ImageImageImageImage

Magic 5-0 When Jameer Is Out [Merged]

Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior

spinedoc
RealGM
Posts: 11,434
And1: 4,264
Joined: Aug 16, 2002

 

Post#41 » by spinedoc » Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:01 pm

Its obvious that Jameer has been struggling lately because of injury or the loss of his father, but to then take that a step further and say that Arroyo or Dooling is better than him is a fallacy. We may need a new starting pg going forward in the future, but the best pg we currently have is Jameer. Arroyo can't get the playground out of his game. He makes a lot of shots when he's on, but his showboat style keeps seeping through. Talk about a guy who often leaves his feet to pass btw, and Dooling has Francis-itis, he holds onto the ball way too long. He is however better then Carlos when it comes to driving to the basket and defense, but that shouldn't be the standard we should use to evaluate in keeping him.

If you have noticed, Hedo has really been our third string pg for good chunks of the games. Dooling is playing off the ball, running off of screens, while Hedo has been running the offense at the top of the key. Also, there are other factors here at work other than Jameer being out recently. Our intensity has gone up significantly lately. The way we've been playing recently as a team, it really wouldn't matter who our pg was.

All three of our pg's have warts. We have already invested in Jameer, I doubt he's going anywhere anytime soon. So that leaves us with what to do about Carlos and Dooling, both expiring contracts. We all know we need a big pg in our rotation, it could possibly be that neither of them come back depending on what we do at sg as well in the offseason, which would affect Dooling's status more than Carlos'. I say we keep meer, draft another big point, and look to free agency on the cheap to fill the third string gap. Then use the full mle to go out and get us a real starting sg for this team, thats if a trade doesn't come by the deadline to fill that need. I'd like to retain Evans if possible, as well as Kebo who is already under contract to come off the bench in reserve, and yes, move Hedo to the bench as well. We are currently a good team, but our goal should remain to be a great team. We don't have that yet with this roster, it needs more tinkering still.
User avatar
magicman123
RealGM
Posts: 26,171
And1: 722
Joined: Jan 14, 2007
Location: "THO"
   

 

Post#42 » by magicman123 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:15 pm

..i dont see where he is playing that good, yes we are winning but doolings played a bigger factor, arroyo is -17pts to blake, billups, and conley..well that prolly is a plus
User avatar
mrtcsm
Rookie
Posts: 1,006
And1: 105
Joined: Jul 27, 2006

 

Post#43 » by mrtcsm » Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:22 pm

TooNice00 wrote:ultimately SVG needs to settle on a pg rotation. there is no need to go three deep in our pg position each game. a solid rotation of jameer and keyon works just fine for the moment.


it DOES NOT!!! What are the results with that rotation??? I'd stay put with Carlos and Keyon until we start loosing! Then experiment with another rotation!
Sharper
Pro Prospect
Posts: 857
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 25, 2006
Location: Earth

 

Post#44 » by Sharper » Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:23 pm

A recap of TooNice00's posts on last night's game-thread:

>ahhh don't run plays like that for arroyo
>F Arroyo !
>get carlos out please
>let hedo handle the ball and keep it away from arroyo
>god arroyo is just annoying me he sucks
>i am not a huge keyon fan but he is vastly better than arroyo
>YES arroyo is on the bench
>get arroyo out and put keyon in
>i'd give arroyo away to any team who wants him
>WHY WHY WHY Is arroyo still in
>i'd much rather have a jameer and keyon combo.....arroyo sucks bad


And from this thread:

>and carlos just plain sucks.
>i want the rotation to be jameer/keyon. carlos arroyo is just plain horrible




So OK ... I think we get the point. Carlos Arroyo Sucks. I agree. :thumbsup:
whocares
Senior
Posts: 663
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 07, 2006

 

Post#45 » by whocares » Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:35 pm

1. that is why at some point, tired of all the same thing being spouted over and over, the ignoreland comes to the rescue.
only 10 points, 10 rebounds, 10 assists shy of yet another triple double - anonymous
craig01
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,958
And1: 483
Joined: Dec 24, 2005
Location: orlando

 

Post#46 » by craig01 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:56 pm

The Magic will need all 3 guards to win.

