Kings - Grizzlies (Grizz rebuild, Kings rebound)

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890

Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Kings - Grizzlies (Grizz rebuild, Kings rebound) 

Post#1 » by Smills91 » Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:36 pm

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... &te=&cash=

Kings deal:
Kevin Martin
Quincy Douby
Kenny Thomas
Mikki Moore

Griz deal:
Pau Gasol
Andre Brown
Casey Jacobson
Brian Cardinal

Why for the Kings:
Salmons/Garcia/Dahntay can fill the vacated 2 spot left by Kevin Martin and Gasol is the same age as most of the Kings main players (Artest, Bibby, Miller, Salmons) Gasol gives the Kings the PF they've been searching for since C-Webb got hurt.

Why for the Grizz:
With a less than enthused Gasol who seems not to fit as well with the up-tempo style of the Grizz(specifically Conley/Gay as their future core), Martin AND Douby look like two young pieces that would excel in a fast breaking style that can be added to their young core. The grizz add a future all-star at the 2 guard spot who's only 24 years old and average nearly 25 ppg this season.

New rosters:

Kings -
C: Brad Miller, Spencer Hawes, Justin Williams
PF: Pau Gasol, Brian Cardinal, Andre Brown, SAR
SF: Ron Artest, Francisco Garcia, Casey Jacobson
SG: John Salmons, Dahntay Jones
PG: Mike Bibby, Beno Udrih

Grizzlies -
C: Darko Milicic, Stromile Swift
PF: Mikki Moore, Hakim Warrick, Kenny Thomas
SF: Rudy Gay, Mike Miller, Bobby Jones
SG: Kevin Martin, Quincy Douby, Juan Carlos Navarro
PG: Mike Conley, Kyle Lowry, Damon Stoudamire
pardon_my_interruption
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,800
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 27, 2005
Location: Houston, TX
     

 

Post#2 » by pardon_my_interruption » Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:43 pm

What would be the point of giving up Cardinal if we're taking back Thomas/SAR.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

 

Post#3 » by Smills91 » Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:46 pm

pardon_my_interruption wrote:What would be the point of giving up Cardinal if we're taking back Thomas/SAR.


SAR's just injured, I'm SURE he holds more value in the league than Cardinal to deal next year...as for Kenny, he's maybe a quarter step better than Cardinal and is needed to fill salary in the deal. The deal boils down to Martin/Douby for Gasol...the rest is just salary/roster filler.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

 

Post#4 » by Smills91 » Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:52 pm

Would substituting Moore in for SAR improve the deal in your eyes PMI?
dark-child
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,831
And1: 125
Joined: Nov 08, 2005
     

 

Post#5 » by dark-child » Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:57 pm

Right idea: Trading Gasol

Wrong team: Sac. Kings
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 58,977
And1: 18,945
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

 

Post#6 » by shrink » Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:59 pm

I don't know if the MEM would do this deal for Gasol, but I wanted to say that its refreshing to see trades where the Kings aren't automatically written off. They have three talented veterans, who simply don't have a lot of trade value. I think this deal (with Moore) puts them in the West Coast Playoffs. Even if they have to break it up this summer, reminding the league of the Kings players success might help their trade value more.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

 

Post#7 » by Smills91 » Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:09 pm

dark-child wrote:Right idea: Trading Gasol

Wrong team: Sac. Kings


Is that because Andres Nocioni is a superior player to Kevin Martin??? Please explain to me why a sure-fire 20 PPG scorer at the age of 24 is not a good idea for a team with Conley, Warrick, Gay, Lowry. Martin would fit in PERFECTLY to Iavoroni's beyond up-tempo desired offense. Gay and Martin on the wings with Conley would be a ridiculously good up-temp team.
User avatar
Crimson King
Pro Prospect
Posts: 959
And1: 34
Joined: Apr 26, 2007

 

Post#8 » by Crimson King » Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:22 pm

pardon_my_interruption wrote:What would be the point of giving up Cardinal if we're taking back Thomas/SAR.


Match the salaries, because Martin is a PPP player.

Taking out for a moment Cardinal and Thomas (about the same negative value), the deal is:

Gasol for Kevin Martin, Mikki Moore and Quincy Douby.

The 3 players are good for Iavaroni's system, I've seen a lot worse proposals for Gasol.

I think the Kings should do that, and it's not bad for Memphis but not sure it's enough.
User avatar
Crimson King
Pro Prospect
Posts: 959
And1: 34
Joined: Apr 26, 2007

 

Post#9 » by Crimson King » Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:39 pm

In this proposal I don't think Memphis would have a problem adding Navarro instead of Brown/Jacobsen. Navarro is a very good player from the bench and he would make the transition better for Gasol.

Also if necessary, I'd put Garcia instead of Douby in the deal.

