Nets Definitely looking to deal Carter!

Chubby Chaser · Post #21 » by **Chubby Chaser** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:23 am

I'm not saying to do the trade. But this lineup would be just insane offensively.

Fisher
Kobe
Vince
Pau
Bynum

--or--

Kobe
Vince
Vlad Rad
Pau
Bynum

That's a NBA Live team right there!

Bgil · Post #22 » by **Bgil** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:47 am

DEEP3CL wrote:All people look at is scoring, that's all VC does he plays no D doesn't rebound doesn't pass well and last but not least sp18614 he's not a triangle type player......................so why would the Lakers want him ?

Answer me that.

He's actually a really good passer. He can shoot and finish extremely well too.
I'd take him at the end of the season when he won't upset our chemistry and has time to learn the triangle but not now. LO is going to be a massive expiring in the off-season and could easily fetch us Iggy... who would probably be a better fit.

Post #23 » by **dockingsched** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:12 am

Bgil wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

LO is going to be a massive expiring in the off-season and could easily fetch us Iggy... who would probably be a better fit.

Post #24 » by **crackjack** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:20 am

If the Lakers are considering trading for Carter, they might as well buy out Gasol and send Bynum down to the D league.

I can't think of too many moves that will abolish the Lakers' chances of winning a championship than trading for a loser like Carter.

Jordan-esque · Post #25 » by **Jordan-esque** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:15 am

No to VC.

LA · Post #26 » by LA » Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:54 am

no. I'd rather have Tmac over VC. but I don't want him either unless the deal was too good to be true (kwame-esque) lol

B-Scott · Post #27 » by **B-Scott** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:04 am

no to Vince and his isolation 22 foot falleaway jumpers

His shot selection is absolutely horrible

Erik Eleven · Post #28 » by **Erik Eleven** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:26 am

Never.

SashAlex · Post #29 » by **SashAlex** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:24 pm

Is our luxury tax 100M to trade for Carter ?

El Hardee · Post #30 » by **El Hardee** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:25 pm

Much like Luke with the ball and the game on the line, I'll pass.

kamillion · Post #31 » by **kamillion** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:51 pm

I would not want carter on this squad. But I would use him in a trade.

Carter to Houston
Odom to N.J.
Battier + Snyner+ Francis (Expirings) to LA

I think that would work for all parties.

Joe Kleazy · Post #32 » by **Joe Kleazy** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:14 pm

Lets heal and see what we have.

Financially and chemistry wise we are not gonna get any better than our additons of bynum and ariz. We need all the pieces that know our offense for the post season.

IMO we see whats out there for odom in the offseason while trying to move luke, and radman. If we can decide that we can keep odom at a "fair" and reduced cost while adding a effective "cheap" piece we will be set.

CDB · Post #33 » by **CDB** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:19 pm

Why would Vince even come to your mind when you think of this team.

TonyMontana · Post #34 » by **TonyMontana** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:26 pm

CDB wrote:Why would Vince even come to your mind when you think of this team.

Cause he just wanted to start a thread .... :rofl:

Flipdog69xxx · Post #35 » by **Flipdog69xxx** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:27 pm

no thank you. I'd rather keep LO.

Chubby Chaser · Post #36 » by **Chubby Chaser** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:33 pm

kamillion wrote:I would not want carter on this squad. But I would use him in a trade.

Carter to Houston
Odom to N.J.
Battier + Snyner+ Francis (Expirings) to LA

I think that would work for all parties.

Or, why don't we just let Odom's contract expire next year if that's the case :crazy: