A trade i'd like to see BC make right now!

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

nivisi9
Pro Prospect
Posts: 766
And1: 557
Joined: Apr 01, 2007

A trade i'd like to see BC make right now! 

Post#1 » by nivisi9 » Thu Feb 7, 2008 1:12 pm

TORONTO
Rasho Nesterovic
Jamario Moon
Juan Dixon

UTAH

Andrei Kirilenko

This is the type trade I would love to see BC make. We all know Colangelo likes and has already tried to acquire Kirilenko (almost got him for mo-pete at last years deadline), and it appears AK47 has worn his welcome in Utah. Utah definitely wouldn't mind dealing Kirilenko, and from Toronto's side you get rid of Rasho, Dixon contracts, while selling high on Moon (who coincidentally appears to be nothing more then a poor man's Kirilenko).

In fact, if proposed I could actually see this exact trade going through; Utah takes some scrubs and potential, in exchange for getting rid of Kirilenko's contract (cap room they'll need in the future). The main benefit in this trade? Kirilenko appears to be the perfect guy to shadow Bargnani's rebounding and defensive deficiencies while playing big minutes at the 3. There are some negatives, AK's contract, and somewhat disappointing development, but you never know what a trade could do for a guy? (Especially for a guy whose wanted a 2nd chance and is as passionate as kirilenko). if not, he's still good for 13ppg, 6 rpg, 2.5 bpg, while shooting 50% from the field, while helping Bargnani, in addition to playing some of the best defense you'll find in the league.

GET ER DONE BC!
teamLeiweke
Head Coach
Posts: 6,837
And1: 5,019
Joined: Jul 20, 2006

 

Post#2 » by teamLeiweke » Thu Feb 7, 2008 1:15 pm

I agree.. he is a rich man's Jamario Moon, exactly what we need at the 3.

BUT, there use to be tension in Utah, thats why we coudl low ball them with Mo Pete.... all the turmoil surrounding AK in Utah seems to have passed, both sides are now happy again, so I dont know why they make this deal.
Fairview4Life
RealGM
Posts: 70,059
And1: 33,939
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
     

 

Post#3 » by Fairview4Life » Thu Feb 7, 2008 1:29 pm

We couldn't low ball them with Mo Pete. Check their salaries last year.
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
nivisi9
Pro Prospect
Posts: 766
And1: 557
Joined: Apr 01, 2007

kirilenko 

Post#4 » by nivisi9 » Thu Feb 7, 2008 1:33 pm

I can't see Utah refusing, did you see what the lakers traded for Gasol!??!?! Kirilenko is no Gasol, plus Utah is probably interested in getting rid of his contract
ss-wiish!
Senior
Posts: 659
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 25, 2008

 

Post#5 » by ss-wiish! » Thu Feb 7, 2008 1:40 pm

I doubt BC would choose to take a contract like that
User avatar
mintsa
Head Coach
Posts: 6,694
And1: 3,749
Joined: Jun 28, 2001

Re: kirilenko 

Post#6 » by mintsa » Thu Feb 7, 2008 1:41 pm

nivisi9 wrote:I can't see Utah refusing, did you see what the lakers traded for Gasol!??!?! Kirilenko is no Gasol, plus Utah is probably interested in getting rid of his contract


I can see Utah refusing this....
nivisi9
Pro Prospect
Posts: 766
And1: 557
Joined: Apr 01, 2007

he did 

Post#7 » by nivisi9 » Thu Feb 7, 2008 1:42 pm

I doubt BC would choose to take a contract like that


he already tried to...did you read?
ss-wiish!
Senior
Posts: 659
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 25, 2008

 

Post#8 » by ss-wiish! » Thu Feb 7, 2008 1:51 pm

my bad, just saw the trade and the bold. :oops:
User avatar
miruss2001
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,064
And1: 335
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
Location: Patrolling the neutral zone

 

Post#9 » by miruss2001 » Thu Feb 7, 2008 2:24 pm

If utah moved AK for that package I'd do backflips of joy... not likely though.
User avatar
Quiet-Storm
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,908
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 24, 2005

 

Post#10 » by Quiet-Storm » Thu Feb 7, 2008 2:29 pm

Utah can get wayyyyyyyyyyy more value for Kirilenko.
User avatar
CAE15
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,141
And1: 699
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: Udoka Azubuike Central
   

 

Post#11 » by CAE15 » Thu Feb 7, 2008 2:35 pm

Yeah KOC isn't a moron, hes not handing away AK like the Grizzlies did with Gasol. Jazz/Raptors are horrible trade partners. IMHO
Image
kavan
General Manager
Posts: 9,451
And1: 91
Joined: Apr 19, 2004
Location: Toronto
         

 

Post#12 » by kavan » Thu Feb 7, 2008 2:57 pm

Swap Moon for Joey i can see it other then that BC wont take that contract and would rather build having more options with cap space.
risktaker91
Banned User
Posts: 2,487
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 18, 2007

 

Post#13 » by risktaker91 » Thu Feb 7, 2008 3:01 pm

I'd love to have AK at the 3, but this deal is pretty bad for the Jazz.
User avatar
rise of raptors
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,474
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 14, 2007
Location: H.K.

Re: he did 

Post#14 » by rise of raptors » Thu Feb 7, 2008 3:40 pm

nivisi9 wrote:
I doubt BC would choose to take a contract like that


he already tried to...did you read?


BC did try.

When asked about the Jazz and starting small forward Andrei Kirilenko during a recent online chat, ESPN.com NBA writer Chad Ford said this: "I heard they almost moved Kirilenko at the trade deadline to the Raptors for Mo Peterson and change."

http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/46561/20070618/kirilenko_almost_dealt_to_toronto_in_february/

But honesty, why would Utah give up AK47 for MoPete & change? I would love to have AK47 in a Rap's uniform. IMO he is exactly what the Raptors are missing and he can cover virtually all of Bargnani's deficiencies i.e. rebounding and help-defense. AK also plays the 3 & 4 and can guard a multiple of positions.

With that said, again, why on earth would the Jazz trade AK to the Raps. AK and Sloan are getting along better, at least there hasn't been any public outcry for awhile. Secondly, the Raps likely couldn't put a package together to entice Utah to bite. Our biggest asset (excluding Bosh) is one of our PGs, and Utah already have D. Williams. If Utah is willing to get rid of AK47, I'd be willing to throw in AP in a package.

How bout Rasho + AP + fillers (Joey? Dixon?) + possibly picks for AK?
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

 

Post#15 » by loserX » Thu Feb 7, 2008 4:15 pm

Utah has no interest in "trading down" on Kirilenko. At all.
User avatar
undisputed55
Senior
Posts: 578
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 13, 2004

 

Post#16 » by undisputed55 » Thu Feb 7, 2008 4:16 pm

After we fleeced them with Hoffa for Hump, i doubt they're interested in trading with us again.
Image
nivisi9
Pro Prospect
Posts: 766
And1: 557
Joined: Apr 01, 2007

joey 

Post#17 » by nivisi9 » Thu Feb 7, 2008 4:21 pm

Swap Moon for Joey i can see it other then that BC wont take that contract and would rather build having more options with cap space


even if Utah were to take joey instead of Moon that would leave Toronto with Parker,Moon,Delfino, kapono, and kirlenko, all needing significant minutes from the same spot
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

 

Post#18 » by loserX » Thu Feb 7, 2008 4:24 pm

undisputed55 wrote:After we fleeced them with Hoffa for Hump, i doubt they're interested in trading with us again.


No, we were pretty happy with that deal too, and would probably do it again. Humphries didn't fit in Utah at all, so we got out of his contract.

The reason we don't do this is because we don't want to take back lesser parts for Kirilenko (and the Joey Graham substitution just "so Toronto can have cap flexibility" is completely laughable).
risktaker91
Banned User
Posts: 2,487
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 18, 2007

 

Post#19 » by risktaker91 » Thu Feb 7, 2008 4:26 pm

loserX wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



No, we were pretty happy with that deal too, and would probably do it again. Humphries didn't fit in Utah at all, so we got out of his contract.

The reason we don't do this is because we don't want to take back lesser parts for Kirilenko (and the Joey Graham substitution just "so Toronto can have cap flexibility" is completely laughable).




You've got to be the first person EVER who'd rather have Hoffa then Humphries, or any other player for that matter.
User avatar
JES12
RealGM
Posts: 24,863
And1: 128
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#20 » by JES12 » Thu Feb 7, 2008 5:15 pm

I thought BC was Boston Celtics.

Return to Trades and Transactions