As others have said, each guard has significant flaws.

What people need to remember in here is that each one of the three guards will have performances that may literally dance with the wind.

The Magic guard situation is just a bunch of scrambled eggs, meaning you need more than one to eat breakfast......but put them all together and you've got a meal.
Basketball is driven by three principles:

1) Movement 2) Application of fundamentals 3) Predictability
MagicNolesFSU
Analyst
Posts: 3,314
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 04, 2007

 

Post#47 » by MagicNolesFSU » Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:59 pm

when jameer comes back he should come off the bench until he gets back into game shape. But eventually he will be starting again.
Illuminati wrote:MagicNoles is a g. Don't bring beef and there ain't no beef.
TooNice00
Banned User
Posts: 2,653
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 11, 2006

 

Post#48 » by TooNice00 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:08 pm

Sharper wrote:A recap of TooNice00's posts on last night's game-thread:

>ahhh don't run plays like that for arroyo
>F Arroyo !
>get carlos out please
>let hedo handle the ball and keep it away from arroyo
>god arroyo is just annoying me he sucks
>i am not a huge keyon fan but he is vastly better than arroyo
>YES arroyo is on the bench
>get arroyo out and put keyon in
>i'd give arroyo away to any team who wants him
>WHY WHY WHY Is arroyo still in
>i'd much rather have a jameer and keyon combo.....arroyo sucks bad


And from this thread:

>and carlos just plain sucks.
>i want the rotation to be jameer/keyon. carlos arroyo is just plain horrible




So OK ... I think we get the point. Carlos Arroyo Sucks. I agree. :thumbsup:


lol
User avatar
SOUL
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,353
And1: 41,074
Joined: Dec 11, 2006
Location: Orl★ndo
     

 

Post#49 » by SOUL » Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:17 pm

This forum is full of more idiots than I thought.

We're going to hit more bumps most likely, and you will be calling for Arroyo/Doolings head.. just look at when we lost a lot a couple weeks ago. If you think we're going to go undefeated,I'd hate for you to be our GM so you can trade Jameer while we're 5-0
www.rareslums.com // please support my writing!
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,288
And1: 8,982
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

 

Post#50 » by drsd » Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:30 pm

craig01 wrote:The Magic will need all 3 guards to win.

As others have said, each guard has significant flaws.

What people need to remember in here is that each one of the three guards will have performances that may literally dance with the wind.

The Magic guard situation is just a bunch of scrambled eggs, meaning you need more than one to eat breakfast......but put them all together and you've got a meal.


This is an excellent point. If a team has three flawed, but OK PGs, then the coach will play each to their strengths. Depth replaces awe here.
User avatar
DiplomaticMagic
General Manager
Posts: 8,084
And1: 2,903
Joined: Jan 11, 2007
   

 

Post#51 » by DiplomaticMagic » Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:49 pm

I can't believe all the hate Jameer gets.

Jameer > Any of our PG's

Billups is just a match-up nightmare for Jameer Nelson. Billups is much stronger and much taller. But Billups is usually match-up nightmares of most pg's.

Jameer is bothering by his foot. I didn't knew he had a foot injury too till he left Charlotte and said that it's been bothering him for weeks but he agrravated it vs. Charlotte. We're 5-0 without him? We were 15-4 with him 100% too.
Play Jase or Trade for Alvarado
User avatar
EasternMagic
RealGM
Posts: 15,459
And1: 1,154
Joined: Oct 17, 2007

 

Post#52 » by EasternMagic » Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:07 pm

you cant blame those losses on jameer wen we went through that funk nobody was playing good and jameer was alright he was just never getting calls so he wouldnt go to the whole as much
whocares
Senior
Posts: 663
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 07, 2006

 

Post#53 » by whocares » Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:08 pm

DiplomaticMagic wrote:I can't believe all the hate Jameer gets.

