Ian Thomsen of SI.com has learned the NBA is considering expanding its use of replay.
"The one area that we're exploring is the three-vs.-two shot call near the end of a game,'' said Stu Jackson, the executive VP of basketball operations for the NBA.
"We're talking about expanding it for some period at the end of the game when there's a natural break in the action, vis-a-vis a timeout or something along those lines,'' Jackson said. "Where a coach could make a challenge, and/or a referee could conduct a review.''
Good idea? - NBA Considering Replay Expansion
Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass
Good idea? - NBA Considering Replay Expansion
- mhectorgato
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,446
- And1: 574
- Joined: Jan 11, 2005
- Location: Finals Baby!
-
Good idea? - NBA Considering Replay Expansion
Wiretap: http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archi ... expansion/
NEM wrote: However, I'm a fan of my team winning so, keep the winning coming. All the "tank" fans can take their crap to another board. We are here to win.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,617
- And1: 198
- Joined: Jun 29, 2005
- Location: Welcome back the Comeback King !
yeah definately
Dwight Howard on his FT struggles:
"I just think everybody needs to stop talking about it," Howard said. "There's more to life than free throws."
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,940
- And1: 214
- Joined: Aug 08, 2003
-
im cool with it as long as it yields the correct turnout...the last thing we want is a bunch of reviews that end up like Foyle's tip...they took forever to review that and in many peoples eyes it wasn't accurate...there would need to be a 3rd party involved to make judgments unanimous, like the booth or something...
if the play is ruled for the Magic or against them I wont care as long as it's the right call...if your going to do it, there has be >.1% doubt otherwise it will just cause more problems...
if the play is ruled for the Magic or against them I wont care as long as it's the right call...if your going to do it, there has be >.1% doubt otherwise it will just cause more problems...
- laVal03
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,515
- And1: 6
- Joined: Oct 08, 2007
- Location: Da Burg
theTHIEF wrote:im cool with it as long as it yields the correct turnout...the last thing we want is a bunch of reviews that end up like Foyle's tip...they took forever to review that and in many peoples eyes it wasn't accurate...there would need to be a 3rd party involved to make judgments unanimous, like the booth or something...
if the play is ruled for the Magic or against them I wont care as long as it's the right call...if your going to do it, there has be >.1% doubt otherwise it will just cause more problems...
totally agree........and when in doubt they can just use the NFL's "inconclusive evidence" to overturn the call
- AdamTheGreek
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,346
- And1: 2,530
- Joined: Dec 30, 2006
- Location: Orlando, FL. Thinking of Greece.
-
I'm down, but that doesn't stop the gambling refs from screwing us over.
Bluesky: @adampapageorgiou.bsky.social
Penny & Pops Podcast (Orlando Magic): https://soundcloud.com/137665379
Penny & Pops Podcast (Orlando Magic): https://soundcloud.com/137665379
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,434
- And1: 4,264
- Joined: Aug 16, 2002
I don't see a problem with it as long as it comes at the end of the game, or even at the end of any quarter. It shouldn't have to be a coaches challenge though. It should come automatically from the scorers table or the refs themselves. Ideally we want the right call to be made, and I don't want a coach to use it as a tactic to take the other team out of their rhythm or stop a fast break opportunity. It sounds like they are worried about that aspect too, so it doesn't appear there would be an issue with that. I don't understand why it takes so long, even in the nfl. You either see it or you don't.
- Last Guardian
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,041
- And1: 4,284
- Joined: Feb 22, 2004
- Location: New Jersey
-
- FFBlitzace
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 35,559
- And1: 8,007
- Joined: Jan 14, 2004
- Location: Beyond the Space, Beyond the Time
-
I personally won't be satisfied until a coach can challenge any play that precedes a dead ball.
I don't want to get into scenarios where a player is stripped, guy takes it all the way for a dunk, coach challenges that saying his guy was fouled, and now we're dealing with taking a basket away. No. I just mean, if a play happens, and the whistle blows, and you think you got screwed, I'd like to be able to let the replay decide.
I don't want to get into scenarios where a player is stripped, guy takes it all the way for a dunk, coach challenges that saying his guy was fouled, and now we're dealing with taking a basket away. No. I just mean, if a play happens, and the whistle blows, and you think you got screwed, I'd like to be able to let the replay decide.
11/18/2017 - I have officially disowned Nikola Vucevic and branded him a loser.
- Skal Labissiere was my guy in 2016 pre-trade. Whoops, but I still believe.
- Malik Monk was my guy in 2017. Whoops(?)
- Mo Bamba was my guy in 2018. TBD.
- Skal Labissiere was my guy in 2016 pre-trade. Whoops, but I still believe.
- Malik Monk was my guy in 2017. Whoops(?)
- Mo Bamba was my guy in 2018. TBD.
- SS_MagicMark
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 4,840
- And1: 73
- Joined: Jul 08, 2004
- Location: Orlando
-