Image ImageImage Image

How would a Tyrus Thomas trade affect YOU?

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

User avatar
JeremyB0001
General Manager
Posts: 7,582
And1: 810
Joined: Jul 25, 2007

 

Post#81 » by JeremyB0001 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 2:18 am

BR0D1E86 wrote:So I agree with you... Tyson doesn't have the skills and would have to learn to handle the ball and whatnot. Tyrus just needs to learn how and when to use the skills he has... along with refining them obviously.


Agreed. In some ways that makes Tyrus a project, but I'm much more optimistic about the development of a player who has some good skills and needs to harness them than I am about a player who needs to develop skills themselves. The only skill Tyrus' that has needed serious refinement is his jumper (assuming that you don't view BBIQ as a skill) and he seems to be off to a good start. Unless people are hoping he'll be a low post scorer, all the other skills are largely there, he just needs to learn how to use them effectively.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 59,016
And1: 19,097
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

 

Post#82 » by dougthonus » Tue Jan 8, 2008 2:35 am

On Tyrus's ball handling:

1) If I said it was like Tyson Chandler's that was quite some time ago and I apologize.

2) It depends on where you set the bar. Maybe he's average for a PF, but he's definitely far below average for a guy of his size and build.

If Tyrus had above average ball handling for his size then with his athleticism he would just absolutely destroy people off the dribble. I mean he'd be crushing guys and be an absolutely fearsome offensive creator. He's got an awesome first step, and if he had the ball handling to change directions quickly and easily no one would stand a chance of guarding him.

As it is, Tyrus is still decent at taking guys off the dribble largely because of his great first step. I think maybe some people take that ability and then lump it in with his ball handling whereas I don't.
User avatar
JeremyB0001
General Manager
Posts: 7,582
And1: 810
Joined: Jul 25, 2007

 

Post#83 » by JeremyB0001 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 2:51 am

dougthonus wrote:Maybe he's average for a PF, but he's definitely far below average for a guy of his size and build.


This sounds somewhat like the "Tyrus is a tweener" argument, which I've never agreed with. The way I see it, Tyrus is a PF and Tyrus dribbles the ball more often than most PF's and with success so hence he has an above average handle for his position. Whether his handle is above or below average for his size seems irrelevant. If you think he's undersized for his position then that seems like a separate issue that should create problems elsewhere and I'm not sure what those would be, other than perhaps post scoring.

dougthonus wrote:If Tyrus had above average ball handling for his size then with his athleticism he would just absolutely destroy people off the dribble. I mean he'd be crushing guys and be an absolutely fearsome offensive creator. He's got an awesome first step, and if he had the ball handling to change directions quickly and easily no one would stand a chance of guarding him.


I think the reasons he's not dominant off the dribble are that he doesn't try to beat his man off the dribble often enough and for some reason he's had trouble finishing off the dribble. I haven't noticed changing directions as a problem though maybe I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to.

dougthonus wrote:As it is, Tyrus is still decent at taking guys off the dribble largely because of his great first step. I think maybe some people take that ability and then lump it in with his ball handling whereas I don't.


I guess I just think that most PF's don't take defender off the dribble from the perimeter at all. If Tyrus can do it and isn't being hindered by his ball handling (e.g. having the ball stolen) then he has skills most players at his position don't.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 59,016
And1: 19,097
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

 

Post#84 » by dougthonus » Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:06 am

This sounds somewhat like the "Tyrus is a tweener" argument, which I've never agreed with. The way I see it, Tyrus is a PF and Tyrus dribbles the ball more often than most PF's and with success so hence he has an above average handle for his position. Whether his handle is above or below average for his size seems irrelevant. If you think he's undersized for his position then that seems like a separate issue that should create problems elsewhere and I'm not sure what those would be, other than perhaps post scoring.


I see what you are saying, but I look at it differently I suppose. If Tyrus is going to be a perimeter based PF (and not a post up one) then he needs to be able to do one of 2 things (in order to be more than a garbage point guy):

1) Nail jumpers over guys while he's contested. He still struggles to hit open jumpers, so obviously this isn't close (yet).

2) Take the bigger PFs off the dribble with his greatly superior speed and quickness.

