad. Is anyone going to chew them out? Like someone should, but then again Wemby is in the midst of altering his game significantly, or at least adding to it and has to learn how to best post up cleanly.

Not sure wtf Castle and his team high 4TOs/game is about besides **** hard hands.

Anyway, I'm resigned to accepting that Vassell is who he is as a player at this point. Nothing in his stats shows any different whether Pop was chewing him out, whether Mitch does or doesn't do it, whether he's the main go to guy or not or whether he has guys around him who should make his game easier.

They're both 'they are who they are' at this point but headed in opposite directions.

Vassell happens to have a contract that can get more costly value back. It is what it is. I like him as a person, drama free guy, just, we need to level up, and if we know what we are getting already and it's not what we need it to be, there's no sense in lowering expectations or in staying put. We need upgrades and we have a glut of guards.


Well, we are kind of stuck with him at the moment. I just suggest putting him in a position where he can still chuck up contested shots but hurt us the least. That would be bench minutes when we need scoring without Wemby on the floor. Also keeping him as far away from the floor as possible in crunch time. He still has some value.

At least as far away as possible from shooting in crunch time. He made some key D stops. But you know what'll happen now, right? This will be that *one game* his shot goes in to win and we're back to empty-the-clip square one :lol:
ImageImageImage
The Spurs Way Ever Onward

#XX

Return to San Antonio Spurs