Jameer > Any of our PG's

Billups is just a match-up nightmare for Jameer Nelson. Billups is much stronger and much taller. But Billups is usually match-up nightmares of most pg's.

Jameer is bothering by his foot. I didn't knew he had a foot injury too till he left Charlotte and said that it's been bothering him for weeks but he agrravated it vs. Charlotte. We're 5-0 without him? We were 15-4 with him 100% too.


1. now, that is original.
2. some clever footwork to throw billups off balance might just do the trick.
3. fly like a beepitty, stink like garrity.
4. close enough.
User avatar
Typhoon20
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,991
And1: 4
Joined: Nov 07, 2004

 

Post#54 » by Typhoon20 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:20 pm

Some ignant idiots running around here.

Jameer > Arroyo.

Jameer > Dooling.

That doesn't mean Jameer is a good PG, he's not.

I'd prefer Otis to go after a good PG.
User avatar
DiplomaticMagic
General Manager
Posts: 8,084
And1: 2,903
Joined: Jan 11, 2007
   

 

Post#55 » by DiplomaticMagic » Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:22 pm

whocares wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



1. now, that is original.
2. some clever footwork to throw billups off balance might just do the trick.
3. fly like a beepitty, stink like garrity.
4. close enough.


what the hell?

the foot injury has nothing to deal with billups..it's jameer's performance

what the hell are you trying to say
Play Jase or Trade for Alvarado
Sharper
Pro Prospect
Posts: 857
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 25, 2006
Location: Earth

 

Post#56 » by Sharper » Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:23 pm

Typhoon20 wrote:Jameer > Arroyo.

Jameer > Dooling.

Fixed.

Edit: (In case people don't understand my "fixing", I reduced the size of the ">" symbols as I think Jameer might be better than the others, overall, but not by much, really. They are all pretty much in the same level IMO. Which is not a very high level, BTW. LOL.)
whocares
Senior
Posts: 663
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 07, 2006

 

Post#57 » by whocares » Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:27 pm

1. -(jameer / (foot * p)) + arroyo (1 - q) + dooling / (hedo + dooling) = w, where p and q are in [0,1].
2. p : the rumor coefficient.
3. q : questioning (stan's decision) uncertainty constant.
only 10 points, 10 rebounds, 10 assists shy of yet another triple double - anonymous
Gerhalt11
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,883
And1: 827
Joined: Dec 04, 2004
     

 

Post#58 » by Gerhalt11 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:30 pm

whocares wrote:1. -(jameer / (foot * p)) + arroyo (1 - q) + dooling / (hedo + dooling) = w, where p and q are in [0,1].
2. p : the rumor coefficient.
3. q : questioning (stan's decision) uncertainty constant.


For the love of God, stop talking.
User avatar
magik9113
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,600
And1: 1,589
Joined: Feb 03, 2006
       

 

Post#59 » by magik9113 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:34 pm

whocares wrote:1. -(jameer / (foot * p)) + arroyo (1 - q) + dooling / (hedo + dooling) = w, where p and q are in [0,1].
2. p : the rumor coefficient.
3. q : questioning (stan's decision) uncertainty constant.


i suck at math
but i think i get it

:o
User avatar
surflawyer
Analyst
Posts: 3,207
And1: 19
Joined: Feb 04, 2006
Location: I love being on everyones IGNORE List ... no one ever disagrees with me ....
   

 

Post#60 » by surflawyer » Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:45 pm

whocares wrote:1. -(jameer / (foot * p)) + arroyo (1 - q) + dooling / (hedo + dooling) = w, where p and q are in [0,1].
2. p : the rumor coefficient.
3. q : questioning (stan's decision) uncertainty constant.


Holy Crap .... that was my closing argument at my last trial. I won of course. It had nothing to do with the case but it worked anyway. I guess they figured that if they ruled in my favor I'd shut up.
"The first thing we need to do is kill all the attorneys."

William Shakespeare

Return to Orlando Magic