I do think his size in this is important, because your body size determines largely how successful you can be at something. Tyrus has a body type where he could be a fantastic dribbler. He's not that heavy; he's not super tall. He's smaller and faster than the most guys who will defend him. If you don't think taking guys off the dribble is something he should be able to do (if he's a good ball handler) then I simply disagree. A good ball handler can take people off the dribble as a general rule, and should be able to trivially take larger slower players off the dribble.

I think the reasons he's not dominant off the dribble are that he doesn't try to beat his man off the dribble often enough and for some reason he's had trouble finishing off the dribble. I haven't noticed changing directions as a problem though maybe I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to.


Well if he could be dominant off the dribble and isn't for lack of trying then he should start trying. However, I don't think that's it at all. He just can't dribble well in traffic at this point.

I guess I just think that most PF's don't take defender off the dribble from the perimeter at all. If Tyrus can do it and isn't being hindered by his ball handling (e.g. having the ball stolen) then he has skills most players at his position don't.


There aren't many 6'8 220 lb PFs in the NBA. Rudy Gay has basically the exact same measurables as Tyrus and plays SG.

Maybe I should phrase it this way instead, so as to not insult Tyrus:

He has tremendous room to make further improvements in his ball handling. I agree that it is not a weakness relative to other PFs, however, given his body type, I think he's still very early in his learning curve for ball handling and expect that 2 years from now you will look back at this point and consider ball handling to have been a raw skill at this time.
User avatar
C3
Veteran
Posts: 2,813
And1: 22
Joined: Sep 22, 2003

 

Post#85 » by C3 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:13 am

Ben B. wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I'm fortunate that my oldest is 4 and a half and has not yet discovered Sponge Bob. Actually he has in passing, but we did our best to put the kibosh on that for the time being. It's only a matter of time, and it's not as if we're perfect-- I certainly shouldn't be letting him watch Simpsons or King of the Hill re-runs with me before dinner-- but we're fighting The Man as best we know how. :lol:



Ben, Just enjoy that innocent life while you can.

I don't have any children, and rightfully should not.

But I do have a co-worker who does have children, and man was he pissed when his son tattoo'd his fingers.

But he was even madder when that kid tattoo'd his own forehead.


Please, put off that Sponge Bob as long as you can.
NDave79
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,801
And1: 1,348
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
Location: San Cristóbal De Las Casas, Mexico
       

 

Post#86 » by NDave79 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:37 am

Hi all,

I'd like to pose a challenge for Doug or anyone else who would like to chime in. Show me a player who has the same standing reach and vertical (or better) as Tyrus with equal ball handling skills. I'm not talking about being close or "well he has a little worse standing reach, but better vertical to make up for it". Show me a player who has a 9"0' 2-handed standing reach (or higher) and 39.5" vertical (or higher) with equal ball handling skills.
User avatar
C3
Veteran
Posts: 2,813
And1: 22
Joined: Sep 22, 2003

 

Post#87 » by C3 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:42 am

Tyrus is not a perimeter PF... He belongs as close to the basket as we can get him.
Don't take life to seriously and find your potential. Most importantly, have as much fun as you can while you're still here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN2gMP3Q ... r_embedded
User avatar
Ben
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,806
And1: 2,941
Joined: Feb 09, 2006

 

Post#88 » by Ben » Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:51 am

C3 wrote:Tyrus is not a perimeter PF... He belongs as close to the basket as we can get him.


Yes-- about 3 inches above it would be nice. Alley- OOP!!!

C3 wrote:
But I do have a co-worker who does have children, and man was he pissed when his son tattoo'd his fingers.

But he was even madder when that kid tattoo'd his own forehead.

Please, put off that Sponge Bob as long as you can.


Worst of both worlds would be having a kid who tattoos SpongeBob on his forehead. :lol:

Please no... :pray:
User avatar
C3
Veteran
Posts: 2,813
And1: 22
Joined: Sep 22, 2003

 

Post#89 » by C3 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:57 am

Ben B. wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Worst of both worlds would be having a kid who tattoos SpongeBob on his forehead. :lol:

Please no... :pray:


Yea, I don't know how anyone would explain that.....

