ImageImageImage

Why the heck are we giving George playing time?

Moderators: Dirk, HMFFL, Mavrelous

Realmavsman
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,465
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 25, 2005

Why the heck are we giving George playing time? 

Post#1 » by Realmavsman » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:20 pm

I don't understand why we continue to start George and give him alot of minutes after the just screwed us. And I am sorry but I don't buy this B.S. about his Bird rights. Bird rights are extremely unlikely to help freaking Devin George. He is not going to get even close to the MLE from any team so it is not like some team is going to pay him like 8 mil and he needs the Bird rights for that team to go over the salary cap.

Any team can use some portion of thier MLE to sign him and his Bird rights have nothing to do with it.

I would sit his butt down and not give him any minutes regardless of who is hurt. Why reward him for screwing the team with this ridiculous idea that Bird rights is going to help him next year.
dirkforpres
RealGM
Posts: 12,020
And1: 7,967
Joined: Sep 13, 2005
   

 

Post#2 » by dirkforpres » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:24 pm

My thoughts exactly... Play him 0 minutes and he'll want to leave even more. I dont know why they play him so much after the s#!t he's pulled this week
User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 53,777
And1: 10,231
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

 

Post#3 » by HMFFL » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:26 pm

I have no problem with Devin starting, as he's one of our best subs, and it's not like we're healthy. We need our best talent on the floor and Devin is one behind our regular starters.

There is something called a players union and understanding by his fellow teammates. While you think Devin screwed us, many are starting to think Jerry Stackhouse has by opening his mouth too early, and there needed to be a backup plan knowing that Devin could decline the trade.
Realmavsman
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,465
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 25, 2005

 

Post#4 » by Realmavsman » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:33 pm

HMFFL wrote:I have no problem with Devin starting, as he's one of our best subs, and it's not like we're healthy. We need our best talent on the floor and Devin is one behind our regular starters.

There is something called a players union and understanding by his fellow teammates. While you think Devin screwed us, many are starting to think Jerry Stackhouse has by opening his mouth too early, and there needed to be a backup plan knowing that Devin could decline the trade.


The one game we won in the last 4 was in spite of Devin George not because of him. He went 0-11 in the one game during that stretch that we won.

And Stackhouse is a dumb-ass for opening his trap. And I have no doubt that the league (who hates Mark Cuban) will again try to screw the Mavs by saying that he can not resign with the Mavs should a deal go down. However with that said, a player who is released should be free to sign with any team that they want and if Stackhouse would like to return to the Mavs I am not sure what is wrong with saying it. It is only wrong if there was some prearranged deal. I hope there is no evidence of that.
JapanAir21
Junior
Posts: 272
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 13, 2007

 

Post#5 » by JapanAir21 » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:37 pm

It's a chain reaction though, if Devean hadn't blocked the trade, then Jerry's comments have even been a problem, because it would have been too late.
User avatar
catalyst
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,237
And1: 41
Joined: Feb 20, 2003
Location: here

 

Post#6 » by catalyst » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:42 pm

Pull out the KVH Card!
from_ro_to_dirk
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,354
And1: 4
Joined: May 23, 2007

 

Post#7 » by from_ro_to_dirk » Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:06 pm

Is there a roster deadline in the NBA for the playoffs, like in baseball. I'd love to cut him like 5 minutes before the deadline so he couldnt sign with another playoff team. That would teach the homo.
JD45
General Manager
Posts: 7,998
And1: 263
Joined: Dec 28, 2003

Re: Why the heck are we giving George playing time? 

Post#8 » by JD45 » Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:24 pm

Realmavsman wrote:I don't understand why we continue to start George and give him alot of minutes after the just screwed us. And I am sorry but I don't buy this B.S. about his Bird rights. Bird rights are extremely unlikely to help freaking Devin George. He is not going to get even close to the MLE from any team so it is not like some team is going to pay him like 8 mil and he needs the Bird rights for that team to go over the salary cap.

Any team can use some portion of thier MLE to sign him and his Bird rights have nothing to do with it.

I would sit his butt down and not give him any minutes regardless of who is hurt. Why reward him for screwing the team with this ridiculous idea that Bird rights is going to help him next year.


George is doing Avery's dirty work in killing this deal. There is no basketball reason to play George these heavy minutes and leave Hassell on the bench. He is obviously being shown that he will get playing time here and there is no need to go to New Jersey.

Seriously, if Avery wanted this deal, George would have been glued to the bench.
"Government is the great fiction through which everyone endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else"

Frederic Bastiat
User avatar
jwa1107
General Manager
Posts: 7,865
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 16, 2004
Location: i wanna know where da gold at

 

Post#9 » by jwa1107 » Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:28 pm

consider the number of injuries, especially to Stack and Josh
and even Damp and the trickle down effect that has and then ask yourself again why George is getting minutes...
from_ro_to_dirk
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,354
And1: 4
Joined: May 23, 2007

Re: Why the heck are we giving George playing time? 

Post#10 » by from_ro_to_dirk » Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:48 pm

JD45 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Seriously, if Avery wanted this deal, George would have been glued to the bench.



I don't think there is any doubt that Avery wants this deal. There's been times when Mavs insiders whisper that he's not overly fond of Devin. I think he'd love to have kidd leading the team. he wants someone he can trust and could trust Kidd.
JD45
General Manager
Posts: 7,998
And1: 263
Joined: Dec 28, 2003

 

Post#11 » by JD45 » Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:00 pm

jwa1107 wrote:consider the number of injuries, especially to Stack and Josh
and even Damp and the trickle down effect that has and then ask yourself again why George is getting minutes...


Why did George get the minutes and not Hassell?
"Government is the great fiction through which everyone endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else"

Frederic Bastiat
studcrackers
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,226
And1: 6,100
Joined: Oct 31, 2004
Location: Getting hit in the head
         

 

Post#12 » by studcrackers » Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:07 pm

b/c george is playing better, people please get off his ass. do people not realize that ever since he made those comments about PT he's gotten it and he's been playing pretty good too.
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
Rand10
Starter
Posts: 2,292
And1: 42
Joined: Mar 21, 2007

 

Post#13 » by Rand10 » Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:54 pm

studcrackers wrote:b/c george is playing better, people please get off his ass. do people not realize that ever since he made those comments about PT he's gotten it and he's been playing pretty good too.


Thank you! George is better than both Jones and Hassell. That's why he is playing. This has nothing to do with the trade.
colangelo wrote:Nowitzki walk in with Maytricks and says welcome to horse team and championship time.
User avatar
JES12
RealGM
Posts: 24,863
And1: 128
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

Re: Why the heck are we giving George playing time? 

Post#14 » by JES12 » Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:27 am

Realmavsman wrote:I don't understand why we continue to start George and give him alot of minutes after the just screwed us.


He saved us from our 3rd callosal PG mistake in the last 12 years.

You should be thanking him!
User avatar
JES12
RealGM
Posts: 24,863
And1: 128
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#15 » by JES12 » Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:28 am

mavfan33 wrote:Thank you! George is better than both Jones and Hassell. That's why he is playing. This has nothing to do with the trade.
+1
User avatar
JES12
RealGM
Posts: 24,863
And1: 128
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#16 » by JES12 » Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:31 am

JapanAir21 wrote:It's a chain reaction though, if Devean hadn't blocked the trade, then Jerry's comments have even been a problem, because it would have been too late.
:nonono:

No it's not.

Jerry made those comments before Deveon blocked the trade. If the trade went though, withing that 30 day span, Stern would have rulled him ineligible to return to the Mavs for the same comments. Meaning he would have signed with San Antonio, Boston, Pheonix, Cleveland, Detoit or some other playoff contending team. George had nothing to do with the Stack situation whatsoever.

Return to Dallas Mavericks