Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
Moderators: loserX, HartfordWhalers, Trader_Joe, Texas Chuck, Andre Roberstan, pacers33granger, Mamba4Goat, MoneyTalks41890
Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
-
bgrep14
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,167
- And1: 318
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
Cavs: Allen, Strus, Schroeder, Tyson
Cavs: Durant and Gafford
Houston: Durant and Adams
Houston: Allen, Schroeder, Martin, and Tyson
Dallas: Gafford and Martin
Dallas: Strus and Adams
Cavs: Fill SF with one of the best in the game
Houston: Get off KD as he didn't seem to gel with the team and get a couple young assets plus 15M in expiring money to reallocate
Dallas: Dallas gets an expiring
Cavs: Durant and Gafford
Houston: Durant and Adams
Houston: Allen, Schroeder, Martin, and Tyson
Dallas: Gafford and Martin
Dallas: Strus and Adams
Cavs: Fill SF with one of the best in the game
Houston: Get off KD as he didn't seem to gel with the team and get a couple young assets plus 15M in expiring money to reallocate
Dallas: Dallas gets an expiring
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum

- Posts: 95,692
- And1: 103,457
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
No interest for Dallas at all without incentive. Not sure they prefer Porter and Tomlin to young guys they already have and they would need to clear 3 roster spots (already 1 over). All to save future money on a good player? I don't get it for Dallas.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 62,255
- And1: 38,431
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
This is not something the Cavs would consider doing, but Houston is getting way too good of a deal and I suspect that the Mavs would want Tyson at least.
This will end badly
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
- LarsV8
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,415
- And1: 6,886
- Joined: Dec 13, 2009
-
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
Getting off of Durant is not incentive for Houston.
You have us taking Tyson as incentive for eating Scrhoder's/Martin deals.
And then we give up Durant to downgrade our backup center position, although make it younger.
This is really bad for Houston across the board.
You have us taking Tyson as incentive for eating Scrhoder's/Martin deals.
And then we give up Durant to downgrade our backup center position, although make it younger.
This is really bad for Houston across the board.

Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
-
bgrep14
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,167
- And1: 318
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
-
daoneandonly
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,872
- And1: 4,471
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
Serious question? Dallas is owed value. This deal is horrendous
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
- red96
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,438
- And1: 2,569
- Joined: Oct 09, 2008
- Location: Where hope is still alive.
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
Deal doesn't make sense for Houston. They trade easily the best player in the deal for a worse backup 5 then what they already have, who's also moved in this deal. Why would the Rockets want to get out of his contract? Hes alll NBA 2nd team with the nba's 28th highest salary. No real incentive for the Rockets here.
"Morey decided in 2007 that Steve Francis was to be the "franchise player" of the Rockets only to play what... 5 games? Morey didn't think Marc Gasol was worth a look that year,"
-baki "the Rockets fan"
-baki "the Rockets fan"
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
-
jayjaysee
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 24,143
- And1: 9,911
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
I think the value is good for Houston, Allen is just a really strange target for a team with Sengun as a starter.
IMO, you probably can find a different team to trade a useful center and a first for Allen, and cut Dallas out.
Dallas part - feel like they’d rightfully want some value. Dumping Martin is incentive, I guess but it’s not really a need. Dallas’ roster needs so much turnover, I wouldn’t really be thinking about the 9 mil next offseason..
IMO, you probably can find a different team to trade a useful center and a first for Allen, and cut Dallas out.
Dallas part - feel like they’d rightfully want some value. Dumping Martin is incentive, I guess but it’s not really a need. Dallas’ roster needs so much turnover, I wouldn’t really be thinking about the 9 mil next offseason..
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
-
jayjaysee
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 24,143
- And1: 9,911
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
red96 wrote:in the trade for a worse backup 5 then they already Have.
You’re saying current Adams is better than Allen?
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 62,255
- And1: 38,431
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
jayjaysee wrote:red96 wrote:in the trade for a worse backup 5 then they already Have.
You’re saying current Adams is better than Allen?
Yep, and that's why he's not taken seriously.
This will end badly
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
-
ThatBoyNick
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,940
- And1: 3,887
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
-
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
jbk1234 wrote:Yep, and that's why he's not taken seriously.
You stated that KD for Allen and fillers is way too good for Houston. I'd be careful with casting stones.
I agree Allen is much better than Adams given health/age, but at the same time some teams that have a starting center might prefer Steve at 13 mill over Allen at 30, cap wise, while still seeing Allen as more valuable.
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 62,255
- And1: 38,431
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
ThatBoyNick wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Yep, and that's why he's not taken seriously.
You stated that KD for Allen and fillers is way too good for Houston. I'd be careful with casting stones.
I agree Allen is much better than Adams given health/age, but at the same time some teams that have a starting center might prefer Steve at 13 mill over Allen at 30, cap wise, while still seeing Allen as more valuable.
You should find those teams and propose a trade.
This will end badly
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
-
davidv2001
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 973
- And1: 1,059
- Joined: Sep 12, 2017
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
jayjaysee wrote:red96 wrote:in the trade for a worse backup 5 then they already Have.
You’re saying current Adams is better than Allen?
I’m a Rockets’ fan, and Allen is much better than Adams. He would start at center if the Rockets made this deal. However, Allen isn’t a good fit next to Sengun, and the Rockets need more shooting, not less.
This deal doesn’t address their needs nor make them better.
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
-
jayjaysee
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 24,143
- And1: 9,911
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
davidv2001 wrote:jayjaysee wrote:red96 wrote:in the trade for a worse backup 5 then they already Have.
You’re saying current Adams is better than Allen?
I’m a Rockets’ fan, and Allen is much better than Adams. He would start at center if the Rockets made this deal. However, Allen isn’t a good fit next to Sengun, and the Rockets need more shooting, not less.
This deal doesn’t address their needs nor make them better.
Agree completely. Even would agree that Allen would come off bench in Houston due to fit. Just meh to feel the need to ignore the talent Houston is getting.
OP is a weird target for Houston and they’d be looping in another team.
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
-
ThatBoyNick
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,940
- And1: 3,887
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
-
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
jbk1234 wrote:
You should find those teams and propose a trade.
I'm not sure you read my post correctly, or perhaps I didn't do a good job explaining my thought. Find those teams and propose a trade for what?
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
- mcfly1204
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,301
- And1: 2,860
- Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
ThatBoyNick wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
You should find those teams and propose a trade.
I'm not sure you read my post correctly, or perhaps I didn't do a good job explaining my thought. Find those teams and propose a trade for what?
Teams that want to trade something of value to have Steven Adams as their starting center?
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
-
ThatBoyNick
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,940
- And1: 3,887
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
-
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
mcfly1204 wrote:Teams that want to trade something of value to have Steven Adams as their starting center?
I have no idea why you'd reply with this, I didn't claim anything like that.
Perhaps there's a sentence thats being ambiguously interpreted here, but I was specifically saying teams that already have a starting center might prefer Adams for contract reasons to be their backup C, even if they view Allen as the better, more valuable player, strictly from a cap management POV.
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
- mcfly1204
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,301
- And1: 2,860
- Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
ThatBoyNick wrote:mcfly1204 wrote:Teams that want to trade something of value to have Steven Adams as their starting center?
I have no idea why you'd reply with this, I didn't claim anything like that.
Perhaps there's a sentence thats being ambiguously interpreted here, but I was specifically saying teams that already have a starting center might prefer Adams for contract reasons to be their backup C, even if they view Allen and the better, more valuable player, strictly from a cap management POV.
My bad, I initially misread that as valuing Adams of Allen in the same role, largely due to the salary difference.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 62,255
- And1: 38,431
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
ThatBoyNick wrote:mcfly1204 wrote:Teams that want to trade something of value to have Steven Adams as their starting center?
I have no idea why you'd reply with this, I didn't claim anything like that.
Perhaps there's a sentence thats being ambiguously interpreted here, but I was specifically saying teams that already have a starting center might prefer Adams for contract reasons to be their backup C, even if they view Allen as the better, more valuable player, strictly from a cap management POV.
The problem with this is that it's far from clear that the Rockets view Sengun as the long term answer at starting center. They just had a taking-calls-on-everyone-but-Amen June and no one got moved. Not a single player.
Durant is going to turn 38 in September, has had some ill-timed injuries the last two seasons, has struggled to fit into the last three teams he personally chose, and isn't cheap. Maybe his trade value isn't what Rockets fans hope it is league wide.
This will end badly
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
-
ThatBoyNick
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,940
- And1: 3,887
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
-
Re: Cleveland/Houston/Dallas - Where is valued owed
jbk1234 wrote:
The problem with this is that it's far from clear that the Rockets view Sengun as the long term answer at starting center. They just had a taking-calls-on-everyone-but-Amen June and no one got moved. Not a single player.
Durant is going to turn 38 in September, has had some ill-timed injuries the last two seasons, has struggled to fit into the last three teams he personally chose, and isn't cheap. Maybe his trade value isn't what Rockets fans hope it is league wide.
Again, not even sure what your original point was in your response, but I can say I'm lower on KD than most, and I don't think Allen at 3/90 is substantially valuable to the point of saying KD for Allen would be "way too good" for Houston.
Return to Trades and Transactions