Somehow MTV would get hold of it, and blame it on the parents.
User avatar
JeremyB0001
General Manager
Posts: 7,582
And1: 810
Joined: Jul 25, 2007

 

Post#90 » by JeremyB0001 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 4:03 am

dougthonus wrote:I see what you are saying, but I look at it differently I suppose. If Tyrus is going to be a perimeter based PF (and not a post up one) then he needs to be able to do one of 2 things (in order to be more than a garbage point guy):

1) Nail jumpers over guys while he's contested. He still struggles to hit open jumpers, so obviously this isn't close (yet).

2) Take the bigger PFs off the dribble with his greatly superior speed and quickness.

I do think his size in this is important, because your body size determines largely how successful you can be at something. Tyrus has a body type where he could be a fantastic dribbler. He's not that heavy; he's not super tall. He's smaller and faster than the most guys who will defend him.


Yeah, I guess we're largely just approaching the issue differently. You seem to be saying "Yeah, he's an above average dribbler for his position but he needs to be (or needs to be a great ball handler for his position) so that he can someday be an above average scorer." I'm constantly responding to people who claim Tyrus does nothing well other than jump, so I find it important to recognize that - even if it's essential to his development or a byproduct of his body type - he has some skills a lot of players at his position don't.

dougthonus wrote:Well if he could be dominant off the dribble and isn't for lack of trying then he should start trying. However, I don't think that's it at all. He just can't dribble well in traffic at this point.


From what I've seen he's not struggling to take his man off the dribble because he can't handle the ball well enough. I haven't seen him struggle to get past players, I haven't seen him lose control of the ball while dribbling, and I haven't seen players steal the ball from him with frequency.

dougthonus wrote:There aren't many 6'8 220 lb PFs in the NBA. Rudy Gay has basically the exact same measurables as Tyrus and plays SG.



That sounds pretty explicitly like the tweener argument. First of all, there's no way Tyrus is 6'8 220. He measured at 6'8.25 in the combines and it often appears he's grown taller. He weighed in at 217 and he looks to weigh at least 15 pounds more than that right now. Also, standing reach is possibly the most important measurement of height and Tyrus fares well there. The fact that Gay is oversized for his position doesn't mean that Tyrus is undersized.

dougthonus wrote:I think he's still very early in his learning curve for ball handling and expect that 2 years from now you will look back at this point and consider ball handling to have been a raw skill at this time.


I hope that's true but if that's the case, I still don't think I'll look back and think his dribbling was raw at any point in time. I will believe his dribbling went from good to great.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,317
And1: 15,128
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

 

Post#91 » by Ayt » Tue Jan 8, 2008 4:14 am

dougthonus wrote:

There aren't many 6'8 220 lb PFs in the NBA. Rudy Gay has basically the exact same measurables as Tyrus and plays SG.



Minor quibble, but Gay has spent a ton of time at PF this season. He doesn't really play SG at all for Memphis.

http://www.82games.com/0708/07MEM9C.HTM

dougthonus wrote:
His skills which you state aren't raw (rebounding and shot blocking, to which I'd also add his quick hands for generating steals) aren't really finesse based skills that require a lot of development. The learning curve on these skills strikes me as pretty small. A huge portion of them is based on effort and athleticism.


I'd say an even larger portion is based on instincts. One of the reasons Tyrus was so highly regarded coming out were his incredible defensive instincts. The learning curve in being an exceptional shotblocker or ball thief definitely is not small, and the same goes for being a good rebounder.
User avatar
Clint Eastwood
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,990
And1: 1,168
Joined: Aug 13, 2004
Location: Taking my talents to South Beach (twice a day at times)

 

Post#92 » by Clint Eastwood » Tue Jan 8, 2008 4:29 am

Ben B. wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Dude, I have a longstanding "Barney Ban" in my house that's breakable only if our youngest turns out to have god-like powers and can grant me a Cubs World Series title in return.

The Wiggles are thankfully off the table as well.

I don't even know what the Doodlebops are, but the name makes me shudder.

