ImageImageImageImageImage

Jerry West to NY???

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
knicks742
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,344
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 30, 2006
Location: Watching the Knicks and Nuggets at Boxers

 

Post#41 » by knicks742 » Sun Jan 13, 2008 2:54 pm

nyknicks2k2 wrote:Forget how much of an upgrade West would be on the GM front.

The Knicks would finally receive respect. West is a liked person. We wouldn't have GM's not wanting to trade with us because of past history with our GM.


This is a huge point that people overlook. First off, personal feelings do come into play. Isiah is not well liked by many in this league.

Secondly, Isiah has made so many horrible deals that even if he now is ready to take less chances, most GMS probably are reluctant to trade for him and be the guy that got raped by Isiah.
OrangeandBlue20
Pro Prospect
Posts: 826
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 06, 2006

 

Post#42 » by OrangeandBlue20 » Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:19 pm

They eagerly await? What in the world is Dolan doing- get rid of Isiah now and hire competent people in important positions. What a concept!
User avatar
JoeT
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,412
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 15, 2005
Location: Long Island, NY

 

Post#43 » by JoeT » Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:25 pm

knicks742 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



This is a huge point that people overlook. First off, personal feelings do come into play. Isiah is not well liked by many in this league.

Secondly, Isiah has made so many horrible deals that even if he now is ready to take less chances, most GMS probably are reluctant to trade for him and be the guy that got raped by Isiah.


Huh? Your logic makes no sense whatsoever. GM's aren't going to avoid deals in their team's best interest just because there's a chance it'll look like Isiah Thomas beat them in a deal down the road. Teams make deals to improve their teams, not to try and show up other GM's or avoid being showed up by other GM's. If anything, GM's would be more eager to trade with someone they think they can take advantage of, because they can get a better deal for their team. It's not a giant pissing contest between GM's with people scared of looking bad.
User avatar
BBALLER4FR
RealGM
Posts: 19,539
And1: 8,480
Joined: May 05, 2004
Location: Not sure anymore.
   

 

Post#44 » by BBALLER4FR » Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:28 pm

knicks742 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



This is a huge point that people overlook. First off, personal feelings do come into play. Isiah is not well liked by many in this league.

Secondly, Isiah has made so many horrible deals that even if he now is ready to take less chances, most GMS probably are reluctant to trade for him and be the guy that got raped by Isiah.


When has that happened?

Phoenix - Nash has made the Suns a perennial playoff contender after the Marbury trade

Chicago - Immediately after the Crawford trade the Bulls make the playoffs. After trading Eddy Curry they continued to make the playoffs in addition to receiving 2 top 10 picks as a result of the trade.

Portland - The year after Zach gets traded to the Knicks one of the youngest teams has a season start that includes a 13 game win streak :o

No team has ever been raped as a result of a Isiah Thomas trade.
User avatar
Deeeez Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 49,262
And1: 55,183
Joined: Nov 12, 2004

 

Post#45 » by Deeeez Knicks » Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:31 pm

I would think teams would want to trade with isiah and the knicks because we are so willing to take on bad contracts. Whenever a team has a bad, cancercous contract they want to trade the Knicks are always first on the list to call (Marbury, Francis, Zach).
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
User avatar
Deeeez Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 49,262
And1: 55,183
Joined: Nov 12, 2004

 

Post#46 » by Deeeez Knicks » Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:32 pm

Either West or Collangello would be great. We need an experienced person to get us outta this mess. I think either would understand what needs to be done here.
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
User avatar
PrecociousNeoph
Head Coach
Posts: 6,652
And1: 377
Joined: May 31, 2007
Location: Gentleman D'Antoni
       

 

Post#47 » by PrecociousNeoph » Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:32 pm

DaGoodz wrote:I'll believe it when it happens. just fire Isiah before he trades our 1st for T-Mac. Cause I know he's itching to do it


that's my #1 fear right now... he could truly screw us by doing that, and I know that in his twisted mind he believes it would be a good trade
“Bye, Felicia.”
User avatar
HellsKitchen
Head Coach
Posts: 6,390
And1: 0
Joined: May 21, 2001

 

Post#48 » by HellsKitchen » Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:11 pm

I'd rather get Colangelo at this point, but I'd be thrilled with either.
User avatar
CrazyEyes
RealGM
Posts: 10,098
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 03, 2001

 

Post#49 » by CrazyEyes » Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:23 pm

nyknicks2k2 wrote:The Knicks would finally receive respect. West is a liked person. We wouldn't have GM's not wanting to trade with us because of past history with our GM.


That's the most important thing. Isiah is a pariah. He has too many enemies. Layden was just a guy who got his job because of his Daddy -- which I'm sure other GMs resented.
100guns100clips
Ballboy
Posts: 29
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 20, 2007

Re: Jerry West to NY??? 

Post#50 » by 100guns100clips » Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:17 pm

Jerry West is "ahem" way past his prime and how may rings does Colangelo have? :noway: The NBA is full of over rated has beens. Isiah definitely needs to leave NY - the Zach Randolph deal has been an absolute disaster; This team full of coach killers - Isiah drank the Kool-aid and put his faith in the wrong crew. what a waste this season has turned into.
User avatar
Election
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,659
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 14, 2004
Location: 'The game is the game'

 

Post#51 » by Election » Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:46 pm

Anyone knows why he left the Grizz if he wasn't serious about retiring?

