ImageImage

Is Redd better than Manu Ginobili?

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
DH34Phan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,627
And1: 114
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Contact:

Is Redd better than Manu Ginobili? 

Post#1 » by DH34Phan » Sun Feb 24, 2008 6:10 pm

Stats would say so, but I think Ginobili is better than Redd, and is paid almost 7 million less per season the next 2 seasons.
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#2 » by jerrod » Sun Feb 24, 2008 6:11 pm

heeeeeeeelllllllllllllllllllllll no
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,685
And1: 27,269
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#3 » by trwi7 » Sun Feb 24, 2008 6:13 pm

Yes. I don't see Ginobili on Team USA. :wink:
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Andrew34r
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,831
And1: 2
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Location: AZ
     

 

Post#4 » by Andrew34r » Sun Feb 24, 2008 6:13 pm

I think if the two of them played one on one at the Y or something like that...Redd would beat him. But when you throw them on a team and they have to play that type of basketball...Ginobili is a lot better.
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#5 » by jerrod » Sun Feb 24, 2008 6:15 pm

trwi7 wrote:Yes. I don't see Ginobili on Team USA. :wink:


very nice :D
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

 

Post#6 » by REDDzone » Sun Feb 24, 2008 6:16 pm

Ginobili >>>>> The Bucks in general.

Gino >>>>>>>>> Redd

Factor in that the pinnacle of his salary is 10 million...

:cry:
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,496
And1: 4,430
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

 

Post#7 » by Kerb Hohl » Sun Feb 24, 2008 6:25 pm

Redd may win in PPG or whatever but they don't have a stat called DEFENSE and "fitting in perfectly with the offense" in which Ginobili would win both 100 to 1.
User avatar
THE DINJ
Starter
Posts: 2,005
And1: 121
Joined: Jun 25, 2006
Location: Madison, WI
   

 

Post#8 » by THE DINJ » Sun Feb 24, 2008 6:48 pm

It could just be me, but perhaps if Ginobili had to play on a team with Simmons, Ivey, Voshkul, Bell, and CV instead of, say, Duncan, Parker, Bowen, etc. he might not look as good.
Max Green
RealGM
Posts: 16,324
And1: 4,715
Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Location: Heelville
 

 

Post#9 » by Max Green » Sun Feb 24, 2008 6:50 pm

THE DINJ wrote:It could just be me, but perhaps if Ginobili had to play on a team with Simmons, Ivey, Voshkul, Bell, and CV instead of, say, Duncan, Parker, Bowen, etc. he might not look as good.


Exactly. Who hasn't fit it or looked good when playing next to Tim Duncan?? This dude makes the people around him so much better it's not even funny.
Vice President of Parker-Nation.
#Jabariunleashed
#OwnTheFuture
:wizard: Maxtradamus
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

 

Post#10 » by Newz » Sun Feb 24, 2008 7:00 pm

It's hard for me to say, personally.

I've never seen Redd play with players on the level of Tim Duncan and Tony Parker, who Ginobili has had for his entire career.
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#11 » by jerrod » Sun Feb 24, 2008 7:02 pm

i don't think you'll find anyone who will argue that duncan doesn't make ginobili look better.

but manu is just a far more complete player
User avatar
DH34Phan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,627
And1: 114
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Contact:

 

Post#12 » by DH34Phan » Sun Feb 24, 2008 7:04 pm

LukePliska wrote:It's hard for me to say, personally.

I've never seen Redd play with players on the level of Tim Duncan and Tony Parker, who Ginobili has had for his entire career.

Duncan has only won one title without Parker and Ginobli :nod:
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,496
And1: 4,430
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

 

Post#13 » by Kerb Hohl » Sun Feb 24, 2008 7:09 pm

We can do this in a very scientific way since some people like to judge off of this :D :

Ginobili: 1 gold medal
Redd: 0 gold medals

Don't try counting last year's FIBA Americas because Argentina had none of its stars.

It would be cool though, if you guys could talk again about that being a "Gold Medal" for Redd.
User avatar
aaprigs311
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,425
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Location: Titletown

 

Post#14 » by aaprigs311 » Sun Feb 24, 2008 7:58 pm

they are totally different players. manu is way more versatile. redd is a slightly better shooter, but manu's got him on everything. MANU?
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#15 » by jerrod » Sun Feb 24, 2008 8:06 pm

jeff van gundy called manu the second best sg in the league today
LISTEN2JAZZ
RealGM
Posts: 13,295
And1: 196
Joined: Feb 21, 2005
Location: Madison
 

 

Post#16 » by LISTEN2JAZZ » Sun Feb 24, 2008 8:55 pm

Ginobili didn't need Duncan to win a gold medal, so I don't want to see anybody pretending that we have no idea whether Ginobili would be good without Duncan.
User avatar
Wise1
RealGM
Posts: 18,261
And1: 256
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Location: Devouring worlds.
     

 

Post#17 » by Wise1 » Sun Feb 24, 2008 9:27 pm

Ginobili. Better brain, comparable skills.

As stated, Redd hasn't had the advantage of playing with pros like Duncan, Horry, Bowen, ect.. He also hasn't had the advantage of being coached by Greg Popovich.

All in all, they're very close. Ginobili is just on an incredible roll right now.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,063
And1: 14,932
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

 

Post#18 » by Ayt » Sun Feb 24, 2008 9:41 pm

Manu is better at basically everything.
Stopshere2
Head Coach
Posts: 6,001
And1: 38
Joined: Jan 01, 2006

 

Post#19 » by Stopshere2 » Sun Feb 24, 2008 9:43 pm

The Bucks would be better with Manu just on defence. He used to get flack that he was getting his good offensive numbers against second units, however, check him out as a starter in 13 games this season:

25.8 points
6.2 assists
5.7 boards
1.5 steals
0.3 blocks
37.2 minutes
50.7 FG%
46.2 3P%
86.8 FT%

Here's Redd who doesn't come off very well by comparision:

23.2 points
3.7 assists
4.7 boards
1.1 steals
0.2 blocks
37.8 minutes
44.5 FG%
37.3 3P%
83.8 FT%
Comet
Veteran
Posts: 2,766
And1: 8
Joined: May 17, 2007
     

 

Post#20 » by Comet » Sun Feb 24, 2008 9:56 pm

Statistically-speaking, they are close, but if you watch them play, Ginobili is better than Redd IMO. Ginobili is a better leader, and ultimately a better team player.

In general, it's an advantage to play with Duncan, because he attracts defenders away from teammates and grabs plenty of rebounds, but Ginobili has proven he can play well without him, as proven by his international play, pointed out by Adam.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks