ImageImage

New Lineup

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

msiris
RealGM
Posts: 10,982
And1: 2,249
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Central Wisconsin

 

Post#21 » by msiris » Sun Feb 3, 2008 9:42 pm

Playing CV more will not increase his trade value. Per 20 he is already up there, but people know what they are getting in CV.
Ride the tank
msiris
RealGM
Posts: 10,982
And1: 2,249
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Central Wisconsin

 

Post#22 » by msiris » Sun Feb 3, 2008 9:46 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I can't believe you think mods shouldn't have an opinion. And my opinion is that Ersan was useless last year.
I do not know why Ersan was valued so much either. He did not display much and he is still not doing it overseas.
And mods are robot, so keep your opinions to yourself. :lol: :rofl:
Ride the tank
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,844
And1: 54,967
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

 

Post#23 » by MickeyDavis » Sun Feb 3, 2008 9:53 pm

Ersans basketball IQ was incredibly low. Maybe, someday, he'll contribute in the NBA. I doubt it.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

 

Post#24 » by xTitan » Sun Feb 3, 2008 10:05 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:CV being in the doghouse goes back to an incident that happened last season.


Intriguing, anything else you can say?
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,844
And1: 54,967
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

 

Post#25 » by MickeyDavis » Sun Feb 3, 2008 10:07 pm

I wish I could. I'll say there there was an incident between LH and CV when LH was still an assistant. And LH handled it perfectly.
oshmeehan
Banned User
Posts: 842
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Contact:

 

Post#26 » by oshmeehan » Sun Feb 3, 2008 10:19 pm

Larry Harris wasn't an assistant coach....
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,844
And1: 54,967
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

 

Post#27 » by MickeyDavis » Sun Feb 3, 2008 10:41 pm

Oops meant LK.
LISTEN2JAZZ
RealGM
Posts: 13,295
And1: 196
Joined: Feb 21, 2005
Location: Madison
 

 

Post#28 » by LISTEN2JAZZ » Sun Feb 3, 2008 10:56 pm

I agree that Yi probably has more untapped potential than CV, but it isn't a 100% certainty that this is the case. It's possible that the two players are the same age - if they're the same age (both 23), does that change anything about who should be spoon-fed minutes and who should have to earn them?
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#29 » by europa » Mon Feb 4, 2008 3:26 am

MickeyDavis wrote:I can't believe there is a debate about Ersan. Did anyone actually watch him play last year?


I never understood the love for this guy last season. He spent most of the season playing like a D-Leaguer in my opinion. He was overmatched almost constantly, shot poorly for much of the season, wasn't a good defender and didn't play very intelligently much of the time. He hustled and that was good to see but that's all he really did. And now he's out of the league and may never return. He's another of Harris' poor second-round draft decisions.

As far as the new lineup, I'm fine with benching Yi but I'd prefer to start Ruffin. He isn't the offensive player Villanueva is obviously but unlike Villanueva, he plays smart, is a willing defender and will do the dirty work. I'd could see him being a Mark Pope-type starter at PF. Villanueva simply hasn't done anything in my opinion to merit being a starter.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
WRau1
RealGM
Posts: 11,943
And1: 5,154
Joined: Apr 30, 2005
Location: Milwaukee
     

 

Post#30 » by WRau1 » Mon Feb 4, 2008 3:34 am

I'd take Ersan over Yi right now. At least Ersan went to go get the ball and wouldn't get out muscled by Earl Boykins.
#FreeChuckDiesel
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
okanoho
Senior
Posts: 668
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 21, 2007

 

Post#31 » by okanoho » Mon Feb 4, 2008 6:16 am

Boykins?
lol

what you smoking
i think i can out muscle Boykin, so do you
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

 

Post#32 » by paul » Mon Feb 4, 2008 6:25 am

I can't believe anyone proposing a new starting lineup still has Yi in it. Like Bobby or not, even when he's not playing that well and is a bit 'invisible' he's not hurting us and is trying to do the team things to contribute. Our starting lineup should be as below imo, and should have been since day 1.

Mo
Redd
Bobby
CV
Bogut
Chuck Diesel
RealGM
Posts: 17,587
And1: 11,556
Joined: May 23, 2004

 

Post#33 » by Chuck Diesel » Mon Feb 4, 2008 7:03 am

Once Ersan figures some things out I think he will be a contributing player on an NBA team, someone along the lines of Bostjan Nachbar. His work ethic is so good and he the tools, he just needs to put some things together and continue to learn the game. I hope he stays in Europe for another year and gets a lot of playing time. He's been improving as the season goes along in Spain.

