YogurtProducer wrote:ArthurVandelay wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:IQ + Poeltl >>>>> Monk / Sabonis / MLE
We don't need IQ to be an isolation scorer when we got BI. We need high level 3 point shooting and a guy who is not a target defensively. Same with Sabonis. He just gives a massive hole for teams to attack.
To be clear, that is your opinion. It is not fact. I'm not talking about Sabonis.
Ingram gets his shot off because of his length and he has to usually back people down to get to his spot. The Raptors don't have anyone who can explode past the defense and get to the rim off the bounce. Monk can very much do that.
Also, just a year ago, under Mike Brown, in another system, Monk was being credited for some pretty good defense and improvement overall:
https://www.nbcsportsbayarea.com/nba/sacramento-kings/malik-monk-defense-starting-lineup/1813805/"People said I couldn’t guard so I’m showing people [I can].”
....
With Monk’s tenacious defense, the Kings have a lot of momentum to build on as they head toward the heart of the greuling NBA season.
Also, can you imagine sharing the court and playing D with LaVine, DeRozan, and Sabonis? LOL
Sure it is my opinion... but it is also a pretty widely accepted fact that Monk and Sabonis are both bad defenders. One quote from his coach trying to hype Monk up doesn't change that
Here is Darko saying Dick is doing a much better job defensively:
Yeah. See you should engage in conversations with the perspective you don't know everything. No poop a coach would be hyping up his own players ability. Except there is no quote from Mike Brown in that 3 paragraph article
The quote is I put in is from Monk himself. Everything else is from a reporter. So Monk's defense improved enough for it to be noticed at one point. Which means he has the ability to play defense. It also shows he has improved from when he came into the league. So it might be worth letting go of those preconceived notions. We aren't talking about a Dame Lillard or Trae Young or Jalen Brunson here.



















