Here's a new deal.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Here's a new deal.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,433
- And1: 11,235
- Joined: May 12, 2002
Here's a new deal.
Yi (LA cash cow)
Simmons (returns to scene of crime)
Voskuhl (expiring whit guy)
for
Elton Brand (back to the mid-west)
Who blinks first here?
Simmons deal may be the deal breaker, but we could include another asset or two (pick, 3 million in cash, whatever). Puts Yi in a major Asian market to make money for Donald Sterling. Gives us the rugged (if injured) PF that we've been calling for for years.
Simmons (returns to scene of crime)
Voskuhl (expiring whit guy)
for
Elton Brand (back to the mid-west)
Who blinks first here?
Simmons deal may be the deal breaker, but we could include another asset or two (pick, 3 million in cash, whatever). Puts Yi in a major Asian market to make money for Donald Sterling. Gives us the rugged (if injured) PF that we've been calling for for years.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 7,978
- And1: 1
- Joined: Oct 13, 2004
Re: Here's a new deal.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,135
- And1: 2,283
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
-
Re: Here's a new deal.
midranger wrote:Yi
Simmons
Voskuhl
for
Elton Brand
Who blinks first here?
Simmons deal may be the deal breaker, but we could include another asset or two (pick, 3 million in cash, whatever). Puts Yi in a major Asian market to make money for Donald Sterling. Gives us the rugged (if injured) PF that we've been calling for for years.
Thats an interesting deal but I really am not real interested in getting a second low post player that would take alot away from Bogut....You can see how good Kaman is when he is the lone low post option for the Clips, easy to say thats because he has never had opportunities before this year. I want length, athleticism, and intelligence out of my 1,2, and 3 spots, thats where I would concentrate all my deals on.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,433
- And1: 11,235
- Joined: May 12, 2002
Bucks_Revenge wrote:so I am guessing we all give up on Yi........
Elton Brand has been our ideal PF for years. If healthy, he's light years better than Yi. Gaining him while dumping Simmons awful deal is hardly "giving up" on Yi. It's trying to imrove our situation. Obviously, there is a risk with Brand's injury/contract issues, but if he were risk free, no way I'd even be able to bring myself to propose this.
- steger_3434
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,419
- And1: 5,649
- Joined: Mar 05, 2005
- Location: Getting Rowdy in Section 212 with Squad 6
-
I'd be all over this deal. Then in the off season trade Redd for the number 5 pick where Gordon may be a possibility and then use our pick on D. Collison.
Collison
Gordon
Dez
Brand
Bogut
with Mo off the bench backing up both the point and the SG position.
Collison
Gordon
Dez
Brand
Bogut
with Mo off the bench backing up both the point and the SG position.
yiyiyi wrote:give rockets Redd ,houston give you T-MAC in return .please help rockets!
i dont want see that woman anymore !
Re: Here's a new deal.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,433
- And1: 11,235
- Joined: May 12, 2002
Re: Here's a new deal.
xTitan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Thats an interesting deal but I really am not real interested in getting a second low post player that would take alot away from Bogut....You can see how good Kaman is when he is the lone low post option for the Clips, easy to say thats because he has never had opportunities before this year. I want length, athleticism, and intelligence out of my 1,2, and 3 spots, thats where I would concentrate all my deals on.
So, you wouldn't bring in Elton Brand because you want Bogut to get more post touches? Well.......
Anyway, Brand had (before his injury at least) become one of the better midrange jumpshooters at the PF in the NBA and has a terrific face up game. He is by no means exclusively a low post PF.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,433
- And1: 11,235
- Joined: May 12, 2002
steger_3434 wrote:I'd be all over this deal. Then in the off season trade Redd for the number 5 pick where Gordon may be a possibility and then use our pick on D. Collison.
Collison
Gordon
Dez
Brand
Bogut
with Mo off the bench backing up both the point and the SG position.
If we traded for Brand, we'd be in win now mode IMO. Starting two rookies doesn't really help that cause. I agree that other changes could be made, but I prefer to target another good vet.
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,831
- And1: 2
- Joined: Mar 17, 2006
- Location: AZ
-
Brand would be the perfect PF compliment to Bogut but as XTitan pointed out...we have to focus on our PG and SG positions before we make a trade like that. Brand is a beast but he needs the ball from time to time. Im not convinced at all that Mo and Redd would be able to play with such a talented PF or even know how to play with a player the caliber of Brand.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,108
- And1: 17,267
- Joined: Jul 20, 2004
miggs0721 wrote:no thanks....Yi will ban an all star next year, only due to the fact that he will be listed on the ballot![]()
In all honestly, I believe we end up with the 7th or 8th pick, and will selcet Jared Bayless, or OJ Mayo, hopefully not Kevin Love
Dear god no. Bayless and Mayo. Those are two guys who DO NOT fit with this team.
Give me the likes of Rose, Gordon, Green, Batum, Collison, or Smith any day of the week.
Re: Here's a new deal.
- bigkurty
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,212
- And1: 1,511
- Joined: Apr 23, 2005
- Location: Gilbert, AZ
-
Re: Here's a new deal.
midranger wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
So, you wouldn't bring in Elton Brand because you want Bogut to get more post touches? Well.......
Anyway, Brand had (before his injury at least) become one of the better midrange jumpshooters at the PF in the NBA and has a terrific face up game. He is by no means exclusively a low post PF.

Re: Here's a new deal.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,135
- And1: 2,283
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
-
Re: Here's a new deal.
midranger wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
So, you wouldn't bring in Elton Brand because you want Bogut to get more post touches? Well.......
Anyway, Brand had (before his injury at least) become one of the better midrange jumpshooters at the PF in the NBA and has a terrific face up game. He is by no means exclusively a low post PF.
My point is simple, you don't see many teams with 2 low post options, someone gets left out....goes to building a team right, something we all know has not been done in Milwaukee, you have to look at how the pieces you add will compliment each other.....you'd also have to ask why the Clips would be dealing Brand? I think the perimeter for the Bucks needs a major overhaul and adding a 4 does nothing to improve that. You also have to look at the fact you'd be adding another huge contract, does that mean Bogut walks? I am in the camp you build around Bogut and Yi and this obviously would be a different direction.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,433
- And1: 11,235
- Joined: May 12, 2002
To further illustrate my point, last year, 70% of Brand's shots were jumpers.
http://www.82games.com/0607/06LAC16D.HTM
http://www.82games.com/0607/06LAC16D.HTM
Please reconsider your animal consumption.