MJS: Bucks have lost 17 games when leading in 4th
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
MJS: Bucks have lost 17 games when leading in 4th
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,752
- And1: 6,957
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
MJS: Bucks have lost 17 games when leading in 4th
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=729109
That is absolutely amazing. Comes down to:
1. Horrible coaching. LK rarely sticks with what was working or a matchup that is really glaring to our advantage.
2. Horrible guard play. Mo/Redd love to shoot in the fourth when the defense gets a little tougher, instead of working the offense.
3. Horrible D. Teams able to make runs quite easily on us.
4. No clutch players. If Redd is going to the line in the fourth, might as well chalk it up as a L.
Sounds like the Crew and their 16 3+ run blown leads last year.
That is absolutely amazing. Comes down to:
1. Horrible coaching. LK rarely sticks with what was working or a matchup that is really glaring to our advantage.
2. Horrible guard play. Mo/Redd love to shoot in the fourth when the defense gets a little tougher, instead of working the offense.
3. Horrible D. Teams able to make runs quite easily on us.
4. No clutch players. If Redd is going to the line in the fourth, might as well chalk it up as a L.
Sounds like the Crew and their 16 3+ run blown leads last year.
- worthlessBucks
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,566
- And1: 4,932
- Joined: Jan 26, 2005
- Location: Bucks Logo
-
fam3381 wrote:And they've also set a team record for blowout losses...the moral: when you suck, you find lots of ways to lose.
Yep.
"17 games in the other direction and we're one of the best teams in the East"
On a serious note Larry K gives this one..
"If you look at games where we're in a game in the fourth quarter, we probably lead the league," coach Larry Krystkowiak said. "We're barely below .500 (5-7) in games decided by three points or less."
- WEFFPIM
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,521
- And1: 473
- Joined: Nov 14, 2005
- Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
-
Andrew Bogut wrote:"I bet a lot of those (fourth-quarter) leads are double-digit leads, too," third-year center Andrew Bogut said. "We don't play the same way in the third and the fourth. The ball is moving in the second and the third, and in the fourth . . . every team in the league, if you ask their scouts, they know what we're running in the fourth quarter.
Bazing
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
- rilamann
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,669
- And1: 15,197
- Joined: Jun 20, 2003
- Location: Damn that rilamann!!
-
There isnt a single player on the Bucks roster I would have any confidence in down the stretch of a close game although I would have confidence in Bogut if he could improve his FT shooting.
Redd is a choker and takes garbage shots.
Mo likes to drive for buzzer beating lay ups when we are down 3 or call time outs that we dont have.
CV seems like a player who doesnt have clutch bone in his body
Bell hell no.
Dez lmao.
Im not even going to go on.
Combine that with zero defensive effort and a coach who doesnt have a clue its easy to see why we've lost so many games.
Redd is a choker and takes garbage shots.
Mo likes to drive for buzzer beating lay ups when we are down 3 or call time outs that we dont have.
CV seems like a player who doesnt have clutch bone in his body
Bell hell no.
Dez lmao.
Im not even going to go on.
Combine that with zero defensive effort and a coach who doesnt have a clue its easy to see why we've lost so many games.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
Re: MJS: Bucks have lost 17 games when leading in 4th
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,042
- And1: 16
- Joined: Aug 01, 2005
Re: MJS: Bucks have lost 17 games when leading in 4th
LUKE23 wrote:http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=729109
That is absolutely amazing. Comes down to:
1. Horrible coaching. LK rarely sticks with what was working or a matchup that is really glaring to our advantage.
2. Horrible guard play. Mo/Redd love to shoot in the fourth when the defense gets a little tougher, instead of working the offense.
3. Horrible D. Teams able to make runs quite easily on us.
4. No clutch players. If Redd is going to the line in the fourth, might as well chalk it up as a L.
Sounds like the Crew and their 16 3+ run blown leads last year.
By my account we have lost 13 games directly because of bad play down the stretch by Redd and Williams. Gaurds not knowing how to close out games proves catestrophic.
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,576
- And1: 174
- Joined: Jun 07, 2005
- Location: Austin
MFScho wrote:On a serious note Larry K gives this one..