Your point is well taken. My brother in law, who's an awesome guy, loves Spongebob. He's probably a lot of fun for adults. But since I've been finding ample ways to corrode my poor boy's intelligence I'm trying to limit his TV time where I can. :lol:

Back to the thread topic:

How would a Tyrus trade affect YOU, Duck?


ben,

we have same aged oldest child. we havent seen spongebob. i hear its good for adults. i cant stand the songs from these kid show. barney is the worst, thank god that is for younger kids. in our house, i think i am ready for the tragic death of curious george however. my son no longer uses words. he just says ahh, eeh ahh ohh, eehh haaa. i am thinking of disowning him.

strange thing is he knows how to operated my rather complex av system and every morning comes down and puts a movie in. we have hundreds of them and sometimes he picks inappropriate ones. i dont know how to control it, but right now he is into watching national treasure. think DCFS reads these threads?

oh, on topic, a tyrus trade would cause me to reevaluate my entire value system. i would most likely become a hockey fan, or adopt the clippers as my team, ,or renounce barnabys as the best thin crust pizza in the universe. that is unless he is traded in a package for gasol...
User avatar
Ben
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,806
And1: 2,941
Joined: Feb 09, 2006

 

Post#93 » by Ben » Tue Jan 8, 2008 4:29 am

Ayt wrote:Minor quibble, but Gay has spent a ton of time at PF this season. He doesn't really play SG at all for Memphis.


Absolutely. It's amazing how many times I read posters claiming that either Mike Miller and/or Rudy Gay plays SG, yet Memphis is still looking for a regular 2 (b/c neither of those guys can defense SGs regularly). Miller is basically a 3 and Gay is a 3/4. Deng can play the 2 once in a while, too, but he's not a SG.

Also, Tyrus is not 6'8 220. Come on, Doug, usually those stats get mentioned by folks who have a grudge against Tyrus, whereas I know that you do not. Tyrus measured 6'7 1/4" in bare feet at the pre-draft combine, which comes out to 6'8 3/4" when you factor in the average shoe height (1.5 inches). And we can all see him standing eye to eye with Luol, who's 6'9". What's more, he's almost certainly at least 225 right now. He has noticeably bulked up and will almost certainly put on 5-10 more pounds over the next several years. 6'9" 230 is just fine for a PF, especially when he has Tyrus' vertical reach and leaping ability. Marion is shorter than that and Bosh, who's 6'10, is 230 pounds and proclaims that he won't get much heavier.

In the final analysis I agree with you (Tyrus will improve his ball-handling skills) and with Jeremy (Tyrus is a better ball-handler than most PFs already). He still has a long way to go, which is why I want him to get more PT. But those who say that he has no skills just haven't watched him play, whether in college or in the pros.

EDIT: Granville, great post. Just saw it. :clap:
theanimal23
RealGM
Posts: 17,748
And1: 927
Joined: Mar 02, 2005

 

Post#94 » by theanimal23 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 4:45 am

Tyrus is 6'9 230lbs

A report earlier in the summer said he gained 12 lbs of muscle. A month later, TrueHoop had a link to an article that had about one regarding TyTy and it said he gained 14 lbs (of muscle I'm assuming).

He is eye to eye with Luol. Possibly a hair taller. No one's ever gotten a good angle to see them next to each other to see who is taller. Thats why I always wish during media day we'd see him and Lu take a pic together.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 59,016
And1: 19,097
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

 

Post#95 » by dougthonus » Tue Jan 8, 2008 5:23 am

Minor quibble, but Gay has spent a ton of time at PF this season. He doesn't really play SG at all for Memphis.


My bad, I was going off the word of what others have said. I don't actually watch the Grizzlies much at all.

I'd say an even larger portion is based on instincts. One of the reasons Tyrus was so highly regarded coming out were his incredible defensive instincts. The learning curve in being an exceptional shotblocker or ball thief definitely is not small, and the same goes for being a good rebounder.


I would also agree that it's very instinctual. I don't think the learning curve to being an exceptional shot blocker or ball thief is large. I think it's non existent. If you do not have the athletic gifts / instincts necessary, it seems virtually impossible to gain them later.

I'm not trying to bash Tyrus at all with my comments that I feel his game is raw. He excels in most of the things that can't be taught. His skill level in other areas certainly isn't zero, but it has an absolute ton of room for refinement.

Yeah, I guess we're largely just approaching the issue differently. You seem to be saying "Yeah, he's an above average dribbler for his position but he needs to be (or needs to be a great ball handler for his position) so that he can someday be an above average scorer."


