Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed

Moderators: loserX, HartfordWhalers, Trader_Joe, Texas Chuck, Andre Roberstan, pacers33granger, Mamba4Goat, MoneyTalks41890

bgrep14
Analyst
Posts: 3,167
And1: 318
Joined: Jun 14, 2009

Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#1 » by bgrep14 » Thu Jul 30, 2026 8:11 pm

Cavs: Allen, Strus, Schroeder, Tyson
Cavs: Durant and Gafford

Houston: Durant and Adams
Houston: Allen, Schroeder, Martin, and Tyson

Dallas: Gafford and Martin
Dallas: Strus and Adams

Cavs: Fill SF with one of the best in the game

Houston: Get off KD as he didn't seem to gel with the team and get a couple young assets plus 15M in expiring money to reallocate

Dallas: Dallas gets an expiring
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 95,692
And1: 103,455
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#2 » by Texas Chuck » Thu Jul 30, 2026 8:22 pm

No interest for Dallas at all without incentive. Not sure they prefer Porter and Tomlin to young guys they already have and they would need to clear 3 roster spots (already 1 over). All to save future money on a good player? I don't get it for Dallas.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,254
And1: 38,431
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#3 » by jbk1234 » Thu Jul 30, 2026 8:24 pm

This is not something the Cavs would consider doing, but Houston is getting way too good of a deal and I suspect that the Mavs would want Tyson at least.
This will end badly
User avatar
LarsV8
RealGM
Posts: 11,414
And1: 6,885
Joined: Dec 13, 2009
       

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#4 » by LarsV8 » Thu Jul 30, 2026 8:39 pm

Getting off of Durant is not incentive for Houston.

You have us taking Tyson as incentive for eating Scrhoder's/Martin deals.

And then we give up Durant to downgrade our backup center position, although make it younger.

This is really bad for Houston across the board.
Image
bgrep14
Analyst
Posts: 3,167
And1: 318
Joined: Jun 14, 2009

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#5 » by bgrep14 » Thu Jul 30, 2026 8:40 pm

edited
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 16,872
And1: 4,471
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#6 » by daoneandonly » Thu Jul 30, 2026 10:53 pm

Serious question? Dallas is owed value. This deal is horrendous
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
User avatar
red96
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,437
And1: 2,569
Joined: Oct 09, 2008
Location: Where hope is still alive.

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#7 » by red96 » Thu Jul 30, 2026 11:10 pm

Deal doesn't make sense for Houston. They trade easily the best player in the deal for a worse backup 5 then what they already have, who's also moved in this deal. Why would the Rockets want to get out of his contract? Hes alll NBA 2nd team with the nba's 28th highest salary. No real incentive for the Rockets here.
"Morey decided in 2007 that Steve Francis was to be the "franchise player" of the Rockets only to play what... 5 games? Morey didn't think Marc Gasol was worth a look that year,"
-baki "the Rockets fan"
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 24,143
And1: 9,911
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#8 » by jayjaysee » Thu Jul 30, 2026 11:10 pm

I think the value is good for Houston, Allen is just a really strange target for a team with Sengun as a starter.

IMO, you probably can find a different team to trade a useful center and a first for Allen, and cut Dallas out.

Dallas part - feel like they’d rightfully want some value. Dumping Martin is incentive, I guess but it’s not really a need. Dallas’ roster needs so much turnover, I wouldn’t really be thinking about the 9 mil next offseason..
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 24,143
And1: 9,911
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#9 » by jayjaysee » Thu Jul 30, 2026 11:12 pm

red96 wrote:in the trade for a worse backup 5 then they already Have.


You’re saying current Adams is better than Allen?
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,254
And1: 38,431
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#10 » by jbk1234 » Thu Jul 30, 2026 11:49 pm

jayjaysee wrote:
red96 wrote:in the trade for a worse backup 5 then they already Have.


You’re saying current Adams is better than Allen?

Yep, and that's why he's not taken seriously.
This will end badly
ThatBoyNick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,939
And1: 3,887
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
 

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#11 » by ThatBoyNick » Fri Jul 31, 2026 12:08 am

jbk1234 wrote:Yep, and that's why he's not taken seriously.

You stated that KD for Allen and fillers is way too good for Houston. I'd be careful with casting stones.

I agree Allen is much better than Adams given health/age, but at the same time some teams that have a starting center might prefer Steve at 13 mill over Allen at 30, cap wise, while still seeing Allen as more valuable.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,254
And1: 38,431
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#12 » by jbk1234 » Fri Jul 31, 2026 12:17 am

ThatBoyNick wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:Yep, and that's why he's not taken seriously.

You stated that KD for Allen and fillers is way too good for Houston. I'd be careful with casting stones.

I agree Allen is much better than Adams given health/age, but at the same time some teams that have a starting center might prefer Steve at 13 mill over Allen at 30, cap wise, while still seeing Allen as more valuable.