"If you look at games where we're in a game in the fourth quarter, we probably lead the league," coach Larry Krystkowiak said. "We're barely below .500 (5-7) in games decided by three points or less."
Wait, is LK suggesting that we lead the league in games that we're "in" at some point during the fourth, or that we lead the league in losing games that we're "in"?
His next quote seems to contradict the latter, and given the Bucks have as many blowout losses as anyone, I'm not sure how the former can be anywhere close to true.
I'd guess the Celtics have been "in" a couple more games than us...
Retired Bucks blogger. Occasional Bucks podcaster.
- jerrod
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,178
- And1: 133
- Joined: Aug 31, 2003
- Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
-
rilamann wrote:
Mo likes to drive for buzzer beating lay ups when we are down 3 or call time outs that we dont have.
so you take 2 things that each happened once and decide that mo likes to do those things.
i've so missed your insight
you forgot that bogut likes to flip off the home fans and fall on desmond mason's knee
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,434
- And1: 11,238
- Joined: May 12, 2002
The Mo plays were obviously boneheaded. But it is not a repetative attern of behavior like...
Redd who has consistently shot us out of games the previous two years.
Bogut who has consistently disappeared in the 4th the past three years, which IS partly his fault. You can't go to a 50% FT shooter down the stretch of a close game. You just can't.
Outside of two, random, boneheaded plays, Mo has been for the most part lights out in the 4th quarter for 3 full years now. I don't recall any instances of him shooting us out of games Redd-style with 4-5 consecutive forced shots or TOs. And if he has, he hasn't done it repetitively to the point where its assumed, like it is with Redd.
Redd who has consistently shot us out of games the previous two years.
Bogut who has consistently disappeared in the 4th the past three years, which IS partly his fault. You can't go to a 50% FT shooter down the stretch of a close game. You just can't.
Outside of two, random, boneheaded plays, Mo has been for the most part lights out in the 4th quarter for 3 full years now. I don't recall any instances of him shooting us out of games Redd-style with 4-5 consecutive forced shots or TOs. And if he has, he hasn't done it repetitively to the point where its assumed, like it is with Redd.
- unklchuk
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,141
- And1: 94
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
"The Mo plays were obviously boneheaded. But it is not a repetative attern of behavior like... "
The repetitive pattern of behavior is Mo not knowing what to do at the end of games, not seeing opportunities and being limited to Mo taking the shot. That lack of leadership makes every teammate (including Redd) look worse than they are.
Leadership doesn't absolutely have to come from PG, but it helps so much when it does. Given the lack of leadership on the court, Larry K doesn't know how to provide it from the coach position.
The repetitive pattern of behavior is Mo not knowing what to do at the end of games, not seeing opportunities and being limited to Mo taking the shot. That lack of leadership makes every teammate (including Redd) look worse than they are.
Leadership doesn't absolutely have to come from PG, but it helps so much when it does. Given the lack of leadership on the court, Larry K doesn't know how to provide it from the coach position.
AFAIK, IDKM
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 7,978
- And1: 1
- Joined: Oct 13, 2004
- rilamann
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,669
- And1: 15,197
- Joined: Jun 20, 2003
- Location: Damn that rilamann!!
-
jerrod wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
so you take 2 things that each happened once and decide that mo likes to do those things.
i've so missed your insight
you forgot that bogut likes to flip off the home fans and fall on desmond mason's knee
Bogut flipping off fans isnt going to cost the Bucks victories.
And Bogut falling on Dez sure as hell wouldnt cost the Bucks any victories.

As for the the 2 things Mo did this season I have never seen a starting NBA pg do either of those things ever.
When a guy who is supposed to be your starting PG does things like that its a huge red flag.
Granted a team that has Mo Williams as its starting PG would never make it to a game 7 but Mo is not a guy i'd have much confidence with in a big game or a game 7.
We wont even get into his defense but his (lack of) basketball IQ and shot selection alone are enough to cost his team a game down the stretch.
The catch with Mo is he has an ability to make tough and or bad shots but I dont want to live and die by that in crunch time.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
- jerrod
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,178
- And1: 133
- Joined: Aug 31, 2003
- Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
-