ImageImage

Potential future backcourt partners for Roy

Moderators: DeBlazerRiddem, Moonbeam

DanBlazer
Junior
Posts: 329
And1: 10
Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Location: Sydney

Potential future backcourt partners for Roy 

Post#1 » by DanBlazer » Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:25 am

IMO Pritchard will probably try to lock up a backcourt partner for the future this coming off season. Who would you want to see starting alongside Roy on this team and how hard would it be to get them. Obviously Chris Paul would be ideal but it is a tad unrealistic thinking we could get him without sending out one of our core pieces.

I suppose it also depends on what role everybody envisions Roy playing, whether it being permanently at PG handling the ball, or just handling the ball in the 4th quarter to help close out games.

I could see Eric Gordon as a great complement to Roy personally, as he has a great knack for scoring and will be one of the best shooters in the league with the ability to score at will. Roy could be the playmaker and Gordon could just fit in the team mentality as he could be a catch and shoot type player or create his own shots when the team is down.

We could probably obtain him too without paying too high a price. Who do you guys think we should target in the near future to fill out the guard rotation?
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,210
And1: 7,968
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Potential future backcourt partners for Roy 

Post#2 » by Wizenheimer » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:02 pm

bigd213 wrote:IMO Pritchard will probably try to lock up a backcourt partner for the future this coming off season. Who would you want to see starting alongside Roy on this team and how hard would it be to get them. Obviously Chris Paul would be ideal but it is a tad unrealistic thinking we could get him without sending out one of our core pieces.

I suppose it also depends on what role everybody envisions Roy playing, whether it being permanently at PG handling the ball, or just handling the ball in the 4th quarter to help close out games.

I could see Eric Gordon as a great complement to Roy personally, as he has a great knack for scoring and will be one of the best shooters in the league with the ability to score at will. Roy could be the playmaker and Gordon could just fit in the team mentality as he could be a catch and shoot type player or create his own shots when the team is down.

We could probably obtain him too without paying too high a price. Who do you guys think we should target in the near future to fill out the guard rotation?


if portland is drafting around 13-17 and Gordon is a top 3 pick, then I think the price would be quite a bit higher then you credit. Teams aren't going to trade down from the top 3 without getting a great package. After all, would portland?

As far as backcourt partners, it's possible blake and fernadez will be a good start.

And I really think that portland is headed for a playing time squeeze next season at the sf/pf positions so I wouldn't be surprised at KP making a major draft day trade to open a roster spot or two and beef-up the backcourt. If and what it would be I have no clue.
User avatar
BlackMamba
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,297
And1: 81
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Cd. de M
         

 

Post#3 » by BlackMamba » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:55 pm

well, i think that the only safe addition the blazers must do is bring fernd
Charlie78
Starter
Posts: 2,098
And1: 81
Joined: Sep 08, 2004

 

Post#4 » by Charlie78 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Another problem portland is going to have is that at this point KP has been on the winning end of three or four deals.

Telfair for Roy

Stealing Roy from Houston

Zach to NY

Grabbing James Jones from phx

Grabbing Sergio and Rudy

Pretty soon teams are going to start to become reluctant to deal with him especially west teams because they are going to think he knows something they dont or is trying to pull somthing. I heard something about gms once were the guy said trades are so hard to do because gms are the most paranoid of all people due to there being few jobs and high profile when they make mistakes.
Dome
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,919
And1: 20
Joined: Feb 05, 2003
Location: The Netherlands
 

 

Post#5 » by Dome » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:18 pm

Charlie78 wrote:Another problem portland is going to have is that at this point KP has been on the winning end of three or four deals.

Telfair for Roy

Stealing Roy from Houston

Zach to NY

Grabbing James Jones from phx

Grabbing Sergio and Rudy

Pretty soon teams are going to start to become reluctant to deal with him especially west teams because they are going to think he knows something they dont or is trying to pull somthing. I heard something about gms once were the guy said trades are so hard to do because gms are the most paranoid of all people due to there being few jobs and high profile when they make mistakes.


If that's the case, those GM's should be fired on the spot IMO. If you can't even think for yourself as a GM and your decisions are based on what you think others would think of you etc you're doing an excruciatingly bad job. I don't think it'll be a problem for Pritchard at all.
Telfaire
Analyst
Posts: 3,232
And1: 66
Joined: Jan 09, 2005

 

Post#6 » by Telfaire » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:46 pm

A partner for Roy at the backcourt? Delonte West. He's a lockdown defender at the point who can shoot 3's very well. Not a pure PG, but unselfish and can take care of the ball.
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,728
And1: 384
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

 

Post#7 » by Butter » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:21 pm

Telfaire wrote:A partner for Roy at the backcourt? Delonte West. He's a lockdown defender at the point who can shoot 3's very well. Not a pure PG, but unselfish and can take care of the ball.


You know, West is not a bad idea. That guy was putting up big numbers in Boston before he was traded. I do really like his perimeter defense. He can be a streaky shooter though.

His contract looks to be expiring after this year. Hoopshype salaries show's him with a qualifying offer next year, so who knows what the Sonics will do with him.

That being said, the Blazers would have to move several PG's in order to make room for West. I guess he and Blake could fight it out to see who the starter would be?

As for EG, that guy would be ideal next to Roy IMO. He's a pure shooter who can also can it to the rim and throw down. But I agree, it'll be pretty tough to get him.
TBpup
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,907
And1: 247
Joined: Jan 07, 2004
Location: Financial Planning office in L.O.
       

 

Post#8 » by TBpup » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:43 pm

As the team matures, some of this will take care of itself but one thing is certain, either someone needs to step up into the 'sidekick' role or they need to get someone of that nature at some point.

Roy is really the only one who can create for himself and others. The most logical position would be a SF who could handle, create and score but none of the current Blazer options can do that. Jones is a spot up shooter, Webster is also for the most part. Travis can create his own shot but doesnt' pass it very well and none of the three have any handle. Neither Jack nor Blake can really create consistently and for PG's, run the fast break very poorly.

The roster as a whole will need someone to step into that role to help balance the floor or to be the go-to guy when Roy is on the bench.

With the coming glut of players Portland will have, a 3-1 or 4-2 type deal will almost be needed and obtaining someone like a EG or someone more established might not be that far off. KP has lots of young, talented and rookie-contract players to work with. There will need to be less quantity and more quality as this goes on.


:starwars
@TBpup22
Telfaire
Analyst
Posts: 3,232
And1: 66
Joined: Jan 09, 2005

 

Post#9 » by Telfaire » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:59 pm

I dont agree that blake cant create on a consistent basis, and he does'nt run the fast break poorly. I just think Delonte would be a defensive upgrade.

As for the type of SF you were talking about...I think Gallinari could be that guy in a few years, so if we cant trade up, I think we should draft him since we could also let him develop overseas.
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,432
And1: 2,196
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

 

Post#10 » by Norm2953 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:35 pm

I'm of the opinion that the ideal partner for Roy is an explosive
scorer, someone like Gilbert Arenas.
User avatar
Mr Odd
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,081
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 08, 2003

 

Post#11 » by Mr Odd » Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:47 pm

Norm2953 wrote:I'm of the opinion that the ideal partner for Roy is an explosive
scorer, someone like Gilbert Arenas.


I totally agree, but getting someone like that will be superduper tough!!
Image
bing'o-bang'o-bong'o-baby!!
User avatar
mojomarc
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,838
And1: 999
Joined: Jun 01, 2004
Location: Funkytown

 

Post#12 » by mojomarc » Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:44 pm

Other than Arenas, I think Rudy can be as good or better than all the other players mentioned in this thread within the next three seasons. Let's instead figure out how to move our glut of players in a 3-1 deal for a true defensive stopper/rebounder on the wings who can play the Pippen or Bowen defensive role and take the defensive pressure off Roy and Rudy.
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,432
And1: 2,196
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

 

Post#13 » by Norm2953 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:43 pm

mojomarc wrote:Other than Arenas, I think Rudy can be as good or better than all the other players mentioned in this thread within the next three seasons. Let's instead figure out how to move our glut of players in a 3-1 deal for a true defensive stopper/rebounder on the wings who can play the Pippen or Bowen defensive role and take the defensive pressure off Roy and Rudy.


The problem is that we really don't know for sure that Rudi can play
and whether he really is coming. If we could sign Arenas for the MLE
with an understanding that he will be signed for money later, he would
bring 25 PPG on a team that might score a lot of fast break points. Guys
like Arenas might jump at a chance at playing with a franchise center
like Oden or Howard.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,210
And1: 7,968
Joined: May 28, 2007

 

Post#14 » by Wizenheimer » Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 am

Norm2953 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



The problem is that we really don't know for sure that Rudi can play
and whether he really is coming. If we could sign Arenas for the MLE
with an understanding that he will be signed for money later, he would
bring 25 PPG on a team that might score a lot of fast break points. Guys
like Arenas might jump at a chance at playing with a franchise center
like Oden or Howard.


sign him for the MLE??? are you serious??

