how many teams are 1 trade away from being a contender
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
how many teams are 1 trade away from being a contender
- rutheredfox
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,282
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 14, 2006
how many teams are 1 trade away from being a contender
so far i'd say
SA, Boston, Suns, Mavs, Pistons, Lakers, and the hornets are the only legitimate contenders in the leauge. so how many teams are now 1 trade away from being a contender? obviously out of the players available. i'd say the warriors are a contender if we traded for JO or even artest.
SA, Boston, Suns, Mavs, Pistons, Lakers, and the hornets are the only legitimate contenders in the leauge. so how many teams are now 1 trade away from being a contender? obviously out of the players available. i'd say the warriors are a contender if we traded for JO or even artest.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,467
- And1: 5,349
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)
Patterns wrote:One *GOOD* trade where they get the best player: Warriors, Nuggets, Hornets, Houston, Cleveland, Orlando
Not even close this year even after a trade: Toronto and the rest of the Eastern Conference.
How is Houston only one "Good" trade away? They have 2 top 10 players in the league along with a defensive stopper a decent bench and some good scoring options in Bonzi and James. I say that is a contender easily.

"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
- Hendrix
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,030
- And1: 3,662
- Joined: May 30, 2007
- Location: London, Ontario
Warriors, and Washington are bad overall defensivly. I don't think there 1 player could change them enough to be good enough defensivly to have a legitamte shot at winning a championship.
I'de say Utah, and Houston could add a guy to have a real shot at a title. Maybe the Blazers could be a contender nect year if they added someone really good, while getting Oden back, and Roy, and LA improve. Cleveland's hard to say. If they got a mircle trade (gasolesque) They'd have a shot imo.
I'de say Utah, and Houston could add a guy to have a real shot at a title. Maybe the Blazers could be a contender nect year if they added someone really good, while getting Oden back, and Roy, and LA improve. Cleveland's hard to say. If they got a mircle trade (gasolesque) They'd have a shot imo.
oak2455 wrote:Do understand English???
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,383
- And1: 1
- Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Hendrix wrote:Warriors, and Washington are bad overall defensivly. I don't think there 1 player could change them enough to be good enough defensivly to have a legitamte shot at winning a championship.
I'de say Utah, and Houston could add a guy to have a real shot at a title.
You don't think that the Warriors would have been contenders if they had Pau Gasol on their team?
They have the best record in the Western Conference since the return of Stephen Jackson. And even against the Jazz in the playoffs, we got outrebounded by a tremendous amount of rebounds a game but only lost by about 4-8 points in each loss. All we need is one rebounder/post presence and we'll be fine.
- Hendrix
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,030
- And1: 3,662
- Joined: May 30, 2007
- Location: London, Ontario
CupcakeNoFillin wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
You don't think that the Warriors would have been contenders if they had Pau Gasol on their team?
They have the best record in the Western Conference since the return of Stephen Jackson. And even against the Jazz in the playoffs, we got outrebounded by a tremendous amount of rebounds a game but only lost by about 4-8 points in each loss. All we need is one rebounder/post presence and we'll be fine.
No I don't. They're near the bottom of the league in defense, and rebounding which are important things in the playoffs. I don't see 1 guy that could help so much to get their defence, and rebounding to a level that would be near the top of the league where it should be to win a title. I doubt Gasol would help that much in those areas.
oak2455 wrote:Do understand English???
Re: how many teams are 1 trade away from being a contender
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 19,810
- And1: 6
- Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Re: how many teams are 1 trade away from being a contender
rutheredfox wrote:so far i'd say
SA, Boston, Suns, Mavs, Pistons, Lakers, and the hornets are the only legitimate contenders in the leauge.

- Texas Longhorns
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,005
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 08, 2008
- Location: Cockrell School of Engineering
- Contact:
Re: how many teams are 1 trade away from being a contender
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,740
- And1: 3,194
- Joined: Feb 20, 2005
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: how many teams are 1 trade away from being a contender
Monkeyfeng06 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Join us in the 2007-2008 season?
- sule
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,360
- And1: 34,217
- Joined: Nov 11, 2006
-
Patterns wrote:One *GOOD* trade where they get the best player: Warriors, Nuggets, Hornets, Houston, Cleveland, Orlando
Not even close this year even after a trade: Toronto and the rest of the Eastern Conference.
umm.....Toronto is most def. one trade away from being a contender.
as for my own views:
Toronto
Orlando
Cleveland
Utah
Golden State
are the only teams that are one good player away from being contenders
Re: how many teams are 1 trade away from being a contender
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 19,810
- And1: 6
- Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Re: how many teams are 1 trade away from being a contender
Raptor_Guy wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Join us in the 2007-2008 season?
OMG!!! WHY ISN'T PORTLAND ON THAT LIST!! THEY HAD 10 game win streak!!