2008 Roster and Hopefull Predictions-haha
2008 Roster and Hopefull Predictions-haha
-
- Junior
- Posts: 450
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 10, 2005
2008 Roster and Hopefull Predictions-haha
1. LF- Roberts-275-30SB
2. 3B-Fransden-280-15HR-15SB
3. CF-Rowadnd-300-23HR-18SB
4. RF-Winn- 298-18HR-20SB
5. 2B-Durham 285-15 HR
6. C- Molina-280-16HR
7. 1b-Ortemier-270-20HR
8. SS-Visquel-275-22SB
Cain-2.80 ERA
Zito-3.65 ERA
Lincecum-3.40 ERA
Lowry-3.8 ERA
Correia-4.2 ERA
Wilson-3.60 ERA
Henn- 3.35 ERA
Walker- 3.50 ERA
Kline-3.88 ERA
Taschner-4.4 ERA
Messenger-4.2 ERA *i honestly see scott williamson making the team
Chulk-4.3 ERA
Bench
ALfonzo-280-8HR
Aurrilia-270-7HR
Lewis-288-7HR-12SB
Davis-284-32SB
Velez-Util
Will make an appearance
Shierholtz
Sadler
Sanchez
Andersen
Rodriguez
2. 3B-Fransden-280-15HR-15SB
3. CF-Rowadnd-300-23HR-18SB
4. RF-Winn- 298-18HR-20SB
5. 2B-Durham 285-15 HR
6. C- Molina-280-16HR
7. 1b-Ortemier-270-20HR
8. SS-Visquel-275-22SB
Cain-2.80 ERA
Zito-3.65 ERA
Lincecum-3.40 ERA
Lowry-3.8 ERA
Correia-4.2 ERA
Wilson-3.60 ERA
Henn- 3.35 ERA
Walker- 3.50 ERA
Kline-3.88 ERA
Taschner-4.4 ERA
Messenger-4.2 ERA *i honestly see scott williamson making the team
Chulk-4.3 ERA
Bench
ALfonzo-280-8HR
Aurrilia-270-7HR
Lewis-288-7HR-12SB
Davis-284-32SB
Velez-Util
Will make an appearance
Shierholtz
Sadler
Sanchez
Andersen
Rodriguez
- Basketball Jesus
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,180
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 04, 2003
- Location: P-nuts + hair doos
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,785
- And1: 326
- Joined: Sep 19, 2007
- Location: NorCal
-
Basketball Jesus wrote:This doesn't bode well:
http://baseballanalysts.com/archives/20 ... t_mess.php
Who cares? We know the Giants aren't contenders this year.
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,522
- And1: 480
- Joined: May 23, 2004
-
UPDATE: Messenger will not make the team out of ST as he will be optioned to AAA Fresno(no more options after that) and Williamson has been released.
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AiO8V.QDMkjXvj6jib5.0wYo0bYF?slug=txgiantsmoves&prov=st&type=lgns
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AiO8V.QDMkjXvj6jib5.0wYo0bYF?slug=txgiantsmoves&prov=st&type=lgns
- bill curley II
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,594
- And1: 1
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
- Location: Earth
1. Zito, Cain, Lincecum, and Lowry to have ERA's under 4.00 and continue to develop.
2. Youngsters like Scherholtz, Ortmeier, and Lewis get more AB's then Aurilia, Roberts, and Wynn.
3. Someone step up, hopefully Wilson, to be at least a serviceable closer.
If those three things happen, I'd consider it a successful season given the circumstances (i.e. Sabean). Oh and fire Sabean would be my 4th wish.
2. Youngsters like Scherholtz, Ortmeier, and Lewis get more AB's then Aurilia, Roberts, and Wynn.
3. Someone step up, hopefully Wilson, to be at least a serviceable closer.
If those three things happen, I'd consider it a successful season given the circumstances (i.e. Sabean). Oh and fire Sabean would be my 4th wish.
-
- Junior
- Posts: 375
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 17, 2005
So far in the spring, I think Velez and Lewis have earned the right to start. Will they? Of course not. Spring training numbers really don't mean all that much but you can't help but take notice of what Velez and Lewis have done. I would like to see:
3B - Velez
LF - Lewis
RF - Winn
C - Molina
CF - Rowand
2B - Durham (could Frandsen have choked any bigger?)
1B - Ortmier (Would anyone be shocked to see Aurilla start at 1B?)
SS - Visquel / Bocock
Of course I'll bet we will trade Lewis for a 3B (Inge or Crede) and send Velez to AAA.
Therefore, I'm going to say 2008 Giants: 55 - 107. At least we should be in good shape to get the #1 pick in 2009!
3B - Velez
LF - Lewis
RF - Winn
C - Molina
CF - Rowand
2B - Durham (could Frandsen have choked any bigger?)
1B - Ortmier (Would anyone be shocked to see Aurilla start at 1B?)
SS - Visquel / Bocock
Of course I'll bet we will trade Lewis for a 3B (Inge or Crede) and send Velez to AAA.
Therefore, I'm going to say 2008 Giants: 55 - 107. At least we should be in good shape to get the #1 pick in 2009!

-
- Junior
- Posts: 375
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 17, 2005
- Bleeding Green
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 24,178
- And1: 13,875
- Joined: Feb 28, 2005
- Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!
There are just too many awful teams in the NL for any one of them to lose 100 games.
Nats, Cards, Marlins, Astros, Pirates, Padres, these are all like 75 win teams. The Giants are probably the worst, but 100 losses is really hard to do, especially in the NL West.
105 losses is basically impossible.
Nats, Cards, Marlins, Astros, Pirates, Padres, these are all like 75 win teams. The Giants are probably the worst, but 100 losses is really hard to do, especially in the NL West.
105 losses is basically impossible.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
- RIPskaterdude
- RealGM
- Posts: 92,913
- And1: 37,066
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
-
Return to San Francisco Giants