The "later on" would be 3 years after he was signed, that's when portland would have full bird rights.

he won't be signing anywhere for the MLE
AKBlazerFan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,774
And1: 188
Joined: Mar 24, 2007
Location: Alaska to Arizona
         

 

Post#15 » by AKBlazerFan » Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:23 am

HAaha @ Gilbery signing for MLE. HE opted out to make more money, right? Not a chance. 10 mill a year is worth more than to be a legit contender to almost every player....
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,432
And1: 2,196
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

 

Post#16 » by Norm2953 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:20 am

The thing is with Paul Allen as the owner, Arenas will know he
will be taken care of and the three year agreement at the MLE
is a wink wink agreement for the next agreement for big money
is a balloon payment.

It would then be him waiting one year to be paid for the chance
to play with a franchise center but I think Orlando might be a
better bet for such a deal for Dwight Howard is an established
franchise center.

Is it better to be a Joe Johnson and play for crappy teams or a
guy who sacrifices one year to be able to get on a team that
will compete for championships?
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,728
And1: 384
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

 

Post#17 » by Butter » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:12 am

Norm2953 wrote:The thing is with Paul Allen as the owner, Arenas will know he
will be taken care of and the three year agreement at the MLE
is a wink wink agreement for the next agreement for big money
is a balloon payment.

It would then be him waiting one year to be paid for the chance
to play with a franchise center but I think Orlando might be a
better bet for such a deal for Dwight Howard is an established
franchise center.

Is it better to be a Joe Johnson and play for crappy teams or a
guy who sacrifices one year to be able to get on a team that
will compete for championships?


Dude, I understand your thought process, but there is no way. Some players might say that winning is the most important thing, but Gilbert is not going to take that kind of a pay cut. What if Arenas blows out his ACL, or has to have micro fracture surgery, or whatever? If he signs a one year MLE he's done. He'd be gambling that the Blazers really do clear all that cap space, and that they'd be willing to give it to him, while trying to resign their core young players.

While Tim Duncan did take a pay cut on his extension, he's still getting paid $19 million per year...do you really think Arenas would take the MLE? :o
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,210
And1: 7,968
Joined: May 28, 2007

 

Post#18 » by Wizenheimer » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:42 am

Norm2953 wrote:The thing is with Paul Allen as the owner, Arenas will know he
will be taken care of and the three year agreement at the MLE
is a wink wink agreement for the next agreement for big money
is a balloon payment.

It would then be him waiting one year to be paid for the chance
to play with a franchise center but I think Orlando might be a
better bet for such a deal for Dwight Howard is an established
franchise center.

Is it better to be a Joe Johnson and play for crappy teams or a
guy who sacrifices one year to be able to get on a team that
will compete for championships?


it won't be a 1 year wait for Arenas to get near max money, it will be a 3 year wait if he stays in portland after signing an MLE. Portland couldn't give Arenas big buck till they had full Bird Rights which take 3 years to establish.
User avatar
breaker91
Starter
Posts: 2,125
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 07, 2007
Location: Portland, where meniscus tears happen

 

Post#19 » by breaker91 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:24 am

TBpup wrote:As the team matures, some of this will take care of itself but one thing is certain, either someone needs to step up into the 'sidekick' role or they need to get someone of that nature at some point.

Roy is really the only one who can create for himself and others. [b]The most logical position would be a SF who could handle, create and score
but none of the current Blazer options can do that.
[/b] :starwars


I've heard of that guy and his name is Lamar Odom. A great ballhandler, passer, shooter and rebounder who seems most comfortable being a sidekick.
"The brownies are good for me to make three-points.'' -Rudy Fernandez
User avatar
J~Rush
Head Coach
Posts: 6,997
And1: 28
Joined: Jul 27, 2007
Location: Portland

 

Post#20 » by J~Rush » Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:28 am

breaker91 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I've heard of that guy and his name is Lamar Odom. A good ballhandler, passer, shooter and rebounder who seems most comfortable being a sidekick.


I don't think Lamar Odom is that good of a player. I never really saw him with the Heat, but I'm not impressed with him on the Lakers.
e

Return to Portland Trail Blazers