possible new deal

kidd007 · Post #1 » by **kidd007** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:57 am

Once George has blocked the trade, i think the only two other ways that a deal could go down is if they either sign and trade KVH or put E.Jones and juwan howard instead of George and we put Armstrong in.They don't want to sign van horn, cuz their luxury tax would be 17 million.....so the deal could not be made and kidd remains a net.

unbiased · Post #2 » by **unbiased** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:03 am

You could substitute Trenton Hassell into the deal for Deaven George and Diop, it would work out.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... &te=&cash=

A question to Nets fans; is Stromile Swift available? Since Hassell's salary was added, and Diop was removed, the Nets could keep the Antoine Wright expiring.
I saw that Stro has 5.8 million coming this season, and a player option of 6.2 million next season, which he will likely use. Perhaps the 3 million cash, and the Anthony Johnson TE (2.6 million)?

If the Nets don't want Stro, and need to clear space, Mavs could help out. If not, additional work could be done...[/i]

your_dallas_mavericks · Post #3 » by **your_dallas_mavericks** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:40 pm

Who says that about Wright? He's in a seperate deal. A 2nd rounder for Antoine Wright. That deal stands on its own and should remain.

Swift can't be touched until the season is over with. He just was recently traded.

Post #4 » by **Rich Rane** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:47 pm

unbiased wrote:You could substitute Trenton Hassell into the deal for Deaven George and Diop, it would work out.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... &te=&cash=

A question to Nets fans; is Stromile Swift available? Since Hassell's salary was added, and Diop was removed, the Nets could keep the Antoine Wright expiring.
I saw that Stro has 5.8 million coming this season, and a player option of 6.2 million next season, which he will likely use. Perhaps the 3 million cash, and the Anthony Johnson TE (2.6 million)?

If the Nets don't want Stro, and need to clear space, Mavs could help out. If not, additional work could be done...[/i]

Swift can't be traded until the summer. I doubt Thorn looks at Hassell because of his contract.

Post #5 » by **Rich Rane** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:47 pm

your_dallas_mavericks wrote:Who says that about Wright? He's in a seperate deal. A 2nd rounder for Antoine Wright. That deal stands on its own and should remain.

I sure as hell wouldn't mind...unless we use him in a Mike Miller trade.

unbiased · Post #6 » by **unbiased** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:42 pm

Wrong. Swift can be traded, as long as he is not packaged with another player.

Post #7 » by **Rich Rane** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:51 pm

unbiased wrote:Wrong. Swift can be traded, as long as he is not packaged with another player.

My mistake. I thought you wanted to throw in Swift into the Dallas package.

RJ 24 · Post #8 » by **RJ 24** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:54 pm

your_dallas_mavericks wrote:Who says that about Wright? He's in a seperate deal. A 2nd rounder for Antoine Wright. That deal stands on its own and should remain.

Swift can't be touched until the season is over with. He just was recently traded.

That deal was only because it could not be allowed in the actual Kidd deal. If the Kidd deal doesn't go through, theres no way in hell we are trading Wright for a future 2nd. It would leave a hole at SG.

Post #9 » by **Rich Rane** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:58 pm

RJ 24 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

That deal was only because it could not be allowed in the actual Kidd deal. If the Kidd deal doesn't go through, theres no way in hell we are trading Wright for a future 2nd. It would leave a hole at SG.

And that's where i hope the Mike Miller move comes in either trading Kidd or not.

unbiased · Post #10 » by **unbiased** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:09 pm

Rich Rane wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

My mistake. I thought you wanted to throw in Swift into the Dallas package.

My problem, didn't want to come off as abrasive...
Would the Nets be interested in dealing Swift?
And yeah, Wright for a second rounder as a completely seperate deal makes no sense for the nets...
Does anybody really think it's a "seperate" deal? Come on now...