Most people know he left the Lakers because he didn't get his big paid day like Phil Jackson, why he left the Grizz though?
Fortinos2008
Banned User
Posts: 37
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 11, 2008

 

Post#52 » by Fortinos2008 » Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:43 pm

Jerry West= Memphis Grizzlies = loser
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,235
And1: 25,689
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

 

Post#53 » by moocow007 » Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:18 am

While the legend of West is greater than reality it's pretty hard to argue that either guy would be anything less than a tremendous upgrade.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,235
And1: 25,689
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

 

Post#54 » by moocow007 » Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:20 am

Election wrote:Anyone knows why he left the Grizz if he wasn't serious about retiring?

Most people know he left the Lakers because he didn't get his big paid day like Phil Jackson, why he left the Grizz though?


If I recall it had something to do with the ownership not willing to spend to win...something ownership in LA didn't have a problem with. An ominous sign perhaps.
User avatar
Knox
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,808
And1: 1,299
Joined: May 03, 2005
Contact:

 

Post#55 » by Knox » Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:33 am

Would you want to live in Mempis :crazy:

Cant blame him for leaving
User avatar
Election
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,659
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 14, 2004
Location: 'The game is the game'

 

Post#56 » by Election » Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:49 am

Knox wrote:Would you want to live in Mempis :crazy:

Cant blame him for leaving


Memphis also paid him a record high paycheck to manage that team, he might acquired players people would question about, but he certainly had his version what he wanted, and it worked if Grizz didn't keep running into the Spurs in the playoffs
User avatar
mjhp911
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,886
And1: 14
Joined: Aug 12, 2002
Location: New York

 

Post#57 » by mjhp911 » Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:53 am

Slimpack wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Dolan's restrictions don't seem to be too tight, based on how long he's kept Isiah. I doubt he'd insist on making the playoffs, he for the most part didn't in Isiah's tenure.


Okay, the restriction is, Dolan is not going to allow a full and total rebuild. You don't agree with that, and I don't agree with you. You've told me all your reasons why, and I've told you all my reasons why. C'est la vie.
User avatar
drj
Analyst
Posts: 3,257
And1: 71
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: rocking the baby

 

Post#58 » by drj » Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:06 am

I think we have to distinguish (i) intentionally rebuilding, from (ii) trying to win but losing anyway.

IMO Dolan doesn't mind (ii) as long as he still sells tickets. He doesn't care about winning and losing per se. He's kept Isiah in part because Isiah has helped him sell tickets. The Isiah-era Knicks have been selling the sucker fans hope and empty promises for the last few years, and it by and large has worked.

But I doubt Dolan would accept (i). He has been very clear that he wants to see butts in the seats. If you feature a roster of underdeveloped youngsters, and stop making splashy offseason trades for overhyped players, then how do you hype the team?
User avatar
mjhp911
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,886
And1: 14
Joined: Aug 12, 2002
Location: New York

 

Post#59 » by mjhp911 » Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:12 am

drj wrote:I think we have to distinguish (i) intentionally rebuilding, from (ii) trying to win but losing anyway.

IMO Dolan doesn't mind (ii) as long as he still sells tickets. He doesn't care about winning and losing per se. He's kept Isiah in part because Isiah has helped him sell tickets. The Isiah-era Knicks have been selling the sucker fans hope and empty promises for the last few years, and it by and large has worked.

But I doubt Dolan would accept (i). He has been very clear that he wants to see butts in the seats. If you feature a roster of underdeveloped youngsters, and stop making splashy offseason trades for overhyped players, then how do you hype the team?


That's what I've been pointing out to people. Zeke has been able to make us significantly younger, and more talented, but he had to do it in a 'surreptitious' manner. We still had some big names to (supposedly) sell seats. But at the same time, we've become a lot younger. I still feel that's the only way we're getting out of this mess, through the draft. I seriously doubt we can trade for our franchise player, and I doubt even more that we can sign this franchise player. We're gonna' have to draft him. It's a shame that the mix is all wrong, and that few of the parts fit. Because I still feel that Zeke is one of the few who could have brought us out of this mess. It has to be someone with a good eye for young talent (and that's why I didn't think Kiki would work for us).
User avatar
drj
Analyst
Posts: 3,257
And1: 71
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: rocking the baby

 

Post#60 » by drj » Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:38 am

mjhp911 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



That's what I've been pointing out to people. Zeke has been able to make us significantly younger, and more talented, but he had to do it in a 'surreptitious' manner. We still had some big names to (supposedly) sell seats. But at the same time, we've become a lot younger. I still feel that's the only way we're getting out of this mess, through the draft. I seriously doubt we can trade for our franchise player, and I doubt even more that we can sign this franchise player. We're gonna' have to draft him. It's a shame that the mix is all wrong, and that few of the parts fit. Because I still feel that Zeke is one of the few who could have brought us out of this mess. It has to be someone with a good eye for young talent (and that's why I didn't think Kiki would work for us).


I agree with most of your points mjhp.

The only part where I disagree is the idea that Zeke can bring us out of this. I think he's proven that he can't construct a roster, make reasonable FA acquisitions, etc. etc. Also I think his eye for young talent is overrated.

But I think the key point of agreement is that we need to find our next franchise player through the draft. Let's just hope we still have our pick by the time the trade deadline comes to a close!

Return to New York Knicks