revprodeji wrote:No Timberwolves rotation guys. Woot-woot
Probably because nobody knows any players on the Timberwolves...
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
BrooklynBulls wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I really don't understand people who think that. He does ONE thing well: get into the passing lanes. He does not contest jumpshots, block shots, rebound, get back on defense to stop the transition, take charges in order to protect the paint, play within a set scheme, stay in front of his man. He's small, light, and expending a ton of energy on offense. And if he wasn't all those things, he still wouldn't be a good defender because he wants the steal more than he wants the missed shot.
penbeast0 wrote:Sorry Miller, I edited your post, meant only to quote it, fixed . . . what I had to say in answer was:
Still the Wiz are only 20th out of 30 and with Gil out to remove one defensive liability and focus the rest who can't depend on Gil to bail them out. I wouldn't say they "get it" yet but they are better, at least until Gil returns.
miller31time wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
But when we want to, you can see we play fundamentally sound D. Heck, about 5-7 games ago, we ranked 14th in defensive efficiency (aka sightly above average).
el loco wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I don't know about all of that, he grabbed 6 boards tonight and went into the paint to grab a few. On most nights I would agree with you though. But you could replace him with Chucky Atkins. Hell, Atkins should be number 1 on the list.
BrooklynBulls wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I only included guys who have been healthy, and have played a lot, 25 minutes or over. Atkins was both hurt, and is a bench roleplayer.
There's no point in listing 17 minute-a-game liabilities. Sure, they're awful, but do they, playing against the other scrubs, decide the outcome of a game? No. Its the big-part players who are really weak defensively that a- create a bad defensive team, and b- lose games on that end.
big123 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Nash is much worst than Iverson. At least AI goes for steals. Nash doesn't do a thing, it's like no one is there.