So: Gasol, Cardinal, Navarro for Martin, Moore, Thomas, Garcia/Douby
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

 

Post#10 » by Smills91 » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:04 pm

The Grizzlies, if in fact are looking to move Gasol, would be luckier than Hell to obtain a player of Martin's caliber back in return. I think KEEPING Gasol holds the most PRODUCTION value, but getting Kevin Martin, who I think would be an ideal fit with Conley, Gay, Warrick in a faster pace than the suns would be probably the best player they could realistically get back in return when dealing Gasol. Nocioni's not better, David Lee is not better, Kevin Martin is a rising star in the league and fits with the style and age range of the current Grizzly roster.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

 

Post#11 » by Smills91 » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:06 pm

zar wrote:In this proposal I don't think Memphis would have a problem adding Navarro instead of Brown/Jacobsen. Navarro is a very good player from the bench and he would make the transition better for Gasol.

Also if necessary, I'd put Garcia instead of Douby in the deal.

So: Gasol, Cardinal, Navarro for Martin, Moore, Thomas, Garcia/Douby


Your proposal didn't work for me..since Martin is PPP it was REALLY tricky...adding Navarro throws it out of whack. It pretty much has to be Gasol for Thomas/Martin/Douby and then I just matched up Moore with Cardinal to give the Grizz more size, a better player AND one less year on his deal to boot(since Mikki has a buy out option his final year)
User avatar
Crimson King
Pro Prospect
Posts: 959
And1: 34
Joined: Apr 26, 2007

 

Post#12 » by Crimson King » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:13 pm

Smills91 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Your proposal didn't work for me..since Martin is PPP it was REALLY tricky...adding Navarro throws it out of whack. It pretty much has to be Gasol for Thomas/Martin/Douby and then I just matched up Moore with Cardinal to give the Grizz more size, a better player AND one less year on his deal to boot(since Mikki has a buy out option his final year)


http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... &te=&cash=

With Garcia instead of Douby works too.

Anyways, it's a little variation. I like your original deal for both teams.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

 

Post#13 » by Smills91 » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:30 pm

zar wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... &te=&cash=

With Garcia instead of Douby works too.

Anyways, it's a little variation. I like your original deal for both teams.


One of the main reasons that I'm okay with dealing Martin for Gasol is the fact that we'd still have Salmons AND Garcia there to fill the void. Dealing Martin AND Garcia IMO is a bit too rich.
User avatar
Crimson King
Pro Prospect
Posts: 959
And1: 34
Joined: Apr 26, 2007

 

Post#14 » by Crimson King » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:41 pm

^^ Well, Garcia in the deal is just another sweetener for the Grizzlies. Of course the Kings would like to keep him. Getting Navarro would help too, I'd like to see this guy with 20-25 minutes every game.
DeezXXnutZ
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,881
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 13, 2006
Location: Courtside at the Rose Garden with Jessica Simpson

 

Post#15 » by DeezXXnutZ » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:46 pm

Forgive me if I'm wrong but I was under the impression that Kevin Martin is untouchable especially for Gasol....
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

 

Post#16 » by Smills91 » Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:03 pm

DeezXXnutZ wrote:Forgive me if I'm wrong but I was under the impression that Kevin Martin is untouchable especially for Gasol....


You'll hear it both ways. I'm not opposed to dealing Martin for a player like Gasol.
jefe
General Manager
Posts: 8,294
And1: 736
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
Location: memphis

 

Post#17 » by jefe » Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:26 pm

It's not the worse offer for Gasol I've seen - if the Kings 1st were included then the Grizz would have to seriously consider it (if it were on the table ... and not just on an internet message board).
User avatar
Bac2Basics
RealGM
Posts: 13,588
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 03, 2001
Location: "Are you like a crazy person? I'm quite sure they will say so."
   

 

Post#18 » by Bac2Basics » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:11 pm

I think any trade where the Kings even consider trading Martin, they absolutely won't be taking back a single bad contract.

I'm not saying that Martin & Gasol aren't similar value but I don't see Petrie going in this direction.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

 

Post#19 » by loserX » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:29 pm

Bac2Basics wrote:I think any trade where the Kings even consider trading Martin, they absolutely won't be taking back a single bad contract.


I assume you're talking about Cardinal...you do see that Kenny is going the other way, right? Guess which player is scoring more? Guess which player is being paid more? You're getting the BENEFIT of that swap.
User avatar
Bac2Basics
RealGM
Posts: 13,588
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 03, 2001
Location: "Are you like a crazy person? I'm quite sure they will say so."
   

 

Post#20 » by Bac2Basics » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:34 pm

loserX wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I assume you're talking about Cardinal...you do see that Kenny is going the other way, right? Guess which player is scoring more? Guess which player is being paid more? You're getting the BENEFIT of that swap.


I saw both Kenny & Cardinal, but I stand by what I said, the Kings shouldn't take back a bad contract if their dealing Kevin Martin.

Return to Trades and Transactions