ImageImageImage

Green to Houston

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,513
And1: 12,388
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

 

Post#41 » by Worm Guts » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:42 pm

deeney0 wrote:lol, LeBron wanted help so the Cavs went out and got Wally and Ben Wallace. From ESPN News:

Ben Wallace, Joe Smith, Wally, and Delonte West to the Cavs
Duhon, Newble, and Marshall to Seattle
Larry Hughes, Gooden, and Simmons to the Bulls

Seattle pulls off another robbery, and Cavs get completely hosed.


Huh?
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

 

Post#42 » by C.lupus » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:44 pm

gold0259 wrote:What has brewer done? Look at ggs numbers last year.
If you were playing 5 on 5 with your buddies you tell me you'd rather have brewer than gg. Give me a break, Who is more exciting to watch?
We put up with wally for years with his poor defense, I would have been more than willing to put up with what you people think is terrible about gg, and let the kid learn on the job.
If Whittman is such a teacher why couldn't he teach gg.
you can't teach athleticisim


Teaching requires participation from both parties. Yes, you need to have a good teacher but you also need to have a student who is willing and able to learn.
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,888
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

 

Post#43 » by karch34 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:47 pm

deeney0 wrote:lol, LeBron wanted help so the Cavs went out and got Wally and Ben Wallace. From ESPN News:

Ben Wallace, Joe Smith, Wally, and Delonte West to the Cavs
Duhon, Newble, and Marshall to Seattle
Larry Hughes, Gooden, and Simmons to the Bulls

Seattle pulls off another robbery, and Cavs get completely hosed.


With Z on the Cavs, I don't understand why Wallace would interest them? That said I don't think they got hosed. They added a scorer, decent backup combo guard in West, and got some front court depth. Bibby, Mike Miller, and Andre Miller would've been better acquisitions though.

Seattle gets a decent PG and cuts Wally's expiring next year into Newble's expiring this year and Marshall's next year. Solid deal.

Chicago needed to do something. Gooden and Simmons should help them at their PF hole. Getting rid of Wallace's salary is impressive, but they had to take Larry Hughes, which kind of negates the positive.

Whether he develops or not, Green wasn't going to be with MN. Getting something for him rather than nothing is a solid, if underwhelming move. Not sure we need the Houston 2nd this year anyways, unless we were looking to package all of our 2nds for a 1st.
funkatron101
General Manager
Posts: 7,741
And1: 1,177
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Location: St. Paul

 

Post#44 » by funkatron101 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:09 pm

I have never disliked Green. I saw athleticism and effort, even if he doesn't have high B-ball IQ. He got in good position for rebounds, and when he made a mistake, he owned up to it.

He just wants the ability to prove himself. I've seen players with far worse attitude and selfishness get more respect.

With that said, I don't think this is a bad trade for either side.
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,888
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

 

Post#45 » by karch34 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:21 pm

Saw another site where it said Seattle gets Simmons instead of the Bulls getting him. If that's the case then great trade for Seattle.
Frozen316
Pro Prospect
Posts: 806
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 07, 2006
Location: Here
Contact:

 

Post#46 » by Frozen316 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:36 pm

I hope we give Kirk a chance to play, he could become a good bench player for us.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... eki01.html
twolves4
Rookie
Posts: 1,026
And1: 0
Joined: May 16, 2007

 

Post#47 » by twolves4 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:42 pm

gerald green is just that terrible, plain and simple
User avatar
big3_8_19_21
RealGM
Posts: 12,113
And1: 421
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

 

Post#48 » by big3_8_19_21 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:43 pm

So Green is going to be good because he's athletic? What's that word for that thing Brewer does when he runs really fast and jumps really high? Oh yeah, athleticism. But wait, what's this? He also has a high bball iq and knows how to play defense? What a novel concept. Green had no future on this team and maybe he'll prove me wrong, but if I had to make a prediction, I don't see him amounting to much more than potential in the long run.
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
User avatar
eloper
Starter
Posts: 2,064
And1: 82
Joined: Jul 06, 2004
         

 

Post#49 » by eloper » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:47 pm

^you forgot to mention this thing called a jumpshot, something I heard is kind of important in the NBA.