No, this isn't what I'm saying. I'm saying he's average for a PF, if you set the PF expectation level to 0 (which you seem to have done). Tyrus can not dribble the ball well in traffic without getting stripped. I don't see him regularly (or pretty much ever) use dribble moves to evade people. Granted, the amount of time we get to see Tyrus try these things is limited. In just a few games you saw that I didn't or vice versa we could easily have very different views on the subject based on the limited opportunities and small sample sizes.

That sounds pretty explicitly like the tweener argument. First of all, there's no way Tyrus is 6'8 220. He measured at 6'8.25 in the combines and it often appears he's grown taller. He weighed in at 217 and he looks to weigh at least 15 pounds more than that right now. Also, standing reach is possibly the most important measurement of height and Tyrus fares well there. The fact that Gay is oversized for his position doesn't mean that Tyrus is undersized.


I've never seen it reported that he grew taller except from people on this forum who looked at photos at weird angles and just said he looks taller. If he has grown taller, that would be interesting. Given his age, it's unlikely (though not impossible). I recall it being reported that he added muscle. I thought it was initially reported that it was 12 lbs, and hten someone came back the next day and said it was 7 lbs. I thought he was 214 at the combine, but I had it wrong and he was 217.

Also, Tyrus is not 6'8 220. Come on, Doug, usually those stats get mentioned by folks who have a grudge against Tyrus, whereas I know that you do not. Tyrus measured 6'7 1/4" in bare feet at the pre-draft combine, which comes out to 6'8 3/4" when you factor in the average shoe height (1.5 inches).


I don't want to get into semantics too much over it. He measured at 6'8.25 in shoes at the combine. By NBA standards, he's the shortest 6'9 you can be, but fair enough, I should have still called him 6'9 since everyone in the NBA cheats their measurements.

Maybe I am being a bit unfair about what level of ball handling I think he could have. However, I don't see how you could watch his game and say ball handling is a strength. Do you see him cross anyone over? Go behind his back to get past someone? Fake someone out with spin moves (while dribbling and not his spin move he always uses where he picks up the ball and shoots)?

Do you disagree with the premise that a good ball handler would have little trouble taking a bigger slower defender off the dribble?

I hope that's true but if that's the case, I still don't think I'll look back and think his dribbling was raw at any point in time. I will believe his dribbling went from good to great.


Do you have an example of Tyrus ever displaying good ball handling? I don't know, as I said, maybe I just have selective memory on the subject. or am just hit by limited sample size. I just remember him getting stripped frequently when he tries to dribble through traffic. I don't recall him using dribble moves to get around people (pretty much at all).

Your benchmark seems to be comparing him to people who also do not do these things, and then saying "See look, he's not worse than zero". I can see calling him average for his position, but that's a large qualifier given his position. I don't think it means he has refined ball handling ability.
User avatar
kebzach
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,397
And1: 11
Joined: Nov 13, 2006
Location: Illini Fan Trapped in WI

Re: How would a Tyrus Thomas trade affect YOU? 

Post#96 » by kebzach » Tue Jan 8, 2008 5:27 am

theawakening wrote:I understand that this forum has its fair share of proponents and detractors of Tyrus Thomas. It seems as though national and Chicago media loves to bandy Tyrus' name around in all trade proposals, for they posit that he can provide high yield in a trade. Thinking about Tyrus Thomas leaving the Bulls bothers me, no matter how objective I say I am as a Bulls fan. I find his time on the floor riveting and live and die with his every jump shot attempt.

How would you folks feel about watching the Bulls if Tyrus Thomas was traded? The Bulls for me are WHERE TYRUS THOMAS HAPPENS. It's pathetic how I have lost by objectivity since draft day 2006.


I'd have no problem at all if he was to be traded. The collective IQ of the team would go up by about 200 points too.
jax98
RealGM
Posts: 36,697
And1: 3,015
Joined: Aug 31, 2003

 

Post#97 » by jax98 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 7:44 am

DuckIII wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



That SpongeBob. What will he do next?


Like Britney and other young stars, he too, will become an addict.

Image

kebzach wrote:I'd have no problem at all if he was to be traded. The collective IQ of the team would go up by about 200 points too.


