ImageImageImageImageImage

2008 Roster and Hopefull Predictions-haha

ticknyler
Junior
Posts: 450
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 10, 2005

2008 Roster and Hopefull Predictions-haha 

Post#1 » by ticknyler » Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:39 am

1. LF- Roberts-275-30SB
2. 3B-Fransden-280-15HR-15SB
3. CF-Rowadnd-300-23HR-18SB
4. RF-Winn- 298-18HR-20SB
5. 2B-Durham 285-15 HR
6. C- Molina-280-16HR
7. 1b-Ortemier-270-20HR
8. SS-Visquel-275-22SB

Cain-2.80 ERA
Zito-3.65 ERA
Lincecum-3.40 ERA
Lowry-3.8 ERA
Correia-4.2 ERA

Wilson-3.60 ERA
Henn- 3.35 ERA
Walker- 3.50 ERA
Kline-3.88 ERA
Taschner-4.4 ERA
Messenger-4.2 ERA *i honestly see scott williamson making the team
Chulk-4.3 ERA

Bench
ALfonzo-280-8HR
Aurrilia-270-7HR
Lewis-288-7HR-12SB
Davis-284-32SB
Velez-Util

Will make an appearance
Shierholtz
Sadler
Sanchez
Andersen
Rodriguez
opzoneworld
Junior
Posts: 375
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 17, 2005

 

Post#2 » by opzoneworld » Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:20 pm

I'm going to say 60-102.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#3 » by Basketball Jesus » Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:32 pm

Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
User avatar
FaTaL
Veteran
Posts: 2,902
And1: 11
Joined: Sep 17, 2003
     

 

Post#4 » by FaTaL » Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:04 pm

please dont lose 100 games
Image
ticknyler
Junior
Posts: 450
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 10, 2005

 

Post#5 » by ticknyler » Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:04 am

he shot lower in those predictions than i shot high. At least thats my homer opinion
GswStorm3
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,785
And1: 326
Joined: Sep 19, 2007
Location: NorCal
       

 

Post#6 » by GswStorm3 » Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:15 pm

Molina is hitting cleanup but we're going to suck no doubt.

This year I'm only looking forward to how Lincecum, Cain, Brian Wilson, Dan Ortmeier and Kevin Frandsen develop. The rest of team I could care less about.
GswStorm3
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,785
And1: 326
Joined: Sep 19, 2007
Location: NorCal
       

 

Post#7 » by GswStorm3 » Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:19 pm

Basketball Jesus wrote:This doesn't bode well:

http://baseballanalysts.com/archives/20 ... t_mess.php


Who cares? We know the Giants aren't contenders this year.
GS Warriors 1
General Manager
Posts: 8,522
And1: 480
Joined: May 23, 2004
       

 

Post#8 » by GS Warriors 1 » Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:25 pm

Thanks for posting Zips, BBJ.

I forgot about them. Durham might outperform that but the rest seems like reasonable projections. I also think Rowand will hit a lower BA/OBP split but maybe a tad higher SLG.
GS Warriors 1
General Manager
Posts: 8,522
And1: 480
Joined: May 23, 2004
       

 

Post#9 » by GS Warriors 1 » Thu Mar 6, 2008 10:39 pm

UPDATE: Messenger will not make the team out of ST as he will be optioned to AAA Fresno(no more options after that) and Williamson has been released.

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AiO8V.QDMkjXvj6jib5.0wYo0bYF?slug=txgiantsmoves&prov=st&type=lgns
User avatar
bill curley II
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,594
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
Location: Earth

 

Post#10 » by bill curley II » Mon Mar 10, 2008 11:25 pm

1. Zito, Cain, Lincecum, and Lowry to have ERA's under 4.00 and continue to develop.

2. Youngsters like Scherholtz, Ortmeier, and Lewis get more AB's then Aurilia, Roberts, and Wynn.

3. Someone step up, hopefully Wilson, to be at least a serviceable closer.

If those three things happen, I'd consider it a successful season given the circumstances (i.e. Sabean). Oh and fire Sabean would be my 4th wish.
opzoneworld
Junior
Posts: 375
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 17, 2005

 

Post#11 » by opzoneworld » Sat Mar 15, 2008 6:32 pm

So far in the spring, I think Velez and Lewis have earned the right to start. Will they? Of course not. Spring training numbers really don't mean all that much but you can't help but take notice of what Velez and Lewis have done. I would like to see:

3B - Velez
LF - Lewis
RF - Winn
C - Molina
CF - Rowand
2B - Durham (could Frandsen have choked any bigger?)
1B - Ortmier (Would anyone be shocked to see Aurilla start at 1B?)
SS - Visquel / Bocock

Of course I'll bet we will trade Lewis for a 3B (Inge or Crede) and send Velez to AAA.

Therefore, I'm going to say 2008 Giants: 55 - 107. At least we should be in good shape to get the #1 pick in 2009! :bowdown:
Hopper15
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,969
And1: 274
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Location: Tried like the dickens

 

Post#12 » by Hopper15 » Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:10 am

This team is bad, but it won't lose 100.
opzoneworld
Junior
Posts: 375
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 17, 2005

 

Post#13 » by opzoneworld » Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:46 am

It will take nothing short of a miracle for the Giants not to lose100 games and have the worst record in baseball in 2008.
Hopper15
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,969
And1: 274
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Location: Tried like the dickens

 

Post#14 » by Hopper15 » Fri Mar 21, 2008 4:35 pm

The starters are too good to be a 100 loss team.
opzoneworld
Junior
Posts: 375
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 17, 2005

 

Post#15 » by opzoneworld » Fri Mar 21, 2008 11:35 pm

Doesn't matter how good the starters are if the team cant hit or field. 105 loses.
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#16 » by Bleeding Green » Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:11 am

There are just too many awful teams in the NL for any one of them to lose 100 games.

Nats, Cards, Marlins, Astros, Pirates, Padres, these are all like 75 win teams. The Giants are probably the worst, but 100 losses is really hard to do, especially in the NL West.

105 losses is basically impossible.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,913
And1: 37,066
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

 

Post#17 » by RIPskaterdude » Tue Mar 25, 2008 4:48 am

Hopper15 wrote:The starters are too good to be a 100 loss team.


Fixed.
Image
opzoneworld
Junior
Posts: 375
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 17, 2005

 

Post#18 » by opzoneworld » Tue Apr 8, 2008 12:44 am

Anyone still think this team wont loose 100 games this year?

With the number 1 pick in the 2009 draft, the San Francisco Giants select.....

Is there a worse manager in the game than BB?
Hopper15
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,969
And1: 274
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Location: Tried like the dickens

 

Post#19 » by Hopper15 » Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:04 pm

opzoneworld wrote:Anyone still think this team wont loose 100 games this year?


<----Raises hand
Hopper15
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,969
And1: 274
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Location: Tried like the dickens

 

Post#20 » by Hopper15 » Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:06 pm

xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:Fixed.

Get that green out of there, boy. :evil:

Return to San Francisco Giants