Chad Ford: Kohl Turned Down "Several" Deals
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Chad Ford: Kohl Turned Down "Several" Deals
- europa
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,919
- And1: 471
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
- Location: Right Behind You
Chad Ford: Kohl Turned Down "Several" Deals
This is from his ESPN column today. I'd be interested to know what the other deals were. He said in his chat yesterday that Redd was highly coveted but Kohl didn't want to trade him. I'd heard some rumblings about possible deals involving Villanueva and Simmons but nothing concrete. Hopefully we hear something in the weeks to come to give us a clearer idea of what Kohl turned down and whether it would have helped the Bucks or not.
Here's his writeup:
8. MILWAUKEE BUCKS
Positive Spin: People in China love the Bucks!
Negative Spin: Owner Herb Kohl turned down several deals and appears poised to sack his GM. The team is struggling to find an identity and needed to be making trades, not refusing them. If the Bucks had obtained Zach Randolph for Bobby Simmons, Charlie Villanueva and Dan Gadzuric, they could've been a playoff team.
Here's his writeup:
8. MILWAUKEE BUCKS
Positive Spin: People in China love the Bucks!
Negative Spin: Owner Herb Kohl turned down several deals and appears poised to sack his GM. The team is struggling to find an identity and needed to be making trades, not refusing them. If the Bucks had obtained Zach Randolph for Bobby Simmons, Charlie Villanueva and Dan Gadzuric, they could've been a playoff team.
Nothing will not break me.
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 106,973
- And1: 41,493
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
- europa
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,919
- And1: 471
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
- Location: Right Behind You
In fairness to Kohl, we don't know what deals were being offered other than the Randolph one. And I think he made the right call in turning that down.
I'm definitely bothered by the fact he's letting a sinking ship sink faster and not do anything to alter its course. But I'm not going to blame him if the deals the Bucks were being offered weren't any good. That's why I'd like to know what else was on the table that he shot down.
I'm definitely bothered by the fact he's letting a sinking ship sink faster and not do anything to alter its course. But I'm not going to blame him if the deals the Bucks were being offered weren't any good. That's why I'd like to know what else was on the table that he shot down.
Nothing will not break me.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,710
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
-
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,752
- And1: 6,957
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
xTitan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
The Bucks turned it down, all I know was the player's deal added up to Mo and Yi's
I'm assuming the picks were first rounders, and if so don't those have to count as part of the salary slots or no?
Players that would add up to Yi and Mo huh, that's about $11M or so.
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,752
- And1: 6,957
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
DrugBust wrote:I think it's funny how everyone outside of this forum seems to think that the Randolph deal would have been a boon for Milwaukee, but so many around here believe it would have killed us.
If we could be guaranteed to move him for anything (and by anything I mean anything with no long term commitments) in the offseason, I would have done it. But having Randolph for three years with Yi/Bogut is a nightmare waiting to happen. He would destroy both of them.
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 106,973
- And1: 41,493
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
LUKE23 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
If we could be guaranteed to move him for anything (and by anything I mean anything with no long term commitments) in the offseason, I would have done it. But having Randolph for three years with Yi/Bogut is a nightmare waiting to happen. He would destroy both of them.
He would have been moved over the summer apparently. If he didn't rock the boat and the Bucks won at a better clip than they lost prior to the deal, my guess is we could have gotten something better than what we gave up.
- europa
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,919
- And1: 471
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
- Location: Right Behind You
DrugBust wrote:I think it's funny how everyone outside of this forum seems to think that the Randolph deal would have been a boon for Milwaukee, but so many around here believe it would have killed us.
I'm trying to remember the last time the Bucks made a major trade that actually turned out to support the consensus belief about it at the time of the deal. I don't have to go all the way back to the Bob Lanier trade, do I?
Nothing will not break me.
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 106,973
- And1: 41,493
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
europa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I'm trying to remember the last time the Bucks made a major trade that actually turned out to support the consensus belief about it at the time of the deal. I don't have to go all the way back to the Bob Lanier trade, do I?
A Knicks trade a and a Bucks trade. Doesn't at least one team have to win?
- DH34Phan
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,627
- And1: 114
- Joined: Jun 30, 2005
- Contact:
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,135
- And1: 2,283
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
-
DrugBust wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
He would have been moved over the summer apparently. If he didn't rock the boat and the Bucks won at a better clip than they lost prior to the deal, my guess is we could have gotten something better than what we gave up.
My guess is you are 100% wrong.....the Knicks wanted to just dump him, give him away for bad contratcs, any team could have had him for the playoff push for nothing...no takers now at all, why the hell would some team give value for him during the summer? There is absolutely no logic to that thought.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,710
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
-
- Buck You
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 37,555
- And1: 541
- Joined: Jul 24, 2006
- Location: Illinois
-