You should find those teams and propose a trade.
This will end badly
davidv2001
Pro Prospect
Posts: 973
And1: 1,059
Joined: Sep 12, 2017

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#13 » by davidv2001 » Fri Jul 31, 2026 1:07 am

jayjaysee wrote:
red96 wrote:in the trade for a worse backup 5 then they already Have.


You’re saying current Adams is better than Allen?


I’m a Rockets’ fan, and Allen is much better than Adams. He would start at center if the Rockets made this deal. However, Allen isn’t a good fit next to Sengun, and the Rockets need more shooting, not less.

This deal doesn’t address their needs nor make them better.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 24,143
And1: 9,911
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#14 » by jayjaysee » Fri Jul 31, 2026 1:58 am

davidv2001 wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:
red96 wrote:in the trade for a worse backup 5 then they already Have.


You’re saying current Adams is better than Allen?


I’m a Rockets’ fan, and Allen is much better than Adams. He would start at center if the Rockets made this deal. However, Allen isn’t a good fit next to Sengun, and the Rockets need more shooting, not less.

This deal doesn’t address their needs nor make them better.


Agree completely. Even would agree that Allen would come off bench in Houston due to fit. Just meh to feel the need to ignore the talent Houston is getting.

OP is a weird target for Houston and they’d be looping in another team.
ThatBoyNick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,939
And1: 3,887
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
 

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#15 » by ThatBoyNick » Fri Jul 31, 2026 2:51 am

jbk1234 wrote:
You should find those teams and propose a trade.


I'm not sure you read my post correctly, or perhaps I didn't do a good job explaining my thought. Find those teams and propose a trade for what?
User avatar
mcfly1204
RealGM
Posts: 10,301
And1: 2,860
Joined: Oct 31, 2008

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#16 » by mcfly1204 » Fri Jul 31, 2026 3:18 am

ThatBoyNick wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
You should find those teams and propose a trade.


I'm not sure you read my post correctly, or perhaps I didn't do a good job explaining my thought. Find those teams and propose a trade for what?

Teams that want to trade something of value to have Steven Adams as their starting center?
Well at least we're not Detroit!
ThatBoyNick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,939
And1: 3,887
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
 

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#17 » by ThatBoyNick » Fri Jul 31, 2026 3:35 am

mcfly1204 wrote:Teams that want to trade something of value to have Steven Adams as their starting center?


I have no idea why you'd reply with this, I didn't claim anything like that.

Perhaps there's a sentence thats being ambiguously interpreted here, but I was specifically saying teams that already have a starting center might prefer Adams for contract reasons to be their backup C, even if they view Allen as the better, more valuable player, strictly from a cap management POV.
User avatar
mcfly1204
RealGM
Posts: 10,301
And1: 2,860
Joined: Oct 31, 2008

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#18 » by mcfly1204 » Fri Jul 31, 2026 3:38 am

ThatBoyNick wrote:
mcfly1204 wrote:Teams that want to trade something of value to have Steven Adams as their starting center?


I have no idea why you'd reply with this, I didn't claim anything like that.

Perhaps there's a sentence thats being ambiguously interpreted here, but I was specifically saying teams that already have a starting center might prefer Adams for contract reasons to be their backup C, even if they view Allen and the better, more valuable player, strictly from a cap management POV.

My bad, I initially misread that as valuing Adams of Allen in the same role, largely due to the salary difference.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,254
And1: 38,431
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#19 » by jbk1234 » Fri Jul 31, 2026 11:34 am

ThatBoyNick wrote:
mcfly1204 wrote:Teams that want to trade something of value to have Steven Adams as their starting center?


I have no idea why you'd reply with this, I didn't claim anything like that.

Perhaps there's a sentence thats being ambiguously interpreted here, but I was specifically saying teams that already have a starting center might prefer Adams for contract reasons to be their backup C, even if they view Allen as the better, more valuable player, strictly from a cap management POV.


The problem with this is that it's far from clear that the Rockets view Sengun as the long term answer at starting center. They just had a taking-calls-on-everyone-but-Amen June and no one got moved. Not a single player.

Durant is going to turn 38 in September, has had some ill-timed injuries the last two seasons, has struggled to fit into the last three teams he personally chose, and isn't cheap. Maybe his trade value isn't what Rockets fans hope it is league wide.
This will end badly
ThatBoyNick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,939
And1: 3,887
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
 

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed 

Post#20 » by ThatBoyNick » Fri Jul 31, 2026 3:30 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
The problem with this is that it's far from clear that the Rockets view Sengun as the long term answer at starting center. They just had a taking-calls-on-everyone-but-Amen June and no one got moved. Not a single player.

Durant is going to turn 38 in September, has had some ill-timed injuries the last two seasons, has struggled to fit into the last three teams he personally chose, and isn't cheap. Maybe his trade value isn't what Rockets fans hope it is league wide.


Again, not even sure what your original point was in your response, but I can say I'm lower on KD than most, and I don't think Allen at 3/90 is substantially valuable to the point of saying KD for Allen would be "way too good" for Houston.

Return to Trades and Transactions