Do they honestly teach you this crap at the "Tyrus Thomas Institude of Haters"?

Tyrus has shown that he has rather high understanding of the game itself. It's the ticky-tack fouls and his rush to do things which makes him turn the ball over. Did you even see some of those interior passes Tyrus made in the Kings game? That was downright clever positioning from his side, as he made himself available to feed an inside player as well being able to put it in himself. Tyrus has the capability of giving this team more than one option when he picks his spot. If that is not basketball IQ, then I don't know what is.

I still believe that around 80% of all his turnovers come from him being too eager to make something happen. I also don't blame him one bit. If you had his talent-level at got iced on the bench like Megatron (Yes, just saw Transformers again, and yes, it still rocked) you'd be eager to produce something as well.

IMO, next season so many people will eat their words about Tyrus. I think he's fully capable of having a huge season in 08/09.
User avatar
bullzman23
RealGM
Posts: 14,557
And1: 3
Joined: May 23, 2001
Location: Evanston

 

Post#98 » by bullzman23 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 8:11 am

Portland won again two days after escaping Chicago with a double-overtime win. That makes the Blazers 16-1 in their last 17 games with 2006 draft picks Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldridge the two leading scorers.

Even though the statistics are lopsided right now, I still think it's possible the Bulls made the right move by taking Tyrus Thomas instead of Aldridge in that draft.

For one thing, it's easy to imagine Thomas turning Saturday's line of 14 points, 9 rebounds and 3 blocks against the Kings into a regular occurrence. And I also don't think Aldridge would be doing as well with the Bulls.

Aldridge scored most of his 14 points against the Bulls on jump shots. He gets good looks with the Blazers because he can play off Roy and should be a nice complement to Greg Oden in the future.

The Bulls don't have a creator of Roy's caliber, but have a glaring need for Thomas' athleticism on the front line.

So the decision to pass on Aldridge may still pay off for the Bulls. Passing on Roy could be a different story, because they then could have used Roy or Ben Gordon in a trade for a big man.
http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=108234&src=150



If Thomas were on the Blazer's, I believe that many posters would be criticizing Paxson for taking the 'safe' pick once again when a superior athletic marvel was available. Thomas was my top choice from day 1, and I still believe that he's a superior player to Aldridge. We'll see, but I agree with McGraw....Aldridge would look much worse playing for Skiles and with Hinrich/Gordon.
girlygirl wrote:Sorry, I just don't think MJ changed the game all that much.


www.theslickscript.com
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 59,016
And1: 19,097
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

 

Post#99 » by dougthonus » Tue Jan 8, 2008 1:38 pm

If Thomas were on the Blazer's, I believe that many posters would be criticizing Paxson for taking the 'safe' pick once again when a superior athletic marvel was available. Thomas was my top choice from day 1, and I still believe that he's a superior player to Aldridge. We'll see, but I agree with McGraw....Aldridge would look much worse playing for Skiles and with Hinrich/Gordon.


I don't think Aldridge would look much worse playing for us. His game is pretty refined, and he's not prone to the same type of mental errors that got Tyrus pulled so much. However, I do think Tyrus would look much better if he was on the Blazers (and got as many minutes as he could play without fouling out for the past year and a half).

I would be shocked if Tyrus becomes the better overall pick for our franchise at this point. Aldridge's skills fit what we need more in that we really need a scoring big man, and we need someone with legit size. Tyrus would need to pass Aldridge as a player by a considerable margin before I'd rather have him on the team because his fit isn't as natural. That being said, I think he can definitely be good enough that we're not whining about it all day.
AirP.
RealGM
Posts: 37,541
And1: 32,265
Joined: Nov 21, 2007

 

Post#100 » by AirP. » Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:33 pm

I still don't understand, what Skills does Aldridge bring to the table that dropping 5 million a year for a Joe Smith doesn't? He's younger so he's quicker and can handle more minutes but that's about it. Both hit the outside shot, both can score in the post some but don't shoot often down there, yet I think Smith plays stronger then Aldridge.

If he becomes tougher and ends up utilizing his talents in the low post much more, yeah, he's what we needed, but if he continues how he is and how I expect him to continue, especially with Oden taking over down low... he brings very little more then a good seasoned vet with a jumpshot.

Return to Chicago Bulls