In my opinion Villanueva's issues will prevent him from ever being a big part of a winning team. He might put up 16 and 7 in a contract year, but it won't be for a winning team.
BucksRuleAll22
Banned User
Posts: 1,342
And1: 0
Joined: May 22, 2007

 

Post#34 » by BucksRuleAll22 » Mon Feb 4, 2008 9:56 am

New line up should be

Ivey
Mo
Redd
CV
Bogut

Yi
Mason
Bell
Gaza needs playing time
Simmons
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#35 » by europa » Mon Feb 4, 2008 3:07 pm

Nobody else wants to give Ruffin a shot at PF?
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
smauss
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,733
And1: 432
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Contact:
     

 

Post#36 » by smauss » Mon Feb 4, 2008 3:41 pm

Isn't it interesting how we are looking for someone to play the 4 when we have attempted to fill that position twice? In all fairness, I know Yi is a rook and I don't expect anymore out of him than what we've gotten to this point. I believe he will be a good NBA player, but it just seems ironic to me to be having this discussion. CV is an absolute sieve on defense. When he came into Sat's game I was astounded at how many point in the paint Houston got. If CV goes off and scores big on the offensive end the Bucks still only net zero at that position because of all the points he gives up. Bogut has to run around helping out guys enough but when CV is on the floor, Bogut should trade in his sneakers for roller skates.......

Yi, even though he is learning the NBA game and gives up strength is still a much better defender than CV. Give me someone to split time with Yi that can defend; Ruffin is our only alternative at this time IMO.

BTW, I absolutely hate all the switching the Bucks do on defense! It tends to create terrible miss-matches and our guys tend to be out of defensive position even when they do switch. I just don't like it; maybe I just don't understand it but I saw Saturday, I didn't like.
"Too many people ask for help, and sometimes you have to help yourself." - Jerry Sloan (CBQ is missed)

simul justus et peccator
User avatar
Rockmaninoff
General Manager
Posts: 7,710
And1: 1,713
Joined: Jan 11, 2008
   

 

Post#37 » by Rockmaninoff » Mon Feb 4, 2008 3:54 pm

europa wrote:Nobody else wants to give Ruffin a shot at PF?


I do!

Bell/Williams
Redd/Williams
Mason/Simmons
Ruffin/Villanueva
Bogut/Yi

The Bell, Redd, Mason triumvirate coming from this article about NBA trios. It's a glimmer, but that's pretty much all we've got...

Yi would be just as good as Voskuhl at backup center, although I'm not sure if it fulfills 'The Promise'. We'd have defense in the starting lineup, and scoring to spare off the bench.

Ruffin is probably our best offensive rebounder and hustle player. In related news, Brian Skinner is putting up 3.5 pts, 4 rbs, and 1.3 blks per game, in 14 mins per game.
Epicurus
RealGM
Posts: 15,490
And1: 872
Joined: Jan 25, 2006

 

Post#38 » by Epicurus » Mon Feb 4, 2008 6:08 pm

paul wrote:I can't believe anyone proposing a new starting lineup still has Yi in it. Like Bobby or not, even when he's not playing that well and is a bit 'invisible' he's not hurting us and is trying to do the team things to contribute. Our starting lineup should be as below imo, and should have been since day 1.

Mo
Redd
Bobby
CV
Bogut


This was the intended starting five to start last season. Of course, Simmons injury prevented it from occuring. Maybe it is time to see if it works--good outside shooting from 4 positions to open the lane for Bogut.
Isocleas2
Veteran
Posts: 2,813
And1: 566
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Location: Whitewater, WI

 

Post#39 » by Isocleas2 » Mon Feb 4, 2008 6:14 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:I can't defend CV....he's got all sorts of issues.....

But CV's situation is complicated because he's got a Chinese money machine playing ahead of him......and CV's poor defense is just magnified 10x because he's got terrible defenders in Mo and Redd out there as well.

We are losing by 44 points with Yi starting.....it can't hurt to start CV, let him accumulate some stats....at a minimum it will boost his trade value.


Exactly. If CV isn't in the future plans, and by all accounts he doesn't appear to be, then why not give him more minutes and let him throw down a couple double-doubles? The guy plays well when motivated, and right now he's motivated to get the **** out of Milwaukee.
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

 

Post#40 » by paul » Tue Feb 5, 2008 2:28 am

Epicurus wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



This was the intended starting five to start last season. Of course, Simmons injury prevented it from occuring. Maybe it is time to see if it works--good outside shooting from 4 positions to open the lane for Bogut.


My thoughts exactly Epi. It also give us one decent 'post entry' passer in Bobby.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks