Indeed wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:Indeed wrote:
The answer is not that complicated, but you are complicating or conflicting yourself.
If you believe the drop off is not due to 3 point shooting, then we dont need more 3 point shooting. You just proofed my point.
Do you even read..? Like actually I am questioning this, because you seem to interpret posts the complete opposite of what they actually say.
I said a big reason of the drop of WAS 3 point shooting, and that a significant reason why our offence came to a halt was because no one could hit a 3. How the hell did you get to the conclusion I said the opposite?
Because it was Barrett making others shooting well from 3s, and before the injury, we were top 6 in 3 point shooting. That suggested our need is not an elite shooter.
If Barrett was irrelevant in making the extra 3 point per game, and we need an elite shooter, then you are disagreeing the drop of our efficiency was due to Barrett (disagree to this thread).
If you still dont understand, I will tell you straight. It was not because no one can shoot the 3 as you said, but Barrett took the attention off and allow 3s to be shot at their spot, and you dont need an elite shooter when others can shoot at their comfortable spot, and I rather we double down on the rim pressure, instead of elite 3 point shooting.
Barrett was making others shoot well…? That actually is a hot take.
Take IQ for example, he’s missing wide open catch and shoot shots. What does RJ do that makes him make those vs miss when they’re the same wide open catch and shoot looks?
How was Barrett making bench players shoot better? Was his towel waiving when he was resting that good?