;)
Image
User avatar
big3_8_19_21
RealGM
Posts: 12,113
And1: 421
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

 

Post#50 » by big3_8_19_21 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:49 pm

which is negated by shot selection:
07-08 FG% for Gerald Green: 33.1%
07-08 FG% for Corey Brewer: 34.8%
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,422
And1: 17,379
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

 

Post#51 » by Calinks » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:54 pm

God luck to Green. Hope he does well in Houston.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
User avatar
gold0259
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,544
And1: 65
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: minneapolis

 

Post#52 » by gold0259 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:55 pm

green will now have tmac to teach him! I mean the guy has houston tatooed on his freaking arm
slinky
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,332
And1: 76
Joined: Dec 13, 2006

 

Post#53 » by slinky » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:58 pm

haha thanks big, i was 2.2 seconds away from postin that very same thing


i hope gerald does well, but with mccants and foye and jefferson...the last thing we need is a scorer. I think gerald is more of a volume scorer, nothing wrong with that(i would take AI in his prime any day of the week) but rashad seems to be slowly taking over that role and we dont ahve a need for that. We need the Swiss Army Knife(brewer) in our future starting lineup.
User avatar
big3_8_19_21
RealGM
Posts: 12,113
And1: 421
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

 

Post#54 » by big3_8_19_21 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:59 pm

I mean, I'm not wishing ill on him. The best of luck to him and I hope he does prove me wrong, but I just don't think he will be a significant force in the league and won't be better than Brewer. That's just my opinion, though.
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,856
And1: 23,147
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

 

Post#55 » by Klomp » Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:15 pm

Like a lot of people said, I'm okay with this deal. Yes, we add about 400k in salary for this year, but doesnt that mean we also get 400k more this offseason? Doesn't seem like much, but it could be. Also, another 2nd rounder. Are we becoming the Blazers?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
eloper
Starter
Posts: 2,064
And1: 82
Joined: Jul 06, 2004
         

 

Post#56 » by eloper » Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:15 pm

big3_8_19_21 wrote:which is negated by shot selection:
07-08 FG% for Gerald Green: 33.1%
07-08 FG% for Corey Brewer: 34.8%


Because it makes sense to use a limited sample size for Green and ignore the rest of his career. I'm sure he forgot how to shoot.
Image
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

 

Post#57 » by deeney0 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:18 pm

GeraldGreen5 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I'm sure he forgot how to shoot.


Looks that way.
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

 

Post#58 » by deeney0 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:18 pm

klomp44 wrote:Like a lot of people said, I'm okay with this deal. Yes, we add about 400k in salary for this year, but doesnt that mean we also get 400k more this offseason?


No, that's not how it works.
User avatar
big3_8_19_21
RealGM
Posts: 12,113
And1: 421
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

 

Post#59 » by big3_8_19_21 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:22 pm

I never said he can't shoot, I said he doesn't currently have any semblance of a shot selection. Also it doesn't make sense to compare 2 and half years for Green to half a rookie season for Brewer. It's also not fair to compare NBA stats to college stats. No perfect way to do it. Obviously Green has a better jump shot, I never said he didn't, but his shot selection detracts from it so much. In the end all that matter is the %. That is the stat that objectively combines shot selection and ability to shoot a jump shot.
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
User avatar
casey
General Manager
Posts: 7,660
And1: 7
Joined: Jun 18, 2005
Contact:

 

Post#60 » by casey » Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:26 pm

gold0259 wrote:If you were playing 5 on 5 with your buddies you tell me you'd rather have brewer than gg. Give me a break, Who is more exciting to watch?

lmao, that's how you evaluate players?
"I'm Ricky Rubio."
--Ricky Rubio

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves