ImageImageImageImageImage

jakobe & Dick were bad picks

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

DreamTeam09
RealGM
Posts: 17,662
And1: 11,030
Joined: Jan 06, 2009
Location: Scarborough
 

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#241 » by DreamTeam09 » Yesterday 8:12 pm

mademan wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:
mademan wrote:
Naked +/- is the worst measurement in basketball. It's just full of noise


Well, he has the best on/off splits of everyone as well outside of Battle.


Same thing. Low minute, bench role guys having good +/- or on/offs is different than a 32 min starter. This is 15 games at 16min/game...its genuinely meaningless.


16minutes is plenty of time to get walloped & for you to lose a game. You play a player 16minutes consistently and said team/player loses those minutes, you're not going to be a good team in the long run.

Gradey literally opens up the floor for other players, You literally see the low man turn his back on drives anticipating a kick-out to GD, that's one less player in the lane, one less player to help.
Image

In Raptor Ball I Trust
mademan
RealGM
Posts: 32,111
And1: 31,189
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#242 » by mademan » Yesterday 8:16 pm

DreamTeam09 wrote:
mademan wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:
Well, he has the best on/off splits of everyone as well outside of Battle.


Same thing. Low minute, bench role guys having good +/- or on/offs is different than a 32 min starter. This is 15 games at 16min/game...its genuinely meaningless.


16minutes is plenty of time to get walloped & for you to lose a game. You play a player 16minutes consistently and said team/player loses those minutes, you're not going to be a good team in the long run.

Gradey literally opens up the floor for other players, You literally see the low man turn his back on drives anticipating a kick-out to GD, that's one less player in the lane, one less player to help.


It is crazy to me that people can watch Gradey this year and still glaze him. This is 16 min over 15 games....on/off is historically a stat that has a ton of noise in large samples. In small samples, it is utterly meaningless.
DreamTeam09
RealGM
Posts: 17,662
And1: 11,030
Joined: Jan 06, 2009
Location: Scarborough
 

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#243 » by DreamTeam09 » Yesterday 8:22 pm

mademan wrote:
DreamTeam09 wrote:
mademan wrote:
Same thing. Low minute, bench role guys having good +/- or on/offs is different than a 32 min starter. This is 15 games at 16min/game...its genuinely meaningless.


16minutes is plenty of time to get walloped & for you to lose a game. You play a player 16minutes consistently and said team/player loses those minutes, you're not going to be a good team in the long run.

Gradey literally opens up the floor for other players, You literally see the low man turn his back on drives anticipating a kick-out to GD, that's one less player in the lane, one less player to help.


It is crazy to me that people can watch Gradey this year and still glaze him. This is 16 min over 15 games....on/off is historically a stat that has a ton of noise in large samples. In small samples, it is utterly meaningless.


I mean pointing out statistical facts and drawing conclusion from those stats is not me glazing, it's us literally showing why the numbers correlate to impact and an eye test. If you think having gravity on the floor and a player in the other teams scouting report as "Don't let him get open" is meaningless, then that's a you problem, not us glazing anyone. No1 is saying 2025 GD is Klay Thompson or anything of the sort, just what he brings to the game for those 16mins are justified and warranted and absolutely needed.
Image

In Raptor Ball I Trust
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 15,231
And1: 11,405
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#244 » by PushDaRock » Yesterday 8:23 pm

mademan wrote:
DreamTeam09 wrote:
mademan wrote:
Same thing. Low minute, bench role guys having good +/- or on/offs is different than a 32 min starter. This is 15 games at 16min/game...its genuinely meaningless.


16minutes is plenty of time to get walloped & for you to lose a game. You play a player 16minutes consistently and said team/player loses those minutes, you're not going to be a good team in the long run.

Gradey literally opens up the floor for other players, You literally see the low man turn his back on drives anticipating a kick-out to GD, that's one less player in the lane, one less player to help.


It is crazy to me that people can watch Gradey this year and still glaze him. This is 16 min over 15 games....on/off is historically a stat that has a ton of noise in large samples. In small samples, it is utterly meaningless.


How so? Not sure how you look at Jokic's On/Off Splits and say there's a lot of noise or variance there?
mademan
RealGM
Posts: 32,111
And1: 31,189
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#245 » by mademan » Yesterday 8:24 pm

DreamTeam09 wrote:
mademan wrote:
DreamTeam09 wrote:
16minutes is plenty of time to get walloped & for you to lose a game. You play a player 16minutes consistently and said team/player loses those minutes, you're not going to be a good team in the long run.

Gradey literally opens up the floor for other players, You literally see the low man turn his back on drives anticipating a kick-out to GD, that's one less player in the lane, one less player to help.


It is crazy to me that people can watch Gradey this year and still glaze him. This is 16 min over 15 games....on/off is historically a stat that has a ton of noise in large samples. In small samples, it is utterly meaningless.


I mean pointing out statistical facts and drawing conclusion from those stats is not me glazing, it's us literally showing why the numbers correlate to impact and an eye test. If you think having gravity on the floor and a player in the other teams scouting report as "Don't let him get open" is meaningless, then that's a you problem, not us glazing anyone. No1 is saying 2025 GD is Klay Thompson or anything of the sort, just what he brings to the game for those 16mins are justified and warranted and absolutely needed.


What eye test? What world do you guys live in where Gradey gets an inordinate amount of defensive attention when he's never shot exceptionally well from range in the NBA? You guys think coaches are idiots? Or is a 15 game sample at 16 min/game of a stat that historically is full of noise in much larger samples just meaningless here? Which is more likely? Jamison Battle also secretly hugely impactful (highest +/- per minute on the team)
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 15,231
And1: 11,405
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#246 » by PushDaRock » Yesterday 8:29 pm

DreamTeam09 wrote:
mademan wrote:
DreamTeam09 wrote:
16minutes is plenty of time to get walloped & for you to lose a game. You play a player 16minutes consistently and said team/player loses those minutes, you're not going to be a good team in the long run.

Gradey literally opens up the floor for other players, You literally see the low man turn his back on drives anticipating a kick-out to GD, that's one less player in the lane, one less player to help.


It is crazy to me that people can watch Gradey this year and still glaze him. This is 16 min over 15 games....on/off is historically a stat that has a ton of noise in large samples. In small samples, it is utterly meaningless.


I mean pointing out statistical facts and drawing conclusion from those stats is not me glazing, it's us literally showing why the numbers correlate to impact and an eye test. If you think having gravity on the floor and a player in the other teams scouting report as "Don't let him get open" is meaningless, then that's a you problem, not us glazing anyone. No1 is saying 2025 GD is Klay Thompson or anything of the sort, just what he brings to the game for those 16mins are justified and warranted and absolutely needed.


Who's even glazing him? I think most of us that are a bit more positive on Gradey are just happy he hasn't been a liability like he was his first 2 seasons.
DreamTeam09
RealGM
Posts: 17,662
And1: 11,030
Joined: Jan 06, 2009
Location: Scarborough
 

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#247 » by DreamTeam09 » Yesterday 8:51 pm

mademan wrote:
DreamTeam09 wrote:
mademan wrote:
It is crazy to me that people can watch Gradey this year and still glaze him. This is 16 min over 15 games....on/off is historically a stat that has a ton of noise in large samples. In small samples, it is utterly meaningless.


I mean pointing out statistical facts and drawing conclusion from those stats is not me glazing, it's us literally showing why the numbers correlate to impact and an eye test. If you think having gravity on the floor and a player in the other teams scouting report as "Don't let him get open" is meaningless, then that's a you problem, not us glazing anyone. No1 is saying 2025 GD is Klay Thompson or anything of the sort, just what he brings to the game for those 16mins are justified and warranted and absolutely needed.


What eye test? What world do you guys live in where Gradey gets an inordinate amount of defensive attention when he's never shot exceptionally well from range in the NBA? You guys think coaches are idiots? Or is a 15 game sample at 16 min/game of a stat that historically is full of noise in much larger samples just meaningless here? Which is more likely? Jamison Battle also secretly hugely impactful (highest +/- per minute on the team)


I'm not sure why you're arguing against statistical data and calling it meaningless, but here is a reporter talking about GD and the impact he's making.
You literally see the defender retreat away from the ball on sheads drive because GD is in the corner. No coaches aren't stupid, which is why he is in the scouting report as to not to leave him alone/open even if he's not hitting his 3s at a high enough clip. That's what the word "GRAVITY" is used for. I don't even intend to be snarky here but you're literally trying to disprove what's actually going on lol

He highlites GD in the last chapter

Image

In Raptor Ball I Trust
Tripod
RealGM
Posts: 13,286
And1: 12,765
Joined: Aug 13, 2021
 

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#248 » by Tripod » Yesterday 10:34 pm

PushDaRock wrote:
DreamTeam09 wrote:
mademan wrote:
It is crazy to me that people can watch Gradey this year and still glaze him. This is 16 min over 15 games....on/off is historically a stat that has a ton of noise in large samples. In small samples, it is utterly meaningless.


I mean pointing out statistical facts and drawing conclusion from those stats is not me glazing, it's us literally showing why the numbers correlate to impact and an eye test. If you think having gravity on the floor and a player in the other teams scouting report as "Don't let him get open" is meaningless, then that's a you problem, not us glazing anyone. No1 is saying 2025 GD is Klay Thompson or anything of the sort, just what he brings to the game for those 16mins are justified and warranted and absolutely needed.


Who's even glazing him? I think most of us that are a bit more positive on Gradey are just happy he hasn't been a liability like he was his first 2 seasons.

Yeah crazy how just pointing facts has triggered him...lol.

No one is saying any of those stats or rankings will continue. We also said his 3pt shooting still needs to he better.

But man, if a bench player is winning his minutes 14/15 games and has a TS% above league average, we SHOULD be happy with those results. And if he sucks like Walter has for most of the season, he will get negativity towards him. Both are young guys so ups and down are the norm. It's likely to continue as this year goes on.
User avatar
Reeko
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 26,737
And1: 39,114
Joined: Jan 04, 2015
Location: East side, in a deluxe apartment in the sky.
   

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#249 » by Reeko » Today 2:19 am

Gradey Dick is 7th in Defensive Rating. Just behind Cason Wallace and just ahead of Hartenstein. Who knew that we would draft a two way star with the 13th pick of the draft? He has been really special on the defensive end this season.
Clay Davis wrote:COMPOSED ONLY OF THE COOLEST WOMEN AND THE HOTTEST GUYS, THE TORONTO RAPTORS REALGM BOARD HAS LONG BEEN KNOWN FOR ITS HIGH-QUALITY DISCUSSION, PASSIONATE LOYALTY, TEMPERATE CELEBRATIONS OF VICTORY, AND GRACE IN DEFEAT.
JCP11
Senior
Posts: 703
And1: 480
Joined: Apr 29, 2025

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#250 » by JCP11 » Today 2:31 am

Reeko wrote:Gradey Dick is 7th in Defensive Rating. Just behind Cason Wallace and just ahead of Hartenstein. Who knew that we would draft a two way star with the 13th pick of the draft? He has been really special on the defensive end this season.

Woah 7th? I knew he looked improved but that's a huge leap from last season. He's a lot stronger and makes a huge difference.
tecumseh18
RealGM
Posts: 19,148
And1: 11,377
Joined: Feb 20, 2006
Location: Big green house
 

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#251 » by tecumseh18 » Today 2:35 am

The numbers mean nothing given the weakness of our opposition during this run. Let's revisit this after 30 games, or our January road trip.
Tripod
RealGM
Posts: 13,286
And1: 12,765
Joined: Aug 13, 2021
 

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#252 » by Tripod » Today 4:32 am

tecumseh18 wrote:The numbers mean nothing given the weakness of our opposition during this run. Let's revisit this after 30 games, or our January road trip.

This stretch is all season.

14/15 games he has won his minutes and his only loss was -2.

And our schedule was one of the hardest to start the year.
mademan
RealGM
Posts: 32,111
And1: 31,189
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#253 » by mademan » Today 5:54 am

Tripod wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:
DreamTeam09 wrote:
I mean pointing out statistical facts and drawing conclusion from those stats is not me glazing, it's us literally showing why the numbers correlate to impact and an eye test. If you think having gravity on the floor and a player in the other teams scouting report as "Don't let him get open" is meaningless, then that's a you problem, not us glazing anyone. No1 is saying 2025 GD is Klay Thompson or anything of the sort, just what he brings to the game for those 16mins are justified and warranted and absolutely needed.


Who's even glazing him? I think most of us that are a bit more positive on Gradey are just happy he hasn't been a liability like he was his first 2 seasons.

Yeah crazy how just pointing facts has triggered him...lol.

No one is saying any of those stats or rankings will continue. We also said his 3pt shooting still needs to he better.

But man, if a bench player is winning his minutes 14/15 games and has a TS% above league average, we SHOULD be happy with those results. And if he sucks like Walter has for most of the season, he will get negativity towards him. Both are young guys so ups and down are the norm. It's likely to continue as this year goes on.


I get triggered by people using bad stats to advance poor arguments. On/off is awful, and in low minutes, absolutely meaningless
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 15,231
And1: 11,405
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#254 » by PushDaRock » Today 2:40 pm

mademan wrote:
Tripod wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:
Who's even glazing him? I think most of us that are a bit more positive on Gradey are just happy he hasn't been a liability like he was his first 2 seasons.

Yeah crazy how just pointing facts has triggered him...lol.

No one is saying any of those stats or rankings will continue. We also said his 3pt shooting still needs to he better.

But man, if a bench player is winning his minutes 14/15 games and has a TS% above league average, we SHOULD be happy with those results. And if he sucks like Walter has for most of the season, he will get negativity towards him. Both are young guys so ups and down are the norm. It's likely to continue as this year goes on.


I get triggered by people using bad stats to advance poor arguments. On/off is awful, and in low minutes, absolutely meaningless


It be like that sometimes
HangTime
Head Coach
Posts: 6,573
And1: 4,430
Joined: Oct 18, 2011

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#255 » by HangTime » Today 3:12 pm

I see Ja'Kobe as an Allstar level talent. Saw it last year, and I still see it.

He was inefficient scorer in college, because he was playing hurt, and people weren't encouraged by his defence.

He got here, and it was the opposite, though I really liked his offences process.

I think that's a sign of allstar. True 2 way player, just give him time to adjust to the added weight as well.

I think he can be on that Khris Middleton Level of player.


____________

Also, Ja'kobe playing with the 3rd unit in training camp tells me he's "more advanced" than the others off the bench, so that was a chance for him to get his "own unit" to run.

Return